Coronavirus India update: Stay tuned with Business Standard for latest news on COVID-19, world death toll, and cases across the world and in India

Testing for prostate cancer with a combined biopsy method led to more accurate diagnosis and prediction of the course of the disease in an NCI study. The method is poised to reduce the risk of prostate cancer overtreatment and undertreatment.

‘A record 2,500 tests are being done per million; need for higher level of preparedness’

The latest bottleneck to confront the Indian healthcare system in scaling up molecular diagnostic testing for Covid-19 is shortage of tools and equipment needed to collect and transport samples called the viral transport mediums (VTM).

Niti Aayog and the Department of Biotechnology have launched the Consortium for Affordable & Rapid Diagnostics (CARD) to scale up India’s capacity to make coronavirus testing kits. The move comes after India faced quality issues with Chinese-made antibody testing kits.

Priced around Rs 500, the device has demonstrated a near-100 per cent accuracy in detecting the virus in a short span of 90 minutes, the statement said quoting an ICMR report.

"Indian Council of Medical Research has set a target of carrying out around 1 lakh tests across the country per day. For this crucial work, India Post with its vast network of 1,56,000 post offices has once again turned into a COVID warrior," the statement said.

These are South India Textiles Research Association (SITRA) in Coimbatore, DRDO-INMAS in New Delhi, Heavy Vehicle Factory in Chennai, Small Arms Factory in Kanpur, Ordnance Factory in Kanpur, Ordnance Factory in Muradnagar, Ordnance Factory in Ambernath, and Metal & Steel Factory in Ishapore, West Bengal.

Cambridge, Mass. : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2020

Grade span testing dramatically reduces the number of tests students would take over the course of their education. Unfortunately, it also sacrifices the ability to measure students’ growth from year to year in a content area and dramatically reduces what we would know about what works in education.

The FCC has clarified that nothing in its rules prohibits remote amateur radio testing, and no prior approval is needed to conduct remote exam sessions.

“The Commission provides flexibility to volunteer examiners and coordinators who wish to develop remote testing methods or to increase remote testing programs already in place,” the FCC said in an April 30 news release. “We recognize that some v...

While courts have an important role in ensuring that the rights of citizens are protected, it is essential that they avoid adjudicating on policy matters.

The organisers said Brazilian Ronaldo Souza, who was to fight Uriah Hall on the undercard, will not take part in the event.

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver explained the plan in a conference call open to all NBA players.

These are the most important oncology stories you need to know about today.
Medscape Medical News

When combined with data on prescriptions filled at local pharmacies, EMS drug overdose calls, and drug seizures by law enforcement, wastewater testing can yield insights into the extent of black-market activity, policing impact on community drug use, and where and when drug overdoses might occur.

Dewey Library - SH383.2.B45 2019

Tamil Nadu is ordering 10 lakh more RT-PCR (reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction) testing kits to ramp up testing across the State.Accordin

The Madras High Court on Friday granted time till Monday for the State government to file a comprehensive report on steps taken to conduct mass testin

Amy Kapernick sings us through numerous ways of improving the robustness and reliability of our front end code with a comprehensive rundown of ideas, tools, and resources. The girls and boys won’t get any toys until all the tests are passing.

Anyone who’s spoken to me at some point in November may get the impression that I’m a bit of a grinch. But don’t get me wrong, I love Christmas, I love decorating my tree, singing carols, and doing Christmas cooking - in December. So for me to willingly be humming the 12 days of Christmas in October, it’s probably for something that I think is even more important than banning premature Christmas decorations, like front end testing.

On the 12th day of Christmas, my front end dev, she gave to me, 12 testing tools, 11 optimised images, 10 linting rules, 9 semantic headings, 8 types of colour blindness, 7(.0) contrast ratio, 6 front end tests, 5 browser types, 4 types of tests, 3 shaken trees, 2 image types, and a source controlled deployment pipeline.

Twelve Testing Tools

1. axe does automated accessibility testing. Run as part of your development build, it outputs warnings to your console to let you know what changes you need to make (referencing accessibility guides). You can also specify particular accessibility standard levels that you’d like to test against, eg. best-practice, wcag2a or wcag2aa, or you can pick and choose individual rules that you want to check for (full list of rules you can test with axe).

2. BackstopJS runs visual regression tests on your website. Run separately, or as part of your deployment/PR process, you can use it to make sure your code changes aren’t bleeding into other areas of the website. By default, BackstopJS will set you up with a bunch of configuration options by running backstop init in your project to help get you started.

3. Website Speed Test analyses the performance of your website specifically with respect to images, and the potential size savings if they were optimised.

4. Calibre runs several different types of tests by leveraging Lighthouse. You can run it over your live website through their web app or through the command line, it then monitors your website for performance and accessibility over time, providing metrics and notifications of any changes.

5. Cypress is for end-to-end testing of your website. When visual regression testing may be a bit much for you, Cypress can help you test and make sure elements are still on the page and visible (even if they’re not pixel for pixel where they were last time).
6. pa11y is for automated accessibility testing. Run as part of your build process or using their CLI or dashboard, it tests your website against various Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) criteria (including visual tests like colour contrast). While axe is run as part of your dev build and gives you an output to the console, it can be combined with pa11y to automate any changes as part of your build process.
7. whocanuse was created by Corey Ginnivan, and it allows you to view colour combinations as those with colour blindness would (as well as testing other visual deficiencies, and situational vision events), and test the colour contrast ratio based on those colours.

