On BJP allegation that the Congress government is not been able to manage its guarantee schemes, Mr. Shivakumar said that Karnataka’s financial strength is stronger than the country’s financial strength

The MLA says it appears govt has no funds to install planks of vented dams

Mamidala Jagadesh Kumar asks youth to be proud of Indian culture and civilisation

KIK is Rajesh’s seventh film and it’s amusing to see how little his cinema has evolved.

Jayakumar Gopinath talks about Pulluvanpattu, the ritualistic art form of Kerala that sings songs for the snake gods, and how his community is trying to preserve it

The country has so far won six gold, nine silver and 11 bronze medals to achieve its best-ever haul at a single edition of the Paralympic Games

The Housing Minister is already facing flak for the wakf controversy that has snowballed into a big issue in Karnataka

Housing Minister’s remarks about colour of skin of Union Minister H. D. Kumaraswamy had drawn criticism from BJP and JD(S)

“I received a lot of phone calls from Gautam bhai and Surya, telling me what to work on,” says the Kerala batter, after his century against South Africa

Mr. Sukumaran, when asked why he chose the Conservative Party, says, “because we’re the one party that really values individual freedom over the collectivist approach of the left”

It’s necessary to adapt to the conditions well, be one step ahead in the challenging longest format; can’t bat like how you would in a T20 but at the same time, intent is imperative; you can’t go into the game and ponder too much, just have to go out, put your heart into it and enjoy it

The neice of Tanguturi Prakasam Pantulu brought much popularity to the song written by Sankarambadi Sundarachari

UGC Chairman Jagadesh Kumar emphasises that board exams are not likely to be made irrelevant in light of the decline in pass percentage in CBSE class 12 exams this year

Moka Vijay Kumar’s painting celebrates cultural unity across Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, and Chhattisgarh

Will Akki, who remade Vijay's Thuppakki in Hindi as Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty, thwart SRK?

Shocked by the sudden demise of the popular lyricist, the Tamil film industry took to Twitter to express their grief.

Kadavul Irukaan Kumarui is plain annoying, warns S Sarawasthi.

The fashion ‘story tailor’ wants to continue weaving stories with Tamiska

Ceramic artist Rahul Kumar’s tenth solo exhibition, The Untold Resides Somewhere, is a labyrinth of emotive, lexical and metaphorical expressions for “preserving the discarded”

Today, on his 91st birthday, it is obvious that Kishore Kumar will forever win the hearts of people of all generations

The Janata Dal-Secular demanded that the Congress government should sack Khan from the Cabinet for his racist slur.

Shah Rukh Khan’s last film, Zero, released in December 2018 after which he went on a long sabbatical. He has been reading scripts and even shortlisted a few of them. Meanwhile, the names of a lot of filmmakers did the rounds with whom the superstar was supposedly working with. However, of late, it has come to light that SRK is working with blockbuster filmmaker Rajkumar Hirani in his next directorial flick. Recently, while answering a fan question, he also let out a strong hint that he has indeed given his nod to Rajkumar Hirani’s flick. And naturally, it led to a lot of excitement among fans.

While not much is known about the film and its subject, Bollywood Hungama has exclusively learnt that for this venture, Rajkumar Hirani and his frequent collaborator writer Abhijat Joshi have been joined by Kanika Dhillon. She has become quite well known of late thanks to her work in films like Manmarziyaan (2018), Kedarnath (2018), Judgmentall Hai Kya (2019) and the web film Guilty (2020). Interestingly, in the beginning of her career, she had extensively worked with SRK’s Red Chillies Entertainment. She worked as an assistant director on SRK’s 2007 blockbuster Om Shanti Om. She wrote the screenplay of Ra.One (2011) and additional screenplay of Always Kabhi Kabhi (2011). Rajkumar Hirani’s next hence marks Kanika’s reunion with Shah Rukh and Red Chillies Entertainment after almost 9 years.

A source close to the project says, “Kanika Dhillon has come on-board and she along with Rajkumar Hirani and Abhijat Joshi are busy scripting the film. Kanika is mainly scripting while Rajkumar and Abhijat are helping her with inputs. They are hoping to finish in a month or two. The film was to go on floors in August but due to the lockdown, it seems that the shoot will be pushed ahead.”

Rajkumar Hirani’s last film, Sanju, released in 2018 and was based on the controversial life of actor Sanjay Dutt. Starring Ranbir Kapoor, this flick emerged as the biggest hit of that year, earning Rs. 342.53 crores. Hirani, in fact, holds the envious record of not giving a single flop as a director. The source assures, “His film with Shah Rukh Khan too seems to be shaping up well, at the writing stage. And Rajkumar-Abhijat-Kanika collaboration has added a lot to the script and it’ll be something to watch out for.”

