pti

Cayman Islands Dollar(KYD)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Cayman Islands Dollar = 18.6713 Egyptian Pound



  • Cayman Islands Dollar

pti

Swiss Franc(CHF)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Swiss Franc = 16.0287 Egyptian Pound




pti

CFA Franc BCEAO(XOF)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 CFA Franc BCEAO = 0.0257 Egyptian Pound



  • CFA Franc BCEAO

pti

Vietnamese Dong(VND)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Vietnamese Dong = 0.0007 Egyptian Pound




pti

Macedonian Denar(MKD)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Macedonian Denar = 0.2739 Egyptian Pound




pti

Zambian Kwacha(ZMK)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Zambian Kwacha = 0.003 Egyptian Pound




pti

South Korean Won(KRW)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 South Korean Won = 0.0128 Egyptian Pound



  • South Korean Won

pti

Jordanian Dinar(JOD)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Jordanian Dinar = 21.9359 Egyptian Pound




pti

Lebanese Pound(LBP)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Lebanese Pound = 0.0103 Egyptian Pound




pti

Bahraini Dinar(BHD)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Bahraini Dinar = 41.1541 Egyptian Pound




pti

Chilean Peso(CLP)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Chilean Peso = 0.0188 Egyptian Pound




pti

Maldivian Rufiyaa(MVR)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Maldivian Rufiyaa = 1.0039 Egyptian Pound




pti

Malaysian Ringgit(MYR)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Malaysian Ringgit = 3.591 Egyptian Pound




pti

Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro(NIO)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro = 0.4524 Egyptian Pound



  • Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro

pti

Netherlands Antillean Guilder(ANG)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Netherlands Antillean Guilder = 8.6696 Egyptian Pound



  • Netherlands Antillean Guilder

pti

Estonian Kroon(EEK)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Estonian Kroon = 1.0912 Egyptian Pound




pti

Danish Krone(DKK)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Danish Krone = 2.2619 Egyptian Pound




pti

Fiji Dollar(FJD)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Fiji Dollar = 6.9078 Egyptian Pound




pti

New Zealand Dollar(NZD)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 New Zealand Dollar = 9.5529 Egyptian Pound



  • New Zealand Dollar

pti

Croatian Kuna(HRK)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Croatian Kuna = 2.243 Egyptian Pound




pti

Peruvian Nuevo Sol(PEN)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Peruvian Nuevo Sol = 4.5788 Egyptian Pound



  • Peruvian Nuevo Sol

pti

Dominican Peso(DOP)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Dominican Peso = 0.2828 Egyptian Pound




pti

Papua New Guinean Kina(PGK)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Papua New Guinean Kina = 4.537 Egyptian Pound



  • Papua New Guinean Kina

pti

Brunei Dollar(BND)/Egyptian Pound(EGP)

1 Brunei Dollar = 11.0126 Egyptian Pound




pti

AMBA Adaptive Traffic Profiles: Addressing The Challenge

Modern systems-on-a-chip (SoCs) continue to increase in complexity, adding more components and calculation power to accommodate new performance-hungry applications such as machine learning and autonomous driving.  With increased number of SoC components, such as CPUs, GPUs, accelerators and I/O devices, comes increased demand to correctly model interoperability of various components. Traditional simulation of complex systems requires accurate models of all components comprising the system and normally results in very long simulation times. A better way is to create a set of typical traffic profiles which describe behavior of system’s masters and slaves. Such profiles should be abstract to be applied to various protocols and interfaces and be portable to be applied throughout different SoC design and verification cycles.

To address the challenges outlined above, Arm has recently announced availability of the AMBA® Adaptive Traffic Profiles (AMBA ATP) specification which lays foundation of a new synthetic traffic framework. The AMBA ATP specification includes detailed information of various transaction types and timing characteristics of those transactions. The traffic profiles defined in the specification are abstract in nature and thus could be used to generate stimuli for various standard AMBA protocols and in various environments such as RTL-based simulation, FPGA prototyping and final SoC verification. The traffic profiles outlined in the specification include a set of parameters to define timing relationships between transactions as well as timing relationships within individual transactions. Even though the traffic profile represents the behavior of a single agent it could be applied either in a concurrent manner (e.g. write and read traffic profiles running in parallel) or in a sequential manner (e.g. when one traffic completes before the next one start). Moreover, when simulating a reasonably complex system, it is possible to coordinate traffic profiles generated by multiple components. While providing abstract definition of traffic profiles, the AMBA ATP specification focuses on the use of traffic profiles with an AMBA AXI interface, outlining signaling, timing relationships between different transaction phases and between different transactions. The same application principles could be used to map the abstract traffic profiles to other AMBA protocols such as AMBA5 CHI protocol.  

