1. The present revisional application has been preferred by the petitioners praying for quashing of the proceeding being GR No. 1173 of 2022 arising out of Shyampukur P.S. Case No. 85 of 2022 dated 29.09.2022, pending before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Calcutta, under Sections 354A/354B/323/506/509/188/427/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The petitioners' case is that G.R. No. 1173 of 2022 arising out of Shyampukur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2022 dated 29.09.2022 was registered on the basis of a complaint lodged by one Smt. Mita Roy, wife of Shri Pradip Roy, residing at 8B, Abhoy Mitra Street Police Station-

as follows. The writ petitioners namely, Everrise Housing Private Limited being the Petitioner No. 1 and one Sanjay Agarwal, Director Everrise Housing Private Limited came forward before this Hon'ble Court prayed for declaring the purported proceeding initiated in terms of the alleged notification bearing no. 9817-LA (II) /5 M-1/88 Pt. dated 30th December, 1989 as lapsed. The issue was whether a Post-Acquisition Purchaser or a purchaser after the issuance of a notice under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had any legal right to challenge the acquisition proceeding on the ground of lapse or any other grounds. The answer was 'No'. There was no single instance or any case which had been successfully challenged by the Post Acquisition Purchaser or after the issuance of a notice under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, since 1894 till July, 2024 and or the same had been declared as Good Law. On the contrary, there were hundreds of decisions that Post Acquisition Purchaser had no legal standing to the question of acquisition or to its lapse. The reason was that the legal precedent of jurisprudence surrounding the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 had established that a purchaser a land after issuance of notice under Section 4 and 6 of the Act did not have any locus Standi to challenge the acquisition or the lapse of the acquisition proceeding. This was because the right of the original land owner was extinguished upon the acquisition and the purchasers' right were derivative and limited to the extent of their purchase. They were not aggrieved parties therefore, lacked legal capacity to question the acquisition or its lapse. In the case of Shiv Kumar and Another Vs. Union of India and others reported at (2019) 10 SCC 229, it had been clearly stated that admittedly Power under Section 17(4) was exercised dispensing with the enquiry under Section 5A and on service of notice under Section 9 possession was taken since urgency was acute viz pumping station house to be constructed to drain out flood water. Consequently, the land stood vested in the State under Section 17(2) free from all encumbrances. It was further settled law that once possession was taken by operation of Section 17(2) the land vested in the State free from all encumbrances unless a notification under Section 48(1) was published in the gazette withdrawing the acquisition. Section 11A as amended by Act 68 of 1894 therefore, did not apply and the acquisition did not lapse. The said Judgment held, "It has been laid down that purchasers on any ground whatsoever cannot question proceeding for taking possession. A purchaser after Section 4 notification does not acquire any right in the land as the sale is ab-initio void and has no right to claim the land under policy". Paragraph 22 of the said Judgment stated," a nullity is inoperative and a person cannot claim the land or declaration once no title has been conferred upon him to claim the land should be given back to him". The said judgement was of Three Judges' Bench and had been affirmed the case of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal reported at (2020)8 SCC 129. In the case of Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal reported in (2020)8 SCC 129 it had been held by the Five Judges' of the Hon'ble Supreme Court "It does not visualise a situation where possession has been taken under the urgency provision of Section 71, but the award has not been made in such case under Section 24(1)(a) of the 2013 Act, there is no lapse of entire proceeding but compensation is to be determined in accordance to the provisions of the 2013 Act. In case of urgency possession is usually taken before the award is passed. Thus, where no award is passed, where urgency provisions under Section 17(1) of the 1894 Act had been invoked, there is no lapse". In this instant case the provision of Section 17(4) of 1894 Act had been invoked and as such, there could not be any lapse of the proceeding under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act in any manner whatsoever. In the case Delhi Development Authority Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited and Others reported at (2022) 8 SCC 771 stated that still further the purchaser had purchased the property after vesting of the land with the State. In fact, none of Dharam Trust earlier Three Judges Bench Judgement in M. Venkatesh was not even referred to the purchaser had no right to claim lapsing of acquisition proceeding in view of the recent Larger Bench Judgement of this Court in Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India reported in (2019)10 SCC 229 it had been held the purchaser had no right to claim a declaration sought for. In very recent judgement in the case of Delhi Development Authority Vs. Narendra Kumar Jain and Others reported at (2024) 3 SCC 721, it had been held deemed lapse of acquisition proceedings none payment of compensation was not a ground, where possession of land taken furthermore writ petition by subsequent purchaser claiming lapse of proceeding, held not maintainable as such person did not have locus standi to challenge acquisition proceeding and/or pray for deemed lapse of acquisition proceeding. In paragraph 4 of the said judgment it was stated "however, it is required to be noted that the decision of this Court in Manab Dharam Trust which has been relied by the High Court while passing the impugned judgement and order, is held to be not a good law in view of the decision of this Court in Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and subsequent decision of this Court in DDA Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited reported in (2022)8 SCC 771". In paragraph 5 it stated "In Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and DDA Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited, it is specifically observed and held that the subsequent purchaser has no locus Standi to challenge the acquisition and/or pray for deemed lapse acquisition". The petitioner relied upon a decision (reportable) in M/S Delhi Airtech Services Pvt. Vs. State of U.P. on 14th October, 2022 by Two Judges Bench without referring and considering the ratio of the Judgment of Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India reported in (2019)10 SCC 229 which was a larger bench decision. In paragraph no. 26, the concluding paragraph (ii) if the requirement was compiled and possession was taken after tendering and paying eighty per centum, though there was need to pass an award and pay the balance compensation within a reasonable time, the rigor of section 11A of Act, 1894 would not apply so as to render the entire proceedings for acquisition to lapse in the context of absolute vesting. The right of land loser in such case was to enforce passing of the award and recover the compensation. The ratio of this case was distinguishable in the facts and circumstances of the case of the petitioner as the right of land loser in such case was to enforce passing of the award and recover the compensation, but the same could not be the right of a Post Acquisition Purchaser under any circumstances and as such, the judgement relied upon by the petitioner was distinguishable and had no manner of application in the facts and circumstances of this case. First of all, it had not considered the judgement passed in the case of Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India reported at (2019)10 SCC 229 a judgement of Three Judges' Bench and the judgment did not consider paragraph 123 of the case reported in Indore Development Authority Vs. Manoharlal reported at (2020)8 SCC 129 which was a judgement of Five Judges and as such, the writ petition was liable to be dismissed with exemplary costs solely on the ground that the land in possession of the government and notice under Section 17 Sub Section (4) had been invoked and the judgment relied upon by the petitioner was of the judgement of Two Judges Bench without considering the ratio of Three Judges and Five Judges Bench. Furthermore, in the recent judgment of (2024)3 SCC 721 it had affirmed the judgment of Shiv Kumar Vs. Union of India and DDA Vs. Godfrey Philips (1) Limited and as such, the instant writ petition was devoid of merit and was liable to be dismissed with costs. In the case reported at (2011) 5 SCC 394 it was held that once possession had been taken under section 17 section 11A could not be sustained and elaborate explanation had been given.

