11.11.2024

1. The petitioner has sought the quashing of the recommendations made by the State Level Evaluation Committee (SLEC) in its 4th meeting held on 09.10.2024, whereby the petitioner's technical bid was marked as "non-responsive." This decision was based solely on the ground that the petitioner did not fulfill the criteria specified under Clause 2.2.2.5(iv), "...iv. In case of project executed by applicant under category 3 and 4 as a member of Joint Venture, the project cost should be restricted to the share of the applicant in the joint venture for determining eligibility as per provision under Clause 2.2.2.2. In case statutory auditor certifies that the work of other member(s) is also executed by the applicant, then the total share executed by applicant can be considered for determining eligibility as per provision under clause 2.2.2.2"

Through: -

None CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE (ORDER) 11.11.2024 This is an application filed by the petitioners to place on record the documents.

For the reasons stated in the application, coupled with the submissions made at Bar, by learned counsel for the petitioners, the same is allowed and the documents are taken on record.

08.11.2024

1. In terms of an order dated 31.10.2024, this Court came to direct the personal appearance of Ms. Sheetal Nanda, Commissioner/Secretary to Government Social Welfare Department, Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir for today's hearing both in the writ petition as well as in the contempt petition for the purpose of eliciting from the Commissioner/Secretary, Social Welfare Department some informative inputs as to wherefrom the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, pursuant to which in terms of the Government Order No. 50/SW of 2014 the contractual appointments of the petitioners came to take place is reckoned to be closed as from the reading of the entire reply from the respondents, and, this Court has not come across with any order/decision, express or implied, that the posts created in terms of Government Order No. 50/SW of 2014 for the purpose of running the establishment are to be wound up in terms of a later government order/decision.

11.11.2024

1. The petitioner being a consolidated worker engaged by the Municipal Committee, Handwara came to be terminated/disengaged from service with immediate effect in terms of impugned order No. MC/Hand/Estt/2022-23/32-36 dated 06.04.2023 by the Executive Officer, Municipal Committee, Handwara. This order is under challenge in the present writ petition by the petitioner.

2. In terms of an order dated 12.04.2023, this Court came to keep on hold the operation of the impugned order dated 06.04.2023, with a further interim direction unto the respondents to allow the petitioner to continue as a consolidated worker in terms of his original engagement order dated 30.12.2006.

Through: -

Mr. Furqan Yaqoob, GA CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE (ORDER) 08.11.2024 The subject matter of this petition falls within the definition of 'service matters' as contained in Section 3(q) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), which has become applicable to the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, after coming into force of the Jammu and Kashmir Re-

Through: -

Mr. Furqan Yaqoob, GA CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE (ORDER) 08.11.2024 Vide common Judgment dated 26.05.2022, passed by this Court in SWP No. 1002/2018 titled Tasleema Jan Vs. State and Ors., and SWP No. 876/2015, titled Roomi Akhter Vs. State and Ors., following directions were passed against the resondents.

"i) The respondents shall consider the claim of both the candidates, Roomi Akhter and Tasleema Jan, in respect of their engagement as Angan Wari Worker for the Anganwadi Centre in question. Both the petitioners shall be associated with the consideration process by allowing them to put forward their stand effectively.

11.11.2024 Ms. Rasheeda Shaheen, Advocate was appearing on behalf of the contesting respondents No. 1 to 3. Learned counsel submits that the respondent No. 2-Showkat Ali Para has expired and is now representing the respondent No. 1 & 3.

Let requisite application along with death certificate for bringing on record the legal representatives of the respondent No.2-Showkat Ali Para be submitted by the legal representatives of the respondent No. 2 for the purpose of contesting the case of the petitioners.

In the meantime, an application CM 733/2024 has come to be preferred on behalf of the respondent No. 1 & 3 with respondent No. 2 being no more, as such, cannot be referred for the purpose of being an applicant seeking release of the awarded amount as awarded by the Assistant Labour Commissioner under Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

Through: -

Mr. Furqan Yaqoob, GA CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE (ORDER) 08.11.2024 The petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 195-JKPCC of 2024 dated 16.10.2024, by virtue of which the stone crusher unit of the petitioner has been directed to be closed by respondent No. 2 on the ground that the petitioner has failed to produce the requisite documents from the revenue department as per Rule 10 of S.O. 60 of 2021 dated 23.02.2021 without valid consent from the J&K Pollution Control Committee and that the unit of the petitioner is being run in violation of Section 25/26 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. By virtue of the impugned order, respondent No. 3 has also been directed to de-register the stone crusher of the petitioner.