8. Colour Blindness Emulation was created by Kyo Nagashima as an SVG filter to emulate the different types of colour blindness, or if you’re using Gatsby, you can use a plugin based off of gatsby-plugin-colorblind-filters.
9. Accessible Brand Colors tests all your branding colours against each other (this is great to show designers what combinations they can safely use).

10. Browser dev tools - Most of the modern browsers have been working hard on the features available in their dev tools:
    • Firefox: Accessibility Inspector, Contrast Ratio testing, Performance monitoring.
    • Chromium: (Chrome, Edge Beta, Brave, Vivaldi, Opera, etc) - Accessibility Inspector, Contrast Ratio testing, Performance Monitoring, Lighthouse Audits (testing performance, best practices, accessibility and more).
    • Edge: Accessibility Inspector, Performance monitoring.
    • Safari: Accessibility Inspector, Performance monitoring.

11. Linc is a continuous delivery platform that makes testing the front end easier by automatically deploying a version of your website for every commit on every branch. One of the biggest hurdles when testing the front end is needing a live version of the site to view and test against. Linc makes sure you always have one.
12. ESLint and Stylelint check your code for programmatic and stylistic errors, as well as helping keep formatting standard on projects with multiple developers. Adding a linter to your project not only helps you write better code, it can reduce simple errors that might be found during testing time. If you’re not writing JavaScript, there are plenty of alternatives for whatever language you’re writing in.

If you’re trying to run eslint in VS Code, make sure you don’t have the Beautify extension installed, as that will break things.

Eleven Optimised Images

When it comes to performance, images are where we take the biggest hit, with images accounting for over 50% of total transfer size for websites. Many websites are serving excessively large images “just in case”, but there’s actually a native HTML element that allows us to serve different image sizes based on the screen size or serve better image formats when the browser supports it (or both).

<!-- Serving different images based on the width of the screen -->
<picture>
    <source
        srcset="/img/banner_desktop.jpg"
        media="(min-width: 1200px)"
    />
    <source
        srcset="/img/banner_tablet.jpg"
        media="(min-width: 700px)"
    />
    <source
        srcset="/img/banner_mobile.jpg"
        media="(min-width: 300px)"
    />
    <img src="/img/banner_fallback.jpg">
</picture>

<!-- Serving different image formats based on browser compatibility -->
<picture>
    <source
        srcset="/banner.webp"
        type="image/webp"
    />
    <img src="/img/banner_fallback.jpg">
</picture>

Ten Linting Rules

A year ago, I didn’t use linting. It was mostly just me working on projects, and I can code properly right? But these days it’s one of the first things I add to a project as it saves me so much time (and has taught me a few things about JavaScript). Linting is a very personal choice, but there are plenty of customisations to make sure it’s doing what you want, and it’s available in a wide variety of languages (including linting for styling).

// .eslintrc
module.exports = {
    rules: {
        'no-var': 'error',
        'no-unused-vars': 1,
        'arrow-spacing': ['error', { before: true, after: true }],
        indent: ['error', 'tab'],
        'comma-dangle': ['error', 'always'],
        // standard plugin - options
        'standard/object-curly-even-spacing': ['error', 'either'],
        'standard/array-bracket-even-spacing': ['error', 'either'], },
}

// .stylelintrc
{
    "rules": {
        "color-no-invalid-hex": true,
        "indentation": [
            "tab",
            {
                "except": [
                    "value"
                ]
            }
        ],
        "max-empty-lines": 2,
    }
}

Nine Semantic Headings

No, I’m not saying you should use 9 levels of headings, but your webpage should have an appropriate number of semantic headings. When your users are accessing your webpage with a screen reader, they rely on landmarks like headings to tell them about the page. Similarly to how we would scan a page visually, screen readers give users a list of all headings on a page to allow them to scan through the sections and access the information faster.

When there aren’t any headings on a page (or headings are being used for their formatting rather than their semantic meaning), it makes it more difficult for anyone using a screen reader to understand and navigate the page. Make sure that you don’t skip heading levels on your page, and remember, you can always change the formatting on a p tag if you need to have something that looks like a heading but isn’t one.

<h1>Heading 1 - Page Title</h2>
<p>Traditionally you'll only see one h1 per page as it's the main page title</p>
<h2>Heading 2</h2>
<p>h2 helps to define other sections within the page. h2 must follow h1, but you can also have h2 following another h2.</p>
<h3>Heading 3</h3>
<p>h3 is a sub-section of h2 and follows similar rules to h2. You can have a h3 after h3, but you can't go from h1 to h3.</p>
<h4>Heading 4</h4>
<p>h4 is a sub-section of h3. You get the pattern?</p>

Eight Types of Colour Blindness

Testing colour contrast may not always be enough, as everyone perceives colour differently. Take the below colour combination (ignoring the fact that it doesn’t actually look nice). It has decent colour contrast and would meet the WCAG colour contrast requirements for AA standards – but what if one of your users was red-green colour blind? Would they be able to tell the difference?

Red-green colour blindness is the most common form of colour blindness, but there are 8 different types affecting different parts of the colour spectrum, all the way up to complete colour blindness.

Protanopia

Inability to see red end of the colour spectrum.

Protanomaly

Difficulty seeing some shades of red.

Deuteranopia

Inability to see the green portion of the colour spectrum.

Deuteranomaly

Difficulty seeing some shades of green.

Tritanopia

Inability to see blue end of the colour spectrum.

Tritanomaly

Difficulty seeing some shades of blue.

Achromatopsia

Inability to see all parts of the colour spectrum, only able to perceive black, white and shades of grey.

Achromatomaly

Difficulty seeing all parts of the colour spectrum.

