M. W. McLean, M. P. Wand.

Source: Bayesian Analysis, Volume 14, Number 2, 371--398.

Abstract:
We build on recent work concerning message passing approaches to approximate fitting and inference for arbitrarily large regression models. The focus is on regression models where the response variable is modeled to have an elaborate distribution, which is loosely defined to mean a distribution that is more complicated than common distributions such as those in the Bernoulli, Poisson and Normal families. Examples of elaborate response families considered here are the Negative Binomial and $t$ families. Variational message passing is more challenging due to some of the conjugate exponential families being non-standard and numerical integration being needed. Nevertheless, a factor graph fragment approach means the requisite calculations only need to be done once for a particular elaborate response distribution family. Computer code can be compartmentalized, including that involving numerical integration. A major finding of this work is that the modularity of variational message passing extends to elaborate response regression models.

Daniela Pauger, Helga Wagner.

Source: Bayesian Analysis, Volume 14, Number 2, 341--369.

Abstract:
We propose a Bayesian approach to obtain a sparse representation of the effect of a categorical predictor in regression type models. As this effect is captured by a group of level effects, sparsity cannot only be achieved by excluding single irrelevant level effects or the whole group of effects associated to this predictor but also by fusing levels which have essentially the same effect on the response. To achieve this goal, we propose a prior which allows for almost perfect as well as almost zero dependence between level effects a priori. This prior can alternatively be obtained by specifying spike and slab prior distributions on all effect differences associated to this categorical predictor. We show how restricted fusion can be implemented and develop an efficient MCMC (Markov chain Monte Carlo) method for posterior computation. The performance of the proposed method is investigated on simulated data and we illustrate its application on real data from EU-SILC (European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions).

Ruosi Guo, Chunming Zhang, Zhengjun Zhang.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 35, Number 1, 145--157.

Abstract:
In many scientific disciplines, finding hidden influential factors behind observational data is essential but challenging. The majority of existing approaches, such as the independent component analysis (${mathrm{ICA}}$), rely on linear transformation, that is, true signals are linear combinations of hidden components. Motivated from analyzing nonlinear temporal signals in neuroscience, genetics, and finance, this paper proposes the “maximum independent component analysis” (${mathrm{MaxICA}}$), based on max-linear combinations of components. In contrast to existing methods, ${mathrm{MaxICA}}$ benefits from focusing on significant major components while filtering out ignorable components. A major tool for parameter learning of ${mathrm{MaxICA}}$ is an augmented genetic algorithm, consisting of three schemes for the elite weighted sum selection, randomly combined crossover, and dynamic mutation. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of ${mathrm{MaxICA}}$ in either extracting max-linearly combined essential sources in many applications or supplying a better approximation for nonlinearly combined source signals, such as $mathrm{EEG}$ recordings analyzed in this paper.

Divyansh Agarwal, Jingshu Wang, Nancy R. Zhang.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 35, Number 1, 112--128.

Abstract:
Single cell sequencing technologies are transforming biomedical research. However, due to the inherent nature of the data, single cell RNA sequencing analysis poses new computational and statistical challenges. We begin with a survey of a selection of topics in this field, with a gentle introduction to the biology and a more detailed exploration of the technical noise. We consider in detail the problem of single cell data denoising, sometimes referred to as “imputation” in the relevant literature. We discuss why this is not a typical statistical imputation problem, and review current approaches to this problem. We then explore why the use of denoised values in downstream analyses invites novel statistical insights, and how denoising uncertainty should be accounted for to yield valid statistical inference. The utilization of denoised or imputed matrices in statistical inference is not unique to single cell genomics, and arises in many other fields. We describe the challenges in this type of analysis, discuss some preliminary solutions, and highlight unresolved issues.

Chao Du, S. C. Kou.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 35, Number 1, 75--91.

