Terms of Trade in China decreased to 100.72 points in December from 105.52 points in November of 2019. Terms of Trade in China averaged 98.45 points from 1993 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 118.33 points in February of 2009 and a record low of 81.75 points in February of 2010. This page provides - China Terms Of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in France increased to 115.40 points in January from 114.73 points in December of 2019. Terms of Trade in France averaged 102.09 points from 1999 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 115.87 points in January of 2019 and a record low of 89.48 points in March of 2012. In France, Terms of trade are the ratio for a given product between the export price index and the import price index, with these indices expressed in relation to the same base year. A 1 percent improvement in the terms of trade means that the growth in export prices is 1 percent higher than that of import prices. It also signifies a deterioration in French price-competitiveness. Conversely, a drop in the terms of trade indicates an improvement in price-competitiveness. This ratio can be calculated by product, for a set of products, or globally. This page provides - France Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Israel decreased to 96.89 points in the fourth quarter of 2019 from 98.05 points in the third quarter of 2019. Terms of Trade in Israel averaged 100.63 points from 1995 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 120.76 points in the first quarter of 2016 and a record low of 87.22 points in the fourth quarter of 2011. In Israel, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Israel Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Japan increased to 100.80 points in March from 98.40 points in February of 2020. Terms of Trade in Japan averaged 164.76 points from 1960 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 276.10 points in August of 1960 and a record low of 83.10 points in August of 2008. In Japan, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Japan Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in South Korea increased to 92 points in February from 89.70 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in South Korea averaged 145.30 points from 1990 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 228.10 points in March of 1992 and a record low of 82.90 points in March of 2012. In South Korea, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - South Korea Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Turkey increased to 106.77 points in February from 106.20 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Turkey averaged 113.05 points from 1982 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 147.63 points in September of 1987 and a record low of 93.96 points in October of 2011. In Turkey, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Turkey Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Czech Republic increased to 101.10 points in February from 100.60 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Czech Republic averaged 99.59 points from 1998 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 104.30 points in February of 2009 and a record low of 92.60 points in November of 2000. In Czech Republic, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Czech Republic Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Netherlands decreased to 100.90 points in February from 101.30 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Netherlands averaged 98.55 points from 1990 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 104 points in December of 2008 and a record low of 91.70 points in January of 1995. In Netherlands, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Netherlands Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Italy increased to 105.40 points in February from 104.80 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Italy averaged 93.79 points from 1988 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 105.50 points in May of 2016 and a record low of 83.40 points in October of 1990. In Italy, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Italy Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Brazil increased to 113.03 points in February from 112.44 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Brazil averaged 96.17 points from 1978 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 132.65 points in September of 2011 and a record low of 64.67 points in October of 1981. In Brazil, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Brazil Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Spain increased to 103.70 points in February from 99.90 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Spain averaged 96.12 points from 1970 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 123.70 points in January of 1970 and a record low of 62.20 points in July of 1984. In Spain, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Spain Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Switzerland decreased to 122.45 points in March from 123.58 points in February of 2020. Terms of Trade in Switzerland averaged 98.45 points from 1973 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 127.67 points in June of 2019 and a record low of 74.27 points in March of 1977. In Switzerland, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Switzerland Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Poland increased to 99.90 points in January from 99.50 points in December of 2019. Terms of Trade in Poland averaged 100.64 points from 1997 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 112.30 points in November of 2009 and a record low of 90.60 points in September of 2003. In Poland, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Poland Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms Of Trade in Ukraine increased to 103.10 points in February from 99.40 points in January of 2020. Terms Of Trade in Ukraine averaged 98.31 points from 2013 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 108.80 points in February of 2017 and a record low of 86.90 points in January of 2015. This page provides - Ukraine Terms Of Trade- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms Of Trade in Germany increased to 105.16 points in March from 102.19 points in February of 2020. Terms Of Trade in Germany averaged 93.45 points from 1962 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 105.65 points in December of 1998 and a record low of 73.51 points in August of 1981. This page provides - Germany Terms Of Trade- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Australia increased to 98.80 points in the first quarter of 2020 from 95.20 points in the fourth quarter of 2019. Terms of Trade in