competition

Port Lincoln's tuna toss competition turns 40, with hammer throwers and locals throwing the catch

Port Lincoln, on South Australia's west coast, celebrates four decades of a tuna-tossing competition that commemorates the city's fishing history and is proving popular with hammer throwers.



  • ABC Eyre Peninsula and West Coast
  • eyre
  • Community and Society:Community and Multicultural Festivals:All
  • Community and Society:History:All
  • Community and Society:Regional:All
  • Rural:Fishing
  • Aquaculture:All
  • Australia:SA:Port Lincoln 5606




competition

Competition for milk fierce as rival dairy processors flag interest in Bega Valley

For the first time, dairy farmers in the Bega Valley could have the opportunity to supply the fresh milk market as Lactalis and Saputo look to secure new suppliers.




competition

Drought slashes soybean production prompting fierce competition for the small crop, warnings of price hikes

Drought has collided with high demand for soybeans, lifting prices by around $500 a tonne, prompting warnings of a price hike for soymilk, tofu and tempeh.




competition

A wood chopping competition at Dalby in 1979.




competition

Australia's competitive rabbit hoppers aim for new heights in international competition

The niche sport, which puts leads on rabbits to guide them through horse-jumping-style events, is growing in popularity and it is hoped may soon reach an elite level.




competition

Astrophotography competition sees joint winners for prestigious David Malin Awards

For the first time two overall winners have won the prestigious David Malin Awards which honours the best in Australian astrophotography.




competition

PHOTOS: Fluorescent turtle embryo wins forty-fifth annual Nikon Small World Competition

The winners of the 45th annual competition showcase a spectacular blend of science and artistry under the microscope.





competition

Report: UEFA wants Women's Euro 2021 moved to avoid competition clashes




competition

Bermudian In China Supports Skills Competition

Darren Burchall, a former national youth team footballer who now teaches in Shenzhen, China, recently took the time to salute those taking part in...




competition

Deadline Looms - The 22nd Annual USA Songwriting Competition

This Opportunity Is Gone Soon For Songwriters, Deadline To Enter Is May 31st




competition

Digital Revolution: Sonarworks CEO Wins Top Prize In EMMA Sound Competition Using Sonarworks Core Technology

Sonarworks Software Proves To Be The ‘secret Sauce’ In International Car Audio Competition




competition

Is Zendaya About to Give Kim Kardashian Some Competition?



The former Disney star's next move could be major.



  • Zendaya
  • Celebrity fashion and beauty news

competition

World Of Dance Competition Heats Up!



Everybody 1,2 step.




competition

Concacaf Suspends All Upcoming Competitions

Due to the global concerns about the spread of Covid-19, Concacaf has suspended all upcoming competitions scheduled to take place over the next 30 days. A spokesperson said, “Given the constantly evolving public health situation, and global concerns about the spread of Covid-19, the Concacaf Council convened yesterday via a conference call. “During the meeting […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Concacaf To Suspend Upcoming Competitions

Concacaf announced the suspension of the 2020 Concacaf Nations League Finals, Road to Gold Cup Qualifiers, and Flow Caribbean Club Championship due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic. A spokesperson said, “At Concacaf our thoughts are with all the communities affected by the spread of Covid-19 at this difficult time. As we continue to assess our […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Lockdown Football Skills Competition Extended

GoMedia and SGI Sports have announced that the Lockdown Football Skills Competition has been extended until May 8. A spokesperson said, “The organizations made the decision after the latest Covid-19 regulations were released by the Government, noting that it will be quite a while yet before the island is fully operational. “GoMedia spokesperson Rick Richardson […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Bermudian In China Supports Skills Competition

Darren Burchall, a former national youth team footballer who now teaches in Shenzhen, China, recently took the time to salute those taking part in the Lockdown Football Skills Competition, which is being hosted by GoMedia and SGI Sports. A spokesperson said, “Bermudian teacher and former national youth team footballer Darren “Butchie” Burchall is now back […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Minister Wilson Opens IFFB Competition & Expo

