ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J.

CM APPL. 47591/2022

CM APPL. 34855/2023

By way of CM APPL. No. 47591/2022 filed under Order XLIII Rule 1A(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 („CPC‟), the appellant seeks recall of order dated 24.05.2012 made in the present proceedings, whereby the present regular first appeal alongwith RFA No.193/2003, were disposed-of as settled and satisfied in terms of the observations in that order; or, in the alternate, for modification of that order and a direction to the respondent to obtain a sanctioned building plan from the Municipal Corporation of Delhi („MCD‟) alongwith the structural building certificate to comply with that order. By way of CM APPL. No. 34855/2023 filed under section 151 CPC, the respondent seeks dismissal of CM APPL. No. 47591/2022 and modification of order dated 31.01.2023 passed by this court, whereby the respondent was directed to take steps for regularisation of property being the Third Floor of property bearing No. B-2/88, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi („suit property‟).

(BY SRI B.V.ACHARYA, SPL.PP A/W SRI V.G.BHANUPRAKASH, AAG AND SRI THEJESH P., HCGP FOR R-1 TO R-4;

SRI P.PRASANNA KUMAR, SPL.PP FOR R-5;

PROF.RAVI VARMA KUMAR, SR.ADVOCATE FOR SRI ADITYA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R-6;

SRI SUDHANVA D.S., ADVOCATE FOR I.A.NO. 1/2024 FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITH SECITON 482 OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3 TO TRANSFER AND ENTRUST THE INVESTIGATION OF THE CASE CRIME NO. 118/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE - Q, LEVELING OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 149, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 OF THE INDIAN PENAL CODE TO THE RESPONDENT NO.4-CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND FURTHER DIRECT THE R-4 TO CARRY OUT SPEEDY AND EXPEDITIOUS INVESTIGATION IN THE AFOREMENTIONED CASE WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIME.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2024:HHC:11231 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Appeal No. 4149 of 2013 Reserved on: 05.11.2024 Date of Decision: 13.11.2024 State of Himachal Pradesh ...Appellant.

Versus Suresh Kumar ...Respondent. Coram

1. Since the issue involved in all these three (3) Writ Petitions are identical, all were heard analogously and disposed of by the present common order.

2. For the sake of brevity, pleadings made in W.P.(C ) No.36125 of 2023 was taken as the lead case for deciding the issue in question.

3. Writ petition in W.P.(C ) No.36125 of 2023 has been filed challenging the advertisement issued by the State Selection Board (in short, "the Board") on 11.09.2023 under Annexure-1.Vide the said advertisement, the Board invited applications to fill up the post of Lecturers in various discipline including Physics in non-Government Aided Colleges of Odisha and the last date for making such application was fixed to 13.10.2023.

1. By way of present bail application, the petitioner/applicant seeks regular bail in the proceedings emanating out of ECIR/35/DLZO/I/2022 dated 16.09.2022 which was registered on the basis of the FIR bearing No. 9A dated 23.11.2016 registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (hereafter, the CBI), AC-III, New Delhi under Sections 120-B of IPC & 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of PC Act, 1988.

2. The allegations made in the aforesaid FIR, in nutshell, are that Mr. Amanatullah Khan, i.e. the main accused, in his tenure as chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board (hereafter, the „DWB‟), misused his position from March 2016 - October 2016 to appoint and engage relatives and other known persons to various posts in the DWB, from which they derived pecuniary benefits. It was further alleged that the tenancies of DWF properties were allotted without inviting bids and leased out only on reserve price. There were also allegations of misuse of DWB funds.

Extreme penalty provided under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) i.e. Death Penalty imposed by the Sessions Judge is placed before us for scrutiny due to mandate of Section 366 of the Code, as well as by virtue of appeal preferred by the accused in terms of Section 374[2] of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.)

2. Appellant Nos.1 to 3 were tried and convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot vide judgment and order dated 17.05.2024 in Sessions Case No.57/2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 506 [Part-II] read with Section 34 of the IPC. Though they have also been charged for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Rgd.

Extreme penalty provided under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) i.e. Death Penalty imposed by the Sessions Judge is placed before us for scrutiny due to mandate of Section 366 of the Code, as well as by virtue of appeal preferred by the accused in terms of Section 374[2] of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.)