Through: -

Mr. Furqan Yaqoob, GA CORAM:

HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE (ORDER) 08.11.2024 The petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 212-JKPCC of 2024 dated 18.10.2024, by virtue of which the stone crusher unit of the petitioner has been directed to be closed by respondent No. 2 on the ground that the petitioner has failed to produce the requisite documents from the revenue department as per Rule 10 of S.O. 60 of 2021 dated 23.02.2021 without valid consent from the J&K Pollution Control Committee and that the unit of the petitioner is being run in violation of Section 25/26 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Section 21 of the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. By virtue of the impugned order, respondent No. 3 has also been directed to de-register the stone crusher of the petitioner.

Nobody appears for the petitioners.

2. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed for default.

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.) Signed By : ARUP KUMAR DAS High Court of Calcutta 12 th of November 2024 03:58:09 PM

1. Challenging the impugned proceeding being GR Case no. 1238 of 2021, arising out of Lake Town police station case no. 263 of 2021, petitioners have preferred the present Application with a prayer for quashing the said proceeding, qua the petitioners herein.

2. Petitioner contended in the Application that complainant stated in the FIR (First Information Report) that the opposite party no.2/FIR maker was introduced to Mr. Sanjoy Kumar Agarwal by one Subhash Kumar Roy and one Samaresh Das and relying upon the representation that the said Sanjoy Kumar Agarwal is a developer, the petitioner expressed his desire to join Mr. Agarwal as partner in his firm and thereafter Mr. Agarwal took the opposite party as a partner with him in his partnership firm namely "Shree Krishna Realtors". It is alleged that relying upon said representation the opposite party no.2 along with aforesaid person entered into a registered development agreement dated 18.12.2016 and it is further alleged that when the construction work commenced, said Sanjay Kumar Agarwal took control of the project and also taking advantage of the same took custody and control of the bank account, cheque books, vouchers papers etc. It has been further alleged that the opposite party No. 2 from time to time deposited money in the accounts of his said partner Sanjoy Kumar Agarwal but he did not cooperate with the opposite party no.2 herein /FIR maker and not only that said Sanjay had made huge withdrawal of funds and also misappropriated the funds of the firm amounting to Rs. 40 lacs in between August 2016 to March 2020 on the basis of false and fabricated documents and thereafter retired from the said firm on 17th November, 2020. The allegation against the present petitioners is that said Sanjay and the petitioners are jointly fraudulently took advance money from different buyers pertaining to the said project but neither executed deed nor refunded refundable money.

1. The present revisional application has been preferred by the petitioner against an order dated 22.04.2022 passed by the learned Judge, 5th Special Court, Kolkata, in the proceeding being Special Case No. SEBI/39/2018.

2. The petitioner's case is that the petitioner had joined in Amrit Bio Energy and Industries Limited as an executive director on 27.04.2004, for the erection and commissioning of renewal energy power project. The said Amrit Bio Energy and Industries Limited is a group of companies under Amrit Projects Ltd. a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies Act, 1956. After being satisfied with the performance of the petitioner, Kailash Chand Dujari, the Managing Director of Amrit Projects Ltd. and its group of companies had offered the petitioner to become director of several other group companies of Amrit Projects Ltd. After joining the said Amrit Group the petitioner was to look into the development and set up of a power project of 10 M.W. in the District of Bankura, West Bengal. The said project was successfully completed under the supervision of the petitioner. The said Amrit Project Limited had started a business receiving deposits from the public at large without consulting with the petitioner. The petitioner had tendered resignation and resigned from the said Amrit Projects Limited and all its group of companies in the year 2013.