Minister of Health Kim Wilson officially opened Bermuda’s first IFFB Professional League Bodybuilding Competition and Fitness Expo at CedarBridge Academy on Saturday [Dec 7]. Minister Wilson said during her opening remarks, “Thank you to organizers – Absolute Focus and Smith Technologies – for coordinating this event which has as one of its goals to promote […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Video Competition & Film Screening On March 12

Bermuda Advocates for Safe Technology [BAST] is inviting all students to participate in this year’s Student Video Competition, with the winners to be presented with a prize and have their videos screened before the feature film ‘Generation Zapped’ on Thursday, March 12 at 7.00pm at the Bermuda Underwater Exploration Institute [BUEI]. A spokesperson said, “Bermuda […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Principles Foundation Design Competition

The Bermuda Principles Foundation, sponsored by the Department of Community & Cultural Affairs, is calling on local artists to compete in a design competition. A spokesperson said, “Local artists of all ages are invited to submit a cover and back design for a limited-edition publication on genetics history made in Bermuda. “The Bermuda Triangle: The […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Heather Nova Singer/Songwriter Competition

The Bermuda Festival’s Heather Nova Singer/Songwriter Competition is expanding this year, and is open all male and female local entrants under the age of 30. The winner will be mentored by Ms. Nova and will have the opportunity to open for one of the Bermuda Festival events. In addition, the winner will receive $500 and […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Salayah Stange Wins Heather Nova Competition

Salayah Stange is this year’s winner of the Bermuda Festival Heather Nova Singer/Song Writer competition, with the young singer set to receive a cash prize,  perform at the Bermuda Festival events, and professionally record one of her songs. Ms. Nova said, “I am thrilled to announce that this year’s winner of the annual Heather Nova Singer/Songwriter […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Eight Children Claim Colouring Competition Win

Bernews and TROIKA Bermuda recently invited children from around the island to enter a colouring competition in order to win tickets to see a production of Beauty and the Beast tomorrow [Aug 28]. The contest, which ran for nearly two weeks, received about 100 entries from colouring enthusiasts, each of them 12 or under. Eight […]

(Click to read the full article)




competition

Legal Issues Relating to Airports Promoting Competition

The TRB' Airport Cooperative Research Program's ACRP LRD 37: Legal Issues Relating to Airports Promoting Competition explores permissible means and methods of encouraging and accommodating competition at U.S. airports. It discusses the history of how competition has been addressed by government and airports and provides the context of the concentration of air carriers and fixed-base operators (FBOs), the accommodation of air carriers with differing business models, and avoiding the grant of exclusive rig...



  • http://www.trb.org/Resource.ashx?sn=cover_acrplrd37

competition

Axed Western Force to rejoin Aussie rugby competition in July - PerthNow

  1. Axed Western Force to rejoin Aussie rugby competition in July  PerthNow
  2. New Zealand plotting stunning multi-billion dollar escape from World Rugby  Fox Sports
  3. RA to ditch Super Rugby?  RugbyPass
  4. Forget the Kiwis, Australian rugby's future is local  Sydney Morning Herald
  5. Half of New Zealand Rugby staff face redundancy amid $NZ7m lockdown loss  The Guardian
  6. View Full coverage on Google News




competition

Healthcare skyscraper wins 2020 eVolo Skyscraper Competition

After receiving nearly 500 submissions from around the world, eVolo Magazine has announced the winners of the 2020 Skyscraper Competition. Established in 2006, the annual award recognizes visionary vertical architecture ideas that push the limits of design and technology. First place was awarded to a Chinese team that designed Epidemic Babel, a rapid-deployment healthcare skyscraper concept for mitigating epidemic outbreaks.[...]




competition

Social Design Award 2018: The Final Dash in Our Readers' Competition!