To facilitate adoption of the AMBA Adaptive Traffic Profiles, Cadence has recently announced availability of SystemVerilog UVM ATP Sequence Layer which automatically implements mapping of an abstract ATP traffic to AMBA protocol specific traffic, generated by Cadence AMBA Verification IP. The ATP layer is implemented as a SystemVerilog UVM virtual sequence with the sequence item including all ATP transaction parameters as defined in the specification.

Using the provided sequence infrastructure, users can write tests to define and coordinate traffic profiles for various components in the system. The ATP Layer automatically converts the abstract traffic profile into AMBA protocol-specific traffic, e.g., AMBA5 CHI protocol traffic.

 A sample code below, shows an example of a read profile translated by Cadence ACE Verification IP in ACE protocol traffic.

   `uvm_do_with(ace_atp_vseq,                                            

                       {ace_atp_vseq.agentId == agent_id;                                // ATP agent id

                        ace_atp_vseq.atpDirection == ATP_READ;                    // direction of bursts issued by virtual sequence

                        ace_atp_vseq.startAddress == start_address;                // start of address range being accessed

                        ace_atp_vseq.endAddress == end_address;                  // end of address range being accessed

                        ace_atp_vseq.atpDomain == atp_domain;                      // domain to use for transactions

                        ace_atp_vseq.addressPattern == ATP_SEQUENTIAL;  // address pattern

                        ace_atp_vseq.transactionSize == 64;                             // number of bytes in each burst

                        ace_atp_vseq.dataSize == 4;                                          // number of bytes in each transfer

                        ace_atp_vseq.rate == 150.0/(50.0);                                // requestedBandwidth / clkFrequency

                        ace_atp_vseq.start == ATP_EMPTY;                              // start condition of the ATP FIFO

                        ace_atp_vseq.full == 128;                                               // full level of the ATP FIFO

                        ace_atp_vseq.numOfTransactions == 500;                    // number of bursts issued by this sequence

                        ace_atp_vseq.ARTV == 2;                                              // sub-transaction delay

                        ace_atp_vseq.RBR == 3;                                                // sub-transaction delay

                       });

In addition to the ATP Layer for Cadence Simulation-Based AMBA Verification IP, Cadence supports the ATP functionality in Acceleration-Based AMBA Verification IP. For detailed information about ATP support in Cadence Simulation-Based and Acceleration-Based Verification IP, visit ip.cadence.com.




pti

Noise Simulation in Spectre RF Using Improved Pnoise/Hbnoise and Direct Plot Form Options

Did you check out the new Pnoise and Hbnoise Choosing Analyses forms in the MMSIM 15.1 and IC6.1.7 /ICADV12.2 releases? These forms have been significantly improved and simplified. The Direct Plot Form has also been enhanced and is much easy to use....(read more)




pti

Celebrating Five Years of Performance-Optimized Arm-Based SoCs: Now including AMBA5

It’s been quite a long 5-year journey building and deploying Performance Analysis, Verification, and Debug capabilities for Arm-based SoCs. We worked with some of the smartest engineers on the planet. First with the engineers at Arm, with whom we...(read more)




pti

BoardSurfers: Allegro In-Design IR Drop Analysis: Essential for Optimal Power Delivery Design

All PCB designers know the importance of proper power delivery for successful board design. Integrated circuits need the power to turn on, and ICs with marginal power delivery will not operate reliably. Since power planes can...(read more)




pti

New Rapid Adoption Kit (RAK) Enables Productive Mixed-Signal, Low Power Structural Verification

All engineers can enhance their mixed-signal low-power structural verification productivity by learning while doing with a PIEA RAK (Power Intent Export Assistant Rapid Adoption Kit). They can verify the mixed-signal chip by a generating macromodel for their analog block automatically, and run it through Conformal Low Power (CLP) to perform a low power structural check.  

The power structure integrity of a mixed-signal, low-power block is verified via Conformal Low Power integrated into the Virtuoso Schematic Editor Power Intent Export Assistant (VSE-PIEA). Here is the flow.

 

Applying the flow iteratively from lower to higher levels can verify the power structure.

Cadence customers can learn more in a Rapid Adoption Kit (RAK) titled IC 6.1.5 Virtuoso Schematic Editor XL PIEA, Conformal Low Power: Mixed-Signal Low Power Structural Verification.

The RAK includes Rapid Adoption Kit with demo design (instructions are provided on how to setup the user environment). It Introduces the Power Intent Export Assistant (PIEA) feature that has been implemented in the Virtuoso IC615 release.  The power intent extracted is then verified by calling Conformal Low Power (CLP) inside the Virtuoso environment.

  • Last Update: 11/15/2012.
  • Validated with IC 6.1.5 and CLP 11.1

The RAK uses a sample test case to go through PIEA + CLP flow as follows:

  • Setup for PIEA
  • Perform power intent extraction
  • CPF Import: It is recommended to Import macro CPF, as oppose to designing CPF for sub-blocks. If you choose to import design CPF files please make sure the design CPF file has power domain information for all the top level boundary ports
  • Generate macro CPF and design CPF
  • Perform low power verification by running CLP

It is also recommended to go through older RAKs as prerequisites.