Abstract:
Toward the last quarter of the 20th century, the emergence of single-molecule experiments enabled scientists to track and study individual molecules’ dynamic properties in real time. Unlike macroscopic systems’ dynamics, those of single molecules can only be properly described by stochastic models even in the absence of external noise. Consequently, statistical methods have played a key role in extracting hidden information about molecular dynamics from data obtained through single-molecule experiments. In this article, we survey the major statistical methodologies used to analyze single-molecule experimental data. Our discussion is organized according to the types of stochastic models used to describe single-molecule systems as well as major experimental data collection techniques. We also highlight challenges and future directions in the application of statistical methodologies to single-molecule experiments.

Peter J. Diggle, Emanuele Giorgi, Julienne Atsame, Sylvie Ntsame Ella, Kisito Ogoussan, Katherine Gass.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 35, Number 1, 42--50.

Abstract:
Vector-borne diseases have long presented major challenges to the health of rural communities in the wet tropical regions of the world, but especially in sub-Saharan Africa. In this paper, we describe the contribution that statistical modelling has made to the global elimination programme for one vector-borne disease, onchocerciasis. We explain why information on the spatial distribution of a second vector-borne disease, Loa loa, is needed before communities at high risk of onchocerciasis can be treated safely with mass distribution of ivermectin, an antifiarial medication. We show how a model-based geostatistical analysis of Loa loa prevalence survey data can be used to map the predictive probability that each location in the region of interest meets a WHO policy guideline for safe mass distribution of ivermectin and describe two applications: one is to data from Cameroon that assesses prevalence using traditional blood-smear microscopy; the other is to Africa-wide data that uses a low-cost questionnaire-based method. We describe how a recent technological development in image-based microscopy has resulted in a change of emphasis from prevalence alone to the bivariate spatial distribution of prevalence and the intensity of infection among infected individuals. We discuss how statistical modelling of the kind described here can contribute to health policy guidelines and decision-making in two ways. One is to ensure that, in a resource-limited setting, prevalence surveys are designed, and the resulting data analysed, as efficiently as possible. The other is to provide an honest quantification of the uncertainty attached to any binary decision by reporting predictive probabilities that a policy-defined condition for action is or is not met.

Zhixiang Lin, Mahdi Zamanighomi, Timothy Daley, Shining Ma, Wing Hung Wong.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 35, Number 1, 2--13.

Abstract:
Unsupervised methods, including clustering methods, are essential to the analysis of single-cell genomic data. Model-based clustering methods are under-explored in the area of single-cell genomics, and have the advantage of quantifying the uncertainty of the clustering result. Here we develop a model-based approach for the integrative analysis of single-cell chromatin accessibility and gene expression data. We show that combining these two types of data, we can achieve a better separation of the underlying cell types. An efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is also developed.

Iain M. Johnstone.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 657--668.

Abstract:
Many papers in the early part of Brown’s career focused on the admissibility or otherwise of estimators of a vector parameter. He established that inadmissibility of invariant estimators in three and higher dimensions is a general phenomenon, and found deep and beautiful connections between admissibility and other areas of mathematics. This review touches on several of his major contributions, with a focus on his celebrated 1971 paper connecting admissibility, recurrence and elliptic partial differential equations.

T. Tony Cai.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 635--656.

Abstract:
A wide range of nonparametric function estimation models have been studied individually in the literature. Among them the homoscedastic nonparametric Gaussian regression is arguably the best known and understood. Inspired by the asymptotic equivalence theory, Brown, Cai and Zhou ( Ann. Statist. 36 (2008) 2055–2084; Ann. Statist. 38 (2010) 2005–2046) and Brown et al. ( Probab. Theory Related Fields 146 (2010) 401–433) developed a unified approach to turn a collection of non-Gaussian function estimation models into a standard Gaussian regression and any good Gaussian nonparametric regression method can then be used. These Gaussianization Machines have two key components, binning and transformation. When combined with BlockJS, a wavelet thresholding procedure for Gaussian regression, the procedures are computationally efficient with strong theoretical guarantees. Technical analysis given in Brown, Cai and Zhou ( Ann. Statist. 36 (2008) 2055–2084; Ann. Statist. 38 (2010) 2005–2046) and Brown et al. ( Probab. Theory Related Fields 146 (2010) 401–433) shows that the estimators attain the optimal rate of convergence adaptively over a large set of Besov spaces and across a collection of non-Gaussian function estimation models, including robust nonparametric regression, density estimation, and nonparametric regression in exponential families. The estimators are also spatially adaptive. The Gaussianization Machines significantly extend the flexibility and scope of the theories and methodologies originally developed for the conventional nonparametric Gaussian regression. This article aims to provide a concise account of the Gaussianization Machines developed in Brown, Cai and Zhou ( Ann. Statist. 36 (2008) 2055–2084; Ann. Statist. 38 (2010) 2005–2046), Brown et al. ( Probab. Theory Related Fields 146 (2010) 401–433).