Joint activities, joint projects and improved cooperation: SPIEGEL ONLINE and SPIEGEL WISSEN are looking for the best ideas for creating a vibrant neighborhood. Send us your proposal by August 31!




competition

Breaking down the Lakers' and Clippers' biggest competition for the NBA championship

Giannis Antetokounmpo's outstanding skills are one reason why the Milwaukee Bucks are fully capable of beating the Lakers or Clippers for the NBA title.




competition

Elliott: USA Hockey's Lamoureux twins balance elite competition with motherhood

Twins Monique and Jocelyne Lamoureux are among the first players to take advantage of the maternity and child-care provisions in their new labor agreement with USA Hockey.




competition

Pac-12 cancels all sports competitions 'until further notice' because of coronavirus

The Pac-12 men's basketball tournament, and all other conference sporting events, have been canceled amid the growing coronavirus outbreak.




competition

Pac-12 cancels all sports competitions for remainder of academic year

The Pac-12 has canceled all conference and nonconference competitions through the end of the academic year because of the coronavirus pandemic.




competition

Six renegade visions for LACMA. Protest group announces winners of design competition

An anonymous donor is funding design competition prizes for global firms' alternatives to Peter Zumthor's plan for Los Angeles County Museum of Art




competition

Man Utd have Jude Bellingham transfer belief despite Liverpool, Man City competition



Manchester United have made Jude Bellingham one of their top transfer targets, although the Red Devils face competition from Liverpool and Manchester City to sign the Birmingham City star.




competition

Caption Competition

It's the Caption Competition.

Caption competition is now closed. Full rules can be seen here [PDF].

This week, a new look is unveiled.

6. trisarahtops:
Catwalk face-off

5. StoneyMast:
We come, with our new look, in peace. Take me to your leader

4. George Huber:
Mannequin Skywalker

3. abz:
Terracotta Armani

2. Fi:
After 35 years, someone finally designed a collection to cover Morph's modesty...

1. SkarloeyLine:
Eighth new social class discovered - the faceless minority




competition

Robert Wickens ready for return to IndyCar competition: 'This is really just Step 1 of 100'

It may not be out on the asphalt, but Robert Wickens is energized to be back competing against the IndyCar paddock this weekend.

      




competition

Tamika Catchings to face Mike Conley in NBA HORSE competition

Mike Conley is Tamika Catchings' first-round opponent in the NBA's HORSE event on ESPN; competitors will remain separated

      




competition

The Belt and Road Initiative: geo-economics and Indo-Pacific security competition

8 January 2020 , Volume 96, Number 1

Mingjiang Li

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been regarded by international society as a major policy tool in China's geo-economic strategy. Under this policy platform, Beijing has pledged to invest billions of dollars in the infrastructure and industrial sectors across Eurasia and in the Indo-Pacific nations. It is widely believed that such huge amount of investment will inevitably generate significant geostrategic repercussions in these regions. In response to the BRI, the United States and other powers have come up with a ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ strategy. This article attempts to address the following question: what impact is the BRI likely to have on the security ties between China and the other major players in the Indo-Pacific? The author finds that the BRI may significantly transform China's international security policy and the expansion of Beijing's security influence may further intensify the security competition between China and other major powers in the Indo-Pacific region. The article also proposes a new analytical angle for the study of geo-economics that unpacks the role of economic activities and processes in generating geopolitical intentions and catalysing geopolitical competition.




competition

Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US–China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond

6 November 2019 , Volume 96, Number 1

The first issue of International Affairs in 2020 explores the geopolitics of the 'Indo-Pacific' region.

Kai He and Mingjiang Li

As a geographical concept, ‘Indo-Pacific’ has existed for decades. As a political and strategic concept, it has since 2010 gradually become established in the foreign policy lexicon of some countries, especially Australia, India, Japan and the United States. However, China seems to be reluctant to identify itself as part of the Indo-Pacific; Chinese leaders believe that the US-led Indo-Pacific strategy aims to contain China's rise. While the battle between the two geographical concepts ‘Indo-Pacific’ and ‘Asia–Pacific’ may be fairly easily settled in the future, US–China strategic competition has just begun. Will the Indo-Pacific become a battlefield for US–China rivalry? How will China cope with the US ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ (FOIP) strategy? How will other regional actors respond to the US–China strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific? What are the strategic implications of the ‘Indo-Pacific’ concept for regional order transformation? How will the Indo-Pacific be institutionalized, economically, politically and strategically? This article introduces the January 2020 special issue of International Affairs, which aims to address those questions, using both country-specific and regional perspectives. Seven articles focus on the policy responses of major players (Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan and ASEAN) to the US FOIP strategy and related US–China rivalry in the region. A further three articles examine the profound implications of Indo-Pacific dynamics for regional institution-building and for geopolitical and geo-economic architecture.




