I see posts on Oracle related forums about various releases (anything that isn't 11.x or 12.x) being "unsupported". This is wrong. Of course you should upgrade any 9i or 10g databases, but you don't have to.

Oracle Corporation's lifetime support policy is documented here,
Lifetime Support Policy
take a look, and you'll see that release 10.2 was in premier support until end July 2010 when it went into extended support. At end July 2013, it goes into sustaining support. Sustaining support will continue indefinitely. Even release 8.1.7 will have sustaining support indefinitely.
So what is sustaining support? That is documented here,
Lifetime support benefits
To summarize, extended support gives you everything you are likely to need. What you do not get is certification against new Oracle products or new third party products (principally, operating systems). But does that matter? I don't think so. For example, release 11.2.0.3 (still in premier support) is not certified against Windows 8, but it works fine.
Sustaining support has a more significant problem: no more patches. Not even patches for security holes, or changes in regulatory requirements. The security patch issue may of course be serious, but regulatory issues are unlikely to matter (this is a database, not a tax management system.) Think about it: 10g has been around for many years. It is pretty well de-bugged by now. If you hit a problem with no work around, you are pretty unlucky. Sustaining support gives you access to technical support, available patches, software, and documentation. That is all most sites will ever need.
Right now, I am working on a 9.2.0.8 database. It cannot be upgraded because the application software is written by a company that does not permit a database upgrade. Why not? Well, the reason may be commercial: they have a replacement product that is supported on newer databases. But that is nothing to do with me. The database works, the software works. Making it work better is a challenge - but that is what a DBA is paid to do. Don't just write it off as "unsupported".
Of course I am not suggesting that users should not upgrade to current releases - but upgrades are a huge project, and can have major implications. Running out dated software is silly, unless you have an irrefutable reason for so doing. The lack of security patches make you vulnerable to data loss. The lack of regulatory patches may make it illegal. The lack of newer facilities will be restricting the utility of the system. You may be losing money by not taking of advantage of changes of newer technology that can better exploit your hardware.
If anyone is looking for consulting support to upgrade their database - my boss will be happy to give you a quote. But I won't refuse to support you in the meantime.
--
John Watson
Oracle Certified Master DBA
http://skillbuilders.com

There are three restrictions on indexing and partitioning: a unique index cannot be local non-prefixed; a global non-prefixed index is not possible; a bitmap index cannot be global. Why these limitations? I suspect that they are there to prevent us from doing something idiotic.

This is the table used for all examples that follow:

CREATE TABLE EMP
      (EMPNO NUMBER(4) CONSTRAINT PK_EMP PRIMARY KEY,
       ENAME VARCHAR2(10),
       JOB VARCHAR2(9),
       MGR NUMBER(4),
       HIREDATE DATE,
       SAL NUMBER(7,2),
       COMM NUMBER(7,2),
       DEPTNO NUMBER(2) )
PARTITION BY HASH (EMPNO) PARTITIONS 4;

Why can't I have a local non-prefixed unique index?
A local non-unique index is no problem, but unique is not possible:

orclz> create index enamei on emp(ename) local;

Index created.

orclz> drop index enamei;

Index dropped.

orclz> create unique index enamei on emp(ename) local;
create unique index enamei on emp(ename) local
                              *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14039: partitioning columns must form a subset of key columns of a UNIQUE index

You cannot get a around the problem by separating the index from the constraint (which is always good practice):

orclz> create index enamei on emp(ename) local;

Index created.

orclz> alter table emp add constraint euk unique (ename);
alter table emp add constraint euk unique (ename)
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01408: such column list already indexed


orclz>

So what is the issue? Clearly it is not a technical limitation. But if it were possible, consder the implications for performance. When inserting a row, a unique index (or a non-unique index enforcing a unique constraint) must be searched to see if the key value already exists. For my little four partition table, that would mean four index searches: one of each local index partition. Well, OK. But what if the table were range partitioned into a thousand partitions? Then every insert would have to make a thousand index lookups. This would be unbelievably slow. By restricting unique indexes to global or local prefixed, Uncle Oracle is ensuring that we cannot create such an awful situation.