James O. Berger, Anirban DasGupta.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 621--634.

Abstract:
This article gives a panoramic survey of the general area of parametric statistical inference, decision theory and foundations of statistics for the period 1965–2010 through the lens of Larry Brown’s contributions to varied aspects of this massive area. The article goes over sufficiency, shrinkage estimation, admissibility, minimaxity, complete class theorems, estimated confidence, conditional confidence procedures, Edgeworth and higher order asymptotic expansions, variational Bayes, Stein’s SURE, differential inequalities, geometrization of convergence rates, asymptotic equivalence, aspects of empirical process theory, inference after model selection, unified frequentist and Bayesian testing, and Wald’s sequential theory. A reasonably comprehensive bibliography is provided.

Dalia Ghanem, Todd A. Kuffner.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 604--605.

Roderick J. Little.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 580--583.

Dag Tjøstheim.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 575--579.

Sara van de Geer.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 566--568.

Abstract:
We discuss the papers “Models as Approximations” I & II, by A. Buja, R. Berk, L. Brown, E. George, E. Pitkin, M. Traskin, L. Zao and K. Zhang (Part I) and A. Buja, L. Brown, A. K. Kuchibhota, R. Berk, E. George and L. Zhao (Part II). We present a summary with some details for the generalized linear model.

Andreas Buja, Lawrence Brown, Arun Kumar Kuchibhotla, Richard Berk, Edward George, Linda Zhao.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 545--565.

Abstract:
We develop a model-free theory of general types of parametric regression for i.i.d. observations. The theory replaces the parameters of parametric models with statistical functionals, to be called “regression functionals,” defined on large nonparametric classes of joint ${x extrm{-}y}$ distributions, without assuming a correct model. Parametric models are reduced to heuristics to suggest plausible objective functions. An example of a regression functional is the vector of slopes of linear equations fitted by OLS to largely arbitrary ${x extrm{-}y}$ distributions, without assuming a linear model (see Part I). More generally, regression functionals can be defined by minimizing objective functions, solving estimating equations, or with ad hoc constructions. In this framework, it is possible to achieve the following: (1) define a notion of “well-specification” for regression functionals that replaces the notion of correct specification of models, (2) propose a well-specification diagnostic for regression functionals based on reweighting distributions and data, (3) decompose sampling variability of regression functionals into two sources, one due to the conditional response distribution and another due to the regressor distribution interacting with misspecification, both of order $N^{-1/2}$, (4) exhibit plug-in/sandwich estimators of standard error as limit cases of ${x extrm{-}y}$ bootstrap estimators, and (5) provide theoretical heuristics to indicate that ${x extrm{-}y}$ bootstrap standard errors may generally be preferred over sandwich estimators.

Andreas Buja, Lawrence Brown, Richard Berk, Edward George, Emil Pitkin, Mikhail Traskin, Kai Zhang, Linda Zhao.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 4, 523--544.

