1 Moldovan Leu = 31.9068 Costa Rican Colon

1 Moldovan Leu = 218.5215 Colombian Peso

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.3967 Chinese Yuan Renminbi

1 Moldovan Leu = 46.3123 Chilean Peso

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.0545 Swiss Franc

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.0786 Canadian Dollar

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.6811 Botswana Pula

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.3215 Brazilian Real

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.3867 Bolivian Boliviano

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.0793 Brunei Dollar

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.0212 Bahraini Dinar

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.1013 Bulgarian Lev

1 Moldovan Leu = 4.7666 Bangladeshi Taka

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.0858 Australian Dollar

1 Moldovan Leu = 3.7279 Argentine Peso

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.1007 Netherlands Antillean Guilder

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.206 United Arab Emirates Dirham

1 Colombian Peso = 0.0046 Moldovan Leu

1 Uruguayan Peso = 0.4133 Moldovan Leu

1 Uzbekistan Som = 0.0018 Moldovan Leu

1 Russian Ruble = 0.2429 Moldovan Leu

1 Iraqi Dinar = 0.015 Moldovan Leu

1 Cayman Islands Dollar = 21.3917 Moldovan Leu

1 Swiss Franc = 18.3641 Moldovan Leu

Lawrence, KS – The Haskell Softball team heads to Oklahoma for two double-headers against Mid-America Christian University and Langston University. These two games were scheduled to be played in February but were postponed due to weather conditions.

1 CFA Franc BCEAO = 0.0295 Moldovan Leu

1 Vietnamese Dong = 0.0008 Moldovan Leu

1 Macedonian Denar = 0.3138 Moldovan Leu

1 Zambian Kwacha = 0.0034 Moldovan Leu

1 South Korean Won = 0.0146 Moldovan Leu

1 Jordanian Dinar = 25.1319 Moldovan Leu

1 Lebanese Pound = 0.0118 Moldovan Leu

1 Bahraini Dinar = 47.1502 Moldovan Leu

1 Chilean Peso = 0.0216 Moldovan Leu

1 Maldivian Rufiyaa = 1.1501 Moldovan Leu

1 Malaysian Ringgit = 4.1142 Moldovan Leu

1 Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro = 0.5183 Moldovan Leu

1 Netherlands Antillean Guilder = 9.9327 Moldovan Leu

1 Estonian Kroon = 1.2502 Moldovan Leu

1 Danish Krone = 2.5914 Moldovan Leu

1 Fiji Dollar = 7.9143 Moldovan Leu

1 New Zealand Dollar = 10.9448 Moldovan Leu

1 Croatian Kuna = 2.5699 Moldovan Leu

1 Peruvian Nuevo Sol = 5.246 Moldovan Leu

1 Dominican Peso = 0.324 Moldovan Leu

1 Papua New Guinean Kina = 5.198 Moldovan Leu

1 Brunei Dollar = 12.6171 Moldovan Leu

Test chips are becoming more widespread and more complex at advanced process nodes as design teams utilize early silicon to diagnose problems prior to production. But this approach also is spurring questions about whether this approach is viable at 7nm and 5nm, due to the rising cost of prototyping advanced technology, such as mask tooling and wafer costs.

Semiconductor designers have long been making test chips to validate test structures, memory bit cells, larger memory blocks, and precision analog circuits like current mirrors, PLLs, temperature sensors, and high-speed I/Os. This has been done at 90nm, 65nm, 40nm, 32nm, 28nm, etc., so having test chips at 16nm, 7nm, or finer geometries should not be a surprise. Still, as costs rise, there is debate about whether those chips are over-used given advancements in tooling, or whether they should be utilized even more, with more advanced diagnostics built into them.

Modern EDA tools are very good. You can simulate and validate almost anything with certain degree of accuracy and correctness. The key to having good and accurate tools and accurate results (for simulation) is the quality of the foundry data provided. The key to having good designs (layouts) is that the DRC deck must be of high quality and accurate and must catch all the things you are not supposed to do in the layout. Most of the challenges in advanced node is in the FEOL where semiconductor physics and lithography play outsize roles. Issues that were not an issue at more mature nodes can manifest themselves as big problems at 7nm or 5nm. Process variation across the wafer and variation across a large die also present problems that were of no consequence in more mature nodes.

The real questions to be asked are as follows:

What is the role of test chips in SoC designs?

1. Do all hard IP require test chips for validation?
2. Are test chips more important at advanced nodes compared to more mature nodes?
3. Is the importance of test chip validation relative to the type of IP protocols?
4. What are the risks if I do not validate in silicon?

In complex SoC designs, there are many high-performance protocols such as LPDDR4/4x PHY, PCIe4 PHY, USB3.0 PHY, 56G/112G SerDes, etc. Each one of these IP are very complex in and by itself. If there is any chance of failure that is not detected prior to SoC (tapeout) integration, the cost of retrofit is huge. This is why the common practice is to validate each one of these complex IP in silicon before committing to use such IP in chip integration. The test chips are used to validate that the IP are properly designed and meet the functional specifications of the protocols. They are also used to validate if sufficient margins are designed into the IP to mitigate variances due to process tolerances. All high-performance hard IP go through this test chip/silicon validation process. Oftentimes, marginality is detected at this stage. In advanced nodes, it is also important to have the test chips built under different process corners. This is intended to simulate process variations in production wafers so as to maximize yields. Advanced protocols such as 112G, GDDR6, HBM2, and PCIe4 are incredibly complex and sensitive to process variations. It is almost impossible to design these circuits and try to guarantee their performance without going through the test chip route.

Besides validating performance of the IP protocols, test silicon is also used to validate robustness of ESD structures, sensitivity to latch up, and performance degradation over wide temperature ranges. All these items are more critical in advanced nodes than more mature modes. Test chips are vehicles to guarantee design integrity in bite-size chunks. It is better to deal with any potential issues in smaller blocks than to try to fix them in the final integrated SoC.

Test chips will continue to play a vital role in helping IP and SoC teams lower the risk of their designs, and assuring optimal quality and performance in the foreseeable future. They are not going away!

To read more, please visit https://semiengineering.com/test-chips-play-larger-role-at-advanced-nodes/

We have talked about aspects of the in-design symbol edit application mode in the past. This is the environment specific to the Allegro® Package Designer Plus layout tools allowing you to work...

[[ Click on the title to access the full blog on the Cadence Community site. ]]