Research into improving the cross-browser consistency of both the “clearfix” and “overflow:hidden” methods of containing floats. The aim is to work around several bugs in IE6 and IE7.

This article introduces a new hack (with caveats) that can benefit the “clearfix” methods and the new block formatting context (NBFC) methods (e.g. using overflow:hidden) of containing floats. It’s one outcome of a collaboration between Nicolas Gallagher (that’s me) and Jonathan Neal.

If you are not familiar with the history and underlying principles behind methods of containing floats, I recommend that you have a read of Easy clearing (2004), Everything you know about clearfix is wrong (2010), and Clearfix reloaded and overflow:hidden demystified (2010).

Consistent float containment methods

The code is show below and documented in this GitHub gist. Found an improvement or flaw? Please fork the gist or leave a comment.

Micro clearfix hack: Firefox 3.5+, Safari 4+, Chrome, Opera 9+, IE 6+

.cf {
  /* for IE 6/7 */
  *zoom: expression(this.runtimeStyle.zoom="1", this.appendChild(document.createElement("br")).style.cssText="clear:both;font:0/0 serif");
  /* non-JS fallback */
  *zoom: 1;
}

.cf:before,
.cf:after {
  content: "";
  display: table;
}

.cf:after {
  clear: both;
}

Overflow hack (NBFC): Firefox 2+, Safari 2+, Chrome, Opera 9+, IE 6+

.nbfc {
  overflow: hidden;
  /* for IE 6/7 */
  *zoom: expression(this.runtimeStyle.zoom="1", this.appendChild(document.createElement("br")).style.cssText="clear:both;font:0/0 serif");
  /* non-JS fallback */
  *zoom: 1;
}

The GitHub gist also contains another variant of the clearfix method for modern browsers (based on Thierry Koblentz’s work). It provides greater visual consistency (avoiding edge-case bugs) for even older versions of Firefox.

The only difference from existing float-containment methods is the inclusion of a CSS expression that inserts a clearing line-break in IE 6 and IE 7. Jonathan and I found that it helps to resolve some of the visual rendering differences that exist between these browsers and more modern ones. First I’ll explain what some of those differences are and when they occur.

Containing floats in IE 6/7

In IE 6 and IE 7, the most common and robust method of containing floats within an element is to give it “layout” (find out more: On having Layout). Triggering “layout” on an element in IE 6/7 creates a new block formatting context (NBFC). However, certain IE bugs mean that previous float containment methods don’t result in cross-browser consistency. Specifically, this is what to expect in IE 6/7 when creating a NBFC:

1. The top- and bottom-margins of non-floated child elements are contained within the ancestor element that has been given “layout”. (Also expected in other browsers when creating a NBFC)
2. The bottom-margins of any right-floated descendants are contained within the ancestor. (Also expected in other browsers when creating a NBFC)
3. The bottom-margins of any left-floated children are not contained within the ancestor. The margin has no effect on the height of the ancestor and is truncated, having no affect outside of the ancestor either. (IE 6/7 bug)
4. In IE 6, if the right edge of the margin-box of a left-floated child is within 2px of the left edge of the content-box of its NBFC ancestor, the float’s bottom margin reappears and is contained within the parent. (IE 6 bug)
5. Unwanted white-space can appear at the bottom of a float-container. (IE 6/7 bug)

There is a lack of consistency between IE 6/7 and other browsers, and between IE 6 and IE 7. Thanks to Matthew Lein for his comment that directed me to this IE 6/7 behaviour. It was also recently mentioned by “Suzy” in a comment on Perishable Press.

IE 6/7’s truncation of the bottom-margin of left-floats is not exposed in many of the test-cases used to demonstrate CSS float containment techniques. Using an IE-only CSS expression helps to correct this bug.

The CSS expression

Including the much maligned <br style="clear:both"> at the bottom of the float-container, as well as creating a NBFC, resolved all these inconsistencies in IE 6/7. Doing so prevents those browsers from collapsing (or truncating) top- and bottom-margins of descendant elements.

