One of the key goals for USB4 is to retain compatibility with the existing ecosystem of USB3.2, USB 2.0 and Thunderbolt  products, and the resulting connection scales to the best mutual capability of the devices being connected. USB4 is designed to work with older versions of USB and Thunderbolt . USB4 Fabric support high throughput interconnects of 10 Gbps (for Gen 2) and 20 Gbps (for Gen 3) and supports Thunderbolt 3-compatible rates of 10.3125 Gbps (for Gen 2) and 20.625 Gbps (for Gen 3). It becomes very important to verify the Thunderbolt  backward compatibility with the designs. Though the support of USB4 Interoperability with Thunderbolt  3 (TBT3) is optional in USB4 host or USB4 peripheral device and required USB4 Hub and USB4 Based Dock but it is very essential to work in the existing ecosystem. 

Few Main features of USB4 Interoperability with Thunderbolt  3 (TBT3) Systems

• Support for Bi-Directional Pins & Retimers: TBT3 Active Cables can contain two bidirectional Re-timers which have the capability to send AT Responses on its RX channel. Router connected directly to such Retimer needs to support A Router that is connected directly to a bidirectional Re-timer shall support reception of Transactions on both TX and RX channels. 

• Bounce Mechanism: This feature is used by Router to access the Register Space of a Cable Re-timer that can only be accessed by its Link Partner.
• Asymmetric Negotiation: The Router which connects with Cable Retimers needs to follow Asymmetric TxFFE in Phase 5 of Lane Initialization. 
• USB4 Link Transitions: In TBT3 mode, the configuration of two independent Single Lane Links can be used non-transient state or Single Lane Link just using the Lane1 Adapter.

Cadence has a mature USB4 Verification IP solution that can help in the verification of USB4 designs with TBT3. Cadence has taken an active part in the Cairo group that defined the USB4 specification and has created a comprehensive Verification IP that is being used by multiple members. If you plan to have a USB4-compatible design, you can reduce the risk of adopting new technology by using our proven and mature USB4 Verification IP. Please contact your Cadence local account team, for more details.

Live Doc is an advanced automated PCB documentation generation tool integrated with OrCAD X Presto designed to streamline the creation of PCB documentation. By automating the generation of PCB fabrication and assembly drawings, Live Doc significantly...(read more)

Starting SPB 23.1, in Allegro X PCB Editor and Allegro X Advanced Package Designer, you can align components by using offset mode. Earlier only spacing mode was available.

Follow these steps to Align Components using Offset Mode:

1. Set Application Mode to Placement Edit.
2. Drag the components that need to be aligned and right-click and choose Align Components.
3. Now, in the Options tab, you will notice Spacing Section with Equal Offset. You can equally and individually offset the components by using the +/- buttons for increment or decrement.

Have you ever thought of a handy utility to specify all necessary transmission line parameters to decide upon the stackup?   

Starting SPB 23.1, a handy feature Transmission Line Calculator, is built into Allegro X Advanced Package Designer (Allegro X APD). This feature will require either an SiP Layout license or can be accessed through SiP Layout Bundle. 

From the Analyze dropdown menu in the 23.1 Allegro X APD toolbar, you can choose Transmission Line Calculator. 

You can use this calculator to help decide constraints and stackup for laminate-based PCB or Packages. You can calculate the correct stackup material and width/spacing to meet any requirements that may be later entered in a constraint. This is truly a calculated number and not a true field solver. 

The different types of calculations that the Transmission Line Calculator can provide are Microstrip, Embedded microstrip, Stripline, CPW (Coplanar), FGCPW (frequency-dependent Coplanar), Asymmetric stripline, Coupled microstrip (Differential Pair), Coupled stripline (Differential Pair), and Dual striplines. 

This feature is important for customers relying on fabricators/spreadsheets to provide this information or need to test a quick spacing/width as per the impedance value. 

Let us know your comments on this new feature in 23.1 Allegro X APD. 

Hi，

Can you tell me which setting is causing this?

In the general edit. I try slide via to other position. but the slide is wrong.

in the cm，i set pad-pad connect is all allowed，and i turn off via to pad spacing in the same net spacing. only turn on via to via spacing in the same net spacing，set to via to via spacing =0.

default the via is closer to the pad edge, I think the correct location is show in the pic2.

In SoC development, the verification cycle is a crucial phase that ensures products meet their specifications and function correctly. However, the complexity of modern SoC projects, with their constant data flow, multiple validation teams working in parallel, and tight schedules, presents significant challenges. This article explores these challenges and introduces Verisium Manager as a solution that embodies the 'One Tool Fits All' concept. This means that Verisium Manager is designed to handle all aspects of the verification process for SoC development, from planning to coverage analysis to regression testing, thereby addressing the complex needs of SoC verification.

The Hurdles in Traditional Validation Cycles

 A typical validation process involves planning, coverage analysis, and regression testing. This complexity is compounded by using separate tools for each activity, leading to multiple control environments, APIs, and databases, not to mention the array of tool owners. Such fragmentation results in constant data transfer and translation between systems, from the planning tool to the coverage analysis tool and then to the regression testing tool. This continuous movement of data causes delays, system instability, poor user experiences, and, ultimately, a dip in the quality of the validation process.

The use of multiple platforms leads to inefficiency and reduced productivity. What's needed is a unified system that can streamline the workflow, simplify the verification process, and enhance its effectiveness.

Envisioning the Ideal Solution: Verisium Manager

 The cornerstone of an efficient validation cycle is integration and simplicity. The ideal solution is a singular platform that consolidates planning, coverage analysis, and regression management into one smooth, unified process. Verisium Manager emerges as this much-needed solution, encompassing all the functionalities necessary to streamline the validation process. Its comprehensive nature instills confidence in its ability to handle all aspects of the verification cycle. It can be fully customized to address and enforce any validation methodology and can facilitate smooth integration into any customer environment.

Features that stand out in Verisium Manager include: 

• Unified Workflow: It acts as a single cockpit from which all activities are orchestrated, ensuring the validation teams' work is uninterrupted and seamlessly integrated.
• Customization and Integration: Verisium Manager supports customizing test-plan structures and mapping results per project, ensuring a perfect fit for various project requirements. Its ability to smoothly integrate into the project's environment and compute platforms is unparalleled.
• Support for Continuous Updates and Migration: The tool accommodates constant updates to project data and supports the migration of legacy data, ensuring that no historical data is lost in the transition to a new system.

Addressing Project-Specific Needs

 Verisium Manager recognizes diversity in different projects and offers project-specific solutions, including:

 Enforcing Project Test-Plan Structures and Attributes: It supports and enforces each project's unique test-plan structure and mapping guidelines.

• Unified Data Views and Measurements: Verisium Manager promotes a unified view of data across all teams and enforces unified measurements, ensuring consistency and clarity in the validation process.
• Enabling Project-Specific Actions and Integrations: The tool is designed to support project-specific actions directly from its graphical user interface and allows for smooth integration with in-house databases, dashboards, and the project execution stack.

Verisium Manager is the epitome of efficiency in software/hardware validation. Its differentiating features, such as support for customization, unified data view, and comprehensive coverage and regression requirements, make it an indispensable tool for any validation team looking to elevate their workflow.

