1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 1.8773 Bolivian Boliviano

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 0.3848 Brunei Dollar

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 0.103 Bahraini Dinar

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 0.4915 Bulgarian Lev

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 23.1394 Bangladeshi Taka

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 0.4166 Australian Dollar

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 18.0969 Argentine Peso

1 United Arab Emirates Dirham = 0.4887 Netherlands Antillean Guilder

1 Sri Lanka Rupee = 0.0195 Qatari Rial

1 Sri Lanka Rupee = 0.0032 Latvian Lat

1 Sri Lanka Rupee = 0.0372 Croatian Kuna

1 Sri Lanka Rupee = 0.0197 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Algerian Dinar = 0.0284 Qatari Rial

1 Algerian Dinar = 0.0047 Latvian Lat

1 Algerian Dinar = 0.0541 Croatian Kuna

1 Algerian Dinar = 0.0286 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Indonesian Rupiah = 0.0002 Qatari Rial

1 Indonesian Rupiah = 0 Latvian Lat

1 Indonesian Rupiah = 0.0005 Croatian Kuna

1 Indonesian Rupiah = 0.0002 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Lithuanian Lita = 1.2331 Qatari Rial

1 Lithuanian Lita = 0.2049 Latvian Lat

1 Lithuanian Lita = 2.3499 Croatian Kuna

1 Lithuanian Lita = 1.244 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Nigerian Naira = 0.0093 Qatari Rial

1 Nigerian Naira = 0.0016 Latvian Lat

1 Nigerian Naira = 0.0178 Croatian Kuna

1 Nigerian Naira = 0.0094 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Czech Republic Koruna = 0.1449 Qatari Rial

1 Czech Republic Koruna = 0.0241 Latvian Lat

1 Czech Republic Koruna = 0.2761 Croatian Kuna

1 Czech Republic Koruna = 0.1462 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Bolivian Boliviano = 0.528 Qatari Rial

1 Bolivian Boliviano = 0.0877 Latvian Lat

1 Bolivian Boliviano = 1.0062 Croatian Kuna

1 Bolivian Boliviano = 0.5327 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Japanese Yen = 0.0341 Qatari Rial

1 Japanese Yen = 0.0057 Latvian Lat

1 Japanese Yen = 0.065 Croatian Kuna

1 Japanese Yen = 0.0344 United Arab Emirates Dirham

.. his collection of “vintage knick-knacks, fab furnishings, collectible art, one-of-a-kind porn, and plastic food” and LOTS of books!

Linkastic © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic

And other ways to use BACON to make your life incredible and amazing

Linkastic © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic

Check out Norman Mailer’s ten favourite American novels.

Linkastic © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic

What is the meaning of this error?

I used already two ports (PORT1 and PORT2 for input and output, respectively.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Also when I apply the PSP analysis for S-parameter the value of maximum S21 value (4.75 dB) is much lower than the maximum power gain (17.6 dB).

while the same circuit is designed using  ADS program the two values are approximately the same around (17.1 dB).

Hi,

I'm doing the "The Targeted Fault Campaign" with ncsim and got stuck at the following message: "ncsim: *E,FLTIGF: [FLT] Failed to inject fault at circuit_tb.U0.n2174." I already tried with other NETs, with SET, SA0, SA1, always the same error occurs.

$nchelp ncsim FLTIGF
$ncsim/FLTIGF =
    Injection time is not within the expected finish
    time for the specified fault node. Failed to inject fault.

As can be seen below, the injection time is at 2ns and the -fault_good_run -fault_tw 1ns:100ns, so in theory 2ns is inside the window 1ns:100ns.

My scripts so far, considering I already compiled the Verilog testbench and also the gates from the technology library (gate-level simulation):

#this runs ok

ncelab -work worklib -cdslib circuit/trunk/backend/synthesis/work/cds.lib -logfile ncelab.log -errormax 15 -access +wc -status -timescale 1ps/1ps worklib.circuit_tb -fault_file circuit/trunk/backend/synthesis/scripts/fi.list

#this runs ok
ncsim -fault_good_run -fault_tw 1ns:100ns -fault_work fault_db -fault_overwrite worklib.circuit_tb:module -input ../scripts/fs_strobe.tcl -exit

#this runs NOT OK
ncsim -fault_sim_run -fault_work fault_db worklib.circuit_tb:module -input ../scripts/injection.tcl -exit

After the above command, I get: "ncsim: *E,FLTIGF: [FLT] Failed to inject fault at circuit_tb.U0.n2174."