Darogi Yadav @ Bhupati, aged about 40 years, S/o. Shri Bodhan Yadav, R/o. Vill.- Dudhania Tola, P.O.- Khaira Block, P.S.- Cherko Pathar, Dist.- Jamui, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner

-Versus -

The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party

------

CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, A.P.P.

------

02/12.11.2024 Heard the parties.

Moola Satyanarayan Reddy, aged about 49 years, s/o late Rama Reddy, r/o House No.4-150/1, Janambhumi Nagar, Mancherial, PO, PS & District- Mancheril, Telengana-504208 ... Appellant Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Superintendent of Police, Chief Investigating Officer, NIA ...... Respondents

-------

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVNEET KUMAR

-------

For the Appellant : Ms. Chandana Kumari, Advocate For the Respondent-NIA : Mr. Amit Kumar Das, Spl. PP Mr. Saurav Kumar, Adv.

For the Petitioners : Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P.

-----

03/12.11.2024 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/325/354-B/379/452/ 504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. As per the allegation, the petitioners tried to outrage the modesty of the informant and also snatched the gold chain from her neck worth Rs.95,000/-. It is further submitted that the petitioners are the neighbours and relatives of the informant. They have been implicated in this case by the informant due to previous enmity. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no. 17 of the present application. They also undertake to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, they may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Chandan Singh, aged about 24 years, S/o. Kuldeep Singh, R/o. Toiladungary, P.O. & P.S.- Golmuri, Dist.- East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. ... ... Petitioner

-Versus -

The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party

------

CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Zaid Imam, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tarun Kumar, A.P.P. ------ 03/11.11.2024 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. Case No. 231/2024 arising out of Sidhgora P.S. Case No. 13/2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 468/2024, for the offences registered under Sections 341/323/325/307/302/504/506/120(B)/34 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of Sri B.K. Sahay, learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Jamshedpur.

Shashi Dungdung, aged about 24 years, S/o. Late Amrus Dungdung, R/o. Vill.- Karangagudi, Baijutoli, P.O. & P.S.- Kersai, Dist.- Simdega.