2. Appellant Nos.1 to 3 were tried and convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot vide judgment and order dated 17.05.2024 in Sessions Case No.57/2015 for the offence punishable under Sections 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC and Section 506 [Part-II] read with Section 34 of the IPC. Though they have also been charged for the offence punishable under Section 323 of the Indian Rgd.

1. Heard the petitioner who appears in person as well as Shri Skand Bajpai, learned counsel for the respondent, on the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC more particularly the provisions of Sub Rule (a) and (d) of Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC.

2. Arguing on Sub Rule (a) of Order 7 Rule 11 the argument of the Shri Skand Bajpai is that the said sub rule pertains to rejection of a plaint where it does not disclose a cause of action.

3. Reference has been made to Section 36 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act, 1951') to contend that the said provision pertains to scrutiny of nomination. Sub Section (1) of Section 36 of the Act, 1951 provides for examination of the nomination papers of all candidates which power has been given to the candidates, the election agents, one proposer of each candidate and one other person duly authorized in writing by each candidate but no other person; Sub Section (2) of Section 36 of the Act, 1951 provides for the nomination papers to be examined by the returning officer and to decide all objections which may be made to any nomination and thereafter to reject any nomination either on his own motion or on such objection as might have been preferred.

These four appeals filed by two separate assessees have arisen from separate appellate orders passed by learned Commissioners of Income-tax (Appeals), Ahmedabad for the assessment years, 2010-11 & 2011-12.

2. Since facts and issues involved in all these four appeals are similar which is agreed to by both the rival parties before us and that these four appeals were heard together, we deem it appropriate to dispose of all these appeals by this consolidated order for the sake of brevity and convenience. We will first take up the appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 2498/Ahd/2013 for A.Y. 2010-11, and our decision in this appeal shall apply mutatis mutandis to remaining three appeals.

These four appeals filed by two separate assessees have arisen from separate appellate orders passed by learned Commissioners of Income-tax (Appeals), Ahmedabad for the assessment years, 2010-11 & 2011-12.

2. Since facts and issues involved in all these four appeals are similar which is agreed to by both the rival parties before us and that these four appeals were heard together, we deem it appropriate to dispose of all these appeals by this consolidated order for the sake of brevity and convenience. We will first take up the appeal of the assessee in ITA No. 2498/Ahd/2013 for A.Y. 2010-11, and our decision in this appeal shall apply mutatis mutandis to remaining three appeals.

.

96. It would be evident from the above discussion that the claims for refund under the said two enactments constitute an independent regimen. Every decision favourable to an assessee/manufacturer, whether on the question of classification, valuation or any other issue, does not automatically entail refund. Section 11B of the Central Excises and Salt Act and Section 27 of the Contract Act, whether before or after 1991 amendment - as interpreted by us herein - make every refund claim subject to proof of not passing-on the burden of duty to others. Even if a suit is filed, the very same condition operates. Similarly, the High Court while examining its jurisdiction under Article 226 - and this Court while acting under Article 32 - would insist upon the said condition being satisfied before ordering refund. Unless the claimant for refund establishes that he has not passed on the burden of duty to another, he would not be entitled to refund, whatever be the proceedings and whichever be the forum. Section 11B/Section 27 are constitutionally valid, as explained by us hereinbefore. They have to be applied and followed implicitly wherever they are applicable.

and background of the case:

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 21.09.2023 seeking information on following points:-

"What kind of punishment is sanctioned by the law for any Pilot who gets the RTR permit or licence on the basis of false documents?"

The CPIO, Sr. DWA (COP & regulations) vide letter dated 05.10.2023 replied as under:-

"- Information sought does not fall under purview of RTI Act 2005, hence this RTI is closed"

Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 08.10.2023. The FAA vide order dated 08.11.2023 stated as under:-

"Reply :- I have gone through the case and found that information sought was denied by the CPIO stating that the information did not fall under the purview of the RTI Act, 2005. The undersigned is convinced with the above reply in view of Section 8-1(j) of the RTI Act. 2005."

