It’s almost comforting that such invidious fluffy-minded sludge as this is floating around, as it seems, like religion, to keep the middle-brows hypnotized by “beautiful sentiments” which are so vague as to keep them from actually getting together and doing anything. It’s sort of weird to hear this weakly Marxist social-democratic pap which used to be shouted from the rooftops now being whispered in a low monotonous whine. The author avows his fealty to Jeremy Bentham, not Marx, and calls it utilitarianism not Marxism, but there are many illegitimate fathers along this line of thought.

The root of the idea is that, now that neuroscience has supposedly made it possible to actually identify what makes us happy, the idea of happiness has become quantifiable, and hence a program of providing the greatest happiness to the greatest number of people has become objectively possible. However, the author does not make the slightest effort to apply these wonders of modern science to actually determining what the alleged sources of human happiness are. The neuroscience tack is really just a defensive ploy to ward off the eternal charges that utilitarinism is simply a euphemism for an authoritarian imposition of values. As for espousing his positive program for what constitutes human happiness, it is simply the usual liberal middle-class canards, with not surprisingly a socialist edge: more time to spend with family, a decent wage for everyone, blah blah blah. But he seems to make two pretty criminally unsubstantiated assumptions: one is these sources are essentially the same for everyone, or at least could be under certain conditions, and the other is that they do not inherently conflict with anyone else’s.

I say under certain conditions could be, because in evaluating our current society he seems to privilege envy of other’s material well-being as the principal determinant of happiness. His theory is that above a certain level of material subsistence people are motivated primarily by status-seeking and the desire for a high rank within their social group. Therefore, the increasing wealth of the society will not increase happiness because people measure their well-being relative to the group, not by their absolute prosperity. This is always been a flaw in the concept of the “war against poverty”; I’m not sure it’s much of an argument for socialist economic redistribution. But actually if you read his section on the value of income taxes carefully, he doesn’t even seem to be arguing that they are useful insofar as they can be redirected to the less prosperous, although he does evidently believe that a certain amount of money contributes more to the happiness of a poor person than to a rich one’s. Rather, he seems to think that taking money away from the properous is valuable in and of itself, because it will supposedly make them less focused on the “rat race,” more family-oriented, etc., etc. In short he seems to be advocating a net impoverishment of society.

All of which may be consistent with the program of a good little socialist, but does not necessarily accord marvelously with his own evidence about the supposedly quantified happiness of humanity. The research that he cites non-specifically supposedly indicates that people’s feeling of happiness has not risen in the last half-century, but he does not cite anything which indicates that it has necessarily declined. He cites rising rates of depression and crime as presumably implicit indicators of greater unhappiness, but he does not seem to acknowledge the possibility that in our hyper-medicated and surveillance-based society perhaps people simply report depression and crime more. In any event, if roughly similar numbers of people today as in the ‘50’s report themselves happy (and we believe them), despite the increase in prosperity, that might perhaps indicate that happiness is not fixed to material well-being. Which may be consistent with his general point, but not with his idea of increasing happiness by manipulating income levels.

And even if it did, it seems rather difficult to countenance any social program predicated upon appealing to one of humanity’s most depraved instincts, namely envy. The author acknowledges that his ideal of taxation is mainly motivated by the desire to pander to people’s envy, but he seems to think that their envy will be sated by the loss of prosperity of those around them and that after that point there will be no more. So the envy of the less prosperous will be satisfied by the losses accrued by the more prosperous, which will somehow not be counter-balanced by the chagrin of the more prosperous at the prospect of seeing their status diminished. Very logical.

One of the more egregious presumptions of utilitarians is that non-utilitarian social systems somehow aren’t concerned with seeking the greatest good for the greatest number of people. On the contrary, that’s the defining problem of practically every social and political theory I can think of, and they all either seek or claim to have found the answer—whether such a solution exists, I have my doubts, but that’s why I’m a skeptic about politics. This is a handy trick by utilitarians: they say “I believe in the greatest good for the greatest number of people.” Which is practically begging the question: “As opposed to whom?” It’s useful because it tends to conceal the fact that their real agenda is generally somewhat more specific, and tends to consist in the autocratic notion that one or two measures of social living can be authoritatively determined to be the sources of happiness, and then divided up in a centralized fashion. Those that are the most insistent on the idea of liberty are generally those that are the most skeptical about the possibility of the notion of happiness being either quantitatively defined or generalizable. In other words, only indviduals can determine their own sources of happiness.

