lc Heavenly Hana LLC v. Hotel Union & Hotel Industry of Hawaii Pension Plan By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-01T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Reversing a district court judgment to the plaintiffs following a bench trail in an action under the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendment Act because the plaintiffs were required to assume the unpaid withdrawal liability of their predecessor to a multiemployer pension plan, a constructive notice standard applied and a reasonable purchaser would have been aware of the liability. Full Article Civil Procedure Labor & Employment Law Corporation & Enterprise Law
lc Panoche Energy Center, LLC v. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-07-01T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - In an arbitration action, arising from a dispute between plaintiff electricity producer and defendant utility over which party bears the cost of complying with laws to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, the trial court's vacating of the arbitration award to PG&E is reversed where the question of contact interpretation was ripe for arbitration and plaintiff failed to show sufficient cause for postponing the arbitration process. Full Article Public Utilities Dispute Resolution & Arbitration Environmental Law Oil and Gas Law Contracts
lc Allco Renewable Energy Ltd. v. Massachusetts Electric Company By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-11-13T08:00:00+00:00 (United States First Circuit) - Affirming the dismissal of an action by a private energy company against the utility companies because the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act does not provide a private right of action against utility companies and affirming the denial of a motion for additional relief against various Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities officials because the court did not abuse its discretion in doing so. Full Article Public Utilities Civil Procedure
lc US v. Luminant Generation Co., LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-10-01T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fifth Circuit) - Held that the federal government was time-barred from seeking civil penalties against two electric power companies that allegedly violated the Clean Air Act by failing to obtain a statutorily mandated preconstruction permit for the modification of their facilities. Also held, however, that the government still could pursue injunctive relief, and thus reversed the dismissal of the government's complaint in relevant part. Full Article Environmental Law Public Utilities
lc Richards v. Direct Energy Services, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-02-04T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Held that a consumer could not proceed with a proposed class action challenging electricity rates in the wake of market deregulation. Affirmed summary judgment against his breach of contract, unfair trade practice and other claims alleging that a retail electricity supplier charged unlawful rates. Full Article Public Utilities Consumer Protection Law
lc Mirkin v. XOOM Energy, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-07-26T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Partially affirmed, partially reversed. A class action suit against energy providers was dismissed and a post-judgment request for leave to amend was refused. Plaintiffs should have been allowed to amend their complaint and their proposed amended complaint stated plausible claims. Full Article Public Utilities Class Actions Civil Procedure
lc Winding Creek Solar LLC v. Peterman By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-07-29T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Affirmed. Plaintiff filed suit against the Commissioners of the California Public Utilities commission alleging that the California Renewable Market Adjust Tariff (Re-MAT) program violated the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA). The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Plaintiff, but declined to grant Plaintiff a contract with PG&E at a specified price. The Ninth Circuit held that the Re-MAT program violated the PURPA and therefore is preempted by PURPA, but the Ninth Circuit would not grant the contract because PG&E was not a party to the suit. Full Article Environmental Law Public Utilities Contracts
lc Meridian Products, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-03-28T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - In the Government's challenge to the Court of International Trade's (CIT) third remand determination that certain aluminum trim kits do not fall within the scope of the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on aluminum extrusions from the People's Republic of China, the CIT determination is reversed where the Department of Commerce correctly found in its initial decision that plaintiff's trim kits are aluminum extrusions which are shapes and forms made of an aluminum alloy that is covered by the scope of the Orders. Full Article Administrative Law International Trade
lc Boomerang Tube, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2017-05-08T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - In an appeal of a decision from the U.S. Court of International Trade, which affirmed the U.S. Department of Commerce's final determination in an antidumping investigation into oil country tubular goods (OCTGs) from Saudi Arabia and other countries imported into the U.S., the Trade Court's decision is vacated where the parties failed to exhaust their arguments before Commerce, and the Trade Court abused its discretion in waiving the exhaustion requirement in this case. Full Article Administrative Law International Trade
lc WWRD US, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-04-02T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirming a US Court of International Trade final decision denying a motion for summary judgment to a company and granting a government cross motion for summary judgment because the court agreed with the Customs and Border Patrol's classification of the plaintiff's subject imports finding that the articles at issue, decorative plates and mugs, weren't eligible for duty free treatment. Full Article International Trade Civil Procedure Antitrust & Trade Regulation