Wild River Technology (WRT), the leading supplier of signal integrity measurement and optimization test fixtures for high-speed channels at data rates of up to 224G, has announced the availability of a new advanced channel modeling solution that helps achieve extreme signal integrity design to 70GHz. Read the press release. The CMP-70 program continues the industry-first simulation-to-measurement collaboration with Cadence that was initially established with the CMP-50. Significant resources were dedicated to the development of the CMP-70 by Cadence and WRT over almost three years. The CMP-70 will be on display at DesignCon 2025 , January 28-30, in Cadence booth 827 to benchmark the Cadence Clarity 3D Solver . “I am not a fan of hype-based programs that simply get attention,” remarked Alfred P. Neves, WRT’s co-founder and chief technical officer. “Both Cadence and Wild River brought substantial skills to the table in this project as we continued our industry-first simulation-to-measurement collaboration. The result is a proven, robust and accurate platform that brings extreme signal integrity to 70GHz designs. This application package has also been instrumental in demonstrating the robust 3D EM simulation capability of the Cadence Clarity solver.” “We’re delighted to continue the joint development and validation program with WRT that started with the CMP-50,” said Gary Lytle, product management director at Cadence. “The skilled and experienced signal integrity technologists that both companies bring to the program results in a superior signal integrity solution for our mutual customers.” CMP-70 Solution Features The solution is available both in a standard configuration and as a custom solution for customer-specific stackups and fabrication. The primary target application is to support a 3D EM solver analysis modeling versus the time- and frequency-domain measurement methodologies. The solution features include: The CMP-70 platform, assembled and 100% TDR NIST traceable tested, with custom stands Material Identification overview web-based meeting including anisotropic 3D material identification A cross-section PCB report and structures for using as-fabricated geometries Measured S-parameters, pre-tested for quality (passivity/causality and resampled for time domain simulations) A host of novel crosstalk structures suited for 112G HD level project analysis PCB layout design files (NDA required) An EDA starter library including loss models with industry-first accurate surface roughness models Comprehensive training available for 3D EM analysis – correspondence, material ID in X-Y and Z axis for a host of EDA tools Industry-First Hausdorff Technique The WRT application package also includes an industry-first modified Hausdorff (MHD) technique , included as MATLAB code. This algorithmic approach provides an accurate way to compare two sets of measurements in multi-dimensional space to determine how well they match. The technique is used to compare the results simulated by the Clarity solver with those measured on the CMP-70 platform. The methodology and initial results are shown in the figure below, where the figure of merit (FOM) is calculated from 10, 35, and finally to 50GHz. The MHD algorithm requires a MATLAB license, but WRT also accommodates customer data as another option, where WRT provides the comparison between measured and simulated data. Additional Resources If you are attending DesignCon 2025 , be sure to stop by Cadence booth 827 to see WRT’s CMP-70 advanced channel modeling solution in action with the Clarity 3D Solver. Check out our on-demand webinar, " Validating Clarity 3D Solver Accuracy Through Measurement Correlation ." Learn more about the CMP-70 solution and the Clarity 3D Solver . For more information about Cadence’s full suite of integrated multiphysics simulation solutions, download our Multiphysics System Analysis Solutions Portfolio .

Allegro X System Capture offers a complete ecosystem for library development. This post introduces the latest DE-HDL Library Development using System Capture course in which you learn how to create different library objects. As a librarian, you often work with numerous libraries. Your tasks include creating or modifying symbols for libraries. To use Allegro X System Capture to create a library, you can follow the steps in the following flowchart: Let’s go through each step in detail. Setting the CDS_SITE Variable Before you start library development for a new project, set the CDS_SITE system environment variable. This step is required to access libraries and other configuration files. Creating a Project in Allegro X System Capture The next step is to create a project in Allegro X System Capture. Adding a Library to the Project Symbol development consists of creating symbol graphics, electrical data, and properties used by different tools in the PCB design flow. To add a library to a project, first create a library in the Libraries pane of the Project e xplorer. Creating Library Symbols The library development process supports the creation of various types of symbols. Creating a Symbol with Multiple Views You can generate multiple views of the same symbol using the Duplicate command. For example, a discrete symbol, such as a resistor, can have multiple views, as shown in the following image: Creating a Split Symbol For advanced designs, you often need to create library symbols and break them into multiple sections to support the design process. When a symbol shows all the logical pins in the physical package, it is called a single-section or flat symbol. Many large ICs have several pins and the symbols need to fit on a single schematic page. One workaround is to use vector pin names on a symbol to reduce its size, although manufacturers prefer schematics that show each pin. You can divide these high-pin count devices into smaller pieces, where each piece is a separate version of the part. Such parts are referred to as split parts or multi-section symbols. For multi-section symbols, you can create two types of split parts—symmetrical and asymmetrical. Symmetrical Split Symbols A symmetrical split symbol has only one symbol graphic, which holds two or more identical logic symbols, each with its own unique physical pin numbers. You can create a symmetrical split symbol using the Duplicate Section icon in the canvas window. Each symbol section contains the same set of pins but different pin numbers, as shown in the following image: Asymmetrical Split Symbols An asymmetrical split symbol is a symbol whose physical package contains one or more unique schematic symbols. You can create an asymmetrical split symbol by clicking the New Section icon in the canvas window. Asymmetrical symbols have a unique set of logical pins, as shown in the following image: Creating Symbols Using the Spreadsheet Interface To simplify the development of large symbols, Allegro X System Capture has a Spreadsheet Interface . You can copy from a spreadsheet into the interface. This saves time and helps minimize errors introduced by manual entry. In conclusion, the DE-HDL library development using Allegro X System Capture course involves several critical steps and supports various symbol creation techniques. This course helps librarians create and modify symbols effortlessly and deepens their understanding of library development within Allegro X System Capture. To learn more about this topic, enroll in the DE-HDL Library Development using Allegro X System Capture course on the Cadence Support portal . Click the training byte link now or visit Cadence Support and search for training bytes under Video Library. If you find the post useful and want to delve deeper into training details, enroll in the following online training course for lab instructions and a downloadable design: DE-HDL Library Development using Allegro X System Capture (Online). You can become Cadence Certified once you complete the course. Cadence Training Services now offers free Digital Badges for all popular online training courses. These badges indicate proficiency in a certain technology or skill and give you a way to validate your expertise to managers and potential employers. You can add the digital badge to your email signature or any social media channels, such as Facebook or LinkedIn, to highlight your expertise. To find out more, see the blog post Take a Cadence Masterclass and Get a Badge . You might also be interested in the training Learning Map that guides you through recommended course flows as well as tool experience and knowledge-level training modules. To find information on how to get an account on the Cadence Learning and Support portal, see here . SUBSCRIBE to the Cadence training newsletter to be updated about upcoming training, webinars, and much more. If you have any questions about courses, schedules, online training, blended/virtual live training, or public, or onsite live training, reach out to us at Cadence Training .