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 31.05.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 3

"1- द ल सरकार के SC/ST DEPARTMENT 2018,2019,2020,2021,2022 तक कतना फ ड पछले चार साल म कतनी योजनाओंपर खच कया है उसक" पण ू जानकार द जाये 2- द ल सरकार ने 2014 से 2022 तक अपने व'ापन पर कतना फ ड द ल व ् द ल से बाहार खच कया है उसक" जानकार द जाये 3- द ल के मु+यमं ,ी ने JANUARY 2014 से 2023 JANUARY तक द ल से बाहार के दोरो पर कतना फ ड खच कया है उसक" जानकार द जाये 4- द ल सरकार ने पछले 8 साल म वधायक. को गाडी खर दने के 0लए कतना फ ड दया है उसक" जानकार द जाये"

and background of the case:

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 09.06.2023 seeking information on following points:-

"1) A certified copy of complaint filed by Neha Kumari /Neha Verma against me between September 2022 to November 2022 addressed to the Director General CISF."

The CPIO vide letter dated 20.06.2023 replied as under:-

"02. It is to inform that under provision of Section-24 of RTI Act 2005, the information sought by you vide representation dated 09/06/2023, cannot be provided as the CISF is an Armed Force of Union and exempted from providing information except for the cases of corruption and human rights violation. The information sought by you does not fali just within the ambit of the two categories mentioned above."

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 29.03.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 4

"I Ranjana Garg wife of Shri Keshav Kumar Garg, resident of xxx, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi 110057, wish to seek information, under the RTI Act, 2005. The copy of complete document information needed as per details given below:

4. Copy of complete documents of 0-4 shumar no. 5770, SDM/RA Case No. 206/RA/92 dated 08/01/1994, Khasra # 1084, land measuring 1 bigha 1 biswa in the name of Ranjana Garg wife of Keshav Kumar Garg, situated in the revenue estate of Urbanised Village Rangpuri alias Malikpur Kohi, Tehsil Vasant Vihar, New Delhi."

and background of the case:

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 21.09.2023 seeking information on following points:-

"To, Shri Umang Srivastva Sr.DWA (COP) I had complained on 05/05/2023 against Rahul Sinha regarding his COP permit. What action or inquiry has been conducted in this regard?"

The CPIO, Sr DWA (COP & Regulation) vide letter dated 05.10.2023 replied as under:-

"Information sought does not fall under purview of RTI Act 2005, hence this RTI is closed"

Dissatisfied with the response received from the CPIO, the Appellant filed a First Appeal dated 08.10.2023. The FAA, JWA vide order dated 08.11.2023 stated as under:-

"Reply :- I have gone through the case and found that information sought was denied by the CPIO stating that the information did not fall under the purview of the RTI Act, 2005. The undersigned is convir.ced with the above reply in view of Section 8-1(j) of the RTI Act. 2005."

and background of the case:

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 19.07.2023 seeking information on following points:-

"1. Copy of complete report with all supporting documents submitted by FFC

2. List of the name of the officials/persons to whom the letters were issued by FFC

3. List of Officials who appeared before FFC along with their copy of all statements and supporting documents provided by them.

4. List of Officials who DID NOT appear before FFC

5. List officials/person from the statements/documents was taken on record by FFC The copy of statements along with supporting documents is requested to be provided.

and background of the case:

The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 10.07.2023 seeking information on following points:-

"(1) Copy of filled up application form in which my name & designation is mentioned submitted by Avani seeds Ltd, Ahmedabad to Department of Scientific and Industrial Research to get In-house R &D Units certificate issued in FY 2019 (on March 2019 vide certificate F.No.TU/TV- RD/4444/2019). (2) Copy of filled up application form in which my name & designation is mentioned submitted by Avani seeds Ltd, Ahmadabad to Department of Scientific and Industrial Research to get In-house R&D Units certificate issued in FY 2021."

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 26.05.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 5

"प्र०1- रामा कृष्णा पुरम, अय्यप्पा मार्ग, चचग रोड की रे ड लाइट से लेकर के केंद्रीय विद्यालय तक दिल्ली नर्र ननर्म की ककतनी तहबाजारी अलॉटमें ट की र्ई है उन सभी का साइड नंबर, स्थान, तथा तहबाजारी धारकों के नाम बताएं?

प्र०2- ज्ञानचंि S/Oअयोध्या प्रसाि साइड नंबर 13 341 अलॉटमें ट कक साइट बताएं तथा यह िक ु ान कहां लर्ी हुई है बताएं ?

प्र०3- राजू साइड नंबर 17076 ककस जर्ह लर्ी हुई है इस तहबाजारी का स्थान बताएं ?