1. The present revisional application has been preferred by the petitioners praying for quashing of the proceeding being GR No. 1173 of 2022 arising out of Shyampukur P.S. Case No. 85 of 2022 dated 29.09.2022, pending before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Calcutta, under Sections 354A/354B/323/506/509/188/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioners' case is that G.R. No. 1173 of 2022 arising out of Shyampukur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2022 dated 29.09.2022 was registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Smt. Mita Roy, wife of Shri Pradip Roy, residing at 8B, Abhoy Mitra Street Police Station-

as follows. The writ petitioners namely, Everrise Housing Private Limited being the Petitioner No. 1 and one Sanjay Agarwal, Director Everrise Housing Private Limited came forward before this Hon'ble Court prayed for declaring the purported proceeding initiated in terms of the alleged notification bearing no. 9817-LA (II) /5 M-1/88 Pt. dated 30th December, 1989 as lapsed. The issue was whether a Post-Acquisition Purchaser or a purchaser after the issuance of a notice under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had any legal right to challenge the acquisition proceeding on the ground of lapse or any other grounds. The answer was 'No'. There was no single instance or any case which had been successfully challenged by the Post Acquisition Purchaser or after the issuance of a notice under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, since 1894 till July, 2024 and or the same had been declared as Good Law. On the contrary, there were hundreds of decisions that Post Acquisition Purchaser had no legal standing to the question of acquisition or to its lapse. The reason was that the legal precedent of jurisprudence surrounding the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had established that a purchaser a land after issuance of notice under Section 4 and 6 of the Act did not have any locus Standi to challenge the acquisition or the lapse of the acquisition proceeding. This was because the right of the original land owner was extinguished upon the acquisition and the purchasers' right were derivative and limited to the extent of their purchase. They were not aggrieved parties therefore, lacked legal capacity to question the acquisition or its lapse. In the case of Shiv Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India and others reported at (2019) 10 SCC 229, it had been clearly stated that admittedly Power under Section 17(4) was exercised dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5A and on service of notice under Section 9 possession was taken since urgency was acute viz pumping station house to be constructed to drain out flood water. Consequently, the land stood vested in the State under Section 17(2) free from all encumbrances. It was further settled law that once possession was taken by operation of Section 17(2) the land vested in the State free from all encumbrances unless a notification under Section 48(1) was published in the gazette withdrawing the acquisition. Section 11A as amended by Act 68 of 1894 therefore, did not apply and the acquisition did not lapse. The said Judgment held, "It has been laid down that purchasers on any ground whatsoever cannot question proceeding for taking possession. A purchaser after Section 4 notification does not acquire any right in the land as the sale is ab-initio void and has no right to claim the land under policy". Paragraph 22 of the said Judgment stated," a nullity is inoperative and a person cannot claim the land or declaration once no title has been conferred upon him to claim the land should be given back to him". The said judgement was of Three Judges' Bench and had been affirmed the case of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal reported at (2020)8 SCC 129. In the case of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal reported in (2020)8 SCC 129 it had been held by the Five Judges' of the Hon'ble Supreme Court "It does not visualise a situation where possession has been taken under the urgency provision of Section 71, but the award has not been made in such case under Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of entire proceeding but compensation is to be determined in accordance to the provisions of the 2013 Act. In case of urgency possession is usually taken before the award is passed. Thus, where no award is passed, where urgency provisions under Section 17(1) of the 1894 Act had been invoked, there is no lapse". In this instant case the provision of Section 17(4) of 1894 Act had been invoked and as such, there could not be any lapse of the proceeding under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act in any manner whatsoever. In the case Delhi Development Authority Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited and Others reported at (2022) 8 SCC 771 stated that still further the purchaser had purchased the property after vesting of the land with the State. In fact, none of Dharam Trust earlier Three Judges Bench Judgement in M. Venkatesh was not even referred to the purchaser had no right to claim lapsing of acquisition proceeding in view of the recent Larger Bench Judgement of this Court in Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India reported in (2019)10 SCC 229 it had been held the purchaser had no right to claim a declaration sought for. In very recent judgement in the case of Delhi Development Authority Vs. Narendra Kumar Jain and Others reported at (2024) 3 SCC 721, it had been held deemed lapse of acquisition proceedings none payment of compensation was not a ground, where possession of land taken furthermore writ petition by subsequent purchaser claiming lapse of proceeding, held not maintainable as such person did not have locus standi to challenge acquisition proceeding and/or pray for deemed lapse of acquisition proceeding. In paragraph 4 of the said judgment it was stated "however, it is required to be noted that the decision of this Court in Manab Dharam Trust which has been relied by the High Court while passing the impugned judgement and order, is held to be not a good law in view of the decision of this Court in Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and subsequent decision of this Court in DDA Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited reported in (2022)8 SCC 771". In paragraph 5 it stated "In Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and DDA Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited, it is specifically observed and held that the subsequent purchaser has no locus Standi to challenge the acquisition and/or pray for deemed lapse acquisition". The petitioner relied upon a decision (reportable) in M/S Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Vs. State of U.P. on 14th October, 2022 by Two Judges Bench without referring and considering the ratio of the Judgment of Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India reported in (2019)10 SCC 229 which was a larger bench decision. In paragraph no. 26, the concluding paragraph (ii) if the requirement was compiled and possession was taken after tendering and paying eighty per centum, though there was need to pass an award and pay the balance compensation within a reasonable time, the rigor of section 11A of Act, 1894 would not apply so as to render the entire proceedings for acquisition to lapse in the context of absolute vesting. The right of land loser in such case was to enforce passing of the award and recover the compensation. The ratio of this case was distinguishable in the facts and circumstances of the case of the petitioner as the right of land loser in such case was to enforce passing of the award and recover the compensation, but the same could not be the right of a Post Acquisition Purchaser under any circumstances and as such, the judgement relied upon by the petitioner was distinguishable and had no manner of application in the facts and circumstances of this case. First of all, it had not considered the judgement passed in the case of Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India reported at (2019)10 SCC 229 a judgement of Three Judges' Bench and the judgment did not consider paragraph 123 of the case reported in Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal reported at (2020)8 SCC 129 which was a judgement of Five Judges and as such, the writ petition was liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs solely on the ground that the land in possession of the government and notice under Section 17 Sub Section (4) had been invoked and the judgment relied upon by the petitioner was of the judgement of Two Judges Bench without considering the ratio of Three Judges and Five Judges Bench. Furthermore, in the recent judgment of (2024)3 SCC 721 it had affirmed the judgment of Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and DDA Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited and as such, the instant writ petition was devoid of merit and was liable to be dismissed with costs. In the case reported at (2011) 5 SCC 394 it was held that once possession had been taken under section 17 section 11A could not be sustained and elaborate explanation had been given.

