of

Winners of Tickets to André Rieu’s 2016 Maastricht Concert in Cinemas

Rivalling One Direction-ers in devotion, Australian fans of the musical maestro André Rieu are set to again be wowed at the cinema screenings of his 2016 Maastricht concert.




of

Winners of double passes to Rolling Thunder Vietnam

Conscription, combat, protest and homecoming are themes that come to life in the musical Rolling Thunder Vietnam – Songs that Defined a Generation.




of

Team USA labels report of Ryder Cup postponement 'inaccurate'




of

Euro Tour hopeful of late-May return as virus impacts 2 more events




of

Report: Euro Tour expected to reduce purses as part of drastic changes




of

Westwood, Kaymer to compete in series of virtual charity events




of

Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.

(United States Federal Circuit) - Held that a patent claim relating to light-emitting diodes was invalid because it did not meet the enablement requirement. After a jury found that the defendants had infringed Boston University's patent, the defendants appealed on the ground that the patent was invalid because it did not adequately teach the public how to make and use the invention. Agreeing with this argument, the Federal Circuit held that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.




of

Federal Education Association--Stateside Region v. Department of Defense

(United States Federal Circuit) - Held that a teacher working for the U.S. Department of Defense Domestic Dependent Elementary and Secondary Schools failed to file a timely petition for review of a decision removing her from the federal service. The teacher, who argued that her procedural due process rights were violated when she was fired from her job teaching on a military base, petitioned for review of an arbitrator's decision. However, the Federal Circuit concluded that her petition for review was not timely filed and thus dismissed it.




of

Oliver v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

(United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that vaccinations given to an infant did not cause him to develop a seizure condition. The parents of an infant who developed an illness called Dravet syndrome after being vaccinated sued the Secretary of Health and Human Services for compensation under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. Agreeing with the findings of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the Federal Circuit held in a 2-1 decision that the parents failed to show that the infant's injuries were caused by his vaccinations.




of

Villareal v. Bureau of Prisons

(United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed an arbitrator’s decision sustaining plaintiff’s removal from employment as a corrections officer with the Bureau of Prisons. The Federal Circuit reasoned that there was no claim of prejudice for the delay between the notice of employment infractions and the date of termination and it found plaintiff’s other arguments unpersuasive.




of

Miller v. Office of Personnel Management

(United States Federal Circuit) - Held that the federal government did not properly calculate the retirement annuity of a retired federal employee. The retiree, who had served in both the military and civilian sectors of the U.S. government, argued that he was entitled to civilian service credit for additional discrete time periods of his government service. On his petition for review of a Merit Systems Protection Board decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part.




of

University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.

(United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed a judgment of no interference-in-fact in a patent case involving the CRISPR-Cas9 system for the targeted cutting of DNA molecules. The Federal Circuit found no error in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's conclusion of no interference-in-fact, in this case pitting the Broad Institute, Inc., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and others against the University of California, the University of Vienna, and others.




of

Anatomy of a Classic Goal: Ronaldo's bicycle kick vs. Juventus




of

QUIZ: Test your knowledge of sports dynasties




of

European leagues given May 25 deadline to determine fate of season




of

GOAT Uniforms: Kicking off our countdown of the top 100 sports uniforms




of

NEWTON v. MORGANTOWN MACHINE HYDRAULICS OF WEST VIRGINIA INC

(WV Supreme Court of Appeals) - No. 18-0653




of

Club rides wave of success

South Maroubra SLSC are confident of a top performance at the NSW Inflatable Rescue Boat championships this weekend after ranking well and winning gold on their home beach.




of

Hakoah hopeful of being in finals hunt

WITH the NSW Premier League season drawing closer to the end, Hakoah FC’s division-one team will be looking to string some wins together to ensure a finals berth.




of

No support for official walk to school program

MOSMAN Council has abandoned plans for an official walk to school program because of a lack of support from primary schools in the area.




of

Report: Premier League doctors question safety of restart plan




of

Sampdoria seeking 10% of Fernandes' £47M transfer to Manchester United




of

Anatomy of a Classic Goal: Bergkamp's pirouette vs. Newcastle




of

QUIZ: Test your knowledge of defunct sports teams




of

QUIZ: Test your knowledge of all-time great coaches




of

US v. Loftis

(United States Ninth Circuit) - In a criminal action, the district court's grant in part of defendant's motion is affirmed where evidence of uncharged transactions are not evidence of 'other' crimes under Rule 404(b), but rather evidence of a scheme to defraud that is the first element of wire fraud.




of

BPP Illinois v. Royal Bank of Scotland Grp. PLC

(United States Second Circuit) - In a suit brought by a group of hotel-related businesses, along with their investor and guarantors, alleging fraud claims against a bank and its subsidiaries, the district court's dismissal of the fraud claims is affirmed where the because plaintiffs failed to list their cause of action in a schedule of assets in their now-concluded bankruptcy proceeding, they are barred on judicial estoppel and timeliness grounds.




of

IOC, UEFA monitoring coronavirus threat ahead of Olympics, Euro 2020




of

Trustees of Boston University v. Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd.