Seven (.0) Contrast Ratio

Sufficient colour contrast is perhaps one of the best steps to take for accessibility, as it benefits everyone. Having adequate contrast doesn’t just make the experience better for those with vision impairments, but it also helps those with situational impairments. Have you ever been in the sun and tried to read something on your screen? Whether you can view something when there’s glare could be as easy as making sure there’s enough contrast between the text and its background colour.

The WCAG have defined a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 for normal text (18.5px) and 3:1 for large text (24px) to meet AA accessibility standards, but this should be an absolute minimum and isn’t always readable. All four below examples have sufficient contrast to pass AA standards, but you might be hard pressed to read them when there’s glare or you have a dodgy monitor (even more so considering most websites use below 18.5px for their base font size).

To meet the AAA standard you need to have a ratio of 7:1 for normal text and 4.5:1 for large text, which should be sufficient for those with 20/80 vision to read.

Six Front End Tests

1. Adding default axe-core testing to Gatsby:

   //gatsby-config.js
   {
       resolve: 'gatsby-plugin-react-axe',
       options: {},
   },

2. Running pa11y tests on homepage at various screen sizes:

   // tests/basic-a11y_home.js
   const pa11y = require('pa11y'),
       fs = require('file-system')
   
   runTest()
   
   async function runTest() {
       try {
           const results = await Promise.all([
               pa11y('http://localhost:8000', {
                   standard: 'WCAG2AA',
                   actions: [],
                   screenCapture: `${__dirname}/results/basic-a11y_home_mobile.png`,
                   viewport: {
                       width: 320,
                       height: 480,
                       deviceScaleFactor: 2,
                       isMobile: true,
                   },
               }),
               pa11y('http://localhost:8000', {
                   standard: 'WCAG2AA',
                   actions: [],
                   screenCapture: `${__dirname}/results/basic-a11y_home_desktop.png`,
                   viewport: {
                       width: 1280,
                       height: 1024,
                       deviceScaleFactor: 1,
                       isMobile: false,
                   },
               }),
           ])
   
           fs.writeFile('tests/results/basic-a11y_home.json', JSON.stringify(results), err => {
               console.log(err)
           })
       } catch (err) {
           console.error(err.message)
       }
   }

3. Running pa11y tests on a blog post template at various screen sizes:

   // tests/basic-a11y_post.js
   const pa11y = require('pa11y'),
       fs = require('file-system')
   
   runTest()
   
   async function runTest() {
       try {
           const results = await Promise.all([
               pa11y('http://localhost:8000/template', {
                   standard: 'WCAG2AA',
                   actions: [],
                   screenCapture: `${__dirname}/results/basic-a11y_post_mobile.png`,
                   viewport: {
                       width: 320,
                       height: 480,
                       deviceScaleFactor: 2,
                       isMobile: true,
                   },
               }),
               pa11y('http://localhost:8000/template', {
                   standard: 'WCAG2AA',
                   actions: [],
                   screenCapture: `${__dirname}/results/basic-a11y_post_desktop.png`,
                   viewport: {
                       width: 1280,
                       height: 1024,
                       deviceScaleFactor: 1,
                       isMobile: false,
                   },
               }),
           ])
   
           fs.writeFile('tests/results/basic-a11y_post.json', JSON.stringify(results), err => {
               console.log(err)
           })
       } catch (err) {
           console.error(err.message)
       }
   }

4. Running BackstopJS on a homepage and blog post template at various screen sizes:

   // backstop.json
   {
     "id": "backstop_default",
     "viewports": [
       {
         "label": "phone",
         "width": 320,
         "height": 480
       },
       {
         "label": "tablet",
         "width": 1024,
         "height": 768
       },
       {
         "label": "desktop",
         "width": 1280,
         "height": 1024
       }
     ],
     "onBeforeScript": "puppet/onBefore.js",
     "onReadyScript": "puppet/onReady.js",
     "scenarios": [
       {
         "label": "Blog Homepage",
         "url": "http://localhost:8000",
         "delay": 2000,
         "postInteractionWait": 0,
         "expect": 0,
         "misMatchThreshold": 1,
         "requireSameDimensions": true
       },
       {
         "label": "Blog Post",
         "url": "http://localhost:8000/template",
         "delay": 2000,
         "postInteractionWait": 0,
         "expect": 0,
         "misMatchThreshold": 1,
         "requireSameDimensions": true
       }
     ],
     "paths": {
       "bitmaps_reference": "backstop_data/bitmaps_reference",
       "bitmaps_test": "backstop_data/bitmaps_test",
       "engine_scripts": "backstop_data/engine_scripts",
       "html_report": "backstop_data/html_report",
       "ci_report": "backstop_data/ci_report"
     },
     "report": [
       "browser"
     ],
     "engine": "puppeteer",
     "engineOptions": {
       "args": [
         "--no-sandbox"
       ]
     },
     "asyncCaptureLimit": 5,
     "asyncCompareLimit": 50,
     "debug": false,
     "debugWindow": false
   }

5. Running Cypress tests on the homepage:

   // cypress/integration/basic-test_home.js
   describe('Blog Homepage', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
           cy.visit('http://localhost:8000')
       })
       it('contains "Amy Goes to Perth" in the title', () => {
           cy.title().should('contain', 'Amy Goes to Perth')
       })
       it('contains posts in feed', () => {
           cy.get('.article-feed').find('article')
       })
       it('all posts contain title', () => {
           cy.get('.article-feed')
               .find('article')
               .get('h2')
       })
   })