... ... Petitioner

-Versus -

The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party

------

CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P.

------

02/12.11.2024 Heard the parties.

Shashi Dungdung, aged about 24 years, S/o. Late Amrus Dungdung, R/o. Vill.- Karangagudi, Baijutoli, P.O. & P.S.- Kersai, Dist.- Simdega.

... ... Petitioner

-Versus -

The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite Party

------

CORAM: - HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH

------

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P.

------

02/12.11.2024 Heard the parties.

CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

For the Petitioner: Mr. P. K. Roy For the State: Mr. S. P. Jha, A.P.P ----- 03/11.11.2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 341/323/307/504/506/34 IPC has prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He along with his wife has been roped in this case by the informant due to land dispute. Even if the contents of the written report are taken to be true, the informant sustained lacerated injury on his left eyebrow and there was bleeding from his left nostril. He was advised to undergo X-Ray of skull and CTC of head, however, he did not undergo the said scanning. The injuries sustained by the informant have been found simple in nature. The said fact has been mentioned in paragraph 6 of the present anticipatory bail application. The petitioner, however, undertakes to cooperate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, he may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

1. Maya Kunwar, W/o Late Kamlesh Sah

2. Parwati Kunwar, W/o Late Narayan Sah

3. Lilawati Kunwar, W/o Late Sudama Sah All are R/o village-Muradabad, P.O. & P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar). .......... Petitioners.

-Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Jitendra Singh, S/o Late Anutha Singh, R/o Jeshu Tower, Dibdih, P.O.-Doranda, Office Adress-J.K. International Public School, Agru, P.S. Ratu, District-Ranchi.

.......... Opp. Parties.

With A.B.A. No.1856 of 2024

-----

1. Krishna Kumar, S/o Late Sudama Sah

2. Kaushal Kumar, S/o Late Kamlesh Sah Both are R/o village-Muradabad, P.O. & P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar). .......... Petitioners.

1. Md. Sonu Ansari @ Javed Akhtar, S/o Hasib Ansari.

2. Akramul Ansari, S/o Enush Ansari.

Both residents of Neori, P.O. Neori Vikash, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi.

.......... Petitioners.

-Versus-

The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party.

-----

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, APP

-----

Soleman Sheikh, S/o Shojal Shekh @ Sojal Shekh, R/o village-Shiv Mandir Kalikapur, P.O. & P.S.- Pakur (T), District-

Pakur. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party. -----

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Tripathi, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. ----- Order No.02 Date: 11.11.2024

1. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No.81 of 2024 registered under Sections 379/420/467/468/471/34 of Indian Penal Code, Sections 4/21 of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, Rule 54 of Jharkhand Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2004 and Rules 7/9/13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation & Storage) Rules, 2017.

For the petitioner : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shashi Kumar Verma, A.P.P

-----

02/11.11.2024 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147/149/353/188/307/427/ 269/270 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 of Jharkhand Epidemic Disease (Covid-19) Act, 2020 and Section 51 of Disaster Management Act, 2005.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. As per the allegation, the accused persons including the petitioner by forming unlawful assembly used criminal force against public servants deterring them from discharging their official duties. They also pelted stones on the government servants being part of 'Mangala' procession. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not seen as the member of 'Mangala' procession in the CCTV footage. Despite that he has been implicated in this case with malafide motive only due to the reason that he was actively involved in 'Ramnavmi' puja. Moreover, similarly situated co-accused persons namely, Rajesh Keshri and Rakesh Keshri have already been granted anticipatory bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.08.2021 passed in A.B.A No. 5644 of 2021. Hence, the petitioner may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

Faziran Khatoon wife of Md. Anwar Ali, resident of Phase-II, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro

2. Gulam Hussain, son of Md. Anwar Ali, resident of Phase-II, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro

3. Gulam Ali, son of Md. Anwar Ali, resident of Phase-II, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro

4. Hassain Raza @ Hasnain Raja, son of Md. Anwar Ali, resident of Phase-II, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro ... ... Petitioners Versus

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Neha Kumari daughter of Umesh Ravani, resident of Phase-II, P.O. & P.S.- Bokaro Thermal, District- Bokaro .... ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Shadab Eqbal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. Order No. 05 Dated: 11.11.2024 The petitioners apprehending their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/354/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

1. Maya Kunwar, W/o Late Kamlesh Sah

2. Parwati Kunwar, W/o Late Narayan Sah

3. Lilawati Kunwar, W/o Late Sudama Sah All are R/o village-Muradabad, P.O. & P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar). .......... Petitioners.

-Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Jitendra Singh, S/o Late Anutha Singh, R/o Jeshu Tower, Dibdih, P.O.-Doranda, Office Adress-J.K. International Public School, Agru, P.S. Ratu, District-Ranchi.

.......... Opp. Parties.

With A.B.A. No.1856 of 2024

-----

1. Krishna Kumar, S/o Late Sudama Sah

2. Kaushal Kumar, S/o Late Kamlesh Sah Both are R/o village-Muradabad, P.O. & P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar). .......... Petitioners.

1. Mithlesh Mandal @ Mithlesh Kumar Mandal, S/o of Ganpat Mandal

2. Jitendra Mandal, S/o Bajo Mandal

3. Sandeep Kumar, S/o Dhalo Mandal All residents of Panchayat Dasdih, Block Gandey, Village Margodh, P.S. Gandey, District Giridih.

.......... Petitioners.

-Versus-

The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party.

-----

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR

-----

For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Dev, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, APP

For the Petitioners : Mr. Mahesh Tewary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, A.P.P.

-----

03/12.11.2024 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 147/149/341/323/307/504/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. As per the allegation, the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 assaulted the informant's husband due to which his left leg got fractured. So far as the petitioner no. 1 is concerned, there is no specific allegation against him. The dispute between the parties arose due to a drainage. Even if the content of the written report is taken to be true, the petitioner nos. 2 and 3 had no intention to kill the informant's husband as admittedly, he sustained fracture injury on his leg. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no. 13 of the present application. They also undertake to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, they may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

For the Petitioner : Mr. Subhneet Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P

-----

04/12.11.2024 The petitioner is apprehending her arrest for the offences punishable under Sections 376/313/323/341/498-A/420/ 494/34 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the complaint leading to lodging of the present F.I.R. It has been alleged that the petitioner along with co-accused Shivnandan Sahu @ Shivandan Sahu (father- in-law) and Pramila Devi (mother-in-law) was involved in getting pregnancy of the informant terminated and that the main accused Sikandar Sahu performed another marriage with her. In fact, co- accused Sikandar Sahu has not performed any marriage with the petitioner. She is merely a co-villager and she has been implicated in this case by the informant due to personal grudge. Moreover, co- accused Shivnandan Sahu @ Shivandan Sahu, Pramila Devi and Surendra Sahu @ Sulendra Sahu have already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 10.09.2024 passed in A.B.A No. 3816/2024. The petitioner also undertakes to co-operate in the ongoing investigation. Hence, she may be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

1. Maya Kunwar, W/o Late Kamlesh Sah

2. Parwati Kunwar, W/o Late Narayan Sah

3. Lilawati Kunwar, W/o Late Sudama Sah All are R/o village-Muradabad, P.O. & P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar). .......... Petitioners.

-Versus-

1. The State of Jharkhand

2. Jitendra Singh, S/o Late Anutha Singh, R/o Jeshu Tower, Dibdih, P.O.-Doranda, Office Adress-J.K. International Public School, Agru, P.S. Ratu, District-Ranchi.

.......... Opp. Parties.

With A.B.A. No.1856 of 2024

-----

1. Krishna Kumar, S/o Late Sudama Sah

2. Kaushal Kumar, S/o Late Kamlesh Sah Both are R/o village-Muradabad, P.O. & P.S.-Sasaram, District-Rohtas (Bihar). .......... Petitioners.

Reserved on 27.08.2024 Pronounced on 12.11.2024

1. This criminal revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 09.06.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Bokaro in Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2005 whereby and whereunder the learned appellate court has affirmed the conviction of the petitioner under Sections 353, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as IPC) but modified the sentences awarded to the petitioner to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 06 months with fine of Rs.500/- for each offence with default sentences. Both sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Vide Judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 07.02.2005 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st, Class, Bokaro in G.R. Case No.559 of 2003 / Trial No.15 of 2005 (arising out of Pindrajora P.S. Case No.52 of 2003 dated 05.07.2003), the petitioner along with Banamali Singh Choudhary and Ramlal Singh were convicted for offence under Sections 353, 504/34 of IPC and had sentenced them to undergo Simple Imprisonment for two years under Sections 353 and 504 of IPC for each offence and had directed that the sentences shall run concurrently. The learned trial court had acquitted the petitioner and co- accused persons from the charge under Section 448 of IPC. Arguments on behalf of the petitioner.

C.A.V. on 05.09.2024 Pronounced on 12.11.2024 These criminal revisions have been filed against the common judgment dated 13.08.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih in Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the learned appellate court has dismissed the appeal and has affirmed the judgment of conviction under Section 498-A of IPC and the order of sentence dated 19.05.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih in T.R. No.915 of 2018, arising out of Bengabad P.S. Case No. 34 of 2015 corresponding to G.R. Case No.618 of 2015.