Abstract:
In the early 1980s, Halbert White inaugurated a “model-robust” form of statistical inference based on the “sandwich estimator” of standard error. This estimator is known to be “heteroskedasticity-consistent,” but it is less well known to be “nonlinearity-consistent” as well. Nonlinearity, however, raises fundamental issues because in its presence regressors are not ancillary, hence cannot be treated as fixed. The consequences are deep: (1) population slopes need to be reinterpreted as statistical functionals obtained from OLS fits to largely arbitrary joint ${x extrm{-}y}$ distributions; (2) the meaning of slope parameters needs to be rethought; (3) the regressor distribution affects the slope parameters; (4) randomness of the regressors becomes a source of sampling variability in slope estimates of order $1/sqrt{N}$; (5) inference needs to be based on model-robust standard errors, including sandwich estimators or the ${x extrm{-}y}$ bootstrap. In theory, model-robust and model-trusting standard errors can deviate by arbitrary magnitudes either way. In practice, significant deviations between them can be detected with a diagnostic test.

Pantelis Samartsidis, Shaun R. Seaman, Anne M. Presanis, Matthew Hickman, Daniela De Angelis.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 3, 486--503.

Abstract:
Researchers are often challenged with assessing the impact of an intervention on an outcome of interest in situations where the intervention is nonrandomised, the intervention is only applied to one or few units, the intervention is binary, and outcome measurements are available at multiple time points. In this paper, we review existing methods for causal inference in these situations. We detail the assumptions underlying each method, emphasize connections between the different approaches and provide guidelines regarding their practical implementation. Several open problems are identified thus highlighting the need for future research.

Sijia Xiang, Weixin Yao, Guangren Yang.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 3, 391--404.

Abstract:
Finite mixture models have offered a very important tool for exploring complex data structures in many scientific areas, such as economics, epidemiology and finance. Semiparametric mixture models, which were introduced into traditional finite mixture models in the past decade, have brought forth exciting developments in their methodologies, theories, and applications. In this article, we not only provide a selective overview of the newly-developed semiparametric mixture models, but also discuss their estimation methodologies, theoretical properties if applicable, and some open questions. Recent developments are also discussed.

Jacqueline J. Meulman, Anita J. van der Kooij, Kevin L. W. Duisters.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 3, 361--390.

Abstract:
We present a methodology for multiple regression analysis that deals with categorical variables (possibly mixed with continuous ones), in combination with regularization, variable selection and high-dimensional data ($Pgg N$). Regularization and optimal scaling (OS) are two important extensions of ordinary least squares regression (OLS) that will be combined in this paper. There are two data analytic situations for which optimal scaling was developed. One is the analysis of categorical data, and the other the need for transformations because of nonlinear relationships between predictors and outcome. Optimal scaling of categorical data finds quantifications for the categories, both for the predictors and for the outcome variables, that are optimal for the regression model in the sense that they maximize the multiple correlation. When nonlinear relationships exist, nonlinear transformation of predictors and outcome maximize the multiple correlation in the same way. We will consider a variety of transformation types; typically we use step functions for categorical variables, and smooth (spline) functions for continuous variables. Both types of functions can be restricted to be monotonic, preserving the ordinal information in the data. In combination with optimal scaling, three popular regularization methods will be considered: Ridge regression, the Lasso and the Elastic Net. The resulting method will be called ROS Regression (Regularized Optimal Scaling Regression). The OS algorithm provides straightforward and efficient estimation of the regularized regression coefficients, automatically gives the Group Lasso and Blockwise Sparse Regression, and extends them by the possibility to maintain ordinal properties in the data. Extended examples are provided.

Christopher K. Wikle, Jay M. Ver Hoef.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 349--359.

Abstract:
Noel Cressie, FAA is Director of the Centre for Environmental Informatics in the National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia (NIASRA) and Distinguished Professor in the School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics at the University of Wollongong, Australia. He is also Adjunct Professor at the University of Missouri (USA), Affiliate of Org 398, Science Data Understanding, at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (USA), and a member of the Science Team for NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite. Cressie was awarded a B.Sc. with First Class Honours in Mathematics in 1972 from the University of Western Australia, and an M.A. and Ph.D. in Statistics in 1973 and 1975, respectively, from Princeton University (USA). Two brief postdoctoral periods followed, at the Centre de Morphologie Mathématique, ENSMP, in Fontainebleau (France) from April 1975–September 1975, and at Imperial College, London (UK) from September 1975–January 1976. His past appointments have been at The Flinders University of South Australia from 1976–1983, at Iowa State University (USA) from 1983–1998, and at The Ohio State University (USA) from 1998–2012. He has authored or co-authored four books and more than 280 papers in peer-reviewed outlets, covering areas that include spatial and spatio-temporal statistics, environmental statistics, empirical-Bayesian and Bayesian methods including sequential design, goodness-of-fit, and remote sensing of the environment. Many of his papers also address important questions in the sciences. Cressie is a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Science, the American Statistical Association, the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, and the Spatial Econometrics Association, and he is an Elected Member of the International Statistical Institute. Noel Cressie’s refereed, unrefereed, and other publications are available at: https://niasra.uow.edu.au/cei/people/UOW232444.html.