6. Running Cypress tests on a blog post template at various screen sizes:

   // cypress/integration/basic-test_post.js
   
   describe('Blog Post Template', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
           cy.visit('http://localhost:8000/template')
       })
       it('contains "Amy Goes to Perth" in the title', () => {
           cy.title().should('contain', 'Amy Goes to Perth')
       })
       it('has visible post title', () => {
           cy.get('h1').should('be.visible')
       })
       it('has share icons', () => {
           cy.get('.share-icons a').should('be.visible')
       })
       it('has working share icons', () => {
           cy.get('.share-icons a').click({ multiple: true })
       })
       it('has a visible author profile image', () => {
           cy.get('.author img').should('be.visible')
       })
   })
   
   describe('Mobile Blog Post Template', () => {
       beforeEach(() => {
           cy.viewport('samsung-s10')
           cy.visit('http://localhost:8000/template')
       })
       it('contains "Amy Goes to Perth" in the title', () => {
           cy.title().should('contain', 'Amy Goes to Perth')
       })
       it('has visible post title', () => {
           cy.get('h1').should('be.visible')
       })
       it('has share icons', () => {
           cy.get('.share-icons .share-link').should('be.visible')
       })
       it('has a visible author profile image', () => {
           cy.get('.author img').should('be.visible')
       })
   })

Five Browser Types

Browser testing may be the bane of our existence, but it’s gotten easier, especially when you know the secret:

Not every browser needs to look the same.

Now, this may differ depending on your circumstances, but your website doesn’t have to match pixel for pixel across all browsers. As long as it’s on-brand and is useable across all browsers (this is where a good solid HTML foundation is useful), it’s ok for your site to look a little different between browsers.

While the browsers you test in will differ depending on your user base, the main ones you want to be covering are:

• Chrome/Chromium
• Firefox
• Safari
• Internet Explorer
• Edge

Make sure you’re testing these browsers on both desktop and mobile/tablet as well, sometimes their level of support or rendering engine will differ between devices – for example, iOS Chrome uses the Safari rendering engine, so something that works on Android Chrome may not work on iOS Chrome.

Four Types of Test

When it comes to testing the front end, there are a few different areas that we can cover:

1. Accessibility Testing: doing accessibility testing properly usually involves getting an expert to run through your website, but there are several automated tests that you can run against various standard levels.
2. Performance Testing: performance testing does technically bleed into the back end as well, but there are plenty of things that can be done from a front end perspective. Making sure the images are optimised, our code is clean and minified, and even optimising fonts using features like the font-display property. No amount of optimising the server and back end will matter if it takes forever for the front end to appear in a browser.
3. Visual Regression Testing: we’ve all been in the position where changing one line of CSS somewhere has affected another section of the website. Visual regression testing helps prevent that. By using a tool that compares before and after screenshots against one another to flag up what’s changed, you can be sure that style changes won’t bleed into unintended areas of the site.
4. Browser/device testing: while we all want our users to be running the most recent version of Chrome or Firefox, they may still be using the inbuilt browser on their DVD player – so we need to test various browsers, platforms and devices to make sure that our website can be accessed on whatever device they use.

Three Shaken Trees

Including (and therefore requiring your users to download) things that you’re not using affects the performance of your application. Are you forcing them to download the entire lodash library when you’re only using 2 functions? While a couple of unused lines of code may not seem like a huge performance hit, it can greatly affect users with slower devices or internet connections, as well as cluttering up your code with unused functions and dependencies. This can be set up on your bundler – Webpack and Parcel both have guides for tree shaking, and Gatsby has a plugin to enable it.

Two Image Types

While there are several different types of images, most of the time they fall into one of two categories:

Informative

The image represents/conveys important information that isn’t conveyed by the content surrounding it.

Decorative

The image only adds visual decoration to a page.

From these two categories, we can then determine if we need to provide alternative text for an image. If an image is purely decorative, then we add alt="" to let screen readers know that it’s not important. But if an image is informative, then we need to be supplying a text alternative that describes the picture for anyone who’s using a screen reader or isn’t able to see the image (remember the days when a standard internet connection took a long time to load a page and you saw alt text before an image loaded).

<img src="./nice-picture.jpg" alt="" />
<img src="./important-graphic.png" alt="This is a picture of something important to help add meaning to the text around me" />

If you have a lot of images with missing alt text, look into services that can auto-generate alt text based on image recognition services.

One Source Controlled Deployment Pipeline

While front end tests are harder to automate, running them through a source control and deployment pipeline helps track changes and eliminates issues where “it works on my computer”. Whether you’re running tests as part of the PR process, or simply against every commit that comes through, running tests automatically as part of your process makes every developer’s life easier and helps keep code quality at a high standard.

We already knew that testing was important, and your project can’t be run unless all your unit and integration tests are written (and pass), but often we forget about testing the front end. There are so many different tests we need to be running on the front end, it’s hard to work out what your need to test for and where to start.

Hopefully this has given you a bit of insight to front end testing, and some Christmas cheer to take you into the holidays.

About the author

Amy wears many hats as a freelance developer, business owner and conference addict. She regularly shares her knowledge with her peers and the next generation of developers by mentoring, coaching, teaching and feeding into the tech community in many ways.

Amy can be found volunteering her time with Fenders, ACS, SheCodes (formerly Perth Web Girls) and MusesJS (formerly NodeGirls). She also works as an evangelist for YOW! Conferences, is a Twilio Champion and has been nominated for the WiTWA awards for the last 2 years.

In her spare time Amy shares her knowledge and experience on her blogs and speaking at conferences. She has previously given keynotes at multiple events as well as speaking at several international conferences in the US and Europe.