Australia averaged 66.40 points from 1981 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 106.40 points in the third quarter of 2011 and a record low of 47.50 points in the second quarter of 1999. This page provides - Australia Terms Of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Mexico decreased to 45.10 points in March from 49.98 points in February of 2020. Terms of Trade in Mexico averaged 62.58 points from 1970 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 106.34 points in January of 1981 and a record low of 43.37 points in February of 2016. In Mexico, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Mexico Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in the United States decreased to 104.87 points in the first quarter of 2020 from 106.51 points in the fourth quarter of 2019. Terms of Trade in the United States averaged 115.34 points from 1967 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 172.45 points in the second quarter of 1968 and a record low of 94.05 points in the third quarter of 2008. In the United States, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - United States Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Uganda increased to 126.49 points in February from 122.48 points in January of 2020. Terms of Trade in Uganda averaged 109.55 points from 1995 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 167.10 points in September of 1995 and a record low of 72.50 points in June of 2001. This page provides the latest reported value for - Uganda Terms of Trade - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Terms of Trade in Malaysia decreased to 99.90 points in March from 100.20 points in February of 2020. Terms of Trade in Malaysia averaged 100.97 points from 2008 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 117.20 points in July of 2008 and a record low of 92.50 points in October of 2009. In Malaysia, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Malaysia Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Canada decreased to 88.70 points in March from 90.10 points in February of 2020. Terms of Trade in Canada averaged 89.15 points from 1986 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 108.50 points in June of 2008 and a record low of 79.10 points in December of 1993. This page provides - Canada Terms Of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Indonesia decreased to 95.66 points in March from 102.11 points in February of 2020. Terms of Trade in Indonesia averaged 102.62 points from 1998 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 117.70 points in November of 2005 and a record low of 77.43 points in July of 1999. In Indonesia, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Indonesia Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Terms of Trade in Argentina decreased to 133.20 points in the first quarter of 2020 from 133.40 points in the fourth quarter of 2019. Terms of Trade in Argentina averaged 103.13 points from 1986 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 151.40 points in the fourth quarter of 2012 and a record low of 73.60 points in the first quarter of 1986. In Argentina, Terms of Trade (ToT) correspond to the ratio of Price of exportable goods to the Price of importable goods. This page provides - Argentina Terms of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Manufacturing Payrolls in the United States decreased by 1330 thousand in April of 2020. Manufacturing Payrolls in the United States averaged 2.48 Thousand from 1939 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 655 Thousand in April of 1946 and a record low of -1715 Thousand in September of 1945. Manufacturing Payrolls reports the absolute change in the number of employees working in the Manufacturing sector in the United States. This page provides the latest reported value for - United States Manufacturing Payrolls - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Loans To Banks in China increased to 1596506.33 CNY HML in March from 1568072.34 CNY HML in February of 2020. Loans To Banks in China averaged 897423.09 CNY HML from 2010 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 1596506.33 CNY HML in March of 2020 and a record low of 413413.10 CNY HML in January of 2010. This page provides - China Loans To Banks- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Loans To Banks in Angola increased to 1103771 Million AOA in February from 1043654 Million AOA in January of 2020. Loans To Banks in Angola averaged 417668.89 Million AOA from 2011 until 2020, reaching an all time high of 1103771 Million AOA in February of 2020 and a record low of 145377.80 Million AOA in November of 2016. This page provides - Angola Loans To Banks- actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Norway scored 78.05 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Norway averaged 22.12 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 78.94 Points in 2017 and a record low of 5.14 Points in 2011. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Norway Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Namibia scored 54.46 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Namibia averaged 15.32 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 54.46 Points in 2019 and a record low of 3.84 Points in 2008. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Namibia Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Nepal scored 51.57 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Nepal averaged 14.38 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 51.57 Points in 2019 and a record low of 3.34 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Nepal Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Netherlands scored 82.39 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Netherlands averaged 23.16 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 82.39 Points in 2019 and a record low of 5.32 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Netherlands Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