2. The learned trial court has convicted the petitioners for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC') and has sentenced the petitioners to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional Simple Imprisonment for one month. The period of custody undergone by the petitioners was directed to be set off against the period of sentence awarded to them.

C.A.V. on 05.09.2024 Pronounced on 12.11.2024 These criminal revisions have been filed against the common judgment dated 13.08.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih in Criminal Appeal No.73 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the learned appellate court has dismissed the appeal and has affirmed the judgment of conviction under Section 498-A of IPC and the order of sentence dated 19.05.2018 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih in T.R. No.915 of 2018, arising out of Bengabad P.S. Case No. 34 of 2015 corresponding to G.R. Case No.618 of 2015.

2. The learned trial court has convicted the petitioners for the offence under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC') and has sentenced the petitioners to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default of payment of fine, to undergo additional Simple Imprisonment for one month. The period of custody undergone by the petitioners was directed to be set off against the period of sentence awarded to them.

Everyone is blabbing about the metaverse. But what does this future digital world look like? WSJ’s Joanna Stern checked into a hotel and strapped on a VR headset for the day. She went to work meetings, hung out with new avatar friends and attended virtual shows. Photo illustration: Tammy Lian/The Wall Street Journal

The 401(k) workplace-savings plan, designed to augment traditional pensions, has become the primary retirement-savings vehicle for many workers, but critics say it isn’t up to the task. WSJ's Anna Prior highlights five key suggestions to strengthen the 401(k). Photo: Getty

The U.S. presidential election, the landfall of Hurricane Eta, the reopening of a World Heritage site, and an asteroid's hypothetical value are today's topics.

Starting in February, U.S. cellular carriers will begin to shut down 3G. WSJ’s Joanna Stern got an old iPhone 3G and iPhone 4 working on the old network, in order to remember all it did to shape the smartphone revolution. Photo illustration: Preston Jessee for The Wall Street Journal

ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಸೆಪ್ಟೆಂಬರ್‌ 13: ಬಹುನಿರೀಕ್ಷಿತ ಗ್ರೇಟ್ ಇಂಡಿಯನ್ ಫೆಸ್ಟಿವಲ್ ಮಾರಾಟವು ಶೀಘ್ರದಲ್ಲೇ ಆರಂಭವಾಗುತ್ತದೆ ಎಂದು  ಅಮೆಜಾನ್ ಅಧಿಕೃತವಾಗಿ ಘೋಷಿಸಿದೆ. ಇ-ಕಾಮರ್ಸ್ ಕಂಪೆನಿಯು ವ್ಯಾಪಕ ಶ್ರೇಣಿಯ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನಗಳನ್ನು ಬೃಹತ್ ರಿಯಾಯಿತಿಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ಆಫರ್‌ಗಳನ್ನು ನೀಡಲು ಸಜ್ಜಾಗಿದೆ. ಬೃಹತ್ ರಿಯಾಯಿತಿಗಳು: ಎಲೆಕ್ಟ್ರಾನಿಕ್ಸ್, ಗ್ಯಾಜೆಟ್‌ಗಳು, ಫ್ಯಾಷನ್, ಗೃಹೋಪಯೋಗಿ ವಸ್ತುಗಳನ್ನು ಒಳಗೊಂಡಂತೆ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಉತ್ಪನ್ನ ವಿಭಾಗಗಳಲ್ಲಿ ಭಾರೀ ರಿಯಾಯಿತಿಗಳು ಇರಲಿದೆ. {image-amazondiwalisale2024-2-1726192610.jpg

ಬೆಂಗಳೂರು, ಸೆಪ್ಟೆಂಬರ್‌ 14: ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥಿತ  ಹೂಡಿಕೆ ಯೋಜನೆ (SIP) ಸಾಧಾರಣ ಮಾಸಿಕ ಕೊಡುಗೆಗಳೊಂದಿಗೆ ಸಹ ಕಾಲಾನಂತರದಲ್ಲಿ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಸಂಪತ್ತನ್ನು ಬೆಳೆಸಲು ಪ್ರಬಲ ವಿಧಾನವಾಗಿದೆ. ತಿಂಗಳಿಗೆ 5,000 ರೂಪಾಯಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸತತವಾಗಿ ಹೂಡಿಕೆ ಮಾಡುವ ಮೂಲಕ, ನೀವು 7.4 ಕೋಟಿಗಿಂತ ಹೆಚ್ಚಿನ ನಿವೃತ್ತಿ ಕಾರ್ಪಸ್ ಅನ್ನು ಸಂಗ್ರಹಿಸಬಹುದು. ಇದು ಹೇಗೆ ಕೆಲಸ ಮಾಡುತ್ತದೆ ಎಂದು ತಿಳಿಯಿರಿ. SIP ಮ್ಯೂಚುಯಲ್ ಫಂಡ್‌ಗಳಲ್ಲಿ

ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ನಿಧಿ (PF)ಯು ಭಾರತದಲ್ಲಿ ಉದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳಿಗೆ ಸರ್ಕಾರವು ನಿರ್ವಹಿಸುವ ನಿವೃತ್ತಿ ಉಳಿತಾಯ ಯೋಜನೆಯಾಗಿದೆ. ಕಾರ್ಮಿಕ ಮತ್ತು ಉದ್ಯೋಗ ಸಚಿವಾಲಯದ ಅಡಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ನೌಕರರ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ನಿಧಿ ಸಂಸ್ಥೆ (ಇಪಿಎಫ್‌ಒ) ಯಿಂದ ಉದ್ಯೋಗಿಗಳ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ನಿಧಿಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ವಿವಿಧ ನಿಬಂಧನೆಗಳ ಕಾಯಿದೆ (ಇಪಿಎಫ್ ಮತ್ತು ಎಂಪಿ ಆಕ್ಟ್) ಜಾರಿಗೊಳಿಸುವುದರೊಂದಿಗೆ 1952 ರಲ್ಲಿ ಭಾರತದ ಸಾಮಾಜಿಕ ಭದ್ರತಾ ವ್ಯವಸ್ಥೆಯ ಪ್ರಮುಖ ಅಂಶವಾದ

ভ্যালেন্টাইন্স ডে মানেই এক আলাদা অনুভূতি! পরস্পরের কাছের আসার দিন। যদি ভালবাসার জন্য দিনক্ষণ সময়ের দরকার হয় না। তবুও এই বিশেষ দিনটির জন্য অপেক্ষা করে থাকেন প্রেমিক প্রেমিকারা। ঠিক তেমনই কিংখান ৩৪ বছর আগে স্ত্রী গৌরী খানকে দেওয়া উপহারের কথা স্মরণ

Canada Temple Attack: কানাডা পুলিসের তরফে এক বিবৃতিতে বলা হয়েছে, অস্ত্র নিয়ে হামলার অভিযোগে ইন্দ্রজিত গোসালকে গত ৮ নভেম্বর গ্রেফতার করা হয়েছে

Bangladesh:  অন্তর্বর্তী সরকারের প্রধান উপদেষ্টা বাংলাদেশের নোবেলজয়ী অর্থনীতিবিদ  ড. মুহাম্মদ ইউনূস। তিনি শপথ নেন ৪ অগাস্ট। এরপর দফায় দফায় শপথ নেন বাকি ২০ জন উপদেষ্টা।

లైంగిక దాడుల కేసులో హాలీవుడ్ నిర్మాత హార్వే వెయిన్‌స్టెయిన్ ఇప్పటికే 23 ఏళ్ల జైలుశిక్షను అనుభవిస్తున్నారు. ప్రస్తుతం న్యూయార్క్‌లొని బఫెల్లోకు సమీపంలోని జైలులో ఉన్న సంగతి తెలిసిందే. ఇలా భారీ శిక్షను అనుభవిస్తున్న హార్వేపై మరో పిడుగు పడింది. మరో కేసులో ఆయనకు అదనంగా నాలుగు సంవత్సరాల జైలుశిక్షను అనుభవించాలని కోర్టు తాజాగా ఆదేశాలు జారీ చేసింది.

Saudi News: ഷോർട്ട് ഫിലിമുകൾക്കാണ് ഇത്തവണ പ്രാധാന്യം നൽകുന്നത്. അറബ് മേഖലയിൽ നിന്നുള്ള 15 ഹ്രസ്വ സിനിമകളുടെ മത്സരവും പ്രദർശനവുമാണ് ഇവിടെ നടക്കുക

Book release ceremony: മാനവ രാശിയുടെ ഉന്നമനത്തിനായി പ്രവർത്തിച്ച ശ്രീനാരായണ ഗുരുവിൻ്റെ ഏകലോക ദർശനത്തെ ലോകജനഹൃദയങ്ങളിൽ എത്തിക്കുകയെന്ന മഹത്തായ ലക്ഷ്യത്തോടെയാണ് പുസ്തകത്തിൻ്റെ രചന നിർവഹിച്ചിരിക്കുന്നതെന്ന് രചയിതാക്കൾ അഭിപ്രായപ്പെട്ടു.