For the author, on the other hand, the fact that certain stimuli trigger certain areas of the brain at the times when test subjects profess pleasure has solved the problem of determining happiness. Of course, as mentioned, he never really bothers with the results that those studies have yielded. Somehow the fact that he considers envy to be a principal element of human happiness does not place very severe limits on the harmoniousness of individual happiness. Nor does it constitute a tyranny of the majority, because he claims that in an ideal utilitarian society the happiness of the most unhappy would be considered of pre-eminent importance. Of course, at the beginning of the article he cited the equal importance of each individual’s happiness as the fouding tenet of his theory, but I’m sure it all sorts out in the end.

Among social factors responsible for unhappiness, he cites divorce and unemployment as of pre-eminent importance. Of course, rates of both divorce and unemployment in the crassly materialistic and religious United States are much lower than in the much more overtly utilitarian-embracing Europe, but it would be a bit embarassing for him to admit this after avowing that all traditional value-systems outside of utilitarianism and “individualism” are dead.

Personally the question of the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people doesn’t exactly compel me constantly, although the issue of personal happiness tends to impose itself intransigently. I would have thought that evolutionary biology would have provided an adequate explanation of this, as well as the recurrence of what we call altruism. But such an idea of course suggests that happiness, whatever that is, is not really the point of our little existences, and that the more imperious competitiveness of life will ultimately subvert all of these little trifles of pleasure and pain. But in the meantime, we have these debased statistical notions of happiness to amuse us in an idle hour.

It seems to me that if one’s “objective” measure of happiness is electrical stimulation in the cerebral cortex, the most efficient utilitarian solution to the problem of human happiness would be strap everyone onto hospital gurneys and stimulate the “happiness” part of their brain all day long. If one does not wish to be this deterministic about it, perhaps one should allow more latitute to individuals to discover their own conception of happiness. Personally, I have found happiness generally to be an idea for the unhappy and something rarely spoken of by the happiness; mention of practically guarantees that it is not present in the environment where it is uttered. I don’t deny that what you might call love is the real bridge between personal happiness and moral obligations, and the only true means by which the desires of oneself and of others are united, but such a sentiment can never be mandated; it is entirely resistant to intellectual compulsion. Utilitarianism, which sometimes does a decent job of faking morality, is nevertheless ultimately predicated on the pleasure principle, and hence is wholly inadequate to uniting the moral and the pleasurable except when love truly pertains. In that case, of course, political theory is entirely superfluous, which is why this is all a waste of time.

p.s. I don’t claim that people’s behavior necessarily reflects what really would make them happy, but presumably it does at least reflect what they consciously value. Hence, if I were the author I would have been a bit skeptical of using the results of “surveys” of what people claim to value when the results don’t correlate with their behavior, i.e. they claim that spending time with family is most important, but they spend a disproportiante amount of time working (at least according to him). So either people are not really being forthright (consciously or unconsciously) in responding to surveys, or there is not actually a problem of priorities. In either case, he’s way over-valuing surveys as a guide to what will make people happy.

Eine Woche nach dem Ampel-Aus gibt es einen Fahrplan, wie es weitergehen soll: Die Union und die Rest-Ampel verständigten sich auf einen Neuwahltermin am 23. Februar. Auch Bundespräsident Steinmeier signalisierte seine Zustimmung.

Gary Chew says FwB is really, really quite bad. But on the brighter side, it does feature Mila Kunis, Justin Timberlake, Woody Harrelson, Patricia Clarkson, Jenna Elfman and Richard Jenkins. Opens wide July 22.

Robert Jernigan Jr. sadly informed us that his dad, who played Captain Ben on KTUL-TV, has passed away. More information in GroupBlog 330.

Provides information on how much water you should drink to maintain proper hydration levels during body cleansing programs and on an on-going basis.

Published at LXer: Similar to the ACPI CPUFreq and AMD/Intel P-State CPU frequency scaling driver and scaling governor benchmarks and power efficiency comparisons I routinely do on Phoronix, when...

Published at LXer: With the Linux 6.12 merge window wrapping up this weekend and the bulk of the new feature merges now in the tree, I've begun running some Linux 6.12 benchmarks. Here is an...