More articles by Amy

Barmi, Maryam Jozegholami, author

PHC, village secretariats identified for quarantine facility

The panelists discuss testing JavaScript with Joe Eames

Pete Hodgson crosses over from the iPhreaks podcasts to talk with the Jabber gang about testing asynchronous Javascript with promises.

02:20 - Zach Kessin Introduction

• Twitter
• GitHub
• Zach's Books
• Parrot
• JavaScript Jabber: Episode #057: Functional Programming with Zach Kessin
• Testing Erlang With Quickcheck Book

04:00 - Mostly Erlang Podcast

05:27 - Property-based Testing (QuickCheck)

07:22 - Property-based Testing and Functional Programming

• jsverify

09:48 - Pure Functions

• Shrinking

18:09 - Boundary Cases

20:00 - Generating the Data

23:23 - Trending Concepts in JavaScript

32:33 - How Property-based Testing Fits in with Other Kind of Testing

35:57 - Test Failures

Panel

Nolan Lawson: Taming the asynchronous beast with ES7 (Aimee)
Nodevember (Aimee)
Hipster Sound (Jamison)
Om Next by David Nolen  (Jamison)
Gallant - Weight In Gold (Jamison)
React Rally (Jamison)
Better Off Ted (Joe)
Armada: A Novel by Ernest Cline (Joe)
Testing Erlang With Quickcheck Book (Zach)
Parrot Universal Notification Interface (Zach)
The Famine of Men by Richard H. Kessin (Zach)

Panel:

Amy Knight

Charles Max Wood

Special Guests: 

Nick Disabato

In this episode, Java Script Jabbers talk with Nick Disabato. Nick is a newbie to JavaScript Jabber. Nick is the founder of Draft, an interaction design agency where he does research driven A/B testing of E-commerce business.

This is a practical episode for those who are running a business and doing marketing for the products and services. Nick talks about A/B testing for a number scenarios within the company, such as for websites, funnels, and various marketing mechanisms. Nick further goes into how this helps companies strategically increase revenue by changing things such as websites design or building funnels.

In particular, we dive pretty deep on:

• Testing of changes of Copy, Websites, etc.
• What does it mean of changes, Tools, Framework, Plugins, etc
• Does it matter what tools you use? Framework that works within your stack
• How do make we company money
• Researching for the next test
• Testing for conversion rate to decide which design to go implement - Variant
• Responsibility for the designs
• Feature and getting pay for the service
• Learn more about the resources and Copy Hackers
• Large organization or developers, or a QA department
• Optimization teams
• Usability tests and coming up with A/B tests
• Expertise
• Why should be care?
• And much more!

Links:

Draft

Nick Disabato

@nickd

ConversionXL

AB Testing Manual

Wider Funnels 

Copy Hackers

Picks:

Amiee

• Nodevember 

Charles

• Mike Gehard 
• Admin LTE

Nick

• HotJar.com

Panel:

• AJ O’Neal
• Aimee Knight
• Joe Eames
• Charles Max Wood

Special Guests: Vitali Zaidman

In this episode, the panel talks with programmer, Vitali Zaidman, who is working with Software Solutions Company. He researches technologies and starts new projects all the time, and looks at these new technologies within the market. The panel talks about testing JavaScript in 2018 and Jest.

Show Topics:

1:32 – Chuck: Let’s talk about testing JavaScript in 2018.

1:53 – Vitali talks about solving problems in JavaScript.

2:46 – Chuck asks Vitali a question.

3:03 – Vitali’s answer.

3:30 – Why Jest? Why not Mocha or these other programs?

3:49 – Jest is the best interruption of what testing should look like and the best practice nowadays. There are different options, they can be better, but Jest has this great support from their community. There are great new features.

4:31 – Chuck to Joe: What are you using for testing nowadays?

4:43 – Joe: I use Angular, primarily.

6:01 – Like life, it’s sometimes easier to use things that make things very valuable.

7:55 – Aimee: I have heard great things about Cypress, but at work we are using another program.

8:22 – Vitali: Check out my article.

8:51 – Aimee: There are too many problems with the program that we use at work.

9:39 – Panelist to Vitali: I read your article, and I am a fan. Why do you pick Test Café over Cypress, and how familiar are you with Cypress? What about Selenium and other programs?

10:12 – Vitali: “Test Café and Cypress are competing head-to-head.”

Listen to Vitali’s suggestions and comments per the panelists’ question at this timestamp.

11:25 – Chuck: I see that you use sign-on...

12:29 – Aimee: Can you talk about Puppeteer? It seems promising.

12:45 – Vitali: Yes, Puppeteer is promising. It’s developed by Google and by Chrome. You don’t want to use all of your tests in Puppeteer, because it will be really hard to do in other browsers.

13:26: Panelist: “...5, 6, 7, years ago it was important of any kind of JavaScript testing you had no idea if it worked in one browser and it not necessarily works in another browser. That was 10 years ago. Is multiple browsers testing as important then as it is now?

14:51: Vitali answers the above question.

15:30 – Aimee: If it is more JavaScript heavy then it could possibly cause more problems.

15:56 – Panelist: I agree with this.

16:02 – Vitali continues this conversation with additional comments.

16:17 – Aimee: “I see that Safari is the new Internet Explorer.”

16:23: Chuck: “Yes, you have to know your audience. Are they using older browsers? What is the compatibility?”

17:01 – Vitali: There are issues with the security. Firefox has a feature of tracking protection; something like that.

17:33 – Question to Vitali by Panelist.

17:55 – Vitali answers the question.