competition

US–China Strategic Competition: The Quest for Global Technological Leadership

7 November 2019

The current dispute between the US and China goes far beyond trade tariffs and tit-for-tat reprisals: the underlying driver is a race for global technological supremacy. This paper examines the risks of greater strategic competition as well as potential solutions for mitigating the impacts of the US–China economic confrontation.

Marianne Schneider-Petsinger

Senior Research Fellow, US and the Americas Programme

Dr Jue Wang

Associate Fellow, Asia-Pacific Programme (based in Holland)

Dr Yu Jie

Senior Research Fellow on China, Asia-Pacific Programme

James Crabtree

Associate Fellow, Asia-Pacific Programme

Video: Marianne Schneider-Petsinger and Dr Yu Jie discuss key themes from the research paper

Summary

  • The underlying driver of the ongoing US–China trade war is a race for global technological dominance. President Trump has raised a number of issues regarding trade with China – including the US’s trade deficit with China and the naming of China as a currency manipulator. But at the heart of the ongoing tariff escalation are China’s policies and practices regarding forced technology transfer, intellectual property theft and non-market distortions.
  • As China’s international influence has expanded it has always been unlikely that Beijing would continue to accept existing global standards and institutions established and widely practised by developed countries based on ‘the Washington Consensus’.
  • China’s desire to be an alternative champion of technology standard-setting remains unfulfilled. Its ample innovation talent is a solid foundation in its quest for global technology supremacy but tightening controls over personal freedoms could undermine it and deter potential global partners.
  • It is unclear if Chinese government interventions will achieve the technological self-sufficiency Beijing has long desired. China’s approach to macroeconomic management diverges significantly from that of the US and other real market economies, particularly in its policy towards nurturing innovation.
  • Chinese actors are engaged in the globalization of technological innovation through exports and imports of high-tech goods and services; cross-border investments in technology companies and research and development (R&D) activities; cross-border R&D collaboration; and international techno-scientific research collaboration.
  • While the Chinese state pushes domestic companies and research institutes to engage in the globalization of technological innovation, its interventions in the high-tech sector have caused uneasiness in the West.
  • The current US response to its competition with China for technological supremacy, which leans towards decoupling, is unlikely to prove successful. The US has better chances of success if it focuses on America’s own competitiveness, works on common approaches to technology policy with like-minded partners around the globe and strengthens the international trading system.
  • A technically sound screening mechanism of foreign investment can prevent normal cross-border collaboration in technological innovation from being misused by geopolitical rival superpowers.




competition

US–China Strategic Competition: The Quest for Global Technological Leadership

7 November 2019

The current dispute between the US and China goes far beyond trade tariffs and tit-for-tat reprisals: the underlying driver is a race for global technological supremacy. This paper examines the risks of greater strategic competition as well as potential solutions for mitigating the impacts of the US–China economic confrontation.

Marianne Schneider-Petsinger

Senior Research Fellow, US and the Americas Programme

Dr Jue Wang

Associate Fellow, Asia-Pacific Programme (based in Holland)

Dr Yu Jie

Senior Research Fellow on China, Asia-Pacific Programme

James Crabtree

Associate Fellow, Asia-Pacific Programme

Video: Marianne Schneider-Petsinger and Dr Yu Jie discuss key themes from the research paper