lc Bell Supply Company, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-04-25T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Vacating a decision by the US Court of International Trade affirming a US Department of Commerce determination that certain imported oil country tubular goods (OCTG) fabricated as unfinished OCTG in China and finished in other countries were not subject to anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders covering OCTG imported from China because the Trade Court improperly proscribed the use of the substantial transformation analysis to determine the country of origin. Full Article International Trade Antitrust & Trade Regulation Administrative Law
lc DWA Holdings, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-05-09T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reversing and remanding a US Court of Federal Claims summary judgment ruling that a company's overseas earnings did not entitle them to transitional benefits under the American Jobs Creation Act because their holding that the law only provided transitional relief for income earned between 2006 and 2006 was incorrect. Full Article International Trade Commercial Law Labor & Employment Law International Law
lc Meridian Products, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-05-22T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reversing and remanding a decision by the US Court of International Trade affirming a remand determination of the US Department of Commerce regarding the import of extruded aluminum door handles for kitchen appliances packaged for importation with plastic end caps and screws as being within the scope of relevant antidumping and countervailing duties orders where, on appeal, the Court of International Trade concluded that Commerce's scope ruling was unreasonable and unsupported by substantial evidence that resulted in a Commerce determination, under protest, that the subject products were not included within the scope of the relevant orders. Full Article Administrative Law International Trade
lc Animal Science Products, Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-14T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Supreme Court) - Vacating and remanding the Second Circuit's support of a motion to dismiss a complaint relating to allegations that Chinese sellers of Vitamin C were engaged in price and quantity fixing of exports to the US because although the Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China averred that the alleged price fixing scheme was actually a pricing regime mandated by the Chinese Government the court was not bound to accord conclusive effect to the foreign government's statements. No law or regulation had been cited and a foreign nation's laws must be proven as facts. Full Article International Law International Trade Commercial Law
lc Prime International Trading Ltd., et al. v. BP PLC, et al By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-08-29T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Affirmed. The application of the Commodity Exchange Act to alleged misconduct in trading of crude oil extracted from Europe’s North Sea is impermissibly extraterritorial. Full Article International Trade Antitrust & Trade Regulation
lc Magic Kitchen LLC v. Good Things Int'l Ltd. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2007-07-30T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - In suit alleging dress infringement, unfair competition, and false advertising regarding a kitchen device known as the "Tartmaster," order granting directed verdict for defendants on trade dress claims, and finding for defendants on other claims are affirmed as there was no error or abuse of discretion. Full Article Antitrust & Trade Regulation Civil Procedure False Advertising Intellectual Property Patent Trade Dress
lc General Motors Corp. v. Urban Gorilla, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2007-09-13T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Tenth Circuit) - In trademark dispute over steel "body kits" designed to make a truck look like a military-style vehicle, denial of plaintiff GM's motion for preliminary injunction is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that GM failed to make a strong showing of a likelihood of success on the merits that the "body kits" infringe upon and dilute GM's trade dress rights in its Hummer line of vehicles. Full Article Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark Transportation
lc McNeil Nutritionals, Inc. v. Heartland Sweeteners, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2007-12-26T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Third Circuit) - In a trade dress infringement action brought by the marketer of the artificial sweetener Splenda against defendants, who package and distribute sucralose as store brands to a number of retail grocery chains, alleging their product packaging is confusingly similar to Splenda's, denial of plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction is affirmed in part, but reversed in part as to certain boxes and bags where plaintiff demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits with respect to the third element of trade dress infringement, as there was a likelihood of confusion between those products' trade dresses and the analogous Splenda trade dress. Full Article Intellectual Property Trade Dress
lc Art Attacks Ink, LLC v. MGA Ent'mt. Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2009-09-16T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In a copyright, trademark, and trade dress infringement action, judgment as a matter of law for defendant on copyright and trade dress infringement claims is affirmed where: 1) defendant did not timely move for judgment as a matter of law, but the time limit under Fed. R. Civ. P. 50(b) is not jurisdictional; and 2) plaintiff failed to demonstrate that defendant had access to plaintiff's copyrighted works or that plaintiff's trade dress had acquired secondary meaning. Full Article Civil Procedure Copyright Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark
lc Guessous v. Chrome Hearts, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2009-12-01T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - In plaintiff's suit against defendant for infringement of jewelry designs, trademarks and copyrights, trial court's decision denying plaintiff's motion to strike defendant's complaint under the anti-SLAPP statute is affirmed as the filing of a lawsuit in a foreign country is not protected activity under the United States or California Constitutions as to implicate the statute. Full Article Civil Procedure Contracts Copyright Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark
lc Santa's Best Craft, LLC. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2010-07-01T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Seventh Circuit) - In plaintiff's suit against its insurer, arising from an underlying suit against the plaintiff over its marketing of Christmas lights for copying packaging design and for using false and deceptive language, district court's judgment is affirmed where: 1) the insurer had, but did not breach, a duty to defend; 2) the district court properly declined to require the insurer to reimburse plaintiff's contract indemnitee's expenses; but 3) the case is remanded to resolve whether the insurer owes prejudgment interest on litigation expenses and reimbursement for the settlement expenses in the underlying suit. Full Article Contracts False Advertising Insurance Law Intellectual Property Trade Dress Trademark Remedies
lc Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH v. Canady Tech. LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2010-12-09T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - In a patent infringement suit involving three competitor companies that create argon gas-enhanced electrosurgical products for electrosurgery, judgment of the district court is affirmed where: 1) because the district court's construction of "low flow rate" is correct, and because there is no evidence that the accused probes infringe the asserted claims in the '745 patent, the district court's judgment of non-infringement is affirmed; 2) district court correctly granted summary judgment against plaintiff as to its trademark and trade dress claims based on the court's determination that the color blue is functional and has not acquired the requisite secondary meaning; 3) the district court properly granted summary judgment on defendant's antitrust counterclaims in favor of the plaintiffs as the "Sham litigation" exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine is not warranted in this case because the record demonstrates that plaintiff had probable cause to bring this patent enforcement litigation, and defendant failed to meet its burden of seeking discovery on its antitrust claims and failed to establish some genuine issue of material fact as to the other predatory acts is argues the district court ignored Full Article Antitrust & Trade Regulation Civil Procedure Intellectual Property Patent Trade Dress Trademark
lc High Point Design LLC v. Buyer's Direct, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2013-09-11T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Judgment holding defendant's asserted design patent for slippers known as Snoozies, invalid on summary judgment and also dismissing defendant's trade dress claims with prejudice is: 1) reversed as to the grant of summary judgment of invalidity, where the district court made multiple errors in its obviousness and functionality analysis; and 2) vacated as to the dismissal of defendant's trade dress claims, and remanded for the Court to reconsider its decision denying defendant's request to amend the pleadings. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent Trade Dress
lc Direct Technologies, LLC v. Electronic Arts, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-09-06T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - In a copyright infringement and trade secret case arising out of a contract for plaintiff to produce a USB flash drive shaped like a 'PlumbBob' a gem-shaped icon from defendant's computer game, The Sims, the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant is: 1) affirmed in part as to the trade secrets claim, although on different grounds. where plaintiff's contribution to the PlumbBob USB drive, a design for the flash drive’s removal from the PlumbBob object, did not derive independent economic value from not being generally known to the public; and 2) reversed in part as to the copyright infringement claim where the district court erred in ruling as a matter of law that the flash drive was not sufficiently original when compared to the Plumb Bob icon to qualify for copyright protection as a derivative work. Full Article Trade Dress Copyright Cyberspace Law
lc High Point Design, LLC v. LM Insurance Corp. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-12-19T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Affirmed that insurance companies had a duty to provide a defense to a footwear wholesaler that was being sued in an intellectual property case for offering for sale certain infringing slippers. The insurance policy covered advertising injuries, and advertising included offering for sale. Full Article Insurance Law Trade Dress
lc Stone Basket Innovations, LLC v. Cook Medical, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-11T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirming a district court order denying a motion for attorney fees following the dismissal of a patent infringement suit with prejudice because attorney fees are only available in exceptional circumstances and the court decision was not an abuse of discretion. Full Article Attorney's Fees Intellectual Property Patent
lc FASTSHIP, LLC v. US By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-14T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - This appeal is from a series of patent infringement cases against the US claiming that the Freedom-class ships infringe on certain patents owned by plaintiff. Plaintiff appealed the court of Federal Claims grant of the Government Motion for Summary Judgement and the damages calculations of FastShip, LLC v. US. (2017) 131 Fed Cl. 592. The Court of Appeals affirmed the grant of the summary judgement motion for the government and modified the damage award to plaintiff. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent Administrative Law