Here are the files called from the commands above.

fi.list:

fault_target circuit_tb.U0.n2174 -type SET+SA1+SA0

fs_strobe.tcl:

fs_strobe circuit_tb.WRITE_OUT circuit_tb.PC_OUT[0]

injection.tcl:

fault -stop_severity 3 -inject -time 2ns -type sa1 circuit_tb.U0.n2174

I already checked the NETs with simvision, so their paths are correct.

I'm using as reference the following document: "Functional Safety Simulation - Product Version 15.2 - April 2016"

Any ideas are welcome.

Thank you in advance.

Hi,

I'm doing the "The Targeted Fault Campaign" with ncsim and got stuck at the following message: "ncsim: *E,FLTIGF: [FLT] Failed to inject fault at circuit_tb.U0.n2174." I already tried with other NETs, with SET, SA0, SA1, always the same error occurs.

$nchelp ncsim FLTIGF
$ncsim/FLTIGF =
    Injection time is not within the expected finish
    time for the specified fault node. Failed to inject fault.

As can be seen below, the injection time is at 2ns and the -fault_good_run -fault_tw 1ns:100ns, so in theory 2ns is inside the window 1ns:100ns.

My scripts so far, considering I already compiled the Verilog testbench and also the gates from the technology library (gate-level simulation):

#this runs ok

ncelab -work worklib -cdslib circuit/trunk/backend/synthesis/work/cds.lib -logfile ncelab.log -errormax 15 -access +wc -status -timescale 1ps/1ps worklib.circuit_tb -fault_file circuit/trunk/backend/synthesis/scripts/fi.list

#this runs ok
ncsim -fault_good_run -fault_tw 1ns:100ns -fault_work fault_db -fault_overwrite worklib.circuit_tb:module -input ../scripts/fs_strobe.tcl -exit

#this runs NOT OK
ncsim -fault_sim_run -fault_work fault_db worklib.circuit_tb:module -input ../scripts/injection.tcl -exit

After the above command, I get: "ncsim: *E,FLTIGF: [FLT] Failed to inject fault at circuit_tb.U0.n2174."

Here are the files called from the commands above.

fi.list:

fault_target circuit_tb.U0.n2174 -type SET+SA1+SA0

fs_strobe.tcl:

fs_strobe circuit_tb.WRITE_OUT circuit_tb.PC_OUT[0]

injection.tcl:

fault -stop_severity 3 -inject -time 2ns -type sa1 circuit_tb.U0.n2174

I already checked the NETs with simvision, so their paths are correct.

I'm using as reference the following document: "Functional Safety Simulation - Product Version 15.2 - April 2016"

Any ideas are welcome.

Thank you in advance.

I could barely recognize Ben Foster in 3:10 to Yuma, but I was blown away just the same by him as in his star making turn from Hostage. What makes Foster so special in Yuma?

Yuma contains two of Hollywood’s finest: Russell Crowe and Christian Bale. Bale is excellent, Crowe a little too relaxed to be cock-sure-dangerous. Both are unable to provide the powder-keg relationship that the movie demands.

Into this void steps Ben Foster. He plays Charlie Prince, sidekick to Crowe’s dangerous and celebrated outlaw Ben Wade. When Wade is captured, Prince is infuriated. He initiates an effort suffused with desperate passion to rescue his boss.

Playing Prince with a mildly effeminate gait, Foster quickly becomes the movie’s beating heart. What struck me in particular was that Foster was able to balance method acting with just plain good acting. He plays his character organically but isn’t above drawing attention with controlled staginess.

Gradually, Foster’s willingness to control a scene blend in with that of Prince’s. Is the character manipulating his circumstances in the movie or is it the actor playing a fine hand? Foster is so entertaining, the answer is immaterial.

Rave Out © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic

A focus on customer enablement across all Cadence sub-organizations has led to a cross-functional effort to identify opportunities to bring our customers to proficiency with our products and flows. Hence, Rapid Adoption Kits -- RAKs -- for Synthesis...(read more)

Best Practices for Optimization What should be my considerations while preparing data? Libraries, HDL, Constraints... A good result from a synthesis tool depends greatly on the input data. An old saying "garbage in garbage out" is also true for...(read more)

Cadence Encounter® Test uses breakthrough timing-aware and power-aware technologies to enable customers to manufacture higher quality, power-efficient silicon faster and at lower cost. Encounter Diagnostics identifies critical yield-limiting issues and...(read more)