Why can't I have a global non-prefixed index?
Well, why would you want one? In my example, perhaps you want a global index on deptno, partitioned by mgr. But you can't do it:

orclz> create index deptnoi on emp(deptno) global partition by hash(mgr) partitions 4;
create index deptnoi on emp(deptno) global partition by hash(mgr) partitions 4
                                                                *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-14038: GLOBAL partitioned index must be prefixed


orclz>

Why can't I have a global partitioned bitmap index?
This came up on the Oracle forums recently, https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2575623
Global indexes must be prefixed. Bearing that in mind, the question needs to be re-phrased: why would anyone ever want a prefixed partitioned bitmap index? Something like this:

orclz>
orclz> create bitmap index bmi on emp(deptno) global partition by hash(deptno) partitions 4;
create bitmap index bmi on emp(deptno) global partition by hash(deptno) partitions 4
                                       *
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-25113: GLOBAL may not be used with a bitmap index

orclz>

Is there a technology limitation?
I am of course open to correction, but I cannot see a technology limitation that enforces any of these three impossibilities. I'm sure they are all technically possible. But Oracle has decided that, for our own good, they will never be implemented.
--
John Watson
Oracle Certified Master DBA
http://skillbuilders.com

The inverted table format can deliver fast and flexible query capabilities, but is not widely used. ADABAS is probably the most successful implementation, but how often do you see that nowadays? Following is a description of how to implement inverted structures within a relational database. All code run on Oracle Database 12c, release 12.1.0.1.

Consider this table and a few rows, that describe the contents of my larder:

create table food(id number,capacity varchar2(10),container varchar2(10),item varchar2(10));
insert into food values(1,'large','bag','potatoes');
insert into food values(2,'small','box','carrots');
insert into food values(3,'medium','tin','peas');
insert into food values(4,'large','box','potatoes');
insert into food values(5,'small','tin','carrots');
insert into food values(6,'medium','bag','peas');
insert into food values(7,'large','tin','potatoes');
insert into food values(8,'small','bag','carrots');
insert into food values(9,'medium','box','peas');

create table inverted(colname varchar2(10),colvalue varchar2(10),id number);
insert into inverted select 'capacity',capacity,id from food;
insert into inverted select 'container',container,id from food;
insert into inverted select 'item',item,id from food;

create index food_i on food(id);
create index inverted_i on inverted(colname,colvalue);

orclz> set autotrace on explain
orclz> select * from food where id in
  2  (select id from inverted where colname='capacity' and colvalue='large'
  3  intersect
  4  select id from inverted where colname='container' and colvalue='box');

        ID CAPACITY   CONTAINER  ITEM
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
         4 large      box        potatoes


Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 1945359172

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                                | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | C
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                         |            |     3 |   141 |
|   1 |  MERGE JOIN                              |            |     3 |   141 |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID            | FOOD       |     9 |   306 |
|   3 |    INDEX FULL SCAN                       | FOOD_I     |     9 |       |
|*  4 |   SORT JOIN                              |            |     3 |    39 |
|   5 |    VIEW                                  | VW_NSO_1   |     3 |    39 |
|   6 |     INTERSECTION                         |            |       |       |
|   7 |      SORT UNIQUE                         |            |     3 |    81 |
|   8 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BATCHED| INVERTED   |     3 |    81 |
|*  9 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                  | INVERTED_I |     3 |       |
|  10 |      SORT UNIQUE                         |            |     3 |    81 |
|  11 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BATCHED| INVERTED   |     3 |    81 |
|* 12 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                  | INVERTED_I |     3 |       |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   4 - access("ID"="ID")
       filter("ID"="ID")
   9 - access("COLNAME"='capacity' AND "COLVALUE"='large')
  12 - access("COLNAME"='container' AND "COLVALUE"='box')

Note
-----
   - dynamic statistics used: dynamic sampling (level=2)

orclz>

orclz> select * from food where id in
  2  (select id from inverted where colname='item' and colvalue='potatoes');

        ID CAPACITY   CONTAINER  ITEM
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
         1 large      bag        potatoes
         4 large      box        potatoes
         7 large      tin        potatoes


Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 762525239

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                              | Name       | Rows  | Bytes | Cos
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |            |     3 |   183 |
|   1 |  NESTED LOOPS                          |            |       |       |
|   2 |   NESTED LOOPS                         |            |     3 |   183 |
|   3 |    SORT UNIQUE                         |            |     3 |    81 |
|   4 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID BATCHED| INVERTED   |     3 |    81 |
|*  5 |      INDEX RANGE SCAN                  | INVERTED_I |     3 |       |
|*  6 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN                    | FOOD_I     |     1 |       |
|   7 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID          | FOOD       |     1 |    34 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------

   5 - access("COLNAME"='item' AND "COLVALUE"='potatoes')
   6 - access("ID"="ID")

Note
-----
   - dynamic statistics used: dynamic sampling (level=2)
   - this is an adaptive plan

orclz>

In my last post, I looked at using recursive WITH to implement simple recursive algorithms in SQL. One very common use of recursion is to traverse hierarchical data. I recently wrote a series of posts on hierarchical data, using Oracle’s CONNECT BY syntax and a fun example. In this post, I’ll be revisiting the same data using recursive WITH.

There are dozens of examples of hierarchical data, from the EMP table to the Windows Registry to binary trees, but I went with something more fun: the skeleton from the old song “Dem Dry Bones”.

Since every bone has only one ancestor, and there is a root bone with no ancestor, this is hierarchical data and we can stick it in a table and query it.

SELECT * FROM skeleton;
BONE                                     CONNECTED_TO_THE
---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
shoulder                                 neck
back                                     shoulder
hip                                      back
thigh                                    hip
knee                                     thigh
leg                                      knee
foot                                     heel
head
neck                                     head
toe                                      foot
arm                                      shoulder
wrist                                    arm
ankle                                    leg
heel                                     ankle
finger                                   wrist
a rib                                    back
b rib                                    back
c rib                                    back

You can see that I added some ribs and an arm to make the skeleton more complete!

Using Oracle’s CONNECT BY syntax:

SQL> col bone FOR a10
SQL> col connected_to_the FOR a9
SQL> col level FOR 99
SQL> col bone_tree FOR a27
SQL> col path FOR a65
 
SELECT bone, connected_to_the, level, 
lpad(' ',2*level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree , 
ltrim(sys_connect_by_path(bone,'>'),'>') AS path
FROM skeleton
START WITH connected_to_the IS NULL
CONNECT BY prior bone=connected_to_the 
ORDER siblings BY 1

BONE       CONNECTED LEVEL BONE_TREE                   PATH
---------- --------- ----- --------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------
head                     1   head                      head
neck       head          2     neck                    head>neck
shoulder   neck          3       shoulder              head>neck>shoulder
arm        shoulder      4         arm                 head>neck>shoulder>arm
wrist      arm           5           wrist             head>neck>shoulder>arm>wrist
finger     wrist         6             finger          head>neck>shoulder>arm>wrist>finger
back       shoulder      4         back                head>neck>shoulder>back
a rib      back          5           a rib             head>neck>shoulder>back>a rib
b rib      back          5           b rib             head>neck>shoulder>back>b rib
c rib      back          5           c rib             head>neck>shoulder>back>c rib
hip        back          5           hip               head>neck>shoulder>back>hip
thigh      hip           6             thigh           head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh
knee       thigh         7               knee          head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh>knee
leg        knee          8                 leg         head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh>knee>leg
ankle      leg           9                   ankle     head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh>knee>leg>ankle
heel       ankle        10                     heel    head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh>knee>leg>ankle>heel
foot       heel         11                       foot  head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh>knee>leg>ankle>heel>foot
toe        foot         12                         toe head>neck>shoulder>back>hip>thigh>knee>leg>ankle>heel>foot>toe

The above CONNECT BY query uses the LEVEL pseudocolumn and the SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH function. With recursive WITH, there’s no need for these built-ins because these values fall naturally out of the recursion.

