About a month ago I wrote this entry which was, I think, somewhat misunderstood, at least by the one confirmed reader of it. In it I tried to argue that there are some fundamental problems involved in conceptualizing time which, in my mind, appear intractable, and hence its existence as a concept contradictory, impossible. To which it was replied that of course time has an existence, as a social convention, a mental framework. Of that I have no doubt-it would be impossible for me to refute even if I wanted to. My point was about metaphysics, not sociology, and in that regard I don’t think it was that much different from that expressed by St. Augustine regarding time: “if no one asks me what it is I know what it is, but if someone asks me I don’t know.” Or, even more notably, Kant, who regarded time, in addition to space, not as an entity, process, or property of the physical world, but as a filter of percpetion, the mental framework which orders our experience of the world.

Which brings me back to science. I just finished reading The Evolution of Physics, by Einstein and Leopold Infeld. Of course Einstein is justly famed for, among many other things, pioneering the idea of space-time. However, I was quite intrigued to discover, while perusing the science section at the National Library in Paris, that Gödel claimed that his late work on relativity and physics, upon which I touched in my earlier post, was inspired by an intense study of Kant. Now, assuming such a dour man as Gödel was not simply being facetious, the implications of this are immediate. In the (apparent) somewhat paradoxical act of tearing down the structure of Einstein’s work while bringing some of its deepest tendencies to fruition, he was working under the influence of a theory which denies the type of external, property-based existence which Einstein implicitly ascribes to time (and space)! As I understand special relativity (always a dubious premise, I grant you), it holds that space and time, as properties of the universe, are perceived differently at every point of view, or coordinate system, as he calls them. But for me it seems a question of the simplest explanation: if everyone is in a relative frame of reference with respect to space and time, is it simpler and more likely that time and space are real properties which are different at every point in the universe, or simply that they are perceived differently by each observer? It seems to me that if one takes Kant’s idea of space and time as elements perception and not of external reality, none of these problems come up, although there may of course be others. Again, it’s hard for me to say what Gödel’s interpretation of all of this is, since no one seems to have engaged and propogated his work on this subject much, but if he was following in the line of Kant’s thinking as well as the tradition of relativity, it would be interesting to see the resuscitation, by “a commodius vicus of recirculation,” of a very powerful and cogent point of view which has nonetheless been largely dismissed by scientists as non-pertinently metaphysical. Perhaps interesting also to note that, in dealing with Kant last year, I protested against his classification of space as a perceptual framework, and even managed to convince my philosophy professor that it is rather the fundamental visual property, before reversing myself and concluding that light is actually the fundamental visible property. Light is also in some ways the fundamental property in Einstein’s system, or at least the one constant in all of the warping of space-time, which somehow doesn’t seem so surprising now…

p.s. For all of those intersted in Spanish literature (which at this point probably composes nearly 100% of our readership), I also came across this article with the following sub-headline: “It is the 400th anniversary of Don Quixote, a more important work than all of Einstein’s theories.” To the extent that the article follows up on this point, I think the claim about the inevitability of scientific discovery is at the very least highly disputable (and even if Cervantes’ work is more inimitable, that does not in itself mean that it is more “important”), but nonetheless a provocative idea, and gratifying to my humanities-leaning heart.

Frederica examines the spiritual life of Albert Einstein as expressed in a 1929 article in the Saturday Evening Post—published just three days before the Wall Street collapse that began the Great Depression.

Media mogul was found guilty of rape in 2020, but his conviction was overturned in April due to unfair trial concerns

If bagels are having a family reunion, the fun cousin just showed up.

Ready-to-toast bagels from Einstein Bros. Bagels offer freshest at-home bagel option on the market.

M. Glenn Baxter, American author through personal research and spiritual journey over last 5 years eyes have been opened to Absolute Point Zero creation of all life on Planet Earth.

The quest for the einstein tile—a shape never seen before in mathematics—turned up even more discoveries than mathematicians counted on

Discovery that confirms theory of relativity makes headlines around the world “We see today that black holes exist in the universe and they do collide!” Associate Professor Harald Pfeiffer says (image courtesy NASA) For the first time, scientists have observed gravitational waves – ripples in the fabric of spacetime from a cataclysmic event in the […]

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In response to the passing of Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), the following statement can be attributed to NAB President and CEO Curtis LeGeyt:

On Explorations this week Dr. Michio Kaku answers emails on air.  One persistent email is the question of God.  Is there a God? The Einstein God letter has been auctioned.  […]

The post ON EXPLORATIONS – Scientists look to find roots of religion; Einstein’s view of a creator appeared first on KKFI.

