Which outfit suited her best? Let us know.

Hayden Library - PS3503.E5474 A6 2018

Hayden Library - PS3603.R89 D66 2019

Dewey Library - PS508.A8 A4 2019

Online Resource

Dewey Library - PS3604.E129 C36 2019

Online Resource

Hayden Library - PS169.T4 D56 2018

Hayden Library - PS508.N3 S25 2018

Dewey Library - PS153.N5 L472 2018

Dewey Library - PS153.N5 S754 2018

Dewey Library - PS3604.U5268 E97 2019

Dewey Library - PS228.E95 C43 2019

Dewey Library - PS231.R32 M45 2018

Hayden Library - PS44.T43 2019

Dewey Library - PS1541.Z5 R78 2019

Dewey Library - PS309.E96 P47 2018

Hayden Library - PS153.G38 S64 2018

Hayden Library - PS153.M4 C84 2018

Barker Library - PS3612.A543 O84 2019

[Kingston, Ontario] : School of Policy Studies, Queen's University ; Montreal ; Kingston ; London ; Ithaca : McGill-Queen's University Press, 2019.

Online Resource

Browsery DVD ML394.R663 2015b

Browsery DVD N387 cic

Browsery DVD ML3790.A44 2017

Autor: Bühler, Franz, 1760-1824
Erschienen 1821
BSB-Signatur 4 Mus.pr. 45583

URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb11148962-3
URL: http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb11148962_00001.html/

Autor: Münster, Joseph Joachim Benedikt, 1694-1751
Erschienen 1751
BSB-Signatur 4 Mus.pr. 44603

URN: urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb11148808-2
URL: http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/fs1/object/display/bsb11148808_00001.html/

Liminal Drifter

‘India will not win in Australia if they can’t dismiss Smith, Warner early’

Cancer grid project crawls as key professionals exit entity

The heir to the Samsung empire bowed in apology on Wednesday for company misconduct including a controversial plan for him to ascend to the leadership of the world's largest smartphone maker.

Online Resource

Online Resource

Online Resource

Online Resource

Hayden Library - RM666.C266 P37 2017

Hayden Library - RM666.C266 F79 2018

Online Resource

Update
The awesome Lie function got improved and became an official module (yet 30 lines of code thought). Its name is Dodgy, and it's tested and even more awesome!

Not today though, today is just fine

1. if we are in charge of creating the Promise, we are the only one that could possibly make it abortable and only if we want to, it's an opt in rather than a default or a "boring to write" subclass
2. it's widely agreed that cancellation should be rather synonymous of a rejection, there's no forever pending issue there, just a plain simple rejection
3. one of the Promise strength is its private scope callback, which is inevitably the only place where defining abortability would make sense. Take a request, a timer, an event handler defined inside that callback, where else would you provide the ability to explicitly abort and cleanup the behavior if not there?
4. being the callback the best pace to resolve, reject, and optionally to abort, that's also the very same place we want to be sure that if there was a reason to abort we can pass it along the rejection, so that we could simply ignore it in our optionally abort aware Promises, and yet drop out from any other in the chain whenever the rejection occurs or it's simply ignored
5. the moment we make the promise malleable from the outer world through a p.abort() ability, is also the very same moment we could just decide to resolve, or fully fail the promise via p.resolve(value) or p.reject(error)

var p = new Lie(function (resolve, reject, onAbort) {
  var timeout = setTimeout(resolve, 1000, 'OK');
  // invoking onAbort will explicit our intent to opt-in
  onAbort(function () {
    clearTimeout(timeout);
    return 'aborted'; // will be used as rejected error
                      // it could even be undefined
                      // so it's easier to distinguish
                      // between real errors and aborts
  });
});

p.then(
  console.log.bind(console),
  console.warn.bind(console)
).catch(
  console.error.bind(console)
);

var toTheOuterWorld = p.then(
  function (data) {return data},
  function (error) {return error}
);
// or even ...
var toTheOuterWorld = Promise.resolve(p);

// abortable promise
var cancelable = new Lie(function (r, e, a) {
  var t = setTimeout(r, 5000, 'all good');
  a(function () { clearTimeout(t); });
});

// testing purpose, will it resolve or not?
setTimeout(cancelable.reject, 1000, 'nope');
// and what if we abort before?
setTimeout(cancelable.abort, 750);



// generic promise, let's log what happens
var derived = cancelable.then(
  function (result) { console.log('resolved', result); },
  function (error)  { error ?
    console.warn('rejected', error) :
    console.log('ignoring the .abort() call');
  }
).catch(
  function (error)  { console.error('cought', error); }
);

// being just a Promise, no method will be exposed
console.log(
  derived.resolve,
  derived.reject,
  derived.abort
);

Lie.more = function more(lie) {
  function wrap(previous) {
    return function () {
      var l = previous.apply(lie, arguments);
      l.resolve = lie.resolve;  // optional bonus
      l.reject = lie.reject;    // optional bonus
      l.abort = lie.abort;
      return Lie.more(l);
    };
  }
  if (lie.abort) {
    lie.then = wrap(lie.then);
    lie.catch = wrap(lie.catch);
  }
  return lie;
};

var chainedLie = new Lie(function (res, rej, onAbort) {
  var t = setTimeout(res, 1000, 'OK');
  onAbort(function (why) {
    clearTimeout(t);
    return why;
  });
})
.then(
  console.log.bind(console),
  console.warn.bind(console)
)
.catch(
  console.error.bind(console)
);

// check this out
chainedLie.abort('because');

var justPromise = Promise.resolve(chainedLie);

Rotch Library - G70.215.U6 T75 2017

Online Resource

Online Resource

Online Resource

Online Resource

Online Resource