Also Read: Post Manmarziyaan, Taapsee Pannu and Kanika Dhillon reunite for Haseen Dillruba

Karisma Kapoor has been sharing a lot of throwback pictures these days. The latest one she shared was from a movie and even Karisma Kapoor doesn't know which movie the picture is from. She captioned her image as, "I

Each and every minute detail of Allu Arjun's Pushpa has left the fans super excited, ever since the inception. The movie is said to be an action thriller, wherein Allu Arjun will be seen doing some high-octane action sequences. Well, if

Director Sukumar recently got emotional, as his longtime friend and manager Prasad suddenly passed away due to heart attack last month. His sudden demise literally broke Sukumar and he still hasn't recovered from the shock. Sadly, due to the lockdown, he

Apart from Akshay, his wife Twinkle Khanna also shared a photo of herself lying on the grass with her veteran actor mother Dimple Kapadia and daughter Nitara.

There is nothing further the government can do, Kumar said, adding that there is liquidity, partial credit enhancement and interest rates have moderated. Asked about the progress made in the resolution of stressed NBFC Dewan Housing Finance (DHFL), Kumar said: “That you should ask the company.”

Kumar said as long as the lockdown continues, economic activity will remain tepid, but "demand should be there in the economy" and the question of logistics can be taken care of. The SBI chairman also said complete easing of the curbs is still some time away.

Who used to be known as Dileep Kumar, and is now married to Saira Banu?

Workoutable © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic

The petitioner is an accused in Samastipur Town P.S. Case No. 269 of 2018, registered for the offences punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19079 of 2020(2) dt.09-04-2020 2/6 Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

My attention has been drawn by Mr. Rakesh Chander Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, to page 34 of the present application which is the written statement of the informant and the basis for registration of the First Information Report. It is alleged in the written statement that the informant runs a business in the name and style of Maa Vaishnav Galla Bhandar at Samastipur and deals in supply of mustard oil and other edible oils. The petitioner is the Director of S.B.O. Exports Private Limited, New Delhi. Certain supply was made by the informant to the Company for a sum of Rs.4,96,897/-. The petitioner, in his capacity as Director of the Company, had allegedly issued and delivered, at Samastipur, a cheque on 18.06.2018 in favour of the informant of the said amount of Rs.4,96,897/- for having delivered edible oils to the petitioner. The petitioner had requested the informant to present the cheque for encashment in July, 2018. Allegedly, when he presented the cheque, the same stood dishonoured because of insufficiency of fund in the account of the petitioner. There is statement made by the informant that on the petitioner's request, he had again deposited the cheque for encashment, which again Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19079 of 2020(2) dt.09-04-2020 3/6 stood dishonoured for the same reason. Requisite statutory notice was issued to the petitioner for payment of the amount in question. The petitioner, however, did not pay the amount, which compelled the informant to lodge the First Information Report, the informant alleges.

No one appears on behalf of State as copy of the petition has not been served in the Office of Advocate General.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the regular bail petition in the Office of Advocate General through email i.e. advocategeneralbihar@gmail.com.

List this case on 15.04.2020 at 11:00 am.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/-

U

It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that he is 62 years old and is hypertensive, diabetic and cardiac patient having blockage of 85 to 100 per cent and has been advised by- pass surgery.

It is submitted that due to outbreak of COVID-19 Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3391 of 2019(12) dt.10-04-2020 2/3 Pandemic, risk of petitioner being infected by the Corona virus is very high in view of his ill health and congested conditions of jail at present, as such he may be released on provisional bail for a period of 8 weeks, so, that he may live in isolation for said period and get proper treatment. Petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2017.

This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No. 15 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Father of the alleged victim is the informant and it appears from the First Information Report that the contents of the written statement of the informant are based on the information, which he had allegedly gathered from the victim on mobile-phone on 16.01.2020. It is alleged in the First Information Report that the informant's daughter had gone to attend her school on 09.01.2020, where she was studying in Class XII, but she did not return home, thereafter. According to the informant, a co-accused Vidyo Kumar Rai had kidnapped in the informant's daughter and the petitioner and another co- accused had accompanied the main accused.

The matter has been listed under the heading 'For Orders' under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Vide order dated 04.03.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66603 of 2019, the petitioner was granted bail in connection with Hussainganj P.S. Case No. 282 of 2018 giving rise to Sessions Trial No. 194/2019 to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Siwan but inadvertently in the last paragraph of order dated 04.03.2020, in place of Sessions Trial No. 194/2019, the same had been typed as Sessions Trial No. 194/2009.

Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P.N.Shahi, learned Additional Advocate General for the State along with Mr. Sanjay Pandey, learned counsel of the Board.

In this application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner has sought for modification in the order dated 31.01.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No.67419 of 2019 whereby a Bench of this Court had granted provisional bail to the petitioner in connection with Sastri Nagar P.S.Case No.733 of 2019 on fulfilling certain conditions and the provisional bail was to be confirmed only after fulfillment of the remaining part of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19089 of 2020(2) dt.27-04-2020 2/4 terms.

List this case on 11.05.2020, in order to enable learned counsel for the State to file counter affidavit.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/-

U

----Petitioner Versus State, Through P.p.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/05/2020 Lawyers are not appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor through Jitsi Meet Application.

The present second bail application has been filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No. 283/2019, Police Station Surajpol, District Udaipur for the offence under Section 457, 380 IPC.

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : None present

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR Order 08/05/2020 Lawyers are not appearing in the Court in view of the unprecedented situation being faced by the country due to pandemic of novel corona virus (COVID-19).