18:30 – Panelist makes additional comments.

18:43 – If you use Safari, you reap what you sow.

18:49 – Chuck: I use Chrome on my iPhone. (Aimee does, too.) Sometimes I wind up in Safari by accident.

19:38 – Panelist makes comments.

19:52 – Vitali tells a funny story that relates to this topic.

20:45 – There are too many standards out there.

21:05 – Aimee makes comments.

21:08 – Brutalist Web Design. Some guy has this site – Brutalist Web Design – where he says use basic stuff and stop being so custom. Stop using the web as some crazy platform, and if your site is a website that can be scrolled through, that’s great. It needs to be just enough for people to see your content.

22:16 – Aimee makes additional comments about this topic of Brutalist Web Design.

22:35 – Panelist: I like it when people go out and say things like that.

22:45 – Here is the point, though. There is a difference between a website and a web application. Really the purpose is to read an article.

23:37 – Vitali chimes in.

24:01 – Back to the topic of content on websites.

25:17 – Panelist: Medium is very minimal. Medium doesn’t feel like an application.

26:10 – Is the website easy enough for the user to scroll through and get the content like they want to?

26:19 – Advertisement.

27:22 – See how far off the topic we got?

27:31 – These are my favorite conversations to have.

27:39 – Vitali: Let’s talk about how my article got so popular. It’s an interesting thing, I started researching “testing” for my company. We wanted to implement one of the testing tools. Instead of creating a presentation, I would write first about it in Medium to get feedback from the community as well. It was a great decision, because I got a lot of comments back. I enjoyed the experience, too. Just write about your problem in Medium to see what people say.

28:48 – Panelist: You put a ton of time and energy in this article. There are tons of links. Did you really go through all of those articles?

29:10 – Yes, what are the most permanent tools? I was just reading through a lot of comments and feedback from people. I tested the tools myself, too!

29:37 – Panelist: You broke down the article, and it’s a 22-minute read.

30:09 – Vitali: I wrote the article for my company, and they ad to read it.

30:24 – Panelist: Spending so much time – you probably felt like it was apart of your job.

30:39 – Vitali: I really like creating and writing. It was rally amazing for me and a great experience. I feel like I am talented in this area because I write well and fast. I wanted to express myself.

31:17 – Did you edit and review?

31:23 – Vitali: I wrote it by myself and some friends read it. There were serious mistakes, and that’s okay I am not afraid of mistakes. This way you get feedback.

32:10 – Chuck: “Some people see testing in JavaScript, and people look at this and say there are so much here. Is there a place where people can start, so that way they don’t’ get too overwhelmed? Is there a way to ease into this and take a bite-size at a time?”

32:52 – Vitali: “Find something that works for them. Read the article and start writing code.”

He continues this conversation from here on out.

34:03 – Chuck continues to ask questions and add other comments.

34:16 – Vitali chimes-in. 

34:38 – Chuck. 

34:46 – Vitali piggybacks off of Chuck’s comments.

36:14 – Panelist: Let’s go back to Jest. There is a very common occurrence where we see lots of turn and we see ideas like this has become the dominant or the standard, a lot of people talk about stuff within this community. Then we get this idea that ‘this is the only thing that is happening.’ Transition to jQuery to React to... With that context do you feel like Jest will be a dominant program? Are we going to see Jest used just as common as Mocha and other popular programs?

38:15 – Vitali comments on the panelist’s question.

38:50 – Panelist: New features. Are the features in Jest (over Jasmine, Mocha, etc.) so important that it will drive people to it by itself?

40:30 – Vitali comments on this great question.

40:58 – Panelist asks questions about features about Jest.

41:29 – Vitali talks about this topic.

42:14 – Let’s go to picks!

42:14 – Advertisement.

Links:

• Vitali Zaidman’s Facebook
• Vitali Zaidman’s Medium
• Vitali Zaidman’s GitHub
• Vitali Zaidman’s NPM
• Vitali Zaidman’s LinkedIn
• Vitali Zaidman’s Medium Article
• JavaScript
• Brutalist Web Design
• Jasmine
• Cypress
• React
• jQuery
• Jest
• Protractor – end to end testing for Angular
• Test Café
• Intern
• Sinon
• XKCD

Sponsors:

• Kendo UI
• Sentry
• Digital Ocean
• Cache Fly

Picks:

AJ O’Neal

• Continuous from last week’s episode: Crossing the Chasm – New Technologies from Niche to General Adaptation.
• Go Lang

Joe Eames

• Board Game: Rajas of the Ganges
• Framework Summit Conference in Utah
• React Conference

Aimee Knight

• Hacker News – “Does Software Understand Complexity” via Michael Feathers
• Cream City Code

Chuck

• E-Book: How do I get a job?
• Express VPN

Vitali

• Book: The Square and The Tower: Networks and Power, from the Freemasons to Facebook by Niall Ferguson
• My article!

Panel:

• Aimee Knight
• AJ O’Neal
• Charles Max Wood

Special Guest: Gil Tayar

In this episode, the panel talks with Gil Tayar who is currently residing in Tel Aviv and is a software engineer. He is currently the Senior Architect at Applitools in Israel. The panel and the guest talk about the different types of tests and when/how one is to use a certain test in a particular situation. They also mention Node, React, Selenium, Puppeteer, and much more!

Show Topics:

0:00 – Advertisement: KENDO UI

0:35 – Chuck: Our panel is AJ, Aimee, myself – and our special guest is Gil Tayar. Tell us why you are famous!

1:13 – Gil talks about where he resides and his background. 