Jonathan suggested inserting the clearing line-break in IE 6/7 only, using CSS expressions applied to fictional CSS properties. The CSS expression is the result of many iterations, tests, and suggestions. It runs only once, the first time an element receives the associated classname.

*zoom: expression(this.runtimeStyle.zoom="1", this.appendChild(document.createElement("br")).style.cssText="clear:both;font:0/0 serif");

It is applied to zoom, which is already being used to help contain floats in IE 6/7, and the use of the runtimeStyle object ensures that the expression is replaced once it has been run. The addition of font:0/0 serif prevents the occasional appearance of white-space at the bottom of a float-container. And the * hack ensures that only IE 6 and IE 7 parse the rule.

It’s worth noting that IE 6 and IE 7 parse almost any string used as CSS property. An earlier iteration used the entirely fictitious properties “-ms-inject” or “-ie-x” property to exploit this IE behaviour.

*-ie-x: expression(this.x||(this.innerHTML+='<br style="clear:both;font:0/0">',this.x=1));

However, this expression is evaluated over and over again. Using runtimeStyle instead avoids this. Sergey Chikuyonok also pointed out that using innerHTML destroys existing HTML elements that may event handlers attached to them. By using document.createElement and appendChild you can insert the new element without removing all the events attached to other descendant elements.

Containing floats in more modern browsers

There are two popular methods to contain floats in modern browsers. Creating a new block formatting context (as is done in IE 6/7 when hasLayout is triggered) or using a variant of the “clearfix” hack.

Creating a NBFC results in an element containing any floated children, and will prevent top- and bottom-margin collapse of non-floated children. When combined with the enhanced IE 6/7 containment method, it results in consistent cross-browser float containment.

The other method, known as “clearfix”, traditionally used a single :after pseudo-element to clear floats in a similar fashion to a structural, clearing HTML line-break. However, to prevent the top-margins of non-floats from collapsing into the margins of their float-containing ancestor, you also need to use the :before pseudo-element. This is the approach taken in Thierry Koblentz’s “clearfix reloaded”. In contemporary browsers, the micro clearfix hack is also suitable.

The method presented in this article should help improve the results of cross-browser float containment, whether you predominantly use “clearfix” or the NBFC method. The specific limitations of both the “clearfix” and various NBFC methods (as outlined in Thierry’s articles) remain.

Problems

Using a CSS expression to change the DOM in IE 6/7 creates problems of its own. Obviously, the DOM in IE 6/7 is now different to the DOM in other browsers. This affects any JavaScript DOM manipulation that may depend on :last-child or appending new children.

This is still an experimental work-in-progress that is primarily research-driven rather than seeking to become a practical snippet of production code. Any feedback, further testing, and further experimentation from others would be much appreciated.

Thanks to these people for contributing improvements: Jonathan Neal, Mathias Bynens, Sergey Chikuyonok, and Thierry Koblentz.

Applying conditional classnames to the html element is a popular way to help target specific versions of IE with CSS fixes. It was first described by Paul Irish and is a feature of the HTML5 Boilerplate. Despite all its benefits, there are still a couple of niggling issues. Here are some hacky variants that side-step those issues.

An article by Paul Irish, Conditional stylesheets vs CSS hacks? Answer: Neither!, first proposed that conditional comments be used on the opening html tag to help target legacy versions of IE with CSS fixes. Since its inclusion in the HTML5 Boilerplate project, contributors have further refined the technique.

However, there are still some niggling issues with the “classic” conditional comments approach, which Mathias Bynens summarized in a recent article on safe CSS hacks.

1. The Compatibility View icon is displayed in IE8 and IE9 if you are not setting the X-UA-Compatible header in a server config.
2. The character encoding declaration might not be fully contained within the first 1024 bytes of the HTML document if you need to include several attributes on each version of the opening html tag (e.g. Facebook xmlns junk).

You can read more about the related discussions in issue #286 and issue #378 at the HTML5 Boilerplate GitHub repository.