For many luminaries of the financial sector, the place to be when the July payrolls report is released is around a small television set at Leen's Lodge in Grand Lake Stream, Maine. If you are there on the first Friday of August, you are part of “Camp Kotok.”

Beijing is beating back international criticism of its treatment of Uyghurs in Xinjiang with a propaganda push on Facebook, Twitter and the big screen. Here’s how China’s campaign against Western brands is aimed at audiences at home and abroad. Photo: Thomas Peter/Reuters

After Merck’s Covid-19 vaccine candidates failed, the drugmaker partnered with rival Johnson & Johnson. WSJ reporter Jared Hopkins takes us behind the scenes, as the first Merck-made shots are released for distribution. Photo: Hannah Yoon/WSJ

Tripura Assembly Election 2023: ത്രിപുരയിൽ ഭരണകക്ഷിയായ ബിജെപിക്കും പ്രതിപക്ഷത്തിനും കടുത്ത വെല്ലുവിളിയാണ് ടിപ്ര മോത.

AK Antony's Loyalty towards the Nehru Family: കോൺഗ്രസ് പാർട്ടിയോടും ഇന്ത്യൻ ഭരണഘടനയോടും മാത്രമാണ് തന്റെ കൂറ് എന്നായിരുന്നു എകെ ആന്റണി പറഞ്ഞിരുന്നതെങ്കിൽ, അതായിരുന്നു ഏറ്റവും മികച്ച മറുപടി.

ചെള്ള് പനിക്ക് സമാനമായ ബാക്ടീരിയൽ രോ​ഗമാണ് മുറിൻ ടൈഫസ്. അപൂർവമായാണ് ഇത് ഇന്ത്യയിൽ റിപ്പോർട്ട് ചെയ്യുന്നത്.