2:27 – Chuck: What is the landscape like now with testing and testing tools now?

2:39 – Guest: There is a huge renaissance with the JavaScript community. Testing has moved forward in the frontend and backend. Today we have lots of testing tools.  We can do frontend testing that wasn’t possible 5 years ago. The major change was React.

The guest talks about Node, React, tools, and more!

4:17 – Aimee: I advocate for tests and testing. There is a grey area though...how do you treat that? If you have to get something into production, but it’s not THE thing to get into production, does that fall into product or...what?

5:02 – Guest: We decided to test everything in the beginning. We actually cam through and did that and since then I don’t think I can use the right code without testing. There are a lot of different situations, though, to consider.

The guest gives hypothetical situations that people could face.

6:27 – Aimee.

6:32 – Guest: The horror to changing code without tests, I don’t know, I haven’t done that for a while. You write with fear in your heart. Your design is driven by fear, and not what you think is right. In the beginning don’t write those tests, but...

7:22 – Aimee: I totally agree and I could go on and on and on.

7:42 – Panel: I want to do tests when I know they will create value. I don’t want to do it b/c it’s a mundane thing. Secondly, I find that some times I am in a situation where I cannot write the test b/c I would have to know the business logic is correct. I am in this discovery mode of what is the business logic? I am not just building your app.

I guess I just need advice in this area, I guess.

8:55 – Guest gives advice to panelist’s question. He mentions how there are two schools of thought.

10:20 – Guest: Don’t mock too much.

10:54 – Panel: Are unit tests the easiest? I just reach for unit testing b/c it helps me code faster. But 90% of my code is NOT that.

11:18 – Guest: Exactly! Most of our test is glue – gluing together a bunch of different stuff! Those are best tested as a medium-sized integration suite.

12:39 – Panel: That seems like a lot of work, though! I loathe the database stuff b/c they don’t map cleanly. I hate this database stuff.

13:06 – Guest: I agree, but don’t knock the database, but knock the level above the database.

13:49 – Guest: Yes, it takes time! Building the script and the testing tools, but when you have it then adding to it is zero time. Once you are in the air it’s smooth sailing.

14:17 – Panel: I guess I can see that. I like to do the dumb-way the first time. I am not clear on the transition.

14:47 – Guest: Write the code, and then write the tests.

The guest gives a hypothetical situation on how/when to test in a certain situation.

16:25 – Panel: Can you talk about that more, please?

16:50 – Guest: Don’t have the same unit – do browser and business logic stuff separated. The real business logic stuff needs to be above that level. First principle is separation of concerns.

18:04 – Panel talks about dependency interjection and asks a question.

18:27 – Guest: What I am talking about very, very light inter-dependency interjection.

19:19 – Panel: You have a main function and you are doing requires in the main function. You are passing the pieces of that into the components that need it.

19:44 – Guest: I only do it when it’s necessary; it’s not a religion for me. I do it only for those layers that I know will need to be mocked; like database layers, etc.

20:09 – Panel.

20:19 – Guest: It’s taken me 80 years to figure out, but I have made plenty of mistakes a long the way. A test should run for 2-5 minutes max for package.

20:53 – Panel: What if you have a really messy legacy system? How do you recommend going into that? Do you write tests for things that you think needs to get tested?

21:39 – Guest answers the question and mentions Selenium!

24:27 – Panel: I like that approach.

24:35 – Chuck: When you say integration test what do you mean?

24:44 – Guest: Integration tests aren’t usually talked about. For most people it’s tests that test the database level against the database. For me, the integration tests are taking a set of classes as they are in the application and testing them together w/o the...so they can run in millisecond time.

26:54 – Advertisement – Sentry.io

27:52 – Chuck: How much do the tools matter?

28:01 – Guest: The revolutions matter. Whether you use Jasmine or Mocha or whatever I don’t think it matters. The tests matter not the tools.

28:39 – Aimee: Yes and no. I think some tools are outdated.

28:50 – Guest: I got a lot of flack about my blog where I talk about Cypress versus Selenium. I will never use Jasmine. In the end it’s the

29:29 – Aimee: I am curious would you be willing to expand on what the Selenium folks were saying about Puppeteer and others may not provide?

29:54 – Guest: Cypress was built for frontend developers. They don’t care about cross browser, and they tested in Chrome. Most browsers are typically the same. Selenium was built with the QA mindset – end to end tests that we need to do cross browser.

The guest continues with this topic.

30:54 – Aimee mentions Cypress.

31:08 – Guest: My guessing is that their priority is not there. I kind of agree with them.

31:21 – Aimee: I think they are focusing on mobile more.

31:24 – Guest: I think cross browser testing is less of an issue now. There is one area that is important it’s the visual area! It’s important to test visually across these different browsers.

32:32 – Guest: Selenium is a Swiss knife – it can do everything.

33:32 – Chuck: I am thinking about different topics to talk about. I haven’t used Puppeteer. What’s that about?

33:49 – Guest: Puppeteer is much more like Selenium. The reason why it’s great is b/c Puppeteer will always be Google Chrome.

35:42 – Chuck: When should you be running your tests? I like to use some unit tests when I am doing my development but how do you break that down?

36:06 – Guest.

38:30 – Chuck: You run tests against production?

38:45 – Guest: Don’t run tests against production...let me clarify!

39:14 – Chuck.

39:21 – Guest: When I am talking about integration testing in the backend...

40:37 – Chuck asks a question.

40:47 – Guest: I am constantly running between frontend and backend.

I didn’t know how to run tests for frontend. I had to invent a new thing and I “invented” the package JS DONG. It’s an implementation of Dong in Node. I found out that I wasn’t the only one and that there were others out there, too.