Summary

  • The underlying driver of the ongoing US–China trade war is a race for global technological dominance. President Trump has raised a number of issues regarding trade with China – including the US’s trade deficit with China and the naming of China as a currency manipulator. But at the heart of the ongoing tariff escalation are China’s policies and practices regarding forced technology transfer, intellectual property theft and non-market distortions.
  • As China’s international influence has expanded it has always been unlikely that Beijing would continue to accept existing global standards and institutions established and widely practised by developed countries based on ‘the Washington Consensus’.
  • China’s desire to be an alternative champion of technology standard-setting remains unfulfilled. Its ample innovation talent is a solid foundation in its quest for global technology supremacy but tightening controls over personal freedoms could undermine it and deter potential global partners.
  • It is unclear if Chinese government interventions will achieve the technological self-sufficiency Beijing has long desired. China’s approach to macroeconomic management diverges significantly from that of the US and other real market economies, particularly in its policy towards nurturing innovation.
  • Chinese actors are engaged in the globalization of technological innovation through exports and imports of high-tech goods and services; cross-border investments in technology companies and research and development (R&D) activities; cross-border R&D collaboration; and international techno-scientific research collaboration.
  • While the Chinese state pushes domestic companies and research institutes to engage in the globalization of technological innovation, its interventions in the high-tech sector have caused uneasiness in the West.
  • The current US response to its competition with China for technological supremacy, which leans towards decoupling, is unlikely to prove successful. The US has better chances of success if it focuses on America’s own competitiveness, works on common approaches to technology policy with like-minded partners around the globe and strengthens the international trading system.
  • A technically sound screening mechanism of foreign investment can prevent normal cross-border collaboration in technological innovation from being misused by geopolitical rival superpowers.




competition

The Belt and Road Initiative: geo-economics and Indo-Pacific security competition

8 January 2020 , Volume 96, Number 1

Mingjiang Li

The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been regarded by international society as a major policy tool in China's geo-economic strategy. Under this policy platform, Beijing has pledged to invest billions of dollars in the infrastructure and industrial sectors across Eurasia and in the Indo-Pacific nations. It is widely believed that such huge amount of investment will inevitably generate significant geostrategic repercussions in these regions. In response to the BRI, the United States and other powers have come up with a ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ strategy. This article attempts to address the following question: what impact is the BRI likely to have on the security ties between China and the other major players in the Indo-Pacific? The author finds that the BRI may significantly transform China's international security policy and the expansion of Beijing's security influence may further intensify the security competition between China and other major powers in the Indo-Pacific region. The article also proposes a new analytical angle for the study of geo-economics that unpacks the role of economic activities and processes in generating geopolitical intentions and catalysing geopolitical competition.




competition

Understanding the dynamics of the Indo-Pacific: US–China strategic competition, regional actors, and beyond

6 November 2019 , Volume 96, Number 1

The first issue of International Affairs in 2020 explores the geopolitics of the 'Indo-Pacific' region.

Kai He and Mingjiang Li

As a geographical concept, ‘Indo-Pacific’ has existed for decades. As a political and strategic concept, it has since 2010 gradually become established in the foreign policy lexicon of some countries, especially Australia, India, Japan and the United States. However, China seems to be reluctant to identify itself as part of the Indo-Pacific; Chinese leaders believe that the US-led Indo-Pacific strategy aims to contain China's rise. While the battle between the two geographical concepts ‘Indo-Pacific’ and ‘Asia–Pacific’ may be fairly easily settled in the future, US–China strategic competition has just begun. Will the Indo-Pacific become a battlefield for US–China rivalry? How will China cope with the US ‘free and open Indo-Pacific’ (FOIP) strategy? How will other regional actors respond to the US–China strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific? What are the strategic implications of the ‘Indo-Pacific’ concept for regional order transformation? How will the Indo-Pacific be institutionalized, economically, politically and strategically? This article introduces the January 2020 special issue of International Affairs, which aims to address those questions, using both country-specific and regional perspectives. Seven articles focus on the policy responses of major players (Australia, China, India, Indonesia, Japan and ASEAN) to the US FOIP strategy and related US–China rivalry in the region. A further three articles examine the profound implications of Indo-Pacific dynamics for regional institution-building and for geopolitical and geo-economic architecture.




competition

CBD Communiqué: Young Talent Recognised in Global Photography Competition.




competition

CBD Communiqué: Winners announced: Young Hands Together for Diversity International Biodiversity Art Competition.




competition

CBD News: Young people from around the world are encouraged to submit videos for the 2019 Global Youth Video Competition showcasing positive solutions on three themes: Nature-based Solutions for Food and Human Health; Cities and Local Action to Combat Cli




competition

Kohl & Frisch: A Prescription for Competition

How can Canadian pharmaceutical wholesaler Kohl & Frisch deploy its new market clout after acquiring a key competitor?




competition

Competition Policy

Conference

Need for a paradigm shift?