హాస్య ప్రధానమైన చిత్రాలను తీసే దర్శకుడు శ్రీనివాస్ రెడ్డి.. రూట్ మార్చి క్రైమ్ థ్రిల్లర్‌ను పట్టాలెక్కించాడు. కావాల్సినంత అందం ఉండి ప్రతిభ పుష్కలంగా ఉన్నా సరైన అవకాశం రాక ఎదురు చూస్తున్న ఈషా రెబ్బా మెయిన్ లీడ్‌గా రాగల 24 గంటలు చిత్రం తెరకెక్కింది. చాలా కాలం తరువాత తెలుగులో ఓ కీలక పాత్రను పోషించాడు

ಬುಧ ಗ್ರಹವನ್ನು ನಮ್ಮ ಬುದ್ಧಿವಂತಿಕೆ ಮೇಲೆ ಪ್ರಭಾವ ಬೀರುವ ಗ್ರಹ ಎಂದು ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ 28ಕ್ಕೆ ಬುಧನು ಧನು ರಾಶಿ ಬಿಟ್ಟು ಮಕರ ರಾಶಿ ಪ್ರವೇಶಿಸಲಿದೆ. ಬುಧ ಪ್ರತಿ ತಿಂಗಳು ರಾಶಿ ಬದಲಾಯಿಸುತ್ತಾನೆ. ಬುಧನು ಮಕರ ರಾಶಿಗೆ ಪ್ರವೇಶಿಸಿದಾಗ 12 ರಾಶಿಗಳ ಮೇಲೂ ಪ್ರಭಾವ ಬೀರಲಿದೆ. ಜ್ಯೋತಿಷ್ಯ ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ಬುಧನು ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್ 28

ಶುಭೋದಯ..... ಶುಕ್ರವಾರ ಶ್ರೀ ಲಕ್ಷ್ಮಿಯ ಕೃಪೆ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮೇಲಿರಲಿ ಎಂದು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾ ಈ ದಿನದ ರಾಶಿಫಲ ನೋಡೋಣ: ಸಂವತ್ಸರ: ಶುಭಕೃತ್ಆಯನ: ದಕ್ಷಿಣಾಯಣಋತು: ಹೇಮಂತಮಾಸ: ಪುಷ್ಯಪಕ್ಷ: ಕೃಷ್ಣತಿಥಿ: ಅಷ್ಟಮಿನಕ್ಷತ್ರ: ಉತ್ತರ ಭಾಧ್ರಪದರಾಹುಕಾಲ: ಬೆಳಗ್ಗೆ 10:57ರಿಂದ 12:22ರವರೆಗೆಸೂರ್ಯೋದಯ: ಬೆಳಗ್ಗೆ 6.41ಸೂರ್ಯಾಸ್ತ: 6:03

ಶುಕ್ರ ಗ್ರಹವನ್ನು ಶಾರೀರಿಕ ಸೌಕರ್ಯ, ಐಷಾರಾಮಿ ಮತ್ತು ಐಶ್ವರ್ಯದ ಅಂಶ ಎಂದು ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಲಾಗಿದೆ. ಶುಕ್ರದೆಸೆಯಿದ್ದರೆ ಮುಟ್ಟಿದ್ದೆಲ್ಲಾ ಚಿನ್ನವಾಗುವುದು. ಶುಕ್ರಗ್ರಹ ಪ್ರತಿ ತಿಂಗಳು ರಾಶಿ ಬದಲಾವಣೆ ಮಾಡುತ್ತದೆ. ಈ ತಿಂಗಳಿನಲ್ಲಿ ಡಿಸೆಂಬರ್‌ 29ಕ್ಕೆ ರಾಶಿ ಬದಲಾವಣೆ ಮಾಡಿತ್ತು. ಒಂದು ತಿಂಗಳು ಅದೇ ರಾಶಿಯಲ್ಲಿ ಇರಲಿದೆ. ಶುಕ್ರನು ಇದೀಗ ಮಕರ ರಾಶಿಯಲ್ಲಿದೆ. ಶನಿದೇವ ಕೂಡ ಮಕರ ರಾಶಿಯಲ್ಲಿದೆ.

