1 Polish Zloty = 1.3633 Brazilian Real

1 Qatari Rial = 1.5744 Brazilian Real

1 Indian Rupee = 0.0759 Brazilian Real

1 Pakistani Rupee = 0.0359 Brazilian Real

1 Sierra Leonean Leone = 0.0006 Brazilian Real

1 New Taiwan Dollar = 0.192 Brazilian Real

1 Thai Baht = 0.179 Brazilian Real

1 Turkish Lira = 0.8086 Brazilian Real

1 Singapore Dollar = 4.0577 Brazilian Real

1 Mauritian Rupee = 0.1444 Brazilian Real

1 Nepalese Rupee = 0.0474 Brazilian Real

1 Bangladeshi Taka = 0.0674 Brazilian Real

1 Moldovan Leu = 0.3215 Brazilian Real

1 Colombian Peso = 0.0015 Brazilian Real

1 Uruguayan Peso = 0.1329 Brazilian Real

1 Uzbekistan Som = 0.0006 Brazilian Real

1 Russian Ruble = 0.0781 Brazilian Real

1 Iraqi Dinar = 0.0048 Brazilian Real

1 Cayman Islands Dollar = 6.877 Brazilian Real

1 Swiss Franc = 5.9036 Brazilian Real

1 CFA Franc BCEAO = 0.0095 Brazilian Real

1 Vietnamese Dong = 0.0002 Brazilian Real

1 Macedonian Denar = 0.1009 Brazilian Real

1 Zambian Kwacha = 0.0011 Brazilian Real

1 South Korean Won = 0.0047 Brazilian Real

1 Jordanian Dinar = 8.0794 Brazilian Real

1 Lebanese Pound = 0.0038 Brazilian Real

1 Bahraini Dinar = 15.1579 Brazilian Real

1 Chilean Peso = 0.0069 Brazilian Real

1 Maldivian Rufiyaa = 0.3697 Brazilian Real

1 Malaysian Ringgit = 1.3226 Brazilian Real

1 Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro = 0.1666 Brazilian Real

Players are working out creatively, but can't replace the intensity of team training.

1 Netherlands Antillean Guilder = 3.1932 Brazilian Real

1 Estonian Kroon = 0.4019 Brazilian Real

1 Danish Krone = 0.8331 Brazilian Real

1 Fiji Dollar = 2.5443 Brazilian Real

1 New Zealand Dollar = 3.5185 Brazilian Real

1 Croatian Kuna = 0.8262 Brazilian Real

1 Peruvian Nuevo Sol = 1.6865 Brazilian Real

1 Dominican Peso = 0.1041 Brazilian Real

1 Papua New Guinean Kina = 1.6711 Brazilian Real

1 Brunei Dollar = 4.0562 Brazilian Real

hi everyone, 

i'm trying to create a netlist for aging simulation. i would like to simulate how power, Gain and PAE (efficiency) are inlfuenced after 3 hours

i would be grateful if someone can correct my syntax in the netlist since i'm trying to make a sweep HB  simulation where the input power is the parameter.

i did it without any error for the sp (S parameters)  simulation.

you can see the images for both sp and hb simulation netlists. (from left to right: sp aging netlist; hb aging netlist)

i will be grateful if someone can provide me some syntax advices.

thanks,

best regards

Other tools allow a sanity check of placement density vs available board space.  There is an older post "Skill code to evaluate all components area (Accumulative Place bound area)"  (9 years ago) that has a couple of examples that no longer work or expired.

This would be useful to provide feedback to schismatic and project managers regarding the component density on the PCB and how it will affect the routing abilities.  Thermal considerations can be evaluated as well 

Has anyone attempted this or still being done externally in spread sheets?

Hi All,

I'm trying to understand checkpoint concept. When I found save and restart concept in cdnshelp, There is just describing about "$save" and "xrun -r "~~~".

and I found also the below link about save restart and it saves your time.

But I can't find any benefits from my experiment from save&restart article( I fully agree..the article)

Ok, So I'v got some experiment  Here.

