ic

COVID-19 in South Africa: Leadership, Resilience and Inequality

7 May 2020

Christopher Vandome

Research Fellow, Africa Programme
In a world looking for leadership, South Africa’s president Cyril Ramaphosa has been remarkable. One year after he carried the time-worn ANC through a national election, South Africans are crying out for more.

2020-05-07-Ramaphosa-COVID-South-Africa

Cyril Ramaphosa at NASREC Expo Centre in Johannesburg where facilities are in place to treat coronavirus patients. Photo by JEROME DELAY/POOL/AFP via Getty Images.

In the COVID-19 crisis so far, Cyril Ramaphosa has been widely praised for displaying the decisive leadership so many hoped for when they cast their ballot for him in May 2019. Buttressed by others such as health minister Dr Zweli Mkhize, and on a simple objective to prevent transmission, South Africa has been a lesson to the world. Act fast. Act hard.

Former president Thabo Mbeki’s disastrous response to the HIV crisis cast a long shadow over his legacy, and Ramaphosa has taken note. South Africa has had one of the tightest lockdowns in the world. No exercise. No cigarettes. No alcohol.

The lockdown was imposed when the country had only around 1,000 recorded cases and just two deaths. As a result, transmission from returning travellers has not yet led to an exponential infection rate within the community. The government’s swift reaction has bought much needed time with the peak now seemingly delayed to September or October.

Continental and national leadership

Ramaphosa has also emerged as a key focal point for Africa-wide responses. As current chair of the African Union (AU) he leads the continental engagement with the World Health Organization (WHO), and the various international finance institutions, while South African officials are working with the AU and the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA) on a push for African debt restructuring.

He has also been active in trouble shooting to unlock external assistance to the continent, including from China and Russia. Appointing special envoys is typical of his boardroom-honed leadership style.

International and regional partnerships are vital for resilience and the arrival of 217 Cuban doctors to South Africa is strongly reminiscent of the liberationist solidarity of the Cold War era. And regional economies remain dependent on South Africa to protect their own vulnerable citizens. Following the 2008 financial crisis, it was South Africa’s regional trading relationships that remained robust, while trade with its main global partners in China and the US dropped.

Despite the plaudits, Ramaphosa remains vulnerable to challenge at home, notably around his failure to stimulate South Africa’s moribund economy. On the eve of lockdown, Moody’s joined its peers Standard and Poor’s and Fitch in giving South Africa a below investment grade credit rating. The move was a long time coming. Long mooted economic reforms were slow to materialise, and South Africa had fallen into recession.

Ramaphosa depends on a small core of close advisors and allies, initially united in apparent opposition to the kleptocratic rule of President Jacob Zuma and the deep patronage networks he created within both the party and the state. But this allegiance is being tested by economic reality. Support within the party was already drifting prior to the crisis.

Disagreements are not just technocratic – there are big ideological questions in play around the role of the state in the economy, the level of intervention, and its affordability, with key government figures sceptical of rapid market reforms. Energy minister and former union stalwart Gwede Mantashe is wary of job losses, and minister of public enterprises Pravin Gordhan protective of state-owned enterprises (SOEs). Before coronavirus hit, Ramaphosa seemed content to allow these policy disputes to play themselves out with little decisive intervention.

Slow progress on reform, against worsening economic performance, left Ramaphosa and his allies exposed. In January the president missed the UK’s African Investment Summit in order to assert control over a party meeting at which it was expected his detractors would seek to remove Gordhan.

COVID-19 has sharpened thinking

As the independently assertive - and eminently quotable - pro-market reformist finance minister Tito Mboweni stated, ‘you can’t eat ideology’. Accelerated reform and restructuring is required if the government turns to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for assistance.

For the first time, Gordhan has been forced to deny a bailout to beleaguered state airline South African Airways (SAA), and the government’s lockdown bailout of R300 billion has been applauded by business. Much like the fiscal stimulus and recovery plan of 2018, it relies on smart spending, targeting sectors with high multiplier effects. It also includes significant reserve bank loans.

But it has been criticised for not doing enough to help the most vulnerable. There is considerable fear of what could happen when the virus takes hold in South Africa’s townships and informal settlements where social distancing is almost impossible, basic toilet facilities are shared, and HIV and TB rates high.

There are mounting concerns of the humanitarian cost of a prolonged lockdown, and the government has been faster than others in implementing a tiered lockdown system, trying to get people back to work and keep the economy afloat.