प्र०4- रामा कृष्णा पुरम सेक्टर-1 वििेकानंि माकेट के सामने लाल बत्ती से फायर स्टे शन तक ककतनी तहबाजारी लर्ी हुई है सभी का साइड नंबर, स्थान और तहबाजारी धारक का नाम बताएं?"

:

The Appellant filed an (online) RTI application dated 02.05.2023 with the CPIO, Department of Defence seeking the following information:

"Prime Minister Modi ji I want to know from you under the right of information that you and your government always say that we will not spare the fraudsters and forgery as the previous government used to do but did it really happen because I have seen your portal But do not know how many times wrote about the fraud happening in the name of Defense where a multinational company Samsung and its dealer evaded tax in the name of canteen store department as well as canteen department of the countrys most important department Ministry of Defence Store department name used without permission.

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 14.12.2022 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 7

"(a) Subject matter of information required :

The case to accord one-time sanction of Gol, MoD to count the prior service rendered by the Defence Civilian Employee with effect from the date of appointment as 'lN LIEU OF COMBATANTS" for grant of financial upgradation under MACP-lll scheme wef 01 Feb 2014 (on completion of 30 years' service) in respect of No 1091939-X, Office Superintendent, Shashikant Baburao Jasud of HQ Southern Command, DSC Wing, Pune was taken up with DDG DSC, IHQ of MoD (Army) vide DSC Records letter No CA-6121071137 dated 03 Jun 2014, as intimated vide DSC Records letter No CA-6121071156 dated 03 Jul2O14 (copy att).

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 05.01.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 5

"मेरे द्वारा की गयी शिकायत श्रीमतत मुक्ता खलखो िहडोल के कथित बीमा पॉशलसी राशि 1 करोड़ रुपये की शिकायत पर की गयी जााँच एवं काययवाही पर सभी ब्यक्क्तयों के बयान एवं दस्तावेज की सत्यापपत प्रतत उपलब्ध कराये। इस जााँच में अंततम तनर्यय ददनााँक 28.12.2022 के ररपोर्य सदहत दस्तावेज उपलब्ध कराये।"

The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 23.01.2023 stating as under:

"आपके द्वारा चाही गयी जानकारी सूचना का अथधकार अथधतनयम 2005 की धारा 8 (1) (d) एवं 8 (1) (j) के तहत संरक्षित है , अतः आपको उपलब्ध कराने में असमिय हैं।"

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 08.05.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 5

"1 रे ल्वे वर्कशॉप लाल गठ इस्तिथ तटोर मे चिुथक श्रेणी र्मकचारी सुमेर पुत्र अमजद अली निवासी सवोदय बतिी बीर्ािेर र्े इस र्ायाकलय मे र्ब पदभार ग्रहण कर्या, प्रमाणणि प्रनि।

2 सुमेर द्वारा नियुस्ति र्े समय प्रतिुि समति दतिावेजो र्ी प्रमाणणि प्रनिललपप।

3 सुमेर र्ो नियुस्ति आदे श एव पदभार ग्रहण र्रिे र्े आदे श र्ी प्रमाणणि प्रनि।"

The CPIO furnished a reply to the Appellant on 25.05.2023 stating as under:

"उपरोति संदलभकि पत्र र्े माध्यम से आवेदि र्िाक द्वारा मांगी गई जािर्ारी िि ृ ीय पक्षर्ार से सम्बस्धिि होिे र्े र्ारण आरटीआई अधिनियम 2005 र्े नियम सख्या 11 र्े िहि प्रदाि िही र्ी जा सर्िी।"

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 19.06.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 5

"1. COPY OF THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 03.04.2017 PASSED BY COMPETENT AUTHORITY OF EPIL, NEW DELHI AGAINST SH. PARITOSH KUMAR PRAVEEN (EMP. CODE- 1986).

2. WHETHER ANY REVIEW (EXTENSION/REVOCATION) OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 03.04.2017 HAS OCCURRED? IF YES, THEN PLEASE PROVIDE COPY OF ALL THE REPORTS PASSED BY THE REVIEW COMMITTEE SUBSEQUENT TO THE SUSPENSION ORDER DATED 03.04.2017 TILL DATE.

AND ALSO PROVIDE THE COPY OF ALL THE ORDERS OF THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY PASSED ON THE ABOVE MENTIONED REPORTS OF THE REVIEW COMMITTEE TILL DATE.