The decision taken by India to not travel to Pakistan for the Champions Trophy 2025 has reignited the tensions between the two countries.

With his team's 5-1 win over Spain, Hector Sanchez could truly say he was an international football champion -- though not in the way he dreamed of as a child

சென்னை: சங்கர் இயக்கத்தில் இந்தியன் 2 திரைப்படத்தில் பரபரப்பாக நடித்துக் கொண்டே பிக் பாஸ் நிகழ்ச்சியையும் தொகுத்து வழங்குகிறார் கமல் ஹாசன். அடுத்ததாக பா.ரஞ்சித் அல்லது மலையாள இயக்குநர் மகேஷ் நாராயணன் இயக்கத்தில் கமல் நடிப்பார் என்று எதிர்பார்க்கப்படுகிறது. இந்நிலையில் தசாவதாரம் திரைப்படத்தில் நடந்த ஒரு சுவாரசியமான சம்பவம் ஒன்றைப் பற்றி முன்னதாக வாலி மற்றும் கிரேசி

The Goat Life: എആർ റഹ്മാനും റഫീഖ് അഹമ്മദും ചേർന്നാണ് ​ഗാനം രചിച്ചിരിക്കുന്നത്. ആലാപനം ജിതിൻ രാജ്.

Kanguva Release Trailer: ട്രെയിലറിന്റെ അവസാനഭാ​ഗത്ത് കാണിക്കുന്ന കഥാപാത്രം കാർത്തിയെന്നാണ് സോഷ്യൽ മീഡിയയുടെ കണ്ടുപിടിത്തം. 

Kamal Haasan: കലാകാരൻ കലയേക്കാൾ വാഴ്ത്തപ്പെടാൻ പാടില്ലെന്ന അദ്ദേഹത്തിന്റെ വിശ്വാസമാണ് ഇതിന് പിന്നിൽ. 

Hip Hop Song: മലയാളത്തിലെ മുൻനിര താരങ്ങളായ കുഞ്ചാക്കോ ബോബൻ, ഉണ്ണി മുകുന്ദൻ, മഞ്ജു വാര്യർ, അമൽ നീരദ് എന്നിവർ ചേർന്ന് ​​റിലീസ് ചെയ്ത ​ഗാനം സോണി മ്യൂസിക്ക് സൗത്ത്'യു ട്യൂബ് ചാനലിലൂടെയാണ് ​പുറത്തുവിട്ടത്.

സാൻജോ ജോസഫാണ് ഹലോ മമ്മിയുടെ കഥയും തിരക്കഥയും ഒരുക്കിയിരിക്കുന്നത്. ഹാങ്ങ് ഓവർ ഫിലിംസും എ ആൻഡ് എച്ച് എസ് പ്രൊഡക്ഷനും ചേർന്നാണ് നിർമ്മാണം.  

India Vs New Zealand First Test: യശസ്വി ജെയ്സ്വാളിനും ഋഷഭ് പന്തിനും മാത്രമാണ് രണ്ടക്കം കടക്കാനായത്. 20 റൺസ് എടുത്ത പന്ത് ആണ് ടോപ് സ്കോറർ.

Guinness World Record: 69 വർഷം പിന്നിടുന്ന ഗിന്നസ് റെക്കോർഡ്സിന്റെ ചരിത്രത്തിൽ ഇതുവരെ ലോകത്താകമാനമായി 53, 000 പേർക്കാണ് ഈ ഗിന്നസ് ടൈറ്റിൽ ലഭിച്ചിട്ടുള്ളത്.

EP Jayarajan autobiography controversy: പ്രസാധനം നീട്ടിവെച്ചതായി ഡിസി ബുക്ക്സ് അറിയിച്ചു. പുസ്തക നിർമിതിയിലുള്ള സാങ്കേതിക പ്രശ്നം മൂലം നീട്ടിവെച്ചതായി വിശദീകരണം. വോട്ടെടുപ്പ് ദിനമായ ഇന്ന് ആത്മകഥ പ്രസിദ്ധീകരിക്കുമെന്നാണ് ആദ്യം പറഞ്ഞിരുന്നത്. 