1. I declared $save and got the below result as I expected within the simple UVM code.

In UVM code...

$display("TEST1");
$display("TEST2");
$save("SAVE_TEST");
$display("TEST3");
$display("TEST4");

And I restart at "SAVE_TEST" point by xrun -r "SAVE_TEST", I've got the below log

xcelium> run
TEST3
TEST4

Ok, It's Good what I expected.(The concept of Save and Restore is simple: instead of re-initializing your simulation every time you want to run a test, only initialize it once. Then you can save the simulation as a “snapshot” and re-run it from that point to avoid hours of initialization times. It used to be inconvenient. I agree..)

2. But The Problem is that I can't restart with modified code. Let's see the below example.

I just modified TEST5 instead of "TEST3"

$display("TEST1");
$display("TEST2");
$save("SAVE_TEST");
$display("TEST5"); //$display("TEST3");
$display("TEST4");

and I rerun with xrun -r "SAVE_TEST", then I've got the same log

xcelium> run
TEST3
TEST4

There is no "TEST5". Actually I expected "TEST5" in the log.From here We know $save can't support partially modified code after $save. 

Actually, through this, we can approach to our goal about saving developing time. 

So I want to know Is there any possible way that instead of re-initializing our simulation every time we want to run a test, only initialize it once and keep developing(debugging) our code ?

If we do, Could you let me know the simple example?

Verification is the top challenge in mixed-signal design. Bringing analog and digital domains together into unified verification planning, simulating, and debugging is a challenging task for rapidly increasing size and complexity of mixed-signal designs. To more completely verify functionality and performance of a mixed-signal SoC and its AMS IP blocks used to build it, verification teams use simulations at transistor, analog behavioral and real-number model (RNM) and RTL levels, and combination of these.

In recent years, RNM and simulation is being adopted for functional verification by many, due to advantages it offers including simpler modeling requirements and much faster simulation speed (compared to a traditional analog behavioral models like Verilog-A or VHDL-AMS). Verilog-AMS with its wreal continue to be popular choice. Standardization of real number extensions in SystemVerilog (SV) made SV-RNM an even more attractive choice for MS SoC verification.

Verilog-AMS/wreal is scalar real type. SV-RNM offers a powerful ability to define complex data types, providing a user-defined structure (record) to describe the net value. In a typical design, most analog nodes can be modeled using a single value for passing a voltage (or current) from one module to another. The ability to pass multiple values over a net can be very powerful when, for example, the impedance load impact on an analog signal needs to be modeled. Here is an example of a user-defined net (UDN) structure that holds voltage, current, and resistance values:

When there are multiple drives on a single net, the simulator will need a resolution function to determine the final net value. When the net is just defined as a single real value, common resolution functions such as min, max, average, and sum are built into the simulator.  But definition of more complex structures for the net also requires the user to provide appropriate resolution functions for them. Here is an example of a net with three drivers modeled using the above defined structural elements (a voltage source with series resistance, a resistive load, and a current source):

To properly solve for the resulting output voltage, the resolution function for this net needs to perform Norton conversion of the elements, sum their currents and conductances, and then calculate the resolved output voltage as the sum of currents divided by sum of conductances.

With some basic understanding of circuit theory, engineers can use SV-RNM UDN capability to model electrical behavior of many different circuits. While it is primarily defined to describe source/load impedance interactions, its use can be extended to include systems including capacitors, switching circuits, RC interconnect, charge pumps, power regulators, and others. Although this approach extends the scope of functional verification, it is not a replacement for transistor-level simulation when accuracy, performance verification, or silicon correlation are required:  It simply provides an efficient solution for discretely modeling small analog networks (one to several nodes).  Mixed-signal simulation with an analog solver is still the best solution when large nonlinear networks must be evaluated.

Cadence provides a tutorial on EEnet usage as well as the package (EEnet.pkg) with UDN definitions and resolution functions and modeling examples. To learn more, please login to your Cadence account to access the tutorial.