  • Conformal Low Power, RTL Compiler and Incisive: Low Power Verification for Beginners
  • Conformal Low Power: CPF Macro Models
  • Conformal Low Power and RTL Compiler: Low Power Verification for Advanced Users

To access all these RAKs, visit our RAK Home Page to access Synthesis, Test and Verification flow

Note: To access above docs, use your Cadence credentials to logon to the Cadence Online Support (COS) web site. Cadence Online Support website https://support.cadence.com/ is your 24/7 partner for getting help and resolving issues related to Cadence software. If you are signed up for e-mail notifications, you can receive new solutions, Application Notes (Technical Papers), Videos, Manuals, and more.

You can send us your feedback by adding a comment below or using the feedback box on Cadence Online Support.

Sumeet Aggarwal




pti

Low-Power IEEE 1801 / UPF Simulation Rapid Adoption Kit Now Available

There is no better way other than a self-help training kit -- (rapid adoption kit, or RAK) -- to demonstrate the Incisive Enterprise Simulator's IEEE 1801 / UPF low-power features and its usage. The features include:

  • Unique SimVision debugging 
  • Patent-pending power supply network visualization and debugging
  • Tcl extensions for LP debugging
  • Support for Liberty file power description
  • Standby mode support
  • Support for Verilog, VHDL, and mixed language
  • Automatic understanding of complex feedthroughs
  • Replay of initial blocks
  • ‘x' corruption for integers and enumerated types
  • Automatic understanding of loop variables
  • Automatic support for analog interconnections

 

Mickey Rodriguez, AVS Staff Solutions Engineer has developed a low power UPF-based RAK, which is now available on Cadence Online Support for you to download.

  • This rapid adoption kit illustrates Incisive Enterprise Simulator (IES) support for the IEEE 1801 power intent standard. 

Patent-Pending Power Supply Network Browser. (Only available with the LP option to IES)

  • In addition to an overview of IES features, SimVision and Tcl debug features, a lab is provided to give the user an opportunity to try these out.

The complete RAK and associated overview presentation can be downloaded from our SoC and Functional Verification RAK page:

Rapid Adoption Kits

Overview

RAK Database

Introduction to IEEE-1801 Low Power Simulation

View

Download (2.3 MB)

 

We are covering the following technologies through our RAKs at this moment:

Synthesis, Test and Verification flow
Encounter Digital Implementation (EDI) System and Sign-off Flow
Virtuoso Custom IC and Sign-off Flow
Silicon-Package-Board Design
Verification IP
SOC and IP level Functional Verification
System level verification and validation with Palladium XP

Please visit https://support.cadence.com/raks to download your copy of RAK.

We will continue to provide self-help content on Cadence Online Support, your 24/7 partner for learning more about Cadence tools, technologies, and methodologies as well as getting help in resolving issues related to Cadence software. If you are signed up for e-mail notifications, you're likely to notice new solutions, application notes (technical papers), videos, manuals, etc.

Note: To access the above documents, click a link and use your Cadence credentials to log on to the Cadence Online Support https://support.cadence.com/ website.

Happy Learning!

Sumeet Aggarwal and Adam Sherer




pti

Noise figure optimization of LNA

Hello, I looking for reaching minimal NOISE FIRUGE by peaking a combination of the RLC on the output load as shown bellow.
I tried to do it with PNOISE  but it gives me an error on the |f(in)| i am not sure regarding the sidebands in my case(its not a mixer)

How can i show Noise Figure and optimize it using my output RLC?

Thanks





pti

Encryption of IP for Simulation with IES

I'm sending encrypted HDL to a customer who will use Cadence IES for simulation and was wondering how I should go about the encryption.

Does IES support the IEEE's P1735 and if so, where can I find Cadence's public key for performing the encryption?

Or is there an alternative solution that I can use for encryption?




pti

IC Packagers: A New Option in Bond Finger Solder Mask Openings

If you design wire bond packages, you’re familiar with the need for the bond fingers and rings on the package substrate layers to be exposed through the solder mask layer. If they aren’t, it becomes… rather difficult… to bon...(read more)



  • Allegro Package Designer


pti

Scripting Bugs Blight Security Giants' Websites




pti

Yahoo Fixes Email Cross-Site Scripting Flaw




pti

Microsoft To Fix IE8 Cross-Site Scripting Problem, Again








pti

Skype Squishes Cross-Zone Scripting Bug







pti

ASP Dynamika 2.5 Cross Site Scripting

ASP Dynamika version 2.5 suffers from a cross site scripting vulnerability.





pti

Russian Media Group Rambler Attempting To Hold Nginx Hostage