In this edition of the Women in CFD series, we feature Vassiliki Moschou, aka Vicky, senior supervisor at BETA CAE, now part of Cadence. Her career journey serves as an inspiration for anyone who believes that studying in one field and working in another is less desirable. Vicky demonstrates how knowledge gained in one discipline can be effectively applied in another, often providing fresh and intriguing insights. Join us in this conversation to learn more about Vicky, her career path, and her advice for those considering a career in a field different from their studies. Tell us something about yourself. I've lived all my 41 years in the vibrant city of Thessaloniki, Greece. I’m married to my high school sweetheart, and together we're raising two incredible daughters who are 11 and almost 8 years old. These girls are absolutely the center of my world, and every day with them feels like a gift. My entire life, including where I have built my career and family, is deeply rooted in Thessaloniki. It's not just where I am from; it's a big part of who I am. Could you share your educational background and how you first became interested in computational fluid dynamics (CFD)? In 2001, I started my academic journey at the Computer Science Department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , where I focused on studying signal processing and artificial intelligence. This field fascinated me, and I pursued a master’s degree in the same area to further my expertise. Concurrently, I was involved in European research programs on signal/audio processing and machine learning methodologies. It became evident early on that my career would revolve around software engineering, a path I was fully prepared to pursue. However, everything took a turn when I joined BETA CAE in 2008. It was there that I was introduced to the field of CFD, which was completely unfamiliar to me at the time. This presented a new challenge that I eagerly accepted. I received support from all my colleagues, but I was primarily mentored by two brilliant and dedicated engineers, Michael Giannakidis and Vangelis Skaperdas , who introduced me to the world of CFD. Over time, what was once an unknown territory for me has become my passion. My journey through CFD has been a significant part of my professional growth. In my 30s, I pursued and completed a PhD in systems physiology in collaboration with the Medical and Computer Science Departments of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. Our research focused on examining the EGF-activated MAPK pathway (often associated with cancer) from the perspective of complex self-organizing systems. Using graph theory, signal processing, and machine learning, we extracted information from the signals observed in this dynamic, distributed biological system to target novel drug development. What are the different positions you have held within the company, and what responsibilities do you currently hold? I started my career as a junior engineer at BETA CAE (now Cadence). It was a role that plunged me deep into the fascinating worlds of software and CFD, a crucial time of my career filled with learning and growth. My hard work and dedication didn't go unnoticed, and after a few years, I was promoted. That promotion was the first step on a career ladder that I've been ascending ever since. Now, I'm in the position of a senior supervisor. Though my job now involves a wide range of managerial tasks, I'm still deeply passionate about the technical side of things. I love writing code and working through the complexities of our projects, merging my leadership responsibilities with my enthusiasm for the technical facets of our work. What would you be doing if not working in CFD? Had my career taken a different trajectory, I envision myself in a role deeply embedded in human connections—perhaps as the owner of a quaint bakery or a cozy hotel, a teacher, or even venturing into human resources. There's a certain allure in careers that foster direct engagement with people, creating experiences and memories. In fact, I have an inherent desire to connect and communicate with people, aspects that are fundamentally different yet equally fulfilling as my current career. What are some of your favorite pastimes and hobbies? Family is at the center of my leisure time. We love taking short trips to the village, hanging out with our friends, and connecting. Our activities range from solving puzzles in escape rooms to passionately cheering at basketball games, especially since my older daughter has taken up the sport. But beyond these activities, being a mother is my most cherished pastime. The moments I share with my daughters, the lessons we learn together, and the joy we find in everyday adventures are what I hold dear. What are your thoughts on women in technical fields? The landscape for women in technical fields is gradually transforming, a change I observe with optimism and hope. In Greece, the increasing presence of women in engineering is a positive sign. In Cadence specifically, the representation of women is high compared to other tech companies. As a mother to two daughters, I am acutely aware of the importance of being a role model to them. It's crucial to demonstrate that aspirations should not be limited by gender and that the technical field is as much a place for women as it is for men. Encouraging this mindset is vital for the progress of our society and for the empowerment of the next generation of women in technology. Advice from Vicky for those considering a career in a field different from their studies: Learning is a lifelong journey. Embrace every challenge as an opportunity to grow and learn something new. Stay curious and adaptable to navigate the ever-evolving landscape of technology. Being labeled an 'expert' is less important than the willingness to learn and adapt. Finding happiness in your work can lead to natural success. In the epoch of artificial intelligence, train the most powerful neural network: your brain. At Cadence, our commitment is towards establishing an inclusive workspace where women feel empowered to achieve their professional best. Anchored by our One Cadence—One Team ethos, we take pride in fostering a community where our driven, devoted, and skilled women employees excel, making exceptional contributions to our customers, communities, and one another. Are you just like Vicky, venturing beyond your academic background, and considering a career in a different domain while being surrounded by an encouraging and uplifting atmosphere? Then, you won't want to miss exploring career opportunities at Cadence—celebrated as 'A Great Place for Women to Work'! Click the button below to discover your next adventure! Learn more about Cadence Fem.AI Alliance, which aims to lead the gender equity revolution in the AI workforce.

Hey, is it suitable to post here? I wanted a small yet robust amp for practicing while I travel. I wanted something that would fit in my pocket yet still be loud enough to hear.

Presented here is a amplifier based upon the LM386 Audio Amplifier.

There is a standard circuit in the data sheet that is an excellent place to start.

Materials needed:
1 - HM359 project box
1 - 668-1237 speaker
1 - BS6I battery conn
1 - CP1-3515 stereo jack
1 - SC1316 stereo jack
2 - 450-1742 knob
1 - 679-1856 switch
1- 3mm LED
1 - 10 ohm 1/4W resistor
1 - 10uF ceramic cap
1 - .05 uF ceramic cap
1 - 420 uF electrolytic cap
1 - 8 ohm resistor
2 - 51AADB24 10K pot
1 - HM1252 circuit board
1 - LM386N-4 amplifier

Wire and Solder
Step 1: Prep the enclosure

Careful planning is required the first time you free build a circuit. The circuit board has solder pads but not traces. You will have to use thin wire to make the connections for the circuit to work.

Begin by laying out the components on the circuit board that will need to pass through the enclosure. This enclosure has a removable top panel which will be used for the volume, gain and 1/4 inch stereo jack.

Space is limited to check for fit before drilling.

All drilling of the plastic should be done with a step drill bit. This will make the cleanest holes without breaking the plastic.

Lay out the pots a few spaces back but still in line with the desired position. mark the center of each pot shaft then drill with a step drill tot he tightest fitting hole size. Make a center mark between the pot holes then drill for the stereo jack

On the inside of the top cover position and mark where the speaker will go.

Make a template on grid paper the same size as the speaker.

Tape the template to the inside of the cover as shown then use a step bit to drill holes on the center of every square in the grid. This will form the speaker grille. clean up the holes.

Step 2: place the major components

Solder the pots to the circuit board as shown. then place the stereo jack(note in order to get the final fit I had to trim and modify the stereo jack housing a little)

Next, position and solder the switch on the circuit board and mark a space on the top cover that will need to be cut for the switch opening. Use a small file to cut the opening.

Use a sharp knife to bevel the edges of the switch hole to allow for easier operation.

Drill a hole in the side of the upper case for the headphone jack and fasten it in place. ( I had to recess the hole a bit for the retaining nut to grab)

Step 3: Build the circuit

The speaker is held in place by using 2 small brackets that come with the serial cable connector hood. ( I had a bunch around that would never be used)

Refer the the circuit shown from the datasheet and the datasheet for the LM386. The basic circuit only has the volume control while the datasheet shows how to add a gain control across pins 1 and 8 of the amplifier.

The speaker is wired in series with the headphone jack. The headphone jack has internal switches that shut the speaker off when the phones are plugged in.

I chose to use a chip socket for the amplifier which make prototyping easier since you do not have to worry about solder heating as much.

Carefully lay the circuit out on the board and begin wiring components together. I added a second pot and cap in series between pins 1 and 8 of the amp to be able to manually set the gain in addition to volume.

Check you connections with a multimeter before adding the amplifier.

I chose to add a LED indicator for power. This was done by using one side of switch contacts from the battery. The LED is in series with a 220 ohm resistor.