(United States Federal Circuit) - Held that a patent claim relating to light-emitting diodes was invalid because it did not meet the enablement requirement. After a jury found that the defendants had infringed Boston University's patent, the defendants appealed on the ground that the patent was invalid because it did not adequately teach the public how to make and use the invention. Agreeing with this argument, the Federal Circuit held that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.




of

University of California v. Broad Institute, Inc.

(United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed a judgment of no interference-in-fact in a patent case involving the CRISPR-Cas9 system for the targeted cutting of DNA molecules. The Federal Circuit found no error in the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's conclusion of no interference-in-fact, in this case pitting the Broad Institute, Inc., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and others against the University of California, the University of Vienna, and others.




of

Hyatt v. Office of Management and Budget

(United States Ninth Circuit) - Held that an individual could obtain judicial review of the federal government's denial of his petition under the Paperwork Reduction Act, which authorizes individuals to petition for a determination of whether they must provide information requested by a government agency. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings in the district court, in a case involving information collected by the Patent and Trademark Office.




of

Media Rights Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.

(United States Ninth Circuit) - Revived a tech company's copyright infringement claims against a competitor. Held that claim preclusion did not bar the company from asserting copyright infringement claims that had accrued after its earlier patent infringement suit against the competitor.




of

The Estate of Stanley Kauffmann v. Rochester Institute of Technology

(United States Second Circuit) - Reversed and remanded. The court concluded the 44 articles at issue were not works made for hire under the Copyright Act of 1976. District Court’s summary judgement in favor of RIT and denying the motion for partial summary judgement by the Estate reversed. Remanded for further proceedings.




of

Banks out for remainder of Grey Cup with lower-body injury




of

5 biggest plays of the 107th Grey Cup




of

CFL delays beginning of season due to COVID-19




of

Pair falls just short of record

NICK Bertus and Will ­Affleck fell just three runs short of a century-old record to lead Parramatta to a two-day win over Western Suburbs.




of

Seaforth Raiders Kings of the Hill

THE future of rugby at Manly looks bright judging by the performances of the mighty Seaforth Raiders under nines.




of

Rise of cricket for girls delights

THE success of the women’s T20 Big Bash League last summer has seen participation numbers skyrocket among female­ junior players on the northern beaches.




of

Manly United switch kick-off times for fans

MANLY United FC will host fixtures next season on Saturday nights and Sunday afternoons in a bid to attract bigger crowds.




of

Tokyo Olympics rescheduled for July 23-Aug. 8 of 2021




of

Kyrgios offers to deliver food to those in need




of

Djokovic opposes idea of mandatory vaccination once play resumes




of

Flavia Pennetta won her 1st Grand Slam and then rode off into the sunset




of

Kifle-Thompson v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners

(California Court of Appeal) - The denial of a petition for writ of administrative mandate to review the decision of the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners (Board) revoking petitioner's chiropractic license, is affirmed as the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence and petitioner's other claims of error are meritless.




of

In the Matter of Peter J. Galasso

(Court of Appeals of New York) - In disciplinary proceeding against an attorney for various misconduct, including allegations that he failed to properly supervise the firm's bookkeeper resulting in misappropriation of client funds and that he breached his fiduciary duty by failing to safeguard those funds, the order of the Appellate Division is modified to dismiss the charge for failing to timely comply with the Grievance Committee's lawful demands for information where the imposition of this separate charge is unsupported by the record.




of

Hanna v. Dental Bd. of Cal.

(California Court of Appeal) - In appeal from denial of petition for writ of mandate that sought to overturn a decision of the Dental Board of California revoking petitioner's dental license, judgment is affirmed, where: 1) the penalty was authorized; and 2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking petitioner's dental license following her pleading no contest to a felony count of Medi-Cal fraud.




of

Mitchell v. Lyons Professional Services, Inc.

(United States Second Circuit) - Judgment denying plaintiff's motion to execute a monetary judgment entered, as a sanction for plaintiff's attorney misconduct, is vacated and remanded, where although the district court had more than an adequate basis to sanction plaintiff's counsel and accorded the required procedural safeguards, further findings are needed to support a sanction that falls entirely on the clients rather than principally on the lawyer.




of

In the Matter of Raghubir K. Gupta

(Court of Appeals of New York) - The appeal is dismissed upon the ground that the issues presented have become moot because the attorney was automatically disbarred upon his conviction of a felony on March 14, 2014.



  • Ethics & Disciplinary Code
  • Ethics & Professional Responsibility

of

Berman v. Regents of the University of California

(California Court of Appeal) - Judgment denying plaintiff-student's petition for writ of mandate to overturn a two-quarter suspension from the University of California San Diego for hitting another student in the head is affirmed, where the University's Student Conduct Code authorized either the student conduct officer responsible for his case or the Council of Deans of Student Affairs to impose suspension as a sanction when the student conduct review board did not recommend suspension.