"The Einstein Show" marked 100 years since his publication of four papers that changed the laws of physics

Research by Princeton scholars at the Atacama Cosmology Telescope collaboration has culminated in a significant breakthrough in understanding the evolution of the universe.

Xiaoshang Jin
Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 152 (), 5327-5337.
Abstract, references and article information

Through the science of robotics, researchers in California have created a lifelike bust of Albert Einstein to teach others, and themselves, about the breakthroughs made with robots

Hello All,

Following is the einstein's puzzle solved by cadence Incisive92  (solved in less than 3 seconds -> FAST!!!!!!)

Thanks,

Vinay Honnavara

Verification engineer at Keyu Tech

vinayh@keyutech.com

 // Author: Vinay Honnavara

// Einstein formulated this problem : he said that only 2% in the world can solve this problem
// There are 5 different parameters each with 5 different attributes
// The following is the problem

// -> In a street there are five houses, painted five different colors (RED, GREEN, BLUE, YELLOW, WHITE)

// -> In each house lives a person of different nationality (GERMAN, NORWEGIAN, SWEDEN, DANISH, BRITAIN)

// -> These five homeowners each drink a different kind of beverage (TEA, WATER, MILK, COFFEE, BEER),

// -> smoke different brand of cigar (DUNHILL, PRINCE, BLUE MASTER, BLENDS, PALL MALL)

// -> and keep a different pet (BIRD, CATS, DOGS, FISH, HORSES)


///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// *************** Einstein's riddle is: Who owns the fish? ***************************
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

/*
Necessary clues:

1. The British man lives in a red house.
2. The Swedish man keeps dogs as pets.
3. The Danish man drinks tea.
4. The Green house is next to, and on the left of the White house.
5. The owner of the Green house drinks coffee.
6. The person who smokes Pall Mall rears birds.
7. The owner of the Yellow house smokes Dunhill.
8. The man living in the center house drinks milk.
9. The Norwegian lives in the first house.
10. The man who smokes Blends lives next to the one who keeps cats.
11. The man who keeps horses lives next to the man who smokes Dunhill.
12. The man who smokes Blue Master drinks beer.
13. The German smokes Prince.
14. The Norwegian lives next to the blue house.
15. The Blends smoker lives next to the one who drinks water.
*/




typedef enum bit [2:0]  {red, green, blue, yellow, white} house_color_type;
typedef enum bit [2:0]  {german, norwegian, brit, dane, swede} nationality_type;
typedef enum bit [2:0]  {coffee, milk, water, beer, tea} beverage_type;
typedef enum bit [2:0]  {dunhill, prince, blue_master, blends, pall_mall} cigar_type;
typedef enum bit [2:0]  {birds, cats, fish, dogs, horses} pet_type;




class Einstein_problem;

    rand house_color_type house_color[5];
    rand nationality_type nationality[5];
    rand beverage_type beverage[5];
    rand cigar_type cigar[5];
    rand pet_type pet[5];
        rand int arr[5];
    
    constraint einstein_riddle_solver {
    
        
    
        foreach (house_color[i])
            foreach (house_color[j])
               if (i != j)
                house_color[i] != house_color[j];
        foreach (nationality[i])
            foreach (nationality[j])
               if (i != j)
                nationality[i] != nationality[j];
        foreach (beverage[i])
            foreach (beverage[j])
               if (i != j)
                beverage[i] != beverage[j];
        foreach (cigar[i])
            foreach (cigar[j])
               if (i != j)
                cigar[i] != cigar[j];
        foreach (pet[i])
            foreach (pet[j])
               if (i != j)
                pet[i] != pet[j];
    
    
        //1) The British man lives in a red house.
        foreach(nationality[i])
                (nationality[i] == brit) -> (house_color[i] == red);
                
        
        //2) The Swedish man keeps dogs as pets.
        foreach(nationality[i])
                (nationality[i] == swede) -> (pet[i] == dogs);
                
                
        //3) The Danish man drinks tea.        
        foreach(nationality[i])
                (nationality[i] == dane) -> (beverage[i] == tea);
        