Assemble the case and insert the battery.

Step 4: Final notes

If the speaker is noisy while the headphones work normally, try reversing the speaker connections. If it does not correct the issue, connect a 8 ohm resistor across the speaker contacts.

You may have to place an insulating layer between the speaker and the place where the stereo jack comes through to prevent contact. This will be noted by a loud buzz.

You may have to add some foam in the battery compartment to stop the battery from banging around.

For reference, I've also read an article about amplifiers: http://www.apogeeweb.net/article/60.html

Thanks for reading!
​

Hi ,

  FIrst of all , I hope I have posted my query in the right place . I am expecting software support/suggestions for the below issue.

   I am working on LTE which use USB interface and the Host Controller is USB 2.0 . The BSP is from NXP which supports Cadence USB 3.0 Host controller and with USB 3.0 supported cadence driver.NXP had used the   USB 3.0 host controller for USB type C based device.

  Cadence USB 3.0 based device driver seems to be backward compatible for USB 2.0 host controller .Since basic LTE functionalities seems to be working fine I continued to use the same driver in Linux 4.14.62 

  But I am facing a kernel warning of unhandled interrupt and the crash log points to cdns_irq function as shown below  The crash/kerenel warning is very random and not occuring all the time.

.691533] irq 36: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)

[ 1.698242] CPU: 0 PID: 87 Comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 4.9.88 #24

[ 1.704509] Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QXP MEK (DT)

[ 1.709659] Workqueue: pm pm_runtime_work

[ 1.713675] Call trace:

[ 1.716123] [<ffff0000080897d0>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1b0

[ 1.721523] [<ffff000008089994>] show_stack+0x14/0x20

[ 1.726582] [<ffff0000083daff0>] dump_stack+0x94/0xb4

[ 1.731638] [<ffff00000810f064>] __report_bad_irq+0x34/0xf0

[ 1.737212] [<ffff00000810f4ec>] note_interrupt+0x2e4/0x330

[ 1.742790] [<ffff00000810c594>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x44/0x58

[ 1.748974] [<ffff00000810c5f0>] handle_irq_event+0x48/0x78

[ 1.754553] [<ffff0000081100a8>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0xc0/0x1b0

[ 1.760390] [<ffff00000810b584>] generic_handle_irq+0x24/0x38

[ 1.766141] [<ffff00000810bbe4>] __handle_domain_irq+0x5c/0xb8

[ 1.771979] [<ffff000008081798>] gic_handle_irq+0x70/0x15c

1.807416] 7a40: 00000000000002ba ffff80002645bf00 00000000fa83b2da 0000000001fe116e

[ 1.815252] 7a60: ffff000088bf7c47 ffffffffffffffff 00000000000003f8 ffff0000085c47b8

[ 1.823088] 7a80: 0000000000000010 ffff800026484600 0000000000000001 ffff8000266e9718

[ 1.830925] 7aa0: ffff00000b8b0008 ffff800026784280 ffff00000b8b000c ffff00000b8d8018

[ 1.838760] 7ac0: 0000000000000001 ffff000008b76000 0000000000000000 ffff800026497b20

[ 1.846596] 7ae0: ffff00000810bd24 ffff800026497b20 ffff000008851d18 0000000000000145

[ 1.854433] 7b00: ffff000008b8d6c0 ffff0000081102d8 ffffffffffffffff ffff00000810dda8

[ 1.862268] [<ffff000008082eec>] el1_irq+0xac/0x120

[ 1.867155] [<ffff000008851d18>] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x18/0x48

[ 1.873684] [<ffff00000810bd24>] __irq_put_desc_unlock+0x1c/0x48

[ 1.879695] [<ffff00000810de10>] enable_irq+0x48/0x70

[ 1.884756] [<ffff0000085ba8f8>] cdns3_enter_suspend+0x1f0/0x440

[ 1.890764] [<ffff0000085baca0>] cdns3_runtime_suspend+0x48/0x88

[ 1.896776] [<ffff0000084cf398>] pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x40

[ 1.903223] [<ffff0000084dc3e8>] genpd_runtime_suspend+0x88/0x1d8

[ 1.909320] [<ffff0000084d0e08>] __rpm_callback+0x70/0x98

[ 1.914724] [<ffff0000084d0e50>] rpm_callback+0x20/0x88

[ 1.919954] [<ffff0000084d1b2c>] rpm_suspend+0xf4/0x4c8

[ 1.925184] [<ffff0000084d20fc>] rpm_idle+0x124/0x168

[ 1.930240] [<ffff0000084d26c0>] pm_runtime_work+0xa0/0xb8

[ 1.935732] [<ffff0000080dc1dc>] process_one_work+0x1dc/0x380

[ 1.941481] [<ffff0000080dc3c8>] worker_thread+0x48/0x4d0

[ 1.946885] [<ffff0000080e2408>] kthread+0xf8/0x100
[ 1.957080] handlers:

[ 1.959350] [<ffff0000085ba668>] cdns3_irq

[ 1.963449] Disabling IRQ #36

 Kindly provide a solution to solve this issue.

Thanks & Regards,

Anjali

Hello everyone. In recent days, I'm having a weird problem with sound output on my Windows 10 PC. In fact, I can't control the loudness of it. So is there any possibility of PCB of sound card being damaged?

Hi,

I'm looking to download Tensilica SDK for evaluation, but I can't get past the registration form:

This is the 16th installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

Steven Pinker, in his book Enlightenment Now, relates an old Russian joke about two peasants named Boris and Igor. They are both poor. Boris has a goat. Igor does not. One day, Igor is granted a wish by a visiting fairy. What will he wish for?

“I wish,” he says, “that Boris’s goat should die.”

The joke ends there, revealing as much about human nature as about economics. Consider the three things that happen if the fairy grants the wish. One, Boris becomes poorer. Two, Igor stays poor. Three, inequality reduces. Is any of them a good outcome?

I feel exasperated when I hear intellectuals and columnists talking about economic inequality. It is my contention that India’s problem is poverty – and that poverty and inequality are two very different things that often do not coincide.

To illustrate this, I sometimes ask this question: In which of the following countries would you rather be poor: USA or Bangladesh? The obvious answer is USA, where the poor are much better off than the poor of Bangladesh. And yet, while Bangladesh has greater poverty, the USA has higher inequality.

Indeed, take a look at the countries of the world measured by the Gini Index, which is that standard metric used to measure inequality, and you will find that USA, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United Kingdom all have greater inequality than Bangladesh, Liberia, Pakistan and Sierra Leone, which are much poorer. And yet, while the poor of Bangladesh would love to migrate to unequal USA, I don’t hear of too many people wishing to go in the opposite direction.

Indeed, people vote with their feet when it comes to choosing between poverty and inequality. All of human history is a story of migration from rural areas to cities – which have greater inequality.

If poverty and inequality are so different, why do people conflate the two? A key reason is that we tend to think of the world in zero-sum ways. For someone to win, someone else must lose. If the rich get richer, the poor must be getting poorer, and the presence of poverty must be proof of inequality.

But that’s not how the world works. The pie is not fixed. Economic growth is a positive-sum game and leads to an expansion of the pie, and everybody benefits. In absolute terms, the rich get richer, and so do the poor, often enough to come out of poverty. And so, in any growing economy, as poverty reduces, inequality tends to increase. (This is counter-intuitive, I know, so used are we to zero-sum thinking.) This is exactly what has happened in India since we liberalised parts of our economy in 1991.