ಶುಭೋದಯ.....ಬುಧವಾರ ಶ್ರೀ ಗಣೇಶನ ಕೃಪೆ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಮೇಲಿರಲಿ ಎಂದು ಹೇಳುತ್ತಾ ಈ ದಿನದ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ನೋಡೋಣ..... ಸಂವತ್ಸರ: ಶುಭಕೃತ್ಆಯನ: ದಕ್ಷಿಣಾಯಣಋತು: ಹೇಮಂತಮಾಸ: ಪುಷ್ಯಪಕ್ಷ: ಶುಕ್ಲ ಪಕ್ಷತಿಥಿ: ದ್ವಿತೀಯಾನಕ್ಷತ್ರ: ಉತ್ತರ ಆಷಾಢರಾಹುಕಾಲ: ಮಧ್ಯಾಹ್ನ 3:15ರಿಂದ 04:41ರವರೆಗೆಸೂರ್ಯೋದಯ: ಬೆಳಗ್ಗೆ 6.43ಸೂರ್ಯಾಸ್ತ: 6:06

ಸಂಖ್ಯಾಶಾಸ್ತ್ರ ಸಹ ಜ್ಯೋತಿಷ್ಯದ ಇನ್ನೊಂದು ಭಾಗವೆಂದು ಪರಿಗಣಿಸಲಾಗುತ್ತದೆ. ಇದರ ಸಹಾಯದಿಂದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ, ಸ್ವಭಾವ ಮತ್ತು ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿತ್ವವನ್ನು ಕಂಡುಹಿಡಿಯಬಹುದು. ನಮ್ಮ ಇಂದಿನ ಸಂಖ್ಯಾಶಾಸ್ತ್ರ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ಹೇಗಿದೆ? ನಮ್ಮ ಅದೃಷ್ಟ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆಯನ್ನು ಕಂಡುಹಿಡಿಯುವುದು ಹೇಗೆ?ಸಂಖ್ಯಾಶಾಸ್ತ್ರದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ನಮ್ಮ ಅದೃಷ್ಟ ಸಂಖ್ಯೆಯನ್ನು ಪತ್ತೆ ಮಾಡುವ ವಿಧಾನ: ನಾವು ಹುಟ್ಟಿದ ದಿನಾಂಕ, ತಿಂಗಳು ಮತ್ತು ವರ್ಷವನ್ನು ಒಟ್ಟಾಗಿ ಕೂಡಿಸಬೇಕು, ಕೂಡಿಸಿದ

ಹೊಸ ವರ್ಷದ ಮೊದಲ ವಾರ ಕಳೆಯಿತು, ಇದೀಗ ಎರಡನೇ ವಾರಕ್ಕೆ ಕಾಲಿಡುತ್ತಿದ್ದೇವೆ, ಈ ಹೊಸ ವರ್ಷ ನಿಮ್ಮೆಲ್ಲರಿಗೂ ತುಂಬಾ ಚೆನ್ನಾಗಿರಲಿ. ಜ್ಯೋತಿಷ್ಯದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ರಾಶಿಗಳಿಗೆ ತಕ್ಕಂತೆ ಮುಂಬರುವ ವಾರ ಹೇಗಿರಲಿದೆ ಎಂದು ಹೇಳಲಾಗುವುದು. ಜ್ಯೋತಿಷ್ಯದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ಜನವರಿ8ರಿಂದ ಜನವರಿ 14ರವರೆಗೆ ಪ್ರತಿಯೊಂದು ರಾಶಿಗಳ ರಾಶಿ ಭವಿಷ್ಯ ಹೇಗಿದೆ ಎಂದು ನೋಡೋಣ ಬನ್ನಿ:

ಹೊಸ ವರ್ಷದ ಮೊದಲ ಹಬ್ಬ ಮಕರ ಸಂಕ್ರಾಂತಿ. ವರ್ಷದ ಎಲ್ಲಾ ಹಿಂದೂ ಹಬ್ಬಗಳ ಮುನ್ನುಡಿಯಾಗಿ ಸುಗ್ಗಿಯ ಹಬ್ಬ ಮಕರ ಸಂಕ್ರಾಂತಿಯನ್ನು ಆಚರಿಸುತ್ತೇವೆ. ಪ್ರತಿ ತಿಂಗಳು ಸೂರ್ಯ ತನ್ನ ರಾಶಿ ಬದಲಾಯಿಸುತ್ತಾನೆ. ಸೂರ್ಯ ಮಕರ ರಾಶಿಗೆ ಸಂಚರಿಸಿದಾಗ ಮಕರ ಸಂಕ್ರಾಂತಿ ಆಚರಿಸಲಾಗುವುದು, ವೈದಿಕ ಶಾಸ್ತ್ರದ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ಮಕರ ಸಂಕ್ರಾಂತಿಯಿಂದ ಉತ್ತರಾಯಣ ಕಾಲ ಪ್ರಾರಂಭವಾಗುವುದು. ಕನ್ನಡ ಮಾಸಗಳ ಪ್ರಕಾರ ಉತ್ತರಾಯಣ