        
        //4) The Green house is next to, and on the left of the White house.
        foreach(house_color[i])        
                 if (i<4)
                    (house_color[i] == green) -> (house_color[i+1] == white);
        
        
        //5) The owner of the Green house drinks coffee.
        foreach(house_color[i])
                (house_color[i] == green) -> (beverage[i] == coffee);
                
        
        //6) The person who smokes Pall Mall rears birds.
        foreach(cigar[i])
                (cigar[i] == pall_mall) -> (pet[i] == birds);
        
        
        //7) The owner of the Yellow house smokes Dunhill.
        foreach(house_color[i])
                (house_color[i] == yellow) -> (cigar[i] == dunhill);
        
        
        //8) The man living in the center house drinks milk.
        foreach(house_color[i])
                if (i==2) // i==2 implies the center house (0,1,2,3,4) 2 is the center
                    beverage[i] == milk;
        
        
        
        //9) The Norwegian lives in the first house.
        foreach(nationality[i])        
                if (i==0) // i==0 is the first house
                    nationality[i] == norwegian;
        
        
        
        //10) The man who smokes Blends lives next to the one who keeps cats.
        foreach(cigar[i])        
                if (i==0) // if the man who smokes blends lives in the first house then the person with cats will be in the second
                    (cigar[i] == blends) -> (pet[i+1] == cats);
        
        foreach(cigar[i])        
                if (i>0 && i<4) // if the man is not at the ends he can be on either side
                    (cigar[i] == blends) -> (pet[i-1] == cats) || (pet[i+1] == cats);
        
        foreach(cigar[i])        
                if (i==4) // if the man is at the last
                    (cigar[i] == blends) -> (pet[i-1] == cats);
        
        foreach(cigar[i])        
                if (i==4)
                    (pet[i] == cats) -> (cigar[i-1] == blends);
        
        
        //11) The man who keeps horses lives next to the man who smokes Dunhill.
        foreach(pet[i])
                if (i==0) // similar to the last case
                    (pet[i] == horses) -> (cigar[i+1] == dunhill);
        
        foreach(pet[i])        
                if (i>0 & i<4)
                    (pet[i] == horses) -> (cigar[i-1] == dunhill) || (cigar[i+1] == dunhill);
                    
        foreach(pet[i])        
                if (i==4)
                    (pet[i] == horses) -> (cigar[i-1] == dunhill);
                    


        //12) The man who smokes Blue Master drinks beer.
        foreach(cigar[i])
                (cigar[i] == blue_master) -> (beverage[i] == beer);
        
        
        //13) The German smokes Prince.
        foreach(nationality[i])        
                (nationality[i] == german) -> (cigar[i] == prince);
        

        //14) The Norwegian lives next to the blue house.
        foreach(nationality[i])
                if (i==0)
                    (nationality[i] == norwegian) -> (house_color[i+1] == blue);
        
        foreach(nationality[i])        
                if (i>0 & i<4)
                    (nationality[i] == norwegian) -> (house_color[i-1] == blue) || (house_color[i+1] == blue);
        
        foreach(nationality[i])        
                if (i==4)
                    (nationality[i] == norwegian) -> (house_color[i-1] == blue);
        

        //15) The Blends smoker lives next to the one who drinks water.            
        foreach(cigar[i])            
                if (i==0)
                    (cigar[i] == blends) -> (beverage[i+1] == water);
        
        foreach(cigar[i])        
                if (i>0 & i<4)
                    (cigar[i] == blends) -> (beverage[i-1] == water) || (beverage[i+1] == water);
                    
        foreach(cigar[i])        
                if (i==4)
                    (cigar[i] == blends) -> (beverage[i-1] == water);
        
    } // end of the constraint block
    


    // display all the attributes
    task display ;
        foreach (house_color[i])
            begin
                $display("HOUSE : %s",house_color[i].name());
            end
        foreach (nationality[i])
            begin
                $display("NATIONALITY : %s",nationality[i].name());
            end
        foreach (beverage[i])
            begin
                $display("BEVERAGE : %s",beverage[i].name());
            end
        foreach (cigar[i])
            begin
                $display("CIGAR: %s",cigar[i].name());
            end
        foreach (pet[i])
            begin
                $display("PET : %s",pet[i].name());
            end
        foreach (pet[i])
            if (pet[i] == fish)
                $display("THE ANSWER TO THE RIDDLE : The %s has %s ", nationality[i].name(), pet[i].name());
    
    endtask // end display
    
    
endclass




program main ;

    initial
        begin
            Einstein_problem ep;
            ep = new();
            if(!ep.randomize())
                $display("ERROR");
            ep.display();
        end
endprogram // end of main

        

A century ago, Albert Einstein suggested that the universe might contain ripples in space-time, known as gravitational waves – but then he changed his mind

Watch Video | Listen to the Audio

HARI SREENIVASAN: Let’s turn to the continuing fallout and reaction to the Harvey Weinstein story.