New Zealand scored 76.75 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in New Zealand averaged 21.75 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 78.09 Points in 2017 and a record low of 4.91 Points in 2011. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - New Zealand Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Croatia scored 61.94 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Croatia averaged 17.17 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 61.94 Points in 2019 and a record low of 4.03 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Croatia Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Cyprus scored 66.39 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Cyprus averaged 18.48 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 66.39 Points in 2019 and a record low of 4.22 Points in 2008. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Cyprus Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Czech Republic scored 70.85 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Czech Republic averaged 19.90 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 71.18 Points in 2018 and a record low of 4.43 Points in 2014. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Czech Republic Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Denmark scored 81.17 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Denmark averaged 22.74 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 81.17 Points in 2019 and a record low of 5.17 Points in 2014. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Denmark Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Algeria scored 56.25 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Algeria averaged 15.57 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 56.25 Points in 2019 and a record low of 3.71 Points in 2009. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Algeria Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Angola scored 38.11 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Angola averaged 14.54 Points from 2011 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 38.11 Points in 2019 and a record low of 2.93 Points in 2011. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Angola Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Argentina scored 57.20 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Argentina averaged 16.22 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 57.49 Points in 2018 and a record low of 3.76 Points in 2014. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Argentina Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Australia scored 78.75 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Australia averaged 22.09 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 78.85 Points in 2018 and a record low of 5.08 Points in 2015. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Australia Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Austria scored 76.61 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Austria averaged 21.59 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 76.61 Points in 2019 and a record low of 5.08 Points in 2011. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Austria Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Belgium scored 76.38 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Belgium averaged 21.61 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 76.61 Points in 2018 and a record low of 5.05 Points in 2007. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Belgium Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Lithuania scored 68.35 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Lithuania averaged 18.94 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 68.35 Points in 2019 and a record low of 4.29 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Lithuania Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Luxembourg scored 77.03 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Luxembourg averaged 21.53 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 77.03 Points in 2019 and a record low of 4.85 Points in 2009. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Luxembourg Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Macedonia scored 57.33 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Macedonia averaged 12.18 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 57.33 Points in 2019 and a record low of 3.73 Points in 2008. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Macedonia Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Madagascar scored 42.86 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Madagascar averaged 6.42 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 42.86 Points in 2019 and a record low of 3.32 Points in 2016. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Madagascar Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Malawi scored 43.70 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Malawi averaged 13.97 Points from 2009 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 43.70 Points in 2019 and a record low of 3.15 Points in 2016. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Malawi Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Malaysia scored 74.60 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Malaysia averaged 20.98 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 74.60 Points in 2019 and a record low of 4.87 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Malaysia Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Mali scored 43.59 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Mali averaged 12.65 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 43.69 Points in 2017 and a record low of 3.21 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Mali Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Mexico scored 64.95 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Mexico averaged 18.18 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 64.95 Points in 2019 and a record low of 4.18 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Mexico Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Mongolia scored 52.61 points out of 100 on the 2018 Global Competitiveness Report published by the World Economic Forum. Competitiveness Index in Mongolia averaged 15.04 Points from 2007 until 2019, reaching an all time high of 52.94 Points in 2017 and a record low of 3.43 Points in 2010. The most recent 2018 edition of Global Competitiveness Report assesses 140 economies. The report is made up of 98 variables, from a combination of data from international organizations as well as from the World Economic Forum’s Executive Opinion Survey. The variables are organized into twelve pillars with the most important including: institutions; infrastructure; ICT adoption; macroeconomic stability; health; skills; product market; labour market; financial system; market size; business dynamism; and innovation capability. The GCI varies between 1 and 100, higher average score means higher degree of competitiveness. With the 2018 edition, the World Economic Forum introduced a new methodology, aiming to integrate the notion of the 4th Industrial Revolution into the definition of competitiveness. It emphasizes the role of human capital, innovation, resilience and agility, as not only drivers but also defining features of economic success in the 4th Industrial Revolution. This page provides the latest reported value for - Mongolia Competitiveness Index - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.