South Africa has been criticized by the UN for the use of lethal force by security forces in enforcing lockdown and, in a society plagued by corruption, there are fears legislation to stop the spread of false information could be used to restrict legitimate reporting on the virus response or other issues.

COVID-19 shines a spotlight on societies’ fault-lines worldwide. South Africa is often touted as having one of the highest levels of inequality in the world but, in a globalized economy, these divisions are international as much as they are local.

Resilience comes from within, but also depends on regional and global trading and financial systems. South Africans and international partners have long recognised Ramaphosa’s leadership qualities as an impressive voice for the global south.

But he must also be an advocate for South Africa’s poor. This crisis could accelerate implementation of his landmark pro-poor National Health Insurance and Universal Health Care programmes. Or the hit of COVID-19 on top of South Africa’s existing economic woes could see them derailed entirely. Ramaphosa must push through economic reforms at the same time as managing COVID-19 and rebuilding trust in his government.




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 2 – The Calabrian Mafia and Transatlantic Relations




ic

Chatham House Forum: Are Robots Prejudiced?




ic

Identity, Outreach and Community: Arabic Music in the Diaspora




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 4 – Illegal Hospital Detentions in Africa, and LGBTQ+ Rights in Lebanon




ic

Can Old Economics Help Solve Modern Economic Problems?




ic

Should the Super-Rich Pay for a Universal Basic Income?




ic

Can Entrepreneurship Help Stabilize Conflict Zones?




ic

Somaliland's Regional Priorities and Strategic Partnerships




ic

Genes, Germs and Geography: The Future of Medicine




ic

The New Political Landscape in Germany and Austria




ic

Planning for Africa's Future: Youth Perspectives from Kenya and South Africa




ic

The Politics of Personality in the Middle East




ic

Reconstruction in Syria: Between Political Pragmatism and Human Rights Idealism




ic

Stopping the Use of Chemical Weapons in Modern Conflicts




ic

Unfulfilled Ambitions: the State of Democracy in Africa




ic

Argentina: Political Change and the G20 Presidency




ic

Chatham House Forum: Are Humans Psychologically Wired to Fight?




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 10 - Artificial Intelligence in International Affairs, and Women Drivers in Saudi Arabia




ic

Jordan: Regime Survival and Politics Beyond the State




ic

Undercurrents: Bonus Episode - How Can Political Elites Reconnect With Voters?




ic

China, Russia and Iran: Power Politics of a New World Order?




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 12 - Trump's Visit to the UK, and Japanese Foreign Policy in Asia




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 14 - Sustainable Energy for Refugees and Australian Foreign Policy




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 15 - Brexit Update, and Corruption in the World of the Global Super-Rich




ic

Cyber Security Series: Securing Elections and Reclaiming Democratic Processes




ic

A Weapon of War? Sexual Violence in the Syrian Conflict




ic

Undercurrents - Episode 16: Cybercrime in the GCC States, and Fiction from Refugee Camps




ic

The Failed Marshall Plan: Learning from US Foreign Policy Missteps




ic

Cyber Security Series: Comparing Best Practice Across Europe




ic

Global Trade Landscape Series 2018: Technological Transitions and the Future of Global Trade




ic

Evan Davis In Conversation With Christian Ulbrich, CEO, JLL




ic

The American Dream vs America First




ic

The Belt and Road Initiative: Modernity, Geopolitics and the Global Order




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 18 - The American Dream vs America First, and Uganda's Illegal Ivory Trade




ic

A Vision for the Future of the Transatlantic Relationship




ic

Trump’s America: Domestic and International Public Opinion




ic

Leadership in an Era of Geopolitical Turbulence




ic

Voices of Jordan: The Kingdom in the Centre of the Middle East




ic

Iran’s New Foreign Policy Challenges




ic

Frozen Conflict: The Transnistrian Dispute




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 21 - EU-US Relations after the Midterms, and Tackling the Illegal Wildlife Trade in Africa




ic

Can Investment Prevent Conflict?




ic

Online Counterterrorism: The Role of the Public and Private Sectors




ic

Leadership in the 21st Century: Jessica Cecil, BBC




ic

International Law Podcast: Starvation in Armed Conflict




ic

Ten Conflicts to Watch in 2019




ic

The Transatlantic Relationship: Challenges and Opportunities




ic

Undercurrents: Episode 25 - The End of Liberal Foreign Policy, and the Legacy of the Paris Peace Conference




ic

Radical Change? New Political Paradigms in Brazil and Mexico