Qingyuan Zhao, Jingshu Wang, Wes Spiller, Jack Bowden, Dylan S. Small.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 317--333.

Abstract:
Instrumental variable analysis is a widely used method to estimate causal effects in the presence of unmeasured confounding. When the instruments, exposure and outcome are not measured in the same sample, Angrist and Krueger ( J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 87 (1992) 328–336) suggested to use two-sample instrumental variable (TSIV) estimators that use sample moments from an instrument-exposure sample and an instrument-outcome sample. However, this method is biased if the two samples are from heterogeneous populations so that the distributions of the instruments are different. In linear structural equation models, we derive a new class of TSIV estimators that are robust to heterogeneous samples under the key assumption that the structural relations in the two samples are the same. The widely used two-sample two-stage least squares estimator belongs to this class. It is generally not asymptotically efficient, although we find that it performs similarly to the optimal TSIV estimator in most practical situations. We then attempt to relax the linearity assumption. We find that, unlike one-sample analyses, the TSIV estimator is not robust to misspecified exposure model. Additionally, to nonparametrically identify the magnitude of the causal effect, the noise in the exposure must have the same distributions in the two samples. However, this assumption is in general untestable because the exposure is not observed in one sample. Nonetheless, we may still identify the sign of the causal effect in the absence of homogeneity of the noise.

Lei Liu, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, Robert L. Strawderman, Daowen Zhang, Bankole A. Johnson, Haitao Chai.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 253--279.

Abstract:
Zero-inflated nonnegative continuous (or semicontinuous) data arise frequently in biomedical, economical, and ecological studies. Examples include substance abuse, medical costs, medical care utilization, biomarkers (e.g., CD4 cell counts, coronary artery calcium scores), single cell gene expression rates, and (relative) abundance of microbiome. Such data are often characterized by the presence of a large portion of zero values and positive continuous values that are skewed to the right and heteroscedastic. Both of these features suggest that no simple parametric distribution may be suitable for modeling such type of outcomes. In this paper, we review statistical methods for analyzing zero-inflated nonnegative outcome data. We will start with the cross-sectional setting, discussing ways to separate zero and positive values and introducing flexible models to characterize right skewness and heteroscedasticity in the positive values. We will then present models of correlated zero-inflated nonnegative continuous data, using random effects to tackle the correlation on repeated measures from the same subject and that across different parts of the model. We will also discuss expansion to related topics, for example, zero-inflated count and survival data, nonlinear covariate effects, and joint models of longitudinal zero-inflated nonnegative continuous data and survival. Finally, we will present applications to three real datasets (i.e., microbiome, medical costs, and alcohol drinking) to illustrate these methods. Example code will be provided to facilitate applications of these methods.

Gregorio Quintana-Ortí, Amelia Simó.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 236--252.

Abstract:
This paper is focused on kernel regression when the response variable is the shape of a 3D object represented by a configuration matrix of landmarks. Regression methods on this shape space are not trivial because this space has a complex finite-dimensional Riemannian manifold structure (non-Euclidean). Papers about it are scarce in the literature, the majority of them are restricted to the case of a single explanatory variable, and many of them are based on the approximated tangent space. In this paper, there are several methodological innovations. The first one is the adaptation of the general method for kernel regression analysis in manifold-valued data to the three-dimensional case of Kendall’s shape space. The second one is its generalization to the multivariate case and the addressing of the curse-of-dimensionality problem. Finally, we propose bootstrap confidence intervals for prediction. A simulation study is carried out to check the goodness of the procedure, and a comparison with a current approach is performed. Then, it is applied to a 3D database obtained from an anthropometric survey of the Spanish child population with a potential application to online sales of children’s wear.

