1 Bahraini Dinar = 10048.998 Ugandan Shilling

1 Bahraini Dinar = 62.5963 Mexican Peso

1 Chilean Peso = 0.7326 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Chilean Peso = 4.602 Ugandan Shilling

1 Chilean Peso = 0.0287 Mexican Peso

1 Maldivian Rufiyaa = 39.0229 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Maldivian Rufiyaa = 245.1234 Ugandan Shilling

1 Maldivian Rufiyaa = 1.5269 Mexican Peso

1 Malaysian Ringgit = 139.5926 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Malaysian Ringgit = 876.8539 Ugandan Shilling

1 Malaysian Ringgit = 5.462 Mexican Peso

1 Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro = 17.5853 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro = 110.4625 Ugandan Shilling

1 Nicaraguan Cordoba Oro = 0.6881 Mexican Peso

The Redskins quarterback's broken leg led to an insidious infection that could have cost him his life.

1 Netherlands Antillean Guilder = 337.0098 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Netherlands Antillean Guilder = 2116.934 Ugandan Shilling

1 Netherlands Antillean Guilder = 13.1866 Mexican Peso

1 Estonian Kroon = 42.4191 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Estonian Kroon = 266.4565 Ugandan Shilling

1 Estonian Kroon = 1.6598 Mexican Peso

1 Danish Krone = 87.9245 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Danish Krone = 552.2998 Ugandan Shilling

1 Danish Krone = 3.4403 Mexican Peso

1 Fiji Dollar = 268.5261 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Fiji Dollar = 1686.7521 Ugandan Shilling

1 Fiji Dollar = 10.507 Mexican Peso

1 New Zealand Dollar = 371.3479 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 New Zealand Dollar = 2332.6295 Ugandan Shilling

1 New Zealand Dollar = 14.5302 Mexican Peso

1 Croatian Kuna = 87.1935 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Croatian Kuna = 547.7078 Ugandan Shilling

1 Croatian Kuna = 3.4117 Mexican Peso

1 Peruvian Nuevo Sol = 177.9914 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Peruvian Nuevo Sol = 1118.0569 Ugandan Shilling

1 Peruvian Nuevo Sol = 6.9645 Mexican Peso

On Saturday August 31, 2019, both Women's and Men's Cross Country competed in their first meet of the season at Baker University.

At 10:30 AM PST Dorian and Max will be off running!

1 Dominican Peso = 10.9919 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Dominican Peso = 69.046 Ugandan Shilling

1 Dominican Peso = 0.4301 Mexican Peso

1 Papua New Guinean Kina = 176.3653 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Papua New Guinean Kina = 1107.8423 Ugandan Shilling

1 Papua New Guinean Kina = 6.9009 Mexican Peso

1 Brunei Dollar = 428.0882 CFA Franc BCEAO

1 Brunei Dollar = 2689.0452 Ugandan Shilling

1 Brunei Dollar = 16.7504 Mexican Peso

With more and more SoCs employing sophisticated interconnect IP to link multiple processor cores, caches, memories, and dozens of other IP functions, the designs are enabling a new generation of low-power servers and high-performance mobile devices. The complexity of the interconnects and their advanced configurability contributes to already formidable design and verification challenges which lead to the following questions:

While your interconnect subsystem might have a correct functionality, are you starving your IP functions of the bandwidth they need? Are requests from latency-critical initiators processed on time? How can you ensure that all applications will receive the desired bandwidth in steady-state and corner use-cases?

To answer these questions, Cadence recommends the Performance Verification Methodology to ensure that the system performance meets requirements at the different levels:

1. Performance characterization: The first level of verification aims to verify the path-to-path traffic measuring the performance envelope. It targets integration bugs like clock frequency, buffer sizes, and bridge configuration. It requires to analyze the latency and bandwidth of design’s critical paths.
2. Steady state workloads: The second level of verification aims to verify the master-by-master defined loads using traffic profiles. It identifies the impact on bandwidth when running multi-master traffic with various Quality-of-Service (QoS) settings. It analyzes the DDR sub-system’s efficiency, measures bandwidth and checks whether masters’ QoS requirements are met.
3. Application specific use cases: The last level of verification simulates the use-cases and reaches the application performance corner cases. It analyzes the master-requested bandwidth as well as the DDR sub-system’s efficiency and bandwidth.

Cadence has developed a set of tools to assist customers in performance validation of their SoCs. Cadence Interconnect Workbench simplifies the setup and measurement of performance and verification testbenches and makes debugging of complex system behaviors a snap. The solution works with Cadence Verification IPs and executes on the Cadence Xcelium® Enterprise Simulator or Cadence Palladium® Accellerator/Emulator, with coverage results collected and analyzed in the Cadence vManager  Metric-Driven Signoff Platform.

To verify the performance of the Steady State Workloads, Arm has just released a new AMBA Adaptive Traffic Profile (ATP) specification which describes AMBA abstract traffic attributes and defines the behavior of the different traffic profiles in the system.

With the availability of Cadence Interconnect Workbench and AMBA VIP support of ATP, early adopters of the AMBA ATP specification can begin working immediately, ensuring compliance with the standard, and achieving the fastest path to SoC performance verification closure.

For more information on the AMBA Adaptive Traffic Profile, you can visit Dimitry's blog on AMBA Adaptive Traffic Profiles: Addressing The Challenge. 

More information on Cadence Interconnect Workbench solution is available at Cadence Interconnect Solution webpage.

Thierry

Sample clues

5 across: The US president’s bird (3,5,3)

11 down: Group once known as the Quarrymen (7)

10 across: Cavalry sword (5)

19 across: Masonic ritual (5,6)

1 down: Pioneer of Ostpolitik (6)

Extrowords © 2007 IndiaUncut.com. All rights reserved.
India Uncut * The IU Blog * Rave Out * Extrowords * Workoutable * Linkastic