lc WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-06-22T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Supreme Court) - Reversed and remanded. WesternGeco owns a patent for a system to survey the ocean floor and they believed that a competing system owned by ION infringed on their patent. WesternGeco sued. The jury found ION liable and awarded WesternGeco damages including lost profit damages. ION argued that the lost profit damages was not allowed and the appellate court agreed with them. The US Supreme Court disagreed and reversed and remanded the decision stating that lost profits for a domestic patent was permissible under the Patent Act. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc TF3 Ltd. v. Tre Milano LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-13T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reversed a finding of patent claim invalidity relating to patent claims for a hairstyling device. In reversing, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board erred in holding, on inter partes review, that the patent claims were invalid on grounds of anticipation and that the Board had mistakenly construed the claims more broadly than the description in the patent specification merited. On the correct claim construction, the Federal Circuit held that the claims were not anticipated. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-13T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed a finding of patent claim invalidity involving certain claims related to a drug distribution system for tracking prescriptions of sensitive drugs, such as those with addictive properties. In affirming, the Federal Circuit held that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board did not err and that its determination, on inter partes review, that the patents were invalid was obvious. Full Article Patent Intellectual Property Drugs & Biotech
lc Blackbird Tech LLC v. ELB Electronics Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-16T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Vacated a patent noninfringement judgment based on an erroneous construction of the patent's language. The sole issue on appeal concerned a patent pertaining to energy efficient lighting apparatuses and what precisely was meant by the words attachment surface. Because the district court had adopted an erroneous construction of those words, the Federal Circuit vacated the judgment of noninfringement and remanded for further proceedings. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-20T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that certain computer-related patent claims were not directed to patent-eligible subject matter. In this patent infringement case, the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that the patent claims at issue failed under the abstract idea exception, because the claims lacked any arguable technical advance over conventional computer and network technology. The patent claims here related to a way to display two sets of information, in a non-overlapping way, on a display screen. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc ZUP, LLC v. Nash Manufacturing, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-25T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that a patent for a water recreational board was invalid as obvious. On appeal, the patent holder argued that its invention of a recreational board that would help athletically challenged people ride on the water was not obvious. In a 2-1 decision, the Federal Circuit disagreed and affirmed the district court decision granting summary judgment to the defendant in this patent infringement action. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc GoPro, Inc. v. Contour IP Holding, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-27T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Vacated and remanded the Patent Board's prior ruling against plaintiff which had filed suit to challenge the defendant’s proposed patent. In vacating and remanding, the Appellate court ruled that plaintiff’s printed catalog was prior art and that the defendant’s proposed patent could have been based on information in that catalog and that the trial court had not properly considered the catalog in making its finding. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc BSG Tech LLC v. BuySeasons, Inc By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-15T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed. Plaintiff sued defendant for infringement of several patents related to systems and methods for indexing information stored in wide access databases. The district court agreed with the defendant and held all asserted claims invalid as ineligible under 35 U.S.C. section 101. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc Luminara Worldwide, LLC v. IANCU By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-16T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Vacated in part and affirmed in part. Plaintiff owns patents for making flameless candles. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board held that certain claims by plaintiff were unpatentable and some claims were time barred. The Federal Circuit vacated the time barred decision as to one of the claims and affirmed the Board’s decision as to the other claims. Full Article Civil Procedure Patent
lc Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-27T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Vacated and remanded a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Appeals Board (PTO Board) that certain claims relating to a wireless communications system are not patentable. In vacating and remanding, the Federal Circuit reasoned that the PTO Board did not consider portions of plaintiff’s reply. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-09-04T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reinstated a patent infringement claim upon finding that the district court's grant of summary judgment resulted from an erroneous claim construction. The patentee accused several telecommunications companies of infringing its patent for an application-aware resource allocator. On appeal, the Federal Circuit agreed with the patentee that the district court construed the patent incorrectly. The panel vacated in relevant part and remanded. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc IXI IP, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-09-10T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that certain patent claims relating to a wireless networking device were invalid as obvious. The Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in an inter partes review proceeding. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc Orexo AB v. Actavis Elizabeth LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-09-10T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Reversed a judgment that a patent for a pharmaceutical product was invalid on the ground of obviousness. The Federal Circuit concluded that obviousness was not proved by clear and convincing evidence. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-09-13T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Federal Circuit) - Affirmed that some, but not all, claims in a telecommunications patent were unpatentable as obvious. Finding no error, the Federal Circuit affirmed the determinations made in an review. Full Article Intellectual Property Patent