Eitan Greenshtein, Ya’acov Ritov.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 2, 224--228.

Abstract:
We present some personal reflections on empirical Bayes/ compound decision (EB/CD) theory following Efron (2019). In particular, we consider the role of exchangeability in the EB/CD theory and how it can be achieved when there are covariates. We also discuss the interpretation of EB/CD confidence interval, the theoretical efficiency of the CD procedure, and the impact of sparsity assumptions.

Georg Lindgren.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 100--128.

Abstract:
We describe and compare how methods based on the classical Rice’s formula for the expected number, and higher moments, of level crossings by a Gaussian process stand up to contemporary numerical methods to accurately deal with crossing related characteristics of the sample paths. We illustrate the relative merits in accuracy and computing time of the Rice moment methods and the exact numerical method, developed since the late 1990s, on three groups of distribution problems, the maximum over a finite interval and the waiting time to first crossing, the length of excursions over a level, and the joint period/amplitude of oscillations. We also treat the notoriously difficult problem of dependence between successive zero crossing distances. The exact solution has been known since at least 2000, but it has remained largely unnoticed outside the ocean science community. Extensive simulation studies illustrate the accuracy of the numerical methods. As a historical introduction an attempt is made to illustrate the relation between Rice’s original formulation and arguments and the exact numerical methods.

Vincent Dorie, Jennifer Hill, Uri Shalit, Marc Scott, Dan Cervone.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 94--99.

Abstract:
Response to discussion of Dorie (2017), in which the authors of that piece express their gratitude to the discussants, rebut some specific criticisms, and argue that the limitations of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition represent an exciting opportunity for future competitions in a similar mold.

Nicole Bohme Carnegie.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 90--93.

Abstract:
With a thorough exposition of the methods and results of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition, Dorie et al. have set a new standard for reproducibility and comparability of evaluations of causal inference methods. In particular, the open-source R package aciccomp2016, which permits reproduction of all datasets used in the competition, will be an invaluable resource for evaluation of future methodological developments. Building upon results from Dorie et al., we examine whether a set of potential modifications to Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART)—multiple chains in model fitting, using the propensity score as a covariate, targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE), and computing symmetric confidence intervals—have a stronger impact on bias, RMSE, and confidence interval coverage in combination than they do alone. We find that bias in the estimate of SATT is minimal, regardless of the BART formulation. For purposes of CI coverage, however, all proposed modifications are beneficial—alone and in combination—but use of TMLE is least beneficial for coverage and results in considerably wider confidence intervals.

Susan Gruber, Mark J. van der Laan.

Source: Statistical Science, Volume 34, Number 1, 82--85.

Abstract:
Dorie and co-authors (DHSSC) are to be congratulated for initiating the ACIC Data Challenge. Their project engaged the community and accelerated research by providing a level playing field for comparing the performance of a priori specified algorithms. DHSSC identified themes concerning characteristics of the DGP, properties of the estimators, and inference. We discuss these themes in the context of targeted learning.

London (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG) : Cleanair, Campaign for a Smoke-free Environment, [198-?]

London (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG) : Cleanair, Campaign for a Smoke-free Environment, [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London (33 Stillness Rd, SE23 1NG) : Cleanair, Campaign for a Smoke-free Environment, [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG) : Cleanair, Campaign for a Smoke-free Environment, [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG) : Cleanair, Campaign for a Smoke-free Environment, [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair, Smoke-free Environment (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [1989?]

London : Cleanair (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London : Cleanair (33 Stillness Rd, London, SE23 1NG), [198-?]

London (33 Stillness Road London SE23 1NG) : Cleanair Campaign for a Smoke-free Environment, [198-?]