:

The Appellant filed an (online) RTI application dated 23.03.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 5

"In continuation to RTI Application No- DMRCP/R/E/22/00489, received to you dated 15-11-2022 please provide some more details which were not given, related to the same points mentioned below:

1. My policy number of superannuation (GSPS) is 321581 and my LIC ID is 1779. Please provide my annuity number for the same.

2. In my last application number stated above I desired for DMRC pay scale comparison with the CDA pay scale which was denied to me. As an exemployee of your prestigious organization, I can help, it is available at D2 in the HR Manual- A Compendium of service rules in DMRC. Kindly provide.

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 06.02.2023 seeking the following information:

Page 1 of 7

" नवेदन यह है क नेह वहार वाड मु तफाबाद वधान सभा म कर ब चार वष पहले सीवर क" लाईन डाल गई थी और अब सीवर क" लाइन से घर-घर तक सीवर कने*शन का काम चल रहा है । सीवर लाइन के -.येक मैन होल म घर0 म कने*शन करने के 1लए चार चीनी के पाइप लगाए गए थे। इ3ह ं पाइप0 म घर0 के कने*शन जोड़ने थे। ले कन उन चीनी पाइप0 से कने*शन नह ं 8दए जा रहे ह9 और म9ने होलो म कने*शन दे ने के 1लए नये सरु ाख करके पाईप लगाये जा रहे ह9 और नये सरु ाख0 क" मर;मत भी नह ं क" जा रह है और जो पहले से ह

-.येक मैन होलो म चार पाईप लगाये गये ह9। उन पाईप0 से 1स वर ओवर=लो होने पर पानी अ3दर ह अ3दर मकान0 क" नींव म जाएगा। और कने*शन के 1लये अब नये पाईप डाले जा रहे ह9 वह रोड से एक से डेढ़ फुट गहराई पर ह9 और जो मकान नीचे पड़ गए ह9 उनका 1सवरे ज का पानी म9न होल म नह जायेगा। और मैन होल म जो नए सरु ाख कये गये है उनसे मैनहोल बहुत कमजोर हो गये है अतः Aीमान जी से नवेदन है क R.T.I Act न;न1लBखत सच ू ना दे ने क" कृEया करे ।

:

The Appellant filed an (online) RTI application dated 24.04.2023 seeking the following information:

Querry is in reference to Chief Engineer Central Command. Index No 5-28

-Central Command. For renewal of Security Deposit of FDR wherein many letters were sent for sending to bank FDRs for renewal. However, no reply has been received. Letters dated 08.08.2022, No 4501-244 dated 08.08.2022, letter No 4501-245 dated 06.10.2022, dated 15.11.2022 & dated 20.12.2022 & letter No 4501-248 datet25.01.2023, and 20.03.2023.

FDR bearing No.7 15474 Folio 127180-98 dt.25.9-98 for Rs.60,000.00, (Maturity Date :3-7-2001 FDR bearing No.715475 Follo 127198/98) dated 23.9.98 for Rs.60,000.00.

and background of the case:

The Complainant filed an RTI application dated 12.07.2023 seeking information on following points:-

"1. Total number of employees whose Pension Payment Orders (PPOs) were issued between 01.01.2018 to 30.6.2023 from the office of the PAO, PP&M, Faridabad. 2. Total number of employees whose Pension Payment Orders (PPOs) were issued after the date of their retirement or delayed due to any reason. Information may be provided from 01.01.2018 to 30.6.2023 only. 3. Photocopy of note sheet in respect of my (Devendra Singh, Applicant) pension file maintained in your office to date. 4. Photocopies of the dispatch register maintained in your office for the dates 14.3.2023 to 17.3.2023 and 20.3.2023 to 22.3.2023."

:

The Appellant filed an (offline) RTI application dated 16.03.2023 seeking the following information:

"1. Please refer the fwg letters:-

(a) Your Office letter No L/V/T-32/Misc Corr. Dated 06 Jul 2022 (copy att).

Page 1 of 12

(b) Your Office letter No L/V/T-32/Misc Corr. Dated 25 Jul 2022 (copy att).

(c) MPS for the month of Jun 2017 (copy att).

2. With due respect and humble submission, I would like to obtained following information related to above quoted letters and MPS:-

(a) As per your letter, a sum of Rs. 69,978/- has been deducted in 06/2017 MPS on account of recovery of DA (Rs. 67719/-) & FAA (2698/-) for the period of 20.01.2017 to 31.05.2017. However the sum deducted on account of DA & FAA is Rs. 70, 417/- (Le. Rs. 67,719+ Rs. 2698/). It has been observed that, there is a difference of Rs. 439/- (Rs. 70,417 Rs.