The “bubble up” conditional comments method

Although not necessarily recommended, it looks like both of these issues can be avoided with a bit of trickery. You can create an uncommented opening html tag upon which any shared attributes (so no class attribute) can be set. The conditional classes are then assigned in a second html tag that appears after the <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"> tag in the document. The classes will “bubble up” to the uncommented tag.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"
          content="IE=edge,chrome=1">
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <!--[if lt IE 7]><html class="no-js ie6"><![endif]-->
    <!--[if IE 7]><html class="no-js ie7"><![endif]-->
    <!--[if IE 8]><html class="no-js ie8"><![endif]-->
    <!--[if gt IE 8]><!--><html class="no-js"><!--<![endif]-->

    <title>Document</title>
  </head>
  <body>
  </body>
</html>

Fork the Gist

The result is that IE8 and IE9 won’t ignore the <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"> tag, the Compatibility View icon will not be displayed, and the amount of repeated code is reduced. Obviously, including a second html tag in the head isn’t pretty or valid HTML.

If you’re using a server-side config to set the X-UA-Compatible header (instead of the meta tag), then you can still benefit from the DRYer nature of using two opening html tags and it isn’t necessary to include the conditional comments in the head of the document. However, you might still want to do so if you risk not containing the character encoding declaration within the first 1024 bytes of the document.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<!--[if lt IE 7]><html class="no-js ie6"><![endif]-->
<!--[if IE 7]><html class="no-js ie7"><![endif]-->
<!--[if IE 8]><html class="no-js ie8"><![endif]-->
<!--[if gt IE 8]><!--><html class="no-js"><!--<![endif]-->
  <head>
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <title>Document</title>
  </head>
  <body>
  </body>
</html>

Fork the Gist

The “preemptive” conditional comments method

Another method to prevent the Compatibility View icon from showing was found by Julien Wajsberg. It relies on including a conditional comment before the DOCTYPE. Doing this seems to help IE recognise the <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"> tag. This method isn’t as DRY and doesn’t have the character encoding declaration as high up in the document, but it also doesn’t use 2 opening html elements.

<!--[if IE]><![endif]-->
<!DOCTYPE html>
<!--[if lt IE 7]><html class="no-js ie6"><![endif]-->
<!--[if IE 7]><html class="no-js ie7"><![endif]-->
<!--[if IE 8]><html class="no-js ie8"><![endif]-->
<!--[if gt IE 8]><!--><html class="no-js"><!--<![endif]-->
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1">
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <title>Document</title>
  </head>
  <body>
  </body>
</html>

Fork the Gist

While it’s interesting to explore these possibilities, the “classic” method is still generally the most understandable. It doesn’t create invalid HTML, doesn’t risk throwing IE into quirks mode, and you won’t have a problem with the Compatibility View icon if you use a server-side config.

If you find any other approaches, or problems with those posted here, please leave a comment but also consider adding what you’ve found to the relevant issues in the HTML5 Boilerplate GitHub repository.

Thanks to Paul Irish for feedback and suggestions.

Internet Explorer 9–11 suffer from various bugs that prevent proper scaling of inline SVG’s. This is particularly problematic for SVG icons with variable widths. This is the canvas-based hack I’ve been using to work around the issue.

A popular way to use SVG icons is to generate a spritemap of SVG symbol‘s that you then reference from elsewhere in a document. Most articles on the topic assume your icon dimensions are uniformly square. Twitter’s SVG icons (crafted by @sofo) are variable width, to produce consistent horizontal whitespace around the vectors.

Most browsers will preserve the intrinsic aspect ratio of an SVG. Ideally, I want to set a common height for all the icons (e.g., 1em), and let the browser scale the width of each icon proportionally. This also makes it easy to resize icons in particular contexts – just change the height.