23 May 2019 - 9:30am to 5:30pm

Chatham House, London

Overview

Agenda

Speakers

Pricing and booking information

Sponsors

Media partners and supporting organizations

Venue and accommodation

Press registration

Contact us

Models for antitrust policy and competition regulation have traditionally been guided by principles that have prioritized consumer welfare standards, albeit according to varied interpretations, and antitrust has often been seen as disconnected from mainstream public interest and political debate. But what can lawmakers and regulators do to meet the challenges of the political trend of populism that is prevailing in many developed economies? What should competition regulators do in response to the idea that the consumer welfare standard should be replaced – or supplemented – with another standard, or more broadly interpreted to allow consideration of consumer welfare effects that go beyond price, including the surrender by consumers of their personal data?  

In this context the annual Chatham House Competition Policy conference will assess how a range of public interest considerations — such as unemployment, discrimination or protection of small businesses — and rapidly evolving marketplaces, are reshaping thinking on antitrust policy and the regulation of markets to the extent that changes to the scope and nature of the consumer welfare standard are being advocated.

Discussion themes include:

  • A consumer welfare approach versus market regulation
  • Potential changes to the consumer welfare approach to encompass concerns other than price-related effects
  • Advances in technology and the rise of new and unseen competition concerns 
  • The realities of AI and big data for competition and market regulation
  • What do these potential changes and new market realities mean for the consistency and predictability of antitrust decisions and business certainty
  • To what extent do public interest considerations and wider trade issues impact on international cooperation between antitrust regulators

Continuing Professional Development 
6 CPD hours are available for delegates attending this event, as per the Bar Standards Board’s CPD Provider Accreditation Scheme. For professionals regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, 6 CPD hours are available for delegates that remain opted into the 16 hours annual CPD requirement.

The Chatham House Rule 
To enable as open a debate as possible, this conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule.

Twitter 
@CH_Events
#CHCompetition

Thursday 23 May
0930

Welcome and Chair's opening remarks
Howard Shelanski, Professor of Law, Georgetown University; Partner, Davis Polk & Wardwell   

Session One | Competition Policy and Regulation: Pressures in a Globalised Economy
1000-1110

This opening session will assess the current political and economic dynamics that are shaping the decision-making environment for competition policy and regulation, and how in the context of the ongoing globalisation of the world economy, the pressures and expectations of populist movements along with rising trade tensions may influence the principles of competition policy and regulation across developed and developing countries.

Chair
Howard Shelanski, Professor of Law, Georgetown University; Partner, Davis Polk & Wardwell   

Speakers
Andreas Mundt, President, Bundeskartellamt
Rebecca Slaughter, Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission
Sarah Cardell, General Counsel, Competition and Markets Authority
Liyuan Wang, State Administration for Market Regulation, China

Questions and discussion

1110 – 1130 Refreshments

Session Two | Merger Control in an Environment of Trade Tensions and Populist Challenges
1130–1300

  • How should competition authorities react to growing calls for them to take a tougher stance in relation to mergers and acquisitions in the face of increasing market concentration and the rise of common ownership?
  • Do big businesses cause problems beyond their effects on competition?  If so, are antitrust laws the cure?
  • To what extent should competition authorities have greater ability to intervene to protect smaller companies, or prevent their acquisition, where competition is not (yet) threatened?
  • Where competition authorities do intervene, how should they ensure that they do not stifle investment or discourage innovation?
  • Should competition authorities assess mergers on public interest grounds, including how mergers impact on labour markets or national security?  Should they be asking whether mergers will reduce competition for employees?
  • How should competition authorities respond to calls for the promotion of national champions or other protectionist tendencies?