:

The Appellant filed an (online/offline) RTI application dated 21.02.2023 seeking the following information:

"My letter dated 31/8/2021 addressed to The SDM, LIC of India, Nadiad Division with subject of Individual Cash Prize (Awards) Scheme time duration 1/1/2007 to 31/3/2007, which is enclosed herewith, as per given below details.

1. Detail procedure followed by the competent authority in respect of disposal and final reply of my letter and payment of my Individual Cash Awards (Prize).

2. Certified copies of All details of Notes / Remarks / Comments / Opinion / Decisions put up on the file by the concerned officers / managers during the procedure along with their names, designation, salary, roll no., educational qualification, gross annual salary and contact no.

:

The Appellant filed an (online/offline) RTI application dated 21.02.2023 seeking the following information:

"My letter dated 31/8/2021 addressed to The SDM, LIC of India, Nadiad Division with subject of Individual Cash Prize (Awards) Scheme time duration 1/1/2007 to 31/3/2007, which is enclosed herewith, as per given below details.

1. Detail procedure followed by the competent authority in respect of disposal and final reply of my letter and payment of my Individual Cash Awards (Prize).

2. Certified copies of All details of Notes / Remarks / Comments / Opinion / Decisions put up on the file by the concerned officers / managers during the procedure along with their names, designation, salary, roll no., educational qualification, gross annual salary and contact no.

Bogdan Naumovici, om de publicitate, își lansează lungmetrajul de debut pe 28 ianuarie 2025. Comedia „Țăndări”, distribuită de Forum Film, are în distribuție actori precum Alin Florea, Constantin Florescu, Cristian Bota, Nicodim Ungureanu, Cătălin Neamțu, Carmen Tănase, Dan Badea, Alex Conovaru, Sergiu Costache, Robert Tudor, Andreea Samson, și Gabriel Spahiu. De la spoturi publicitare pentru ...

The post Publicitarul Bogdan Naumovici lansează lungmetrajul „Țăndări” în ianuarie 2025 appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Commerzbank analizează opțiunea de a achiziționa o bancă germană de dimensiuni medii ca parte a strategiei de a evita o posibilă preluare de către UniCredit, potrivit Reuters. Planurile sunt într-o etapă incipientă, iar posibilele ținte ar putea include Hamburg Commercial Bank sau Oldenburgische Landesbank. Potrivit surselor Reuters, Commerzbank încearcă să conceapă un plan de apărare, ...

The post Commerzbank ia în considerare achiziționarea unui rival german pentru a respinge UniCredit appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Vatican a lansat o serie de servicii noi bazate pe inteligență artificială pentru Bazilica Sf. Petru, permițând acces virtual la comorile arhitecturale din perioada Renașterii și tururi îmbunătățite pentru vizitatori – zilnic aproximativ 40.000-50.000 de oameni. Noile experiențe au fost prezentate în pregătirea pentru Anul Sfânt sau Jubileul Bisericii Catolice din 2025, care are loc ...

The post Servicii AI pentru Bazilica Sf. Petru lansate de Vatican înainte de anul jubiliar appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Vânzările globale de automobile complet electrice şi vehicule hibride de tip plug-in au crescut cu 35% în luna octombrie a acestui an comparativ cu aceeaşi lună a anului trecut, graţie în primul rând unui salt de 54% al vânzărilor de pe piaţa chineză, arată cifrele publicate de firma de cercetare de piaţă Rho Motion. Potrivit ...

The post Vânzările globale de automobile electrice și hibride, în creștere cu 35% în octombrie appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Valoarea producţiei agricole a blocului comunitar a scăzut cu 1,5% în 2023, comparativ cu 2022, până la 537,1 miliarde de euro, însă România se numără printre ţările UE a căror valoare a producţiei agricole a crescut de la un an la altul, arată datele publicate miercuri de Eurostat. Scăderea uşoară din 2023 vine după o ...

The post Eurostat: România a fost al șaptelea producător agricol din UE în 2023 appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Președintele ales Donald Trump a surprins observatorii politici marți seară prin nominalizarea prezentatorului Fox News, Pete Hegseth, pentru funcția de secretar al apărării. „Pete și-a petrecut întreaga viață ca un războinic pentru trupele noastre și pentru țară,” a declarat Trump într-un comunicat. „Pete este dur, inteligent și un adevărat susținător al politicii America First. Cu ...