US Election 2024: അമേരിക്കയുടെ 47ാം പ്രസിഡന്റായി റിപ്പബ്ലിക്കൻ സ്ഥാനാർത്ഥിയും മുൻ പ്രസിഡന്റുമായ ഡോണാൾഡ് ട്രംപ് തിരഞ്ഞെടുക്കപ്പെട്ടു. 

US Election 2024: തിരഞ്ഞെടുപ്പിൽ ചരിത്രവിജയം സ്വന്തമാക്കിയ പ്രിയ സുഹൃത്തിന് ഹൃദയം നിറഞ്ഞ അഭിനന്ദനങ്ങളെന്ന് നരേന്ദ്ര മോദി.

TikTok Star's video viral: പാകിസ്താനിൽ നിന്നുള്ള സോഷ്യൽ മീഡിയ സെലിബ്രിറ്റി ആണെങ്കിലും മിനാഹിൽ മാലിക്കിന് ലോകമെന്പാടും ആരാധകരുണ്ട്.

Jammu And Kshmir: ആറ് വർഷത്തെ ഇടവേളയ്ക്ക് ശേഷം ചേർന്ന ജമ്മു കശ്മീരിലെ അഞ്ചു ദിവസത്തെ സഭാ സമ്മേളനത്തിനിടെ ഇന്ന് നാടകീയ രംഗങ്ങൾ.

Real Madrid vs Milan, Champions League: Real Madrid has unveiled their lineup for their forthcoming Champions League clash against Milan. The game is set to take place at the Santiago Bernabeu in Madrid, Spain, and promises to be an exciting encounter

The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has informed the International Cricket Council (ICC) that India will not participate in the 2025 Champions Trophy in Pakistan, according to ESPNCricinfo. The tournament is set to start on February 19, 2025,

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has made the decision to call off a significant event that was slated to celebrate the countdown to the 2025 Champions Trophy in Pakistan. This development comes amid the logistical challenges faced in organizing the tournament,

The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) chairman, Mohsin Naqvi, has begun discussions with senior government officials following the International Cricket Council's (ICC) notification about India's refusal to visit Pakistan for the Champions Trophy next year. The PCB confirmed receiving an email from

If speculations are to be believed, then Pakistan is likely not to host the ICC Champions Trophy 2025. Reports said since India has refused to travel to Pakistan, the host country's rights will be revoked. Recently, the Board Of Control For

The Indian women's hockey team is set to continue stellar performance in the Women's Asian Champions Trophy 2024, aiming for victory against Thailand. their quest to defend title, India has already secured wins in their initial two matches, showcasing their formidable

Oppo's Reno 13 series is shaping up for a debut, with reliable reports pointing to a tentative November 25 release in China. According to details from Digital Chat Station, this new lineup is expected to include two models: the Oppo Reno

Quordle is a unique word game, where players need to solve four puzzles at once. If you are looking for today's (Quordle 1008) hints and answers, you are at the right place. Here, we have listed today's (October 28) Quordle hints

Quordle is a unique word game, where players need to solve four puzzles at once. It offers a challenge but remains enjoyable, one can play Quordle regularly on Merriam-Webster's website. If you are looking for today's (Quordle 1009) hints and answers,

Quordle is a unique word game, where players need to solve four puzzles at once. If you are looking for today's (Quordle 1010) hints and answers, you are at the right place. Here, we have listed today's (October 30) Quordle hints

PlayStation fans can look forward to a diverse lineup of games this November, as Sony has announced three new titles for its PlayStation Plus subscribers: the eerie action-adventure Ghostwire: Tokyo, the social deduction game Death Note: Killer Within, and the high-speed

Quordle is a unique word game, where players need to solve four puzzles at once. If you are looking for today's (Quordle 1015) hints and answers, you are at the right place. Here, we have listed today's (November 4) Quordle hints

Quordle is a unique word game, where players need to solve four puzzles at once. It offers a challenge but remains enjoyable, one can play Quordle regularly on Merriam-Webster's website. If you are looking for today's (Quordle 1016) hints and answers,

Quordle is a unique word game, where players need to solve four puzzles at once. If you are looking for today's (Quordle 1017) hints and answers, you are at the right place. Here, we have listed today's (November 6) Quordle hints