Chair
Jorge Padilla, Senior Managing Director and Head, Compass Lexecon Europe

Speakers
Cecilio Madero Villarejo, Deputy Director-General, DG Competition, European Commission
Amelia Fletcher, Professor of Competition Policy, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia
Aaron Hoag, Chief, Technology and Financial Services Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Wolfgang Heckenberger, Chief Counsel Competition, Siemens
Alex Nourry, Partner, Clifford Chance

Questions and discussion

1300 – 1400 Lunch

Session Three | Antitrust Tools and the Challenges of the Digital Economy
1400–1540

  • Does the current antitrust framework need to be supplemented by regulation, inter alia to ensure common standards on transparency and fairness of online platforms?
  • Is there a risk that undue intervention by competition authorities or regulation will hurt innovation and destroy incentives for new entrants to emerge capable of challenging incumbents?
  • Does the possession of so-called Big Data give rise to barriers to entry or more efficient and innovative markets?
  • Whilst the use of pricing algorithms can benefit consumers, how concerned should competition authorities be about the possibility that algorithms might facilitate collusive outcomes and lead to higher prices for consumers?
  • Is there any reason to be concerned about the ability of firms to innovate without fear of undue enforcement, particularly given the special duty ascribed to dominant companies as regards their competitors and consumers?

Chair
Thomas Vinje, Partner, Chairman, Global Antitrust Group, Clifford Chance

Speakers
Jason Furman, Professor of the Practice of Economic Policy, Harvard Kennedy School
Tommaso Valletti, Chief Competition Economist, European Commission
Heike Schweitzer, Professor, Humboldt University
David Sevy, Executive Vice President, Compass Lexecon
Horacio Gutierrez, General Counsel, VP Business & Legal Affairs, Spotify

Questions and discussion

1540 – 1610 Afternoon refreshments

Session Four | International Co-operation Between Competition Authorities: Ensuring Consistent and Effective Enforcement in Interconnected Economy
1600–1730

  • How can the compatibility of procedural and substantive competition rules be maintained, along with legal certainty and predictability, in the face of the growing divergence in trade and industrial policies and conflicting public interest goals?
  • To what extent, if any, could the promotion of best practices and substantive convergence in competition enforcement through multi-lateral organisations such as the OECD and the ICN be enhanced?
  • What other steps could be taken to increase co-operation and coordination in the enforcement of the competition rules such as, for example, the development of international standards for comity, systems of mutual recognition of decisions of other authorities or deference to a lead authority?
  • Is bi-lateral and multi-lateral cooperation sufficient to ensure effective and consistent enforcement or is there a greater need for supra-national authorities, at least, regionally, if not internationally?
  • Can or should WTO rules play a greater role in ensuring a level playing field and thereby removing the incentives for divergence in the scope and enforcement of the competition rules?

Chair
Sean Ennis, Director, Centre for Competition Policy and Professor of Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

Speakers
Isolde Goggin, Chairperson of the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, Ireland
João Paulo Resende, Commissioner, Administrative Council for Economic Defense, Brazil 
Gabriel Harnier, Head of Law, Patents & Compliance, Bayer
Avaantika Kakkar, Partner, Head of Competition Practice, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Questions and discussion

1730 Close of conference and drinks reception

© The Royal Institute of International Affairs 2019

Speakers

Sarah Cardell

General Counsel, CMA

Sean Ennis

Director, Centre for Competition Policy and Professor of Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

Amelia Fletcher

Professor of Competition Policy at the Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia

Jason Furman

Professor of the Practice of Economic Policy, Harvard Kennedy School

Isolde Goggin

Chairperson, Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, Ireland

Horacio Gutierrez

General Counsel and VP Business & Legal Affairs, Spotify

Gabriel Harnier

General Counsel, Bayer

Wolfgang Heckenberger

Senior Competition Advisor, Siemens

Aaron Hoag

Chief, Technology and Financial Services Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice

Avaantika Kakkar

Partner, Head of Competition Practice, Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas

Andreas Mundt

President, Bundeskartellamt

Alex Nourry

Partner, Clifford Chance

Dr Jorge Padilla

Senior Managing Director and Head, Compass Lexecon Europe

João Paulo Resende

Commissioner, Administrative Council for Economic Defense, Brazil

Heike Schweitzer

Professor of Competition, Humboldt University

David Sevy

Executive Vice President, Compass Lexecon

Howard Shelanski

Professor of Law, Georgetown University; Partner, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

Rebecca Slaughter

Commissioner, Federal Trade Commission

Tommaso Valletti

Chief Competition Economist, European Commission

Cecilio Madero Villarejo

Deputy Director-General, DG Competition, European Commission

Thomas Vinje

Partner and Chairman, Global Antitrust Group, Clifford Chance

Liyuan Wang

Deputy Director, State Administration for Market Regulation, China

General Counsel of major companies may register at the standard government department rate.

Ways to book:

  1. Online: Click here to complete the online registration form
  2. Phone: Call Boudicca Georgii Hellberg on +44 (0)20 7314 2785
  3. Email/Post: Download a PDF registration form, complete and return to Boudicca Georgii Hellberg via email or post: Chatham House, 10 St. James's Square, London, SW1Y 4LE

Check if your organization is a member of Chatham House here.

 RATE (+VAT):
Partners and major corporate members 
All organizations£595
Standard corporate members 
Commercial organizations£1,180
Government departments/agencies/intergovernmental organizations£700
NGOs/academic institutions/associations (including not for profits and registered charities)£460
Non-members 
Commercial organizations£1,295
Government departments/agencies/intergovernmental organizations£750
NGOs/academic insitutions/associations (including not for profits and registered charities)£510

Your delegate pass includes:

  • Conference attendance
  • Documentation
  • Lunch and refreshments

Travel and accommodation are not included.

If you are interested in becoming a sponsor for this event, please contact Kamil Hussain on +44 (0)20 7957 5783

If you are interested in becoming a media partner or supporting organization for this event, please contact Ayesha Arif on +44 (0)20 7957 5753

Chatham House
10 St James's Square
London
SW1Y 4LE
UK
conferences@chathamhouse.org

Telephone: +44 (0)20 7957 5643
Fax: +44 (0)20 7957 5710

If you wish to book the venue for your own event please phone +44 (0)20 7314 2764

Directions
The nearest tube station is Piccadilly Circus which is on the Piccadilly and the Bakerloo Underground lines. From Piccadilly follow Regent Street southwards towards Pall Mall and take the first road on the right called Jermyn Street. Duke of York Street is the second road on the left and leads to St James's Square. Chatham House is immediately on your right.

Map

Accommodation
Although we cannot book accommodation for delegates, we have arranged a reduced rate at some nearby hotels, where you can book your own accommodation. Please inform the hotel that you will be attending a conference at Chatham House (The Royal Institute of International Affairs) to qualify for the Institute's reduced rate.

Please note all rates are subject to availability.

Flemings Mayfair
13 Half Moon Street
Mayfair
London - W1J 7BH

Tel: + 44 (0)20 7499 2964
Fax: + 44 (0)20 7499 1817
reservations@flemings.co.uk

Classic Double without breakfast: £195 +VAT

The Cavendish London
81 Jermyn Street
London - SW1U 6JF

Tel: + 44 (0)20 7930 2111
Fax: + 44 (0)20 7839 2125
enquiry.cavendish@the-ascott.com 

Classic Room without breakfast: £195 +VAT

Book The Cavendish online

The Stafford London 
St James's Place
London - SW1A 1NJ

Tel: 020 7493 0111
Fax: 020 7493 7121
​reservations@thestaffordlondon.com

Classic Queen without breakfast: £247 +VAT
Quote Chatham House

This conference will be held under the Chatham House Rule. Information for journalists.

Press can request a press pass.

For enquiries relating to the conference agenda or sponsorship please call Kamil Hussain on +44 (0) 20 7957 5783

For registration enquiries please call Boudicca Georgii Hellberg on +44 (0)20 7314 2785

For general enquiries please email conferences@chathamhouse.org 

Department/project