Yesterday, Weinstein resigned from the board of his production company following numerous revelations of sexual harassment and several allegations of assault.

More than three dozen women have said Weinstein harassed them. While Weinstein has admitted to behaving inappropriately, he has said he didn’t physically assault anyone.

One of those women is Katherine Kendall. She was a 23-year-old actress who met Weinstein in 1993. She alleges that he invited her to his apartment in New York, where, she says, he took off his clothes and asked for a massage.

As other actresses began coming forward about their painful experiences, she also went public with her own story.

She joins me now from Los Angeles.

First, thanks for joining us.

And I don’t want to relive something that’s painful for you, but you are taking a public stance on it.

For people who don’t know your story, what happened?

KATHERINE KENDALL, Actress/ Photographer: Well, I was you know, a young actress, and I had had a formal meeting at the Miramax office earlier that day.

And then, at the end of the meeting, which I thought went really well, he invited me to come to screenings. He said: “Welcome to the Miramax family. You know, come to premieres, screenings, et cetera. In fact, there’s one this afternoon. Would you like to come?”

And I said, “Sure.”

And I ended up going to see a movie with him. It ended up just being a movie, not a screening, but the film “Red Rock West.” And, you know, that’s right when I had this sort of sinking feeling that something wasn’t going right.

And then, after the movie, we walked for a few blocks. And he said he needed to go up to his apartment to get something, and would I just come with him real quick? And I sort of said no, and we went back and forth on that for a minute. It was sort of a negotiation with him always, trying to sort of stand my ground, but then be convinced it was OK.

I did go into his apartment. Once there, we talked for a long time about art and movies. And I felt like he was treating me like an intellect.

And I felt like the meeting was going really well, and sort of continued. I didn’t feel unsafe once I was in there. And, at one point, then, he got up to go to the bathroom. And he came back in a robe and asked me to give him a massage.

And I was extremely uncomfortable. And I was like, oh, God, no, I’m not comfortable with that. And we went back and forth on that.

And then he went back to the bathroom again, and came back this time completely naked. And, you know, that changed it entirely for me, too. It just took it to the next place. It was completely disorienting. And I was scared, you know? I was really scared.

And then it became sort of a cat-and-mouse game of, like, how am I going to get out of there?

And I’m — it’s hard to make sense of what someone is trying to do to you when they’re fully naked, and they’re…

HARI SREENIVASAN: Yes.

KATHERINE KENDALL: You know, I’m 105 pounds. He’s a large man standing between me and the door.

And, I mean, I felt very resolute, like, I will definitely get out of here somehow. But I’m not — I’m not sure — I’m not sure what’s going to happen here. You know, a lot was going through my head.

And he said, well, if you won’t give me a massage, will you at least show me your breasts? And it was just — you know, it was, all in all, an extremely humiliating experience for me.

And even though I got away, I felt like something had still — like something horrible had just happened to me.

HARI SREENIVASAN: You know, in the immediate aftermath, did you tell someone about it? Because you have said before that you felt ashamed…

KATHERINE KENDALL: I did.

HARI SREENIVASAN: … even though you were the victim.

KATHERINE KENDALL: I did.

It’s really interesting how that happens. And I think — you know, I’m older now, and I have done some work on myself. And I have learned that a lot of people feel that way.

It’s — it’s not — it wasn’t just me. But the just me feeling that this is my fault, this must have only happened to me, there’s something wrong with me, is so common when someone perpetrates against you.

HARI SREENIVASAN: What were the…

KATHERINE KENDALL: And I did. I told my mom.

And I told some good friends. But, you know, one of the things that happened was, I didn’t want them to tell anybody. You know, people wanted to help me, but they didn’t know how, and I didn’t want them to try too hard, because I didn’t want it to backlash.