Let’s start with the basic hierarchical query rewritten in recursive WITH.
The hierarchical relationship in our table is:
Parent(row.bone) = row.connected_to_the

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         -- Start with the root
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the 
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           -- Parent(row.bone) = row.connected_to_the
 )
SELECT * FROM skellarchy;

BONE       PARENT
---------- ----------------------------------------
head
neck       head
shoulder   neck
back       shoulder
arm        shoulder
hip        back
wrist      arm
a rib      back
b rib      back
c rib      back
thigh      hip
finger     wrist
knee       thigh
leg        knee
ankle      leg
heel       ankle
foot       heel
toe        foot

Because we built up the SKELLARCHY table recursively, it’s easy to make an equivalent to the LEVEL pseudocolumn; it falls right out of the recursion:

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0 FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SELECT * FROM skellarchy;

BONE       PARENT      THE_LEVEL
---------- ---------- ----------
head                           0
neck       head                1
shoulder   neck                2
back       shoulder            3
arm        shoulder            3
hip        back                4
wrist      arm                 4
a rib      back                4
b rib      back                4
c rib      back                4
thigh      hip                 5
finger     wrist               5
knee       thigh               6
leg        knee                7
ankle      leg                 8
heel       ankle               9
foot       heel               10
toe        foot               11

and it’s also easy to build up a path from root to the current node like the “SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH” function does for CONNECT BY queries:

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level, the_path) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0, CAST(bone AS varchar2(4000)) FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1, r.the_path || '->' || s.bone
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SELECT * FROM skellarchy;

BONE       PARENT     THE_LEVEL THE_PATH
---------- ---------- --------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
head                          0 head
neck       head               1 head->neck
shoulder   neck               2 head->neck->shoulder
back       shoulder           3 head->neck->shoulder->back
arm        shoulder           3 head->neck->shoulder->arm
hip        back               4 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip
wrist      arm                4 head->neck->shoulder->arm->wrist
a rib      back               4 head->neck->shoulder->back->a rib
b rib      back               4 head->neck->shoulder->back->b rib
c rib      back               4 head->neck->shoulder->back->c rib
thigh      hip                5 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh
finger     wrist              5 head->neck->shoulder->arm->wrist->finger
knee       thigh              6 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh->knee
leg        knee               7 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh->knee->leg
ankle      leg                8 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh->knee->leg->ankle
heel       ankle              9 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh->knee->leg->ankle->heel
foot       heel              10 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh->knee->leg->ankle->heel->foot
toe        foot              11 head->neck->shoulder->back->hip->thigh->knee->leg->ankle->heel->foot->toe

and we can use our generated the_level column to make a nice display just as we used the level pseudocolumn with CONNECT BY:

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0  FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SELECT lpad(' ',2*the_level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree FROM skellarchy;

BONE_TREE
---------------------------
head
  neck
    shoulder
      back
      arm
        hip
        wrist
        a rib
        b rib
        c rib
          thigh
          finger
            knee
              leg
                ankle
                  heel
                    foot
                      toe

Now, the bones are coming out in a bit of a funny order for a skeleton. Instead of this:

    shoulder
      back
      arm
        hip
        wrist
        a rib
        b rib
        c rib
          thigh
          finger

I want to see this:

    shoulder
      arm
        wrist
          finger
      back
        a rib
        b rib
        c rib
        hip
          thigh

The rows are coming out in BREADTH FIRST ordering – meaning all siblings of ‘shoulder’ are printed before any children of ‘shoulder’. But I want to see them in DEPTH FIRST: going from shoulder to finger before we start on the backbone.

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0  FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SEARCH DEPTH FIRST BY bone SET bone_order
SELECT lpad(' ',2*the_level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree FROM skellarchy
ORDER BY bone_order;

BONE_TREE
---------------------------
head
  neck
    shoulder
      arm
        wrist
          finger
      back
        a rib
        b rib
        c rib
        hip
          thigh
            knee
              leg
                ankle
                  heel
                    foot
                      toe

And now the result looks more like a proper skeleton.

Now on to cycles. A cycle is a loop in the hierarchical data: a row is its own ancestor. To put a cycle in the example data, I made the skeleton bend over and connect the head to the toe:

UPDATE skeleton SET connected_to_the='toe' WHERE bone='head';

And now if we try to run the query:

ERROR at line 2:
ORA-32044: cycle detected while executing recursive WITH query

With the CONNECT BY syntax, we can use CONNECT BY NOCYCLE to run a query even when cycles exist, and the pseudocolumn CONNECT_BY_IS_CYCLE to help detect cycles. For recursive WITH, Oracle provides a CYCLE clause, which is a bit more powerful as it allows us to name the column which is cycling.