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor through Jitsi Meet Application.

----Petitioner Versus State

----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : O;fDr"k% dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA For Respondent(s) : O;fDr"k% dksbZ mifLFkr ughaA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA Order 08/05/2020 fo'o LokLF; laxBu ¼MCY;w- ,p-vks-½] jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ,oa dsUnzh; ,oa jkT; ljdkj }kjk uksoy dksjksuk ok;jl ¼dksfoM&19½ds xaHkhj egkekjh ,oa laØe.k dks QSyus ls jksdus ,oa fu;a=.k ds fy;s tkjh ,Mokbtjh ds dkj.k izdj.k esa izkFkhZ dh vksj ls fo}ku~ vf/koDrk Jh jkds"k eVksfj;k ,oa fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vfuy tks"kh dks tfj;s fofM;ks dkWy lquk x;kA izkFkhZ ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd vfHk;qDr eqds"k dh tekur gks pqdh gS ftlds c;ku ds vk/kkj ij izkFkhZ dks eqyfte cuk;k x;k gSA blds foijhr fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tkfgj fd;k x;k fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr ls 118-5 fdyks MksMk iksLr dh cjkenxh gqbZ gS tks fd okf.kfT;d ek=k gSA vfHk;qDr eqds"k dk izFke tekur izkFkZuk i= fnukad 06-03-2019 dks pkyku izLrqr gksus ds i"pkr~ iqu^% tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dh NwV nsrs gq;s uksV izsl djus ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk nwljk tekur izkFkZuk i= fnukad 24-05-2019 dks lhtj vkWfQlj lquhy dqekj ds c;ku gksus ds i"pkr~ iqu% tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr djus dh NwV nsrs gq;s uksV izsl djus ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA (Downloaded on 08/05/2020 at 08:28:14 PM) (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3497/2020] lhtj lquhy dqekj ds c;kuksa esa vfHk;qDr eqds"k ds lEcU/k esa vk;s rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij r`rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= fnukad 22-07-2019 dks Lohdkj fd;k x;k gSA xkSjryc gS fd ml le; eqds"k ds fo:) pkyku izLrqr fd;k x;k Fkk ijUrq izkFkhZ&eqyfte ds fo:) /kkjk 173¼8½ n.M izfØ;k lafgrk ds rgr pkyku yafcr j[kk x;k Fkk D;ksafd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku iq'isUnzflag o lqHkk'kpUnz }kjk fd;k x;k Fkk] vr% izkFkhZ dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus ls iwoZ bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk ikfjr vkns"k fnukad 16-04-2020 dh vuqikyuk djok;k tkuk vko";d izrhr gksrk gSA fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd dks funsZf"kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkxkeh is"kh ls iwoZ mDr vkns"k dh vuqikyuk lqfuf"pr dh tkosA i=koyh fnukad 15-05-2020 dks lwphc) dh tk;sA (DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J 2-/AK (Downloaded on 08/05/2020 at 08:28:14 PM) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

2. The present appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 has been filed by the appellant, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 21.9.2010 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court no.7, Mathura in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.239 of 2008 (Virendra Kumar vs. Vijay Kumar and others) awarding a sum of Rs.62,866/- for the expenses incurred towards medicines and treatment of the injuries sustained by the appellant in a motor accident, alongwith 6% interest from the date of filing of the claim petition till the date of payment of compensation.

3. The claimant aged 45 years filed MAC No.239 of 2008 against the driver & owner of the vehicle and the insurance company before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Court No.7, Mathura claiming a compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- along with 12% interest in respect of the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident alleged to have occurred on 17.2.2008 around 12.30 p.m.

By around 7:30 PM on 3-8- 2002, the Sub Inspector of Police, Chandera Police Station (PW1) received secret information that a person by name Anil Kumar (appellant) would be reaching the bus waiting shed situated at Matlayi by around 8:30 PM for the purpose of selling the opium in his possession. Immediately, PW1 recorded the information in the General Diary, intimated his Superior Officer, the Circle Inspector of Police, Nileshwaram and proceeded to the spot. The police party lay in wait near the bus waiting shed and by around 8:45 PM, the appellant reached the spot in an autorikshaw and entered the bus waiting shed. Immediately, the Police party rushed to the waiting shed and on the Crl.A.244/06 3 appellant attempting to flee, apprehended him. PW1 thereupon, asked the appellant whether he required the presence of a Gazetted Officer while his body was searched and on the appellant answering in the negative, his body was searched and a plastic packet recovered from the pocket of his pants. On examination, the packet was found to contain opium, for the possession of which the appellant had no licence. The opium was weighed and found to be 350 gms in weight. Two samples of 25 gms each, were collected from the contraband and were packed and sealed separately. The remaining opium was also packed and sealed in the same manner. Ext.P3 seizure mahazar was prepared and the accused was arrested. Exhibit P4 FIR was registered thereafter. Later, Exhibit P8 chemical analysis report was received finding the sample to be opium.

Ordered accordingly.

(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE Jammu 04.05.2020 Paramjeet Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No. Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No PARAMJEET SINGH 2020.05.05 12:20 I am approving this document