I was scared. And I think that it’s important to remember that we don’t really come from a culture that supports women in talking about sexual harassment, in my — in my experience, that is. And, you know, I just haven’t felt like it was something I was going to get support on…

HARI SREENIVASAN: You know, how long…

KATHERINE KENDALL: … in the bigger picture.

HARI SREENIVASAN: Yes.

How long did this feeling last? Or, I guess, what are the longer-term ripple effects here? Did it shake your confidence in your abilities?

KATHERINE KENDALL: I think it did. I think it did. I think it did.

I think it made me feel like, wow, you know, that was a wash. He wasn’t interested at all in what I had to say, or, you know, he didn’t see any talent there or intellect there. He was assessing the situation the whole time for something else.

And I think that — that did hurt. You know, I wish it didn’t.

HARI SREENIVASAN: Yes.

KATHERINE KENDALL: But he had produced so many movies that I thought were wonderful. And it was — it’s hard when someone has made art that you love, and how do you stay attached to liking their art, but feeling conflicted about them?

And, yes, I think it does have long-term effects. I think you tuck it away. And then, for me, also, I realized that it came back when I would see his name or see him in person. I would start to sort of tremble all over again.

I mean, I wouldn’t think about him on a daily basis or anything for years, and then I would see him, and I would think, oh, I don’t feel well. I got to get out of here.

HARI SREENIVASAN: Right.

KATHERINE KENDALL: You know, it would bring up so much emotion.

And the most recent one was the woman in New York, the Italian model. I felt so, so enraged when I saw what happened there, and that they sort of — the police had him, and that then he got away. And then she was being dragged through the press as somebody who just, you know, wanted a payout, et cetera.

HARI SREENIVASAN: You know, in the wake of that, there was — a friend of yours had tweeted, “At some point, all the women who have been afraid to speak out about Harvey Weinstein are going to have to hold hands and jump.” This was back in 2015.

And from your Twitter account, you said, “Agreed.”

It seemed like you almost had the opportunity to come forward.

What made you want to come forward now? Has this become a turning point in the industry?

KATHERINE KENDALL: This is a turning point. It’s a turning point.

There are so many times when I thought about it, and then felt like — there were times when I thought about it and said, well, I have nothing to lose, I will just do it. And then I thought, I — I just didn’t have the strength or the courage yet.

And I think somebody like Jodi Kantor doing the story for The New York Times, the fact that she thought it was a story at all was startling to me and made me feel like, wow, something is going to be done.

And I knew she had told me — I mean, they were looking for women that this had happened to, because they’d been hearing rumors for so long that it happened to so many people. And she had told me other people were coming out.

And I thought, I can’t — when I watched Rose McGowan or any of the other actresses come forward, I just — or Ashley Judd — I just thought, they look strong to me, and I don’t want to be the one that stays silent.

HARI SREENIVASAN: Well, Katherine Kendall…

KATHERINE KENDALL: I want to stand beside them.

HARI SREENIVASAN: Katherine Kendall, thank you very much for speaking with us.

And, hopefully, there are other people that are empowered by you coming forward.

KATHERINE KENDALL: I hope so. Thank you.

The post Escaping Harvey Weinstein was a ‘cat-and-mouse game,’ says Katherine Kendall appeared first on PBS NewsHour.

I saw Christopher Nolan’s Oppenheimer earlier this week. The main character in the film, J. Robert Oppenheimer, was a physicist whose family was Jewish, and who worked for many years at the Institute of Advanced Studies in Princeton. In these respects he was akin to Albert Einstein, who makes several appearances in the movie itself. [...]

"My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble mind."

Frida is arguably Salma Hayek's finest film.The actress reveals why it gives her no joy.

From explaining the mysteries of nature to proving the power of daydreams, Albert Einstein gave the world a lot to be grateful for.

Sabrina Gonzalez Pasterski, who built and flew her own plane at 14, just earned a Ph.D. from Harvard and she's proof of the growing power of the STEM push.

In 1905, Albert Einstein published 'On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies' now known as Special Relativity; this theory revolutionized geometry, math, physics, science and the classical perspective of the universe as understood since Newton's time. However, were there intrinsic errors in this theory?

Dr. Stuart D. Shoengold, of Millburn, New Jersey, is recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his extensive contributions within the field of Urology.

Dr. Jeffrey S. Borer, M.D., from New York, is honored by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his outstanding achievements within the field of Cardiology.

Dr. Pam Gumbs, of Berkley, California is recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine.