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0  FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SEARCH DEPTH FIRST BY bone SET bone_order
CYCLE bone SET is_a_cycle TO 'Y' DEFAULT 'N'
SELECT lpad(' ',2*the_level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree, is_a_cycle FROM skellarchy
--where is_a_cycle='N'
ORDER BY bone_order;

BONE_TREE                                                    I
------------------------------------------------------------ -
head                                                         N
  neck                                                       N
    shoulder                                                 N
      arm                                                    N
        wrist                                                N
          finger                                             N
      back                                                   N
        a rib                                                N
        b rib                                                N
        c rib                                                N
        hip                                                  N
          thigh                                              N
            knee                                             N
              leg                                            N
                ankle                                        N
                  heel                                       N
                    foot                                     N
                      toe                                    N
                        head                                 Y

The query runs until the first cycle is detected, then stops.

The CONNECT BY syntax does provide a nice pseudocolumn, CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF, which is 1 when a row has no further children, 0 otherwise. In my next post, I’ll look at emulating this pseudocolumn with recursive WITH.

The CONNECT BY syntax provides a useful pseudocolumn, CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF, which identifies leaf nodes in the data: it’s 1 when a row has no further children, 0 otherwise. In this post, I’ll look at emulating this pseudocolumn using recursive WITH.

Let’s continue with the example from my previous posts about hierarchical data: the skeleton from the old song “Dem Dry Bones”.

UPDATE skeleton SET connected_to_the=NULL WHERE bone='head';
SELECT * FROM skeleton;

BONE                                     CONNECTED_TO_THE
---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
shoulder                                 neck
back                                     shoulder
hip                                      back
thigh                                    hip
knee                                     thigh
leg                                      knee
foot                                     heel
head
neck                                     head
toe                                      foot
arm                                      shoulder
wrist                                    arm
ankle                                    leg
heel                                     ankle
finger                                   wrist
a rib                                    back
b rib                                    back
c rib                                    back

With CONNECT BY, we can use the CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF pseudocolumn to identify leaf nodes:

SELECT bone, level, 
ltrim(sys_connect_by_path(bone,' -> '),' -> ') AS path
FROM skeleton
WHERE connect_by_isleaf=1
START WITH connected_to_the IS NULL
CONNECT BY prior bone=connected_to_the 
ORDER siblings BY 1;

BONE      LEVEL PATH                                                                                            
--------- ----- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
finger        6 head -> neck -> shoulder -> arm -> wrist -> finger                                              
a rib         5 head -> neck -> shoulder -> back -> a rib                                                       
b rib         5 head -> neck -> shoulder -> back -> b rib                                                       
c rib         5 head -> neck -> shoulder -> back -> c rib                                                       
toe          12 head -> neck -> shoulder -> back -> hip -> thigh -> knee -> leg -> ankle -> heel -> foot -> toe

This pseudocolumn takes a little more thought to replicate using recursive WITH than the LEVEL pseudocolumn and the SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH, which, as we saw in my last post, fall naturally out of the recursion.

We can imitate CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF by searching DEPTH FIRST and using the LEAD function to peek at the next row’s the_level value. If the next row’s level is higher than the current row, then it’s a child of the current row; otherwise, it’s not a child. Since, with DEPTH FIRST, all the children of a row come out before any siblings, if the next row isn’t a child, then the current row is a leaf.