Most people who complain about inequality in India are using the wrong word, and are really worried about poverty. Put a millionaire in a room with a billionaire, and no one will complain about the inequality in that room. But put a starving beggar in there, and the situation is morally objectionable. It is the poverty that makes it a problem, not the inequality.

You might think that this is just semantics, but words matter. Poverty and inequality are different phenomena with opposite solutions. You can solve for inequality by making everyone equally poor. Or you could solve for it by redistributing from the rich to the poor, as if the pie was fixed. The problem with this, as any economist will tell you, is that there is a trade-off between redistribution and growth. All redistribution comes at the cost of growing the pie – and only growth can solve the problem of poverty in a country like ours.

It has been estimated that in India, for every one percent rise in GDP, two million people come out of poverty. That is a stunning statistic. When millions of Indians don’t have enough money to eat properly or sleep with a roof over their heads, it is our moral imperative to help them rise out of poverty. The policies that will make this possible – allowing free markets, incentivising investment and job creation, removing state oppression – are likely to lead to greater inequality. So what? It is more urgent to make sure that every Indian has enough to fulfil his basic needs – what the philosopher Harry Frankfurt, in his fine book On Inequality, called the Doctrine of Sufficiency.

The elite in their airconditioned drawing rooms, and those who live in rich countries, can follow the fashions of the West and talk compassionately about inequality. India does not have that luxury.

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

This is the 18th installment of The Rationalist, my column for the Times of India.

The man who gave us our national anthem, Rabindranath Tagore, once wrote that nationalism was “a great menace.” He went on to say, “It is the particular thing which for years has been at the bottom of India’s troubles.”

Not just India’s, but the world’s: In his book The Open Society and its Enemies, published in 1945 as Adolf Hitler was defeated, Karl Popper ripped into nationalism, with all its “appeals to our tribal instincts, to passion and to prejudice, and to our nostalgic desire to be relieved from the strain of individual responsibility which it attempts to replace by a collective or group responsibility.”

Nationalism is resurgent today, stomping across the globe hand-in-hand with populism. In India, too, it is tearing us apart. But must nationalism always be a bad thing? A provocative new book by the Israeli thinker Yael Tamir argues otherwise.

In her book Why Nationalism, Tamir makes the following arguments. One, nation-states are here to stay. Two, the state needs the nation to be viable. Three, people need nationalism for the sense of community and belonging it gives them. Four, therefore, we need to build a better nationalism, which brings people together instead of driving them apart.

The first point needs no elaboration. We are a globalised world, but we are also trapped by geography and circumstance. “Only 3.3 percent of the world’s population,” Tamir points out, “lives outside their country of birth.” Nutopia, the borderless state dreamed up by John Lennon and Yoko Ono, is not happening anytime soon.

If the only thing that citizens of a state have in common is geographical circumstance, it is not enough. If the state is a necessary construct, a nation is its necessary justification. “Political institutions crave to form long-term political bonding,” writes Tamir, “and for that matter they must create a community that is neither momentary nor meaningless.” Nationalism, she says, “endows the state with intimate feelings linking the past, the present, and the future.”

More pertinently, Tamir argues, people need nationalism. I am a humanist with a belief in individual rights, but Tamir says that this is not enough. “The term ‘human’ is a far too thin mode of delineation,” she writes. “Individuals need to rely on ‘thick identities’ to make their lives meaningful.” This involves a shared past, a common culture and distinctive values.

Tamir also points out that there is a “strong correlation between social class and political preferences.” The privileged elites can afford to be globalists, but those less well off are inevitably drawn to other narratives that enrich their lives. “Rather than seeing nationalism as the last refuge of the scoundrel,” writes Tamir, “we should start thinking of nationalism as the last hope of the needy.”

Tamir’s book bases its arguments on the West, but the argument holds in India as well. In a country with so much poverty, is it any wonder that nationalism is on the rise? The cosmopolitan, globe-trotting elites don’t have daily realities to escape, but how are those less fortunate to find meaning in their lives?

I have one question, though. Why is our nationalism so exclusionary when our nation is so inclusive?

In the nationalism that our ruling party promotes, there are some communities who belong here, and others who don’t. (And even among those who ‘belong’, they exploit divisions.) In their us-vs-them vision of the world, some religions are foreign, some values are foreign, even some culinary traditions are foreign – and therefore frowned upon. But the India I know and love is just the opposite of that.

We embrace influences from all over. Our language, our food, our clothes, our music, our cinema have absorbed so many diverse influences that to pretend they come from a single legit source is absurd. (Even the elegant churidar-kurtas our prime minister wears have an Islamic origin.) As an example, take the recent film Gully Boy: its style of music, the clothes its protagonists wear, even the attitudes in the film would have seemed alien to us a few decades ago. And yet, could there be a truer portrait of young India?

This inclusiveness, this joyous khichdi that we are, is what makes our nation a model for the rest of the world. No nation embraces all other nations as ours does. My India celebrates differences, and I do as well. I wear my kurta with jeans, I listen to ghazals, I eat dhansak and kababs, and I dream in the Indian language called English. This is my nationalism.

Those who try to divide us, therefore, are the true anti-nationals. We must reclaim nationalism from them.

The India Uncut Blog © 2010 Amit Varma. All rights reserved.
Follow me on Twitter.

Read on to know about the Operating Point Parameters Summary window that gives you a one-stop view of the categorized and tabulated details on all operating point parameters in your design. This window improves your review cycle with its many benefits.(read more)

Designers have long recognized the need to analyze the reliability of ICs. Two commonly used approaches for performing reliability analysis include calculating the change in device degradation and relying on safe operating checks in circuit simulators. 

With the advent of the ever-increasing use of ICs in mission-critical applications, the need for reliable reliability analysis has become of paramount importance. Over the years, you have been using reliability analysis in Virtuoso ADE Assembler and Virtuoso ADE Explorer to measure and review aging effects, such as device characteristic degradations, model parameter changes, self-heating effects, and so on.

Reliability analysis can be performed using two modes: Spectre native and RelXpert. The reliability analysis analyzes the effect of time on circuit performance drift and predicts the reliability of designs in terms of performance. In ADE Assembler, you can run the reliability simulation for fresh test (when time is zero), stress test (to generate degradation data), and aged test (at specific intervals, such as one year, three years, or 10 years). In the stress test, extreme environmental conditions are used to stress devices before aging analysis.

The following figure shows the reliability simulation flow.

The Reliability Options form has the following four tabs: 

• Basic: Enables you to specify analysis type, aging options, start and stop time of reliability simulation, and options related to device masking, degradation ratio, and lifetime calculation. 

• Modeling: Enables you to choose the modeling type you want to use during reliability simulation. 

• Degradation: Enables you to specify the options to print device and subcircuit degradation information into a .bt0 file. 

• Output: Enables you to specify the degradation reports to be generated and methods to filter degradation results in the reports.

While the Basic and the Output tabs are used by design engineers, the Modeling and the Degradation tabs are primarily used by model developers.

Reviewing degradation reports in text or XML formats can be a tiresome exercise because degradation data can be large and can contain a large number of instances due to advanced technology nodes and post-layout simulations. For you to work effectively and interactively with these reports, the new reliability report is based on the SQLite database, which adds the benefit of improved performance and capabilities of sorting and filtering reliability data using SQLite operators.

As they say, watching this in action might help you more than reading about it, so please take a look at our Training Bytes video channel, which offers many helpful videos on how to run Reliability Analysis in Virtuoso Studio.