William Paul Dillon, MD, of Williamsville, NY, is recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his achievements within the field of Medicine.

Dr. Paula J. Prezioso, MD has been recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for her accomplishments within the field of Medicine.

Robert James Spensley, M.D., of Fair Oaks, CA, is recognized with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine Representing Psychiatry and Education for his extensive contributions within the fields of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy.

Dr. William P. Dillon, M.D., of Williamsville, NY, is honored by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his achievements within the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Owner of BKC Pain Specialists and Regenerative Medicine Clinic, Dr. Katabay is a renowned interventional pain medicine specialist.

Dr. Fred M. Fauvre, M.D, Ojai, CA, has been recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his achievements within the field of Internal Medicine, with his career spanning over 5 decades.

Dr. Doryann Marie Lebe of Los Angeles, California, is honored by the International Association of Who's Who for her exemplary achievements within the field of Psychiatry.

Dr. Vincent J. Felitti, M.D., is honored by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his extensive contributions within the field of Medicine.

Dr. Elissa Santoro of Livingston, New Jersey is recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for her exemplary achievements within the field of Oncology.

Dr. Ramzan Zakir, M.D., of New Jersey, is honored by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his accomplishments within the field of Cardiology.

Dr. Floyd Bradd III, M.D. from Front Royal, VA, is recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine for his outstanding dedication and achievements within the field of Family Medicine.

Dr. C. Norman Shealy of Springfield, Missouri is recognized with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine by the International Association of Who's Who for his exemplary achievements within the field of Health Care.

Dr. Miklos Toth, M.D, has been honored for his outstanding contributions to the field of Obstetrics and Gynecology as well as co-founding the Millennium Health Foundation, a nonprofit clinic in Uganda, alongside his wife.

Dr. Claudia Rozuk, M.D. has been recognized by the International Association of Who's Who with the Albert Einstein Award of Medicine.

Part of the joy in breeding or owning horses is choosing their names. J.J. Hysell of In The Money notes that owners of Einstein offspring have been having fun thinking up clever names for their horses. Einstein stands at Adena Springs Farm for a 2013 fee of $7,500. A few of our favorites include: E […]

The post Relatively Clever: Owners Having Fun Naming Einstein Offspring appeared first on Horse Racing News | Paulick Report.

We show that any toric K"ahler cone with smooth compact cross-section admits a family of Calabi-Yau cone metrics with conical singularities along its toric divisors. The family is parametrized by the Reeb cone and the angles are given explicitly in terms of the Reeb vector field. The result is optimal, in the sense that any toric Calabi-Yau cone metric with conical singularities along the toric divisor (and smooth elsewhere) belongs to this family. We also provide examples and interpret our results in terms of Sasaki-Einstein metrics.

We construct semiglobal singular spacetimes for the Einstein equations coupled to a massless scalar field. Consistent with the heuristic analysis of Belinskii, Khalatnikov, Lifshitz or BKL for this system, there are no oscillations due to the scalar field. (This is much simpler than the oscillatory BKL heuristics for the Einstein vacuum equations.) Prior results are due to Andersson and Rendall in the real analytic case, and Rodnianski and Speck in the smooth near-spatially-flat-FLRW case. Similar to Andersson and Rendall we give asymptotic data at the singularity, which we refer to as final data, but our construction is not limited to real analytic solutions. This paper is a test application of tools (a graded Lie algebra formulation of the Einstein equations and a filtration) intended for the more subtle vacuum case. We use homological algebra tools to construct a formal series solution, then symmetric hyperbolic energy estimates to construct a true solution well-approximated by truncations of the formal one. We conjecture that the image of the map from final data to initial data is an open set of anisotropic initial data.

During a recent SAG Foundation Conversations at Home interview, the Oscar winner talks about the main differences between what happens to her Jeanne Crandall character and herself in real life.

Julia Osborn guides us through an eerie tale of The Two Harveys.

This week, the former film producer Harvey Weinstein was convicted on two counts of sexual assault in a New York court. Weinstein, who has been accused of sexual misconduct by more than ninety women, has become an emblem of misogyny in Hollywood, and of the systems that protect wealthy and powerful men from the consequences of criminal misconduct. Rebecca Solnit joins Dorothy Wickenden to discuss whether the Weinstein verdict is a turning point in the #MeToo movement, and what it takes to expose the lies of those in power in business and politics.