The post Trump îl nominalizează pe veteranul și prezentatorul Fox News, Pete Hegseth, pentru funcția de secretar al apărării appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Grupul Bitdefender, cea mai importantă companie din domeniul tehnologiei cu sediul central în România, a înregistrat venituri nete de 391,9 milioane de dolari, în creștere cu 16% comparativ cu anul anterior, și un profit operațional ajustat (EBITDA) de 85 de milioane de dolari, cu 21,7% mai mare decât în 2022. Florin Talpeș, CEO și cofondator ...

The post Florin Talpeș: grupul Bitdefender a avut venituri nete de peste 391 mil. dolari și profit operațional de 85 mil. dolari în 2023, cele mai mari din istorie appeared first on Forbes Romania.

Moov Leasing, un start-up românesc lansat de Bogdan Speteanu și Mircea Dihel, propune o schimbare radicală în leasingul auto, transformând experiența de utilizare a unei mașini într-una simplă și accesibilă, la fel ca utilizarea unui telefon mobil. După 20 de ani de experiență la BCR, timp în care a ocupat mai multe funcții de conducere, printre care și ...

The post Bogdan Speteanu, Moov Leasing: “Utilizatorii pot închiria o mașină pe o perioadă medie, de la unu la cinci ani, și au posibilitatea de a o schimba în funcție de nevoile de moment” appeared first on Forbes Romania.

ADM Naveen Babu Death: എഡിഎം നവീൻ ബാബുവിന്റെ മരണത്തിൽ ആദ്യമായാണ് അന്വേഷണസംഘം പ്രശാന്തിന്റെ മൊഴി എടുത്തത്.  

Lovely 3D: അടുത്ത വർഷം ജനുവരിയിലായാണ് സിനിമയുടെ റിലീസ്. 

രണ്ട് മുഖ്യധാരാ പുരസ്കാരങ്ങളാണ് പ്രിയങ്ക നായർ നായികയായ കർണികയ്ക്ക് ലഭിച്ചിരിക്കുന്നത്.   

മോഹൻ അയിരൂർ, കെ. എം. വർഗീസ്, ലൂക്കോസ് കെ ചാക്കോ, എ കെ ഉസ്മാൻ എന്നിവർ ചേർന്നാണ് ചിത്രം നിർമ്മിക്കുന്നത്.

നവംബർ 21നാണ് ചിത്രം തിയേറ്ററുകളിലെത്തുന്നത്. ജോമിൻ മാത്യു, ഐബിൻ തോമസ്, രാഹുൽ ഇ. എസ് ചേർന്നാണ് ചിത്രം നിർമ്മിക്കുന്നത്.

നവംബർ 15ന് 'ആനന്ദ് ശ്രീബാല' തിയേറ്ററുകളിലെത്തുകയാണ്. ഇൻവെസ്റ്റിഗേഷൻ ത്രില്ലർ ചിത്രമാണിത്. 

Gold Price Today: చాలా కాలంగా ప్రజలు ప్రపంచ వ్యాప్తంగా అనిశ్చితుల కారణంగా బంగారంలో భారీగా పెట్టుబడులు పెడుతున్న సంగతి తెలిసిందే. అయితే అమెరికా అధ్యక్షుడిగా డొనాల్డ్ ట్రంప్ గెలుపు ఇన్వెస్టర్లలో తిరిగి నమ్మకాన్ని నింపుతోంది. దీంతో చాలా మంది ప్రస్తుతం తమ డబ్బును తిరిగి ఈక్విటీలు, బాండ్స్ మార్కెట్లలోకి తరలిస్తున్నారని తెలుస్తోంది. ఇది పరోక్షంగా బంగారం

Known for his humility, Ratan Tata leaves behind a legacy of compassion and generosity

Krasinski's win adds him to an esteemed group of past honourees like George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Idris Elba, and Michael B. Jordan.

Talking about Priyanka Chopra, Arjun admitted that she was already a big star when they made the film.

Rupali Ganguly's lawyer Sana Raees Khan of Bigg Boss 17-fame reveals why Anupamaa actress is asking for Rs 50 crore as defamation compensation from her stepdaughter Esha Verma.