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0  FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SEARCH DEPTH FIRST BY bone SET bone_order
CYCLE bone SET is_a_cycle TO 'Y' DEFAULT 'N'
SELECT lpad(' ',2*the_level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree , the_level,
  lead(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) AS next_level,
  CASE 
    WHEN the_level < lead(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) THEN NULL
    ELSE 'LEAF'
  END is_leaf
FROM skellarchy
ORDER BY bone_order;

BONE_TREE                                      THE_LEVEL NEXT_LEVEL IS_L
--------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----
head                                                   0          1
  neck                                                 1          2
    shoulder                                           2          3
      arm                                              3          4
        wrist                                          4          5
          finger                                       5          3 LEAF
      back                                             3          4
        a rib                                          4          4 LEAF
        b rib                                          4          4 LEAF
        c rib                                          4          4 LEAF
        hip                                            4          5
          thigh                                        5          6
            knee                                       6          7
              leg                                      7          8
                ankle                                  8          9
                  heel                                 9         10
                    foot                              10         11
                      toe                             11            LEAF

Watch out for Cycles

The first point of caution about this solution concerns cycles. In my last post, I had created a cycle by making the ‘head’ node’s parent the ‘toe’ node. If I’d left the cycle in the data, the toe node wouldn’t be a leaf any more, but this query would falsely identify the head as a leaf:

UPDATE skeleton SET connected_to_the='toe' WHERE bone='head';

BONE_TREE                                      THE_LEVEL NEXT_LEVEL IS_L
--------------------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----
head                                                   0          1
  neck                                                 1          2
    shoulder                                           2          3
      arm                                              3          4
        wrist                                          4          5
          finger                                       5          3 LEAF
      back                                             3          4
        a rib                                          4          4 LEAF
        b rib                                          4          4 LEAF
        c rib                                          4          4 LEAF
        hip                                            4          5
          thigh                                        5          6
            knee                                       6          7
              leg                                      7          8
                ankle                                  8          9
                  heel                                 9         10
                    foot                              10         11
                      toe                             11         12
                        head                          12            LEAF
 
19 rows selected.

This can be corrected for by adding WHERE IS_A_CYCLE=’N’ to the query.

Respect the order of evaluation…

A second point of caution: if I add a WHERE clause to the query that limits the number of levels, the last line of the resultset will always be identified as a leaf.

WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
 ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0  FROM skeleton 
   WHERE bone = 'head'                         
 UNION ALL
   SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
   FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
   WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
 )
SEARCH DEPTH FIRST BY bone SET bone_order
CYCLE bone SET is_a_cycle TO 'Y' DEFAULT 'N'
SELECT lpad(' ',2*the_level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree , the_level,
  lead(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) AS next_level,
  CASE 
    WHEN the_level < lead(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) THEN NULL
    ELSE 'LEAF'
  END is_leaf
FROM skellarchy
WHERE the_level < 8 
ORDER BY bone_order;

BONE_TREE                                                     THE_LEVEL NEXT_LEVEL IS_L
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----
head                                                                  0          1
  neck                                                                1          2
    shoulder                                                          2          3
      arm                                                             3          4
        wrist                                                         4          5
          finger                                                      5          3 LEAF
      back                                                            3          4
        a rib                                                         4          4 LEAF
        b rib                                                         4          4 LEAF
        c rib                                                         4          4 LEAF
        hip                                                           4          5
          thigh                                                       5          6
            knee                                                      6          7
              leg                                                     7            LEAF      <<<=====

The leg is falsely identified as a leaf, and NEXT_LEVEL comes out as NULL, even though the ‘leg’ row has a child row. Why is that? It’s because this solution uses the LEAD analytic function. With analytic functions, WHERE clauses are evaluated before the analytic functions.

Highlighting the relevant bits from the query:

WITH skellarchy AS ...[recursive WITH subquery]...
SELECT ... LEAD(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) AS next_level ... --analytic function
FROM skellarchy
WHERE the_level < 8 ...                                                 --where clause

To quote the documentation:

Analytic functions compute an aggregate value based on a group of rows…. The group of rows is called a window and is defined by the analytic_clause. For each row, a sliding window of rows is defined. The window determines the range of rows used to perform the calculations for the current row…. Analytic functions are the last set of operations performed in a query except for the final ORDER BY clause. All joins and all WHERE, GROUP BY, and HAVING clauses are completed before the analytic functions are processed.