Zwischen allen fröhlichen Gesichtern die auf den Straßen zu sehen sind, treten auch immer jene Menschen in Erscheinung die unglücklich sind. Den Satz: "Ich hasse mein Leben" findet man nicht nur in Sit-Coms, sondern auch in der Realität. Glück ist keine Sache der Intelligenz oder der Bildung und bedeutet für jeden Menschen etwas anderes. Die Zahl des Statistischen Bundesamts aus dem Jahr 2005 zeigt, dass sehr viele Menschen, insgesamt 10.260, durch ihr erlebtes Unglück sogar nur noch den Selbstmord als Ausweg sahen.

Zweimal in der Woche wartet Angelika in Berlin geduldig beim Supermarkt des Vereins ?Lichtenberger Hilfe für Menschen e.V.?. Sie und ihr vierjähriger Sohn Julian zählen zu den rund 1.100 vom Verein registrierten Familien, die dort günstig Lebensmittel und Kleidung einkaufen können ? und günstig heißt in diesem Fall 90 Cent pro Tüte.

Der US-amerikanische Präsidentschaftskandidat Ben Carson vertritt eine abenteuerliche Theorie über die ägyptischen Pyramiden: nach seiner Überzeugung dienten diese als Getreidespeicher. Diese Theorie verkündete er bereits im Jahre 1998 und wiederholte sie vor kurzem gegenüber dem Nachrichtensender CBS. Bis 2013 war er der heute 64jährige Carson als Facharzt für Neurochirurgie tätig ...

In a surprising turn of events, the Brazilian government has found a new ally in its fight against inflation and energy challenges: online casinos and crash games, like Aviator operators. By introducing additional taxes on these rapidly growing sectors, the government aims to channel the revenue into critical areas of the economy, including the burgeoning green energy sector. This strategy not only addresses economic stability but also aligns with Brazil's long-term commitment to sustainable development.

About the benfits of sports massage and the types of massage.

The benefits for women of strength training.

About the exercise benefits of using a Bosu Ball when you work out.

5 ways to maximize your health and exercise benefits from cycling.

How to do the seated incline dumbbell biceps curl including HD exercise video.

How to do the incline hammer chest press with exercise video.

How to do the side bends exercise for the obliques with 1 or 2 dumbbells with video.

The health benefits of Omega 3 and how it has benefited my health.

How and why to use a rowing machine at home or at the gym.

How you can benefit in many ways with group exercise workouts.

Strength and stamina exercise benefits of playing cricket. Team sport social benefits.

How Yoga can benefit both body and mind as a form of exercise and meditation.

Benefits and advantages of doing bodyweight exercises to workout and strength train.

A look at some of the best exercise stationary exercise bikes.

Beneficial reasons for for choosing to get breast implants, breast augmentation surgery.

The importance and benefits of taking care of your teeth and gums to your overall body health and well-being.

Benefits of exercising and staying active for the body and mind.

5 valuable reasons to strength train using weights.

Bad and inclement weather is Prime Time to do your treadmill workout at home.

4 perfect reasons to include skipping as part of your overall exercise workout.

Benefits and uses of the natural product kratom from southeast Asia.

Cannabis consumed in moderate and safe quantities has many health benefits.

3 benefits of nighttime exercise workouts.

How cushioned Yoga Mats can really help you to perform yoga better.

Infrared sauna to relax, rejuvenate your body. Offering a variety of possible health benefits.

Here are some ways seaweed can benefit your health.

Therapies for pro and amateur athletes to help them heal faster, get back to athletic competition sooner.

Yoga for exercise and stretching as well as the overall wellness and health of your body.

Micronized creatine monohydrate is an important supplement to use for any exercise activity due to its many benefits.

Benefits of using a BCAA powder when exercising or weight training and its use as a supplement.

If you have diabetes, you may be looking for an exercise workout program. If so, check out our list of the 3 top benefits of yoga for people with diabetes.

A complete guide to yoga and how a regular yoga exercise routine can offer you a range of positive mental, emotional, and physical benefits.

Discover the athletic benefits of cheerleading and the importance of cheerleaders in the NFL and in US college, high school sports. Explore why cheerleading is recognized as a sport and how cheerleaders contribute to the overall sporting experience.