All the related videos are linked together in a channel so that you can easily access and watch as many as you like.

Reliability Analysis in Virtuoso Studio

Want to Learn More?

For lab instructions and a downloadable design, enroll for the online training courses of your interest on

Reliability Analysis in Virtuoso Studio vIC23.1 (Online)

 Training is also available as "Blended" or "live" class.

Digital Badge Available

You can become Cadence Certified once you complete the course (s) and share your knowledge and certifications on social media channels. Go straight to the course exam at the Learning and Support Portal.

Note: Some of the above links are accessible only to Cadence customers who have a valid login ID for the Cadence Learning and Support Portal.

Do You Have Access to the Cadence Support Portal?

If not, follow the steps below to create your account.

• On the Cadence Support portal, select Register Now and provide the requested information on the Registration page.
• You will need an email address and host ID in order to sign up.
• If you need help with registration, contact support@cadence.com.

To stay up-to-date with the latest news and information about Cadence training and webinars, subscribe to the Cadence Training emails.

If you have questions about courses, schedules, online, public, or live onsite training, reach out to us at Cadence Training.

Related Resources

About Knowledge Booster Training Bytes

Knowledge Booster Training Bytes is an online journal that relays information about Cadence Training videos, online courses, and upcoming webinars that are available in the Learning section of the Cadence Learning and Support portal. This blog category brings you direct links to these videos, courses, and other related material on a regular basis.

Niyati Singh

On behalf of the Cadence Training team

How do we purge/remove the duplicated vias in the same location of the PCB editor? These vias are not the one stacked and they are just blind vias running in internal layers 12-14. I find there is an additional copy of the blind via at the same location. Not sure what caused this issue.

Hello..

I'm updating part in part editor in orcad capture, and I wonder how to align pin numbers using menu or tcl/tk command.

Please, let me know. Thank you.

The default position of the pin number is incorrect.

Allegro part of DPI does not support scaling above 150%

Hi All

I followed tutorial video below for using Design link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9JmFF8lqA0

and I followed the video with embedded board design file which should be same one on video

I did every set. but  at 2:55 of video, Steve have the tabs of both design names on top of Constraint Manager in video

but my one didn't exist them

which one would be different?

there was some comment on command windows but I think they would not be problem here

regard

Hello,

A mybe silly question came to my mind: When routing sense lines, is it better to hav them as close as possible to DUT or afer the decoupling capacitors ?

Force in red, sense in purple.

Best way is 1 or 2 ?

Thanks in advance and Merry Christmas to everybody !

Dear all,

I defined two design variables in ADE Assembler, say V1 and V2, that define the voltage 1 and voltage 2 of a "vpulse" voltage source in my schematic.

Then, I define V1 = 1.0, and V2 = 2.0, run a transient simulation, and everything is as expexcted. The source provides pulses between 1.0 V and 2.0 V.

Next, I set V1 = 1.0:0.5:1.5, thereby creating a parametric sweep with 1.0 V and 1.5 V for V1. I keep V2 at 2.0 V. Then the simulation fails, and all I get is "netl err" in my Output Expressions and an error message that the results directory does not exist and nothing can be plotted: This is reasonable, as the results directory is deleted on starting a new simulation, and as there is no simulation result, none of my output expressions can be plotted.

WARNING (OCN-6040): The specified directory does not exist, or the directory does not contain valid PSF results.
        Ensure that the path to the directory is correct and the directory has a logFile and PSF result files.
WARNING (ADE-1065): No simulation results are available.
ERROR (WIA-1175): Cannot plot waveform signals because no waveform data is available for plotting.
One of the possible reasons can be that 'Save' check box for these signals are not selected in the Outputs Setup pane. Ensure that these check boxes are selected before you run the simulation.

Normally, this kind of para,metric sweep is not a problem, I have done this many times before. There must be something special in THIS PARTICULAR test bench or simulator setup. The trouble is, I don't get any useful error messages.

Does anyone know what might be the problem here OR where to find useful information to investigate further (log files stored somewhere)? Thank you!

Regards,

Volker

P.S. Using Corners instead does not help either. Running it through all values by hand works, though.

Dear community

We would like to have more minimalistic and customized sheet borders for our schematics. I used this guide to create a starting point. Essentially, I made a copy of the US_8ths library and modified the Title symbol to look something like that:

Problem 1

The variable ilInst~>libName points to the library of the sheet border symbols, not to the library of the schematic. How do I need to modify this field in order to see the library name of the schematic where the border is instantiated?

Problem 2

The function CCSgetCreator() was taken from here. This solution does not seem to work with our management toll (we use VersIC); the function always returns nil as value. What is the simplest way to display the name of the user that created the schematic? A custom field that could be filled manually would also do the job for us; it doesn't need to be something that automatically fetches data from a database system.

Thanks for any input.

I want to use PSpice model (download from TI) in Virtuoso , but it can not work. Please help me to check the error message, Thanks

ADE-> Setup-> simulation files->Pspice  Files  /TPS628502-Q1_TRANS.LIB

Parse error before token ']' in expression '[[STEADY_STATE]*0.6]'. If '[[STEADY_STATE]*0.6]'  is a spice expression, quotes are required for the expression.

ERROR(SFE-46): An instance of 'TPS628502-Q1_TRANS'  can have at most 8 terminals (but has 9).

*****************************************************************************
.SUBCKT TPS628502-Q1_TRANS COMP_FSET EN FB GND PG SW SYNC_MODE VIN
+ PARAMS: STEADY_STATE=0
V_U9_V45 U9_N16725824 0 5
E_U9_ABM22 U9_N16725392 0 VALUE { V(FREQ)*1e-12 }
X_U9_U161 U9_N16849713 U9_N16846056 one_shot PARAMS: T=20

Hello,


I would like to use the simulation software xrun/simvision that comes with XCELIUM. We are currently using classroom licenses and want to disable all ip addresses on the student pcs except the license server ip. We want to make sure that students cannot copy confidential data from the Cadence tools.


Problem:

When I launch the xrun simulation while all ip addresses are blocked, it starts but the performance is very slow. The GUI starts after 5 minutes and the simulation is ready after 10 minutes. The interesting thing is that when I enable all blocked ip addresses, everything works at a reasonable speed.

Terminal Output (execution without internet connection):

xrun -gui design.vhd

waiting for SimVision/Verisium Debug to connect...


Is there a way to run the simulation tools without an Internet connection? Or can you give me the ip addresses that are used by the simulation tools so that I can enable only those specific ips?


Regards,

Max

Hello,
I'm trying to characterize a full adder that use transmission gate.
Unfortunately, the power calculation are wrong for the cell are always negative.
Is there any method or commands that can can help in power calculation or add the power consumption by the input pins to the power calculation ?
Another question, Is liberate support the characterization or transmission gate cells as standard cells or I should use liberate AMS for these type of cells ?
Thanks in advance,
Tareq 

Hello everyone,

I hope you're all doing well. I’ve set up two testbenches (TB1 and TB2) for my Design Under Test (DUT) using Cadence IC6.1.8-64b.500.21 tools, as shown in the attached figure. The DUT has multiple views available: schematic, Calibre, Maestro, and Symbol, and each testbench uses the same DUT in different scenarios. Currently, I have to manually switch between these views, but I would like to streamline this process.