Unfortunately, IE 9–11 do not preserve the intrinsic aspect ratio of an inline SVG. The svg element will default to a width of 300px (the default for replaced content elements). This means it’s not easy to work with variable-width SVG icons. No amount of CSS hacking fixed the problem, so I looked elsewhere – and ended up using canvas.

canvas and aspect ratios

A canvas element – with height and width attributes set – will preserve its aspect ratio when one dimension is scaled. The example below sets a 3:1 aspect ratio.

<canvas height="1" width="3"></canvas>

You can then scale the canvas by changing either dimension in CSS.

canvas {
  display: block;
  height: 2rem;
}

Demo: proportional scaling of canvas.

Fixing SVG scaling in IE

This makes canvas useful for creating aspect ratios. Since IE doesn’t preserve the intrinsic aspect ratio of SVG icons, you can use canvas as a shim. A canvas of the correct aspect ratio provides a scalable frame. The svg can then be positioned to fill the space created by this frame.

The HTML is straightforward:

<div class="Icon" role="img" aria-label="Twitter">
  <canvas class="Icon-canvas" height="1" width="3"></canvas>
  <svg class="Icon-svg">
    <use fill="currentcolor" xlink:href="#icon-twitter"></use>
  </svg>
</div>

So is the CSS:

.Icon {
  display: inline-block;
  height: 1em; /* default icon height */
  position: relative;
  user-select: none;
}

.Icon-canvas {
  display: block;
  height: 100%;
  visibility: hidden;
}

.Icon-svg {
  height: 100%;
  left: 0;
  position: absolute;
  top: 0;
  width: 100%;
}

Setting the canvas height to 100% means it will scale based on the height of the component’s root element – just as SVG’s do in non-IE browsers. Changing the height of the Icon element scales the inner SVG icon while preserving its 3:1 aspect ratio.

Demo: proportional scaling of svg in IE.

Creating an Icon component

The hack is best added to (and eventually removed from) an existing icon component’s implementation.

If you’re generating and inlining an SVG spritemap, you will need to extract the height and width (usually from viewBox) of each of your icons during the build step. If you’re already using the gulp-svgstore plugin, it supports extracting metadata.

Those dimensions need to be set on the canvas element to produce the correct aspect ratio for a given icon.

Example React component (built with webpack):

import iconData from './lib/icons-data.json';
import React from 'react';
import './index.css';

class Icon extends React.Component {
  render() {
    const props = this.props;
    const height = iconData[props.name.height];
    const width = iconData[props.name.width];

    // React doesn't support namespaced attributes, so we have to set the
    // 'use' tag with innerHTML
    const useTag = `<use fill="currentcolor"
                      xlink:href="#icon-${props.name}">
                    </use>`;

    return (
      <span className="Icon">
        <canvas className="Icon-canvas"
          height={height}
          width={width}
        />
        <svg className="Icon-svg"
          dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: useTag}}
          key={props.name}
        />
      </span>
    );
  }
}

export default Icon;

When I introduced this hack to a code base at Twitter, it had no impact on the the rest of the team or the rest of the code base – one of the many benefits of a component-based UI.

HDIL promoter is lodged in Arthur Road Central Jail

With a view to prevent him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of public order, Naeem Akhtar detention is being extended, an order said.

The NCMC chaired by Cabinet Secretary Rajiv Gauba met on Friday to review the situation arising out of the gas leak

He is wanted for murder, attempt to murder and smuggling of weapons and drugs

Hamann, Gerrit, author

Mellon, Elizabeth

Schragenheim, Eli

Soyka, Peter A., 1958- author

Meyler, Kerrie, author

McGinn, Jeffrey

Duening, Thomas N

Coffing, Tom

Brikman, Yevgeniy, author

Phillips, Michael, author

Arora, Pankaj

Oestergaard, Kris, 1973- author

Freedman, Rick, author

Taylor, Johnny C., 1968-

Egerton, Peter, author

Hamper, Robert J

Müller, Hans-Erich, 1945- author

Blanka, Christine, author

Stull, Edward. author

Coffing, Tom, author

Franz, Peter

Fishman, Neal

Runion, Meryl

Geraldi, Joana G., 1979- author

DeMarco, Tom, author