In the query above, “where the_level < 8" will be evaluated before LEAD(the_level). The EXPLAIN PLAN shows this very clearly:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                                | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                         |          |     2 |    76 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   1 |  WINDOW BUFFER                           |          |     2 |    76 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |  <<=== LEAD
|*  2 |   VIEW                                   |          |     2 |    76 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |  <<=== filter("THE_LEVEL"<8)
|   3 |    UNION ALL (RECURSIVE WITH) DEPTH FIRST|          |       |       |            |          |
|*  4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL                    | SKELETON |     1 |    24 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  5 |     HASH JOIN                            |          |     1 |    49 |     5  (20)| 00:00:01 |
|   6 |      RECURSIVE WITH PUMP                 |          |       |       |            |          |
|   7 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL                   | SKELETON |    18 |   432 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   2 - filter("THE_LEVEL"<8)
   4 - filter("BONE"='head')
   5 - access("R"."BONE"="S"."CONNECTED_TO_THE")

The WINDOW BUFFER (analytic window) is evaluated after the VIEW which filters on “THE_LEVEL”<8. So, "lead(the_level) over (order by bone_order)" will be null where the_level=7, and the 'leg' wrongly identified as a leaf node. What we actually want is for the analytic function LEAD to run over the whole resultset, and only then limit the results to show the levels 0-7. The obvious way to do this is to wrap the query in a second SELECT statement:

SELECT * FROM (
  WITH skellarchy (bone, parent, the_level) AS
   ( SELECT bone, connected_to_the, 0  FROM skeleton 
     WHERE bone = 'head'                         
   UNION ALL
     SELECT s.bone, s.connected_to_the , r.the_level + 1
     FROM skeleton s, skellarchy r
     WHERE r.bone = s.connected_to_the           
   )
  SEARCH DEPTH FIRST BY bone SET bone_order
  CYCLE bone SET is_a_cycle TO 'Y' DEFAULT 'N'
  SELECT lpad(' ',2*the_level, ' ') || bone AS bone_tree , the_level,
    lead(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) AS next_level,
    CASE 
      WHEN the_level < lead(the_level) OVER (ORDER BY bone_order) THEN NULL
      ELSE 'LEAF'
    END is_leaf
  FROM skellarchy
  ORDER BY bone_order
) WHERE the_level < 8;

BONE_TREE                                                     THE_LEVEL NEXT_LEVEL IS_L
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ---------- ----
head                                                                  0          1
  neck                                                                1          2
    shoulder                                                          2          3
      arm                                                             3          4
        wrist                                                         4          5
          finger                                                      5          3 LEAF
      back                                                            3          4
        a rib                                                         4          4 LEAF
        b rib                                                         4          4 LEAF
        c rib                                                         4          4 LEAF
        hip                                                           4          5
          thigh                                                       5          6
            knee                                                      6          7
              leg                                                     7          8

Now, the analytic function in the inner query is evaluated first, before the WHERE clause in the outer query. We can see this in the EXPLAIN PLAN too, of course. Now the WINDOW BUFFER (analytic window) is evaluated before the VIEW with filter(“THE_LEVEL”<8) :

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id  | Operation                                 | Name     | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                          |          |     2 |  4068 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |
|*  1 |  VIEW                                     |          |     2 |  4068 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |  <<=== filter("THE_LEVEL"<8)
|   2 |   WINDOW BUFFER                           |          |     2 |    76 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |  <<=== LEAD
|   3 |    VIEW                                   |          |     2 |    76 |     8  (25)| 00:00:01 |
|   4 |     UNION ALL (RECURSIVE WITH) DEPTH FIRST|          |       |       |            |          |
|*  5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL                    | SKELETON |     1 |    24 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|*  6 |      HASH JOIN                            |          |     1 |    49 |     5  (20)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |       RECURSIVE WITH PUMP                 |          |       |       |            |          |
|   8 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                   | SKELETON |    18 |   432 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
---------------------------------------------------
 
   1 - filter("THE_LEVEL"<8)
   5 - filter("BONE"='head')
   6 - access("R"."BONE"="S"."CONNECTED_TO_THE")

This is one case of the general point that, as Tom Kyte explains in this Ask Tom answer,“select analytic_function from t where CONDITION” is NOT THE SAME AS “select * from (select analytic_function from t) where CONDITION”.

So, to sum up my last few posts, we can do everything that CONNECT BY can do with the 11g recursive WITH syntax. Plus, the recursive WITH syntax makes it easy to express simple recursive algorithms in SQL.