My goal is to use a single config view that allows me to switch between the schematic and the extracted (Calibre) views. Ideally, I would like to have a configuration file where making changes once would update both testbenches (TB1 and TB2) automatically. In other words, when I modify one config, both testbenches should reflect this update for a single simulation run.

I would really appreciate it if you could guide me on the following:

1. How to create a config view for my DUT that can be used to easily switch between the schematic and extracted views, impacting both TB1 and TB2.
2. Where to specify view priorities or other settings to control which view is used during simulation.
3. Best practices for using a config file in this scenario, so that it ensures consistency across multiple testbenches.

Please refer to the attached figure to get a better understanding of the setup I’m using, where both TB1 and TB2 include the same DUT with multiple available views.

Thank you so much for your time and assistance!

I want to use jaspergold to formally verify functionality of my custom multiplier. I am computing the expected result using A*B to check against output of my multiplier. Here, A and B are two logic signed operands. However, jaspergold is performing the operation A*B incorrectly.

I have reproduced this issue using the attached example. JasperGold compiles and elaborates the module and subsequently runs a formal proof. The tool raises a counterexample to assertion whose screenshot is attached below:

I simulated the same example using xrun and it was giving the correct product output in simvision waveform. Please help me resolve this issue. I am using 2023.03 version of Jasper Apps.

Thanks and regards

Anubhav Agarwal

Hello,

I have been running this `uvm_reg_hw_reset_seq` sequence for the AHB protocol. My UVM Adapter looks like:

Issue: When I use basic reg.write, my write access are working well, as that is managed by the driver i.e. once adapter gives the packet to the driver, the driver supplies the address and the control signals to the DUT on the first clock cycle and then the write data on the next clock cycle. But when I am performing the read operation, somehow the UVM adapter is reading the data at the same clock cycle where read address + Controls are supplied and this is triggering read failure messages from the `uvm_reg_hw_reset_seq` sequence. What should I modify in the driver/sequencer/adapter so that the UVM adapter can read the data on the next cycle instead of the same clock cycle.

Just FYI: The waveforms of the read operation are correct, it is just the Adapter and the `uvm_reg_hw_reset_seq`. The AHB Driver + AHB Monitor is fully proven and verified to be working correctly.

I'm completely new to Cadence. I've been able to run a very simple simulation with the -gui option. Simvision opens, I add the variables to the waveform viewer, and press run. All is good.

I don't understand the flow when using the -nogui option. It appears that the simulation runs and returns control to the OS. When I launch Simvision, is there a database or file that I can open to display the already-simulated data?

My command is of the form:

xrun -gui -64bit -sv -access +rwc -top tb_top.sv <src files>

I want to do a 2-step build->simulate as follow:

1. Make multiple builds using xrun -elaborate [other options]. The purpose is to create multiple builds with different compile-time macros (+define+MACROA +define+MACROB=ABC). Each build is located in a different directory.

2. Run simulation with xrun -r. This is where I need help. How do I specify which build to simulate? Also, I need the simulation directory (with log files, …) to be different than the build directory.

Has anyone been able to achieve this or similar solutions?

How could we inherit parameters from schematic to a layout netlist?

Those parameters are user defined parameter given in CDF and netlsiting in schematic.

I just completed the setup of xcelium and I am trying to test a very simple vhdl file - I got " CSI: *F,INTERR: INTERNAL EXCEPTION" without any further explanation. Could someone point me to how to investigate this error further?

csi-xmelab - CSI: Command line: 
xmelab
-f /home/cadadmin/test/xcelium.d/run.lnx86.23.03.d/xmelab.args
-ACCESS +r
-no_analogsolver
-MESSAGES
andgate
-XLMODE ./xcelium.d/run.lnx86.23.03.d
-RUNMODE
-CDSLIB ./xcelium.d/run.lnx86.23.03.d/cds.lib
-HDLVAR ./xcelium.d/run.lnx86.23.03.d/hdl.var
-WORK worklib
-IRUNHASTOP
-CHECK_VERSION TOOL: xrun 23.03-s001
-LOG_FD 4

csi-xmelab - CSI: *F,INTERR: INTERNAL EXCEPTION
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The tool has encountered an unexpected condition and must exit.
Contact Cadence Design Systems customer support about this
problem and provide enough information to help us reproduce it,
including the logfile that contains this error message.
TOOL: xmelab 23.03-s001
OPERATING SYSTEM: Linux 4.18.0-513.9.1.el8_9.x86_64 #1 
Elaboration of package STD.STANDARD
-----------------------------------------------------------------

csi-xmelab - CSI: Cadence Support Investigation, recording details
csi-xmelab - CSI: investigation complete took 0.000 secs, send this file to Cadence Support

Hi, I'm using the xcelium simulator to simulate a testbench, in which I first stimulate my design to do something (part "A") and then do a direct follow-up test on the design (part "B").

I need two things from this testbench: the results of the test (part "B", passed/failed) and coverage information, but the coverage information should only include part A and explicitly not part B.

I could do the following: run the testbench with part A and B, get the "passed/failed" result of the test and then follow up another simulator run with another testbench, that only includes part A and get the coverage information from that simulation run.

Is there a way to force xcelium to give me the coverage information of only a part of the simulation? Ideally, I would like to write the verilog code of my testbench to look something like this:

• do A
• dump coverage information
• do B

But maybe there is another way to tell xcelium to consider only part of the testbench for the coverage information. I did have a look at the manual, but was not able to find something useful for this problem. Any ideas?

> reg [63:0] rMem [0:255] signal

it can be confirmed by rMem [0:255] in Simvision

Is it possible to generate a new rMem1 signal and rMem2 signal by splitting it into 32 bits width through right-click> Create on rMem?

I have been using the rank feature to identify tests that are redundant in our environment, but then I realized I'd also like to be able to see exactly what coverage goes into increasing the delta_cov value for a given test. If I had a test in my rank report that contributed 0.5% of the delta_cov, how could I got about seeing exactly where that 0.5% was coming from? It seems like that might be part of the correlate function, but I couldn't mange to find a way to see what specific coverage was being contributed for a given test.

Hi,

Current and valid TCAs for Functional Safety are readily available at the FuSa "one-stop shop".

But I have not been able to find any archive repository for access to the obsoleted versions.

I would need to have also v1.4 of Xcelum TCA to investigate exact changes wrt previous projects.

Anyone knows how to find it?

Best regards,  Lars

I've heard lots of people asking for a way to generate Makefiles for Specman code, and it seems there are some who don't use "irun" which takes care of this automatically. So I wrote this little utility to build a basic Makefile based on the compiled and loaded e code.

It's really easy to use: at any time load the snmakedeps.e into Specman, and use "write makefile <name> [-ignore_test]".
This will dump a Makefile with a set of variables corresponding to the loaded packages, and targets to build any compiled modules.
Using -ignore_test will avoid having the test file in the Makefile, in case you switch tests often (who doesn't?).

It also writes a stub target so you can do "make stub_ncvlog" or "make stub vhdl" etc.

The targets are pretty basic, I thought it was more useful to #include this into the main Makefile and define your own more complex targets / dependencies as required.

The package uses the "reflection" facility of the e language, which is now documented since Specman 8.1, so you can extend this utility if you want (please share any enhancements you make).

 Enjoy! :-)

Steve.

Hi All.

I put together a small Perl script to generate vr_ad register definitions from SPIRIT (IP-XACT) XML.
If you've got not idea what IP-XACT is, have a look here www.spiritconsortium.org/, then start pestering your design manager to use it :-)

The script can filter out registers and override R/W access types if needed.