43:14 – Chuck: Nice! You talked in the prep docs that you urged a new frontend developer to not run the app in the browser for 2 months?

43:25 – Guest: Yeah, I found out that she was running the application...she said she knew how to write tests. I wanted her to see it my way and it probably was a radical train-of-thought, and that was this...

44:40 – Guest: Frontend is so visual.

45:12 – Chuck: What are you working on now?

45:16 – Guest: I am working with Applitools and I was impressed with what they were doing.

The guest goes into further detail.

46:08 – Guest: Those screenshots are never the same.

48:36 – Panel: It’s...comparing the output to the static site to the...

48:50 – Guest: Yes, that static site – if you have 30 pages in your app – most of those are the same. We have this trick where we don’t upload it again and again. Uploading the whole static site is usually very quick. The second thing is we don’t wait for the results. We don’t wait for the whole rendering and we continue with the tests.

50:28 – Guest: I am working mostly (right now) in backend.

50:40 – Chuck: Anything else? Picks!

50:57 – Advertisement: Get A Coder Job!

END – Advertisement: CacheFly!

Links:

• JavaScript
• React
• Elixir
• Node.js
• Puppeteer
• Cypress
• SeleniumHQ
• Article – Ideas.Ted.Com
• Book: Never Split the Difference
• Applitools
• Guest’s Blog Article about Cypress vs. Selenium
• Gil’s Twitter
• Gil’s Medium
• Gil’s LinkedIn

Sponsors:

• Kendo UI
• Sentry
• CacheFly

Picks:

Aimee

• How Showing Vulnerability Helps Build a Stronger Team

AJ

• Never Split the Difference
• Project - TeleBit

Charles

• Monster Hunter International
• Metabase

Gil

• Cat Zero
• The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind

Daniel Caldas is calling from Singapore. He currently works as a software engineer for Zendesk and has also worked in Portugal and Germany. He has worked primarily on the frontend with Node and JavaScript. He talks about his experience testing JavaScript, how he got started with Jest, and why he likes it. Daniel finds Jest very easy to use and straightforward. He likes that  Jest has a single reference page for documentation. He feels that Jest is largely complete out of the box and has only made a small add on to get rid of Boilerplate in some tests.

Daniel explains what a snapshot, how they work, and why he prefers fixtures over factories. He gives tips on how to set up your tests so that they are easy to follow. He finds it helps to structure your scenarios in the fixture description. He talks about gotchas in Jest. While Jest is largely easy to use, Jest has been around for a while and breaking changes do happen. It’s important to check what version your code base is using. While there are a lot of free sources around Jest online, he advises listeners to stick as close to the official documentation as possible, or to people associated with Jest, and to read recent stuff. As for conventions, Jest has pretty much everything out of the box and the built in conventions make it easy to navigate any project that uses Jest.

Daniel talks about some of the features available in Jest, converting observables into promises, and tricks he has used to make tests easier to put together. He talks about his method for keeping his mocks and stubs straight. He advises listeners to have some organizational rules, such as starting the imports alphabetically, and to always follow those rules. He talks about how he runs tests and what environments he uses. While Jest is normally used for unit testing, Daniel has also used it for end to end tests, and he talks about his experience with an open source project doing both types in Jest. Daniel concludes the show by advising listeners starting with JavaScript and frontend, don’t think too much about the library you’re going to use because you’ll probably end up using Jest. It’s more important to have unit tests and a proper testing framework at the beginning than anything else. He also invites listeners to check out his open source work on Github.

Panelists

• Aimee Knight

• AJ O’Neal

• Charles Max Wood

**To receive your 40% OFF coupon for Manning Publications (good for all our products in all formats) visit us on Facebook - click on "Send A Message"and type "YES"**

Guest

• Danile Caldas

Sponsors

• Sentry | Use the code “devchat” for $100 credit

Links

• Zendesk

• Jest

• React

• Babel

• ESLint

• Async/Await

• Cypress

• React-d3-graph

• Unrevealed tips for unit testing with Jest

Picks

Aimee Knight:

• The Difference Between Fault Tolerance, High Availability, and Disaster Recovery

AJ O’Neal:

• Rubin Report with Lindsay Shepherd

Charles Max Wood:

• White Christmas

• Holiday Inn

Daniel Caldas:

• Home Alone

Movie stars in 2014's polls are a welcome addition to the fray. For those carping about how stars represent glamour and gloss, why not?

Jarvis, W. Todd, author

Online Resource

TrueNat machines will be used for the first time in the State for virus screening

The Centre said it feared that the order may have a “cascading effect” on migrants of other States as well

Interview with Ranhjit Manchanda, MD, author of A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Multigene Testing for All Patients With Breast Cancer

The tests can still be used, CDC says, as urgency over possible outbreak grows

Early batches of the test can still be used, CDC says, while affirming it will deploy new kits

Qiagen vows to ramp up production of kits as scientists turn to social media to plea for donations

Strategy reduces volumes and times needed to evaluate CO₂-switchable systems

Qiagen vows to ramp up production of kits as scientists turn to social media to plea for donations

Fingers are being pointed in the Netherlands and the UK over reagent capacity constraints

Online Resource

Hayden Library - LB3051.A512 2014

Only medical officers can refer people for COVID-19 tests

Rea, Alexander James

India's recovery rate currently stands at 29.36%, according to the Union Health Ministry.

Harsh Vardhan flagged the large prevalence of non-smoking tobacco usage in some of the States and the problem of spitting in public places.