lc Soarus LLC v. Bolson Materials International Corp. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-10-01T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Seventh Circuit) - Held that a company did not violate a nondisclosure agreement by including particular information in a patent application for a 3D printing process. Affirmed summary judgment against a breach-of-contract claim brought by the other party to the nondisclosure agreement, a distributor of specialty polymers. Full Article Contracts Trade Secrets Patent
lc ABS Global, Inc. v. Inguran, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-01-29T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Seventh Circuit) - In a dispute between two companies in the agriculture-related biotechnology field, affirmed in part and reversed in part a judgment after a jury trial. The case involved antitrust claims, patent infringement claims and an alleged breach of a confidentiality agreement. Full Article Agriculture Antitrust & Trade Regulation Patent
lc In re Perlbinder Holdings, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2016-03-24T08:00:00+00:00 (Court of Appeals of New York) - In a real estate and property action, arising after the Manhattan Department of Buildings revoked plaintiff's erroneously-issued permit for a large outdoor advertising sign, the order of the Appellate Division is reversed where: 1) plaintiff did not acquire a vested right to maintain the sign on its property through its reliance on the erroneously issued permit; and 2) the issue of plaintiff's good-faith reliance on the erroneously-issued permit is properly raised in an application for a zoning variance. Full Article Property Law & Real Estate Commercial Law
lc Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. TX Alcohol By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-08-15T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Fifth Circuit) - Partially affirmed, remanded. A Texas ban on public corporations obtaining package store permits did not violate Equal Protection rights, but the district court erred in finding a discriminatory nature and burden imposed by the public corporation ban. Full Article Constitutional Law Government Law Civil Procedure
lc North American Soccer League, LLC v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc. By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-02-23T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Second Circuit) - Affirming the denial of the North American Soccer League's motion for preliminary injunction seeking Division II designation pending the resolution of its antitrust case against the United States Soccer Federation because they had failed to demonstrate a clear likelihood of success on the merits of their claim. Full Article Civil Procedure Sports Law Antitrust & Trade Regulation
lc Willhide-Michiulis v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-07-18T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Affirmed that a ski area was not liable for injuries that a snowboarder suffered when she collided with a snowcat and snow-grooming tiller. The snowboarder, who was seriously hurt, argued that the ski resort was grossly negligent and thus liable for her injuries despite the liability waiver she had signed as part of her season-pass agreement. However, the Third Appellate District concluded that the operation of snow-grooming equipment on a snow run is an inherent risk of snowboarding and that there was no gross negligence, affirming summary judgment against her claims. Full Article Sports Law Injury & Tort Law
lc Staats v. Vintner's Golf Club, LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-01T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Reinstated a claim that a golf club was negligent in failing to protect patrons from yellow jacket wasps. The plaintiff, who was attacked by a swarm of yellow jackets while taking a golf lesson, argued that the golf club owed a duty to protect patrons from the insects even if they came from an undiscovered nest on the course. On appeal, the First Appellate District agreed that a duty of care existed in this situation, requiring actions such as reasonable inspections, and it therefore reversed summary judgment and remanded for further proceedings. Full Article Sports Law Injury & Tort Law
lc Gold Medal LLC v. USA Track and Field By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2018-08-07T08:00:00+00:00 (United States Ninth Circuit) - Affirmed that the U.S. Olympic Committee and USA Track and Field did not violate antitrust law by imposing advertising restrictions during the Olympic Trials. A chewing gum company that wished to pay to display its logo on athletes' apparel brought this suit to challenge the advertising restrictions. Rejecting the company's arguments, the Ninth Circuit held that the defendant organizations were entitled to implied antitrust immunity on the basis that their advertising restrictions were integral to performance of their duties under the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act. Full Article Antitrust & Trade Regulation Media Law Sports Law
lc Long v. Forty Niners Football Co. LLC By feeds.findlaw.com Published On :: 2019-03-26T08:00:00+00:00 (California Court of Appeal) - Held that a man who was shot in the parking lot after a professional football game could not proceed with his personal injury claims. His lawsuit against the football team was barred by the statute of limitations. Affirmed a dismissal. Full Article Sports Law Civil Procedure Injury & Tort Law