An example XML file is included with the package so that you can play with it, and there's a detailed README.txt as well.

Here's an example of the generated e code:

// Automatically generated from xdmac.xml
// DO NOT EDIT, or your changes may be lost
<'

import vr_ad/e/vr_ad_top;

// Component = XDMAC
// memoryMap = xdmac
extend vr_ad_map_kind : [XDMAC];

// addressBlock = dma_eth
extend vr_ad_reg_file_kind : [DMA_ETH];

extend DMA_ETH vr_ad_reg_file {
  keep size == 20;
  keep addressing_width_in_bytes == 4;
};

// Register = command
// Reset    = 0x00
reg_def COMMAND DMA_ETH 0x0 {
  // Field resv3 = command[31:29]
  reg_fld resv3 : uint(bits:3) : R : 0 : cov ;
  // Field transfer_size = command[28:19]
  reg_fld transfer_size : uint(bits:10) : RW : 0 : cov ;
  // Field dma_transfer_target = command[18:14]
  reg_fld dma_transfer_target : uint(bits:5) : RW : 0 : cov ;
  // Field resv2 = command[13:10]
  reg_fld resv2 : uint(bits:4) : R : 0 : cov ;
  // Field transmit_receive = command[9:9]
  reg_fld transmit_receive : uint(bits:1) : RW : 0 : cov ;
  // Field resv1 = command[8:5]
  reg_fld resv1 : uint(bits:4) : R : 0 : cov ;
  // Field dest_address_enable = command[4:4]
  reg_fld dest_address_enable : uint(bits:1) : RW : 0 : cov ;
  // Field source_address_enable = command[3:3]
  reg_fld source_address_enable : uint(bits:1) : RW : 0 : cov ;
  // Field word_size = command[2:0]
  reg_fld word_size : uint(bits:3) : R : 0 : cov ;
};

// Register = queue_exec
// Reset    = 0x00
reg_def QUEUE_EXEC DMA_ETH 0x10 {
  // Field resv = queue_exec[31:1]
  reg_fld resv : uint(bits:31) : R : 0 : cov ;
  // Field exec = queue_exec[0:0]
  reg_fld exec : uint(bits:1) : RW : 0 : cov ;
};

extend XDMAC vr_ad_map {
  dma_eth : DMA_ETH vr_ad_reg_file;

  post_generate() is also {
    add_with_offset(0x00, dma_eth);
    dma_eth.reset();
  };
}
'>

Any comments, please feed them back to me so I can enhance the script.
Note that this forum forces me to post a .zip file rather than .tgz, please be careful to unpack the file under Linux, not Windows, else the DOS linefeeds will corrupt the Perl and XML files.

Steve

As noted in white papers, posts on the Team Specman Blog, and the Specman documentation, IntelliGen is a totally new stimulus generator than the original "Pgen" and, as a result, there is some amount of effort needed to migrate an existing verification environment to fully leverage the power of IntelliGen.  One of the main steps in migrating code is running the linters on your code and adressing the issues highlighted. 

Included below is a simple utility you can include in your environment that allows you to collect some valuable statistics about your code base to allow you to better gauge the amount of work that might be required to migrate from Pgen to IntelliGen.  The ICFS statistics reported are of particular benefit as the utility not only identifies the approximate number of ICFSs in the environment, it also breaks the total number down according to generation contexts (structs/units and gen-on-the-fly statements) allowing you to better focus your migration efforts. 

IMPORTANT: Sometimes a given environment can trigger a large number of IntelliGen linting messages right off the bat.  Don't let this freak you out!  This does not mean that migration will be a long effort as quite often some slight changes to an environment remove a large number of identified issues.  I recently encountered a situation where a simple change to three locations in the environment, removed 500+ ICFSs!

The methods included in the utility can be used to report information on the following:
- Number of e modules
- Number of lines in the environment (including blanks and comments)
- Number and type of IntelliGen Guidelines linting messages
- Number of Inconsistently Connected Field Sets (ICFSs)
- Number of ICFS contexts and how many ICFSs per context
- Number of soft..select overlays found in the envioronment
- Number of Laces identified in the environment

To use the code below, simply load it before/after loading e-code and then
you can execute any of the following methods:

- sys.print_file_stats()             : prints # of lines and files
- sys.print_constraint_stats()   : prints # of constraints in the environment
- sys.print_guideline_stats()    : prints # of each type of linting message
- sys.print_icfs_stats()            : prints # of ICFSs, contexts and #ICFS/context
- sys.print_soft_select_stats() : prints # of soft select overlay issues
- sys.print_lace_stats()           : *Only works for SPMNv6.2s4 and later* prints # of laces identified in the environment

Each of the above calls to methods produces it's own log files (stored in the current working directory) containing relevant information for more detailed analysis.
- file_stats_log.elog : Output of "show modules" command
- constraint_log.elog : Output of the "show constraint" command
- guidelines_log.elog : Output of "gen lint -g" (with notification set to MAX_INT in order to get all warnings)
- icfs_log.elog       : Output of "gen lint -i" command
- soft_select_log.elog: Output of the "gen lint -s" command
- lace_log.elog       : Output of the "show lace" command

Happy generating!

Corey Goss

Microwaves & RF's David Maliniak interviews Sherry Hess of Cadence about recently announced products of Optimality and OnCloud.(read more)

Do you know if it is possible to define localized back etching (LBE) in EMX? It should be associated to a layer which defines the holes done in the substrate. I've not found any reference for this in the .proc syntax. 

--> Answer found. This is not possible because EMX considers the same dielectric in all x-y plane

Hi, newbie here.

We are using AWR Design Enviroment in our university and so I have to install it (OS: Arch Linux)
I installed it in a Windows 10 VM without problems.

When I try to start it prompts "Failed to connect to license server", I guess thats the first problem.

After that when trying to generate my SUL License it will prompt Internal Error -8 (see Image)

I can't find something on Error -8 :/ and overall the available data to the license topic is quit low :/

If someone has a solution for that I would gladly hear about it :)

Hi, 
In the MATLAB, I am using cds_srr and cds_innersrr commands. Although I set the path to the spectre root, I face this error:

One or more output arguments not assigned during call to "cds_innersrr".

Error in cds_srr (line 20)
sig = cds_innersrr(dirname, dataset, signame, verbose);

Error in techsweep_spectre_run (line 64)
struct_n = cds_srr(c.outfile, c.sweep, params_n{1});

I would highly appreciate it if you could help me.

I get multiple results at the same frequency in a 3-tone simulation.

I try to determine the IP3 of a mixer. I have 3 large signal tones: 0.75 GHz, 1.25 GHz and 1.26 GHz.

At the IM3 frequency of 490 MHz I observe 4 results, see also the screenshot of the table output. The frequencies are exactly the same (even when I subtract 490 MHz by using xval() ).

Which of the values do I have to use to determine the correct IP3?

Is there an option to merge these results?

Hello everyone,

For my cross-coupled oscillator design, I have a problem with stability analysis. Based on my achieved results which are attached, where is my design problem?

Best,

https://ibb.co/bgKFP4N

https://ibb.co/3FGRLmV

https://ibb.co/pwSZDSF

Sample clues

18 across: Makoto Hagiwara and David Jung both claim to have invented it (7,6)

1 down: French impressionist who rejected that term (5)

3 down: Artificial surface used for playing hockey (9)

7 down: The sequel to Iliad (7)

12 down: Adipose tissue (4,3)

Extrowords © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic