Browsery QK495.P17 G739 2018

Browsery DT1972.M75 A3 2018

Browsery QE21.C65 2018

Browsery HD6072.2.U52 L363 2019

Browsery TF668.F663 2019

Browsery E184.A75 Y38 2018

Browsery QL85.B43 2018

Browsery GV885.73.C65 H68 2018

Browsery GV1469.34.P79 K46 2018

Browsery CB428.M43 2019

Browsery PJ7862.H356 A2 2018

Browsery HD6060.3.N68 2018b

Browsery TX807.R7845 2018

Browsery TX833.5.K55 2018

Browsery HV6574.G7 K44 2019

Browsery TX715.2.A47 J64 2018

Browsery PN1995.9.W6 S639 2018

Browsery PZ7.1.R5 Pat 2019

Browsery E184.M5 C395 2018

Browsery SF487.B185 2018

One of the things that keeps me fairly upbeat these days is playing board games and D&D with my friends online. Since others might want to do the same, I thought I’d jot down some notes on how I do it.

I briefly tried Tabletopia but didn"t like it. I understand why they built the interface as they did, but I found it very hard and very confusing to use, and it took us about 45 minutes to even start understanding the system. Granted, we picked Teotihuacan for our test game, which may not have been the best of choices.

So I continued using my homebrew system, and it works great so far.

Technical set-up

I use Whereby (the former appear.in), a WebRTC service that works absolutely GREAT. I totally recommend it to everyone for your online communication needs. The greatest thing about it is that you just go to a URL, ask the people you want to communicate with to go to the same URL, give permissions, enter the room, and start talking. No sign-ups or logins or whatever.

I have a pro account (or whatever it’s called) that allows 12 simultaneous connections to my room. You can also just grab a room name, go there, and start communicating, but these free rooms have a maximum of four simultaneous connections. So I advise you to take a paid account; you will most likely need more than four connections for playing board games online.

Besides, fuck free. The free Internet is slowly coming to an end and you should pay for services you like and use, or they won’t survive (or sell your data; see also Zoom).

Whereby works on modern Chromium-based browsers, and also in Firefox (though I haven’t tried Firefox on Android yet). It does not work in Safari iOS, but an app is available that works as simply as the web client.

Then figure out how many devices you own that you can use. On the whole, I send out three streams: my 'social' stream (my face, basically) from my laptop, the main board stream from my iPad, and a secondary board stream from a Samsung S6 I happened to have lying around. I occasionally use my real Samsung phone (an S7) as a third cam, for instance to make sure that everyone has the same bits and pieces on mirrored player boards.

Plug in all devices you use, and make sure any phones are on at least 25% charge or so before starting. My Samsung phones, especially, tend to spend a lot of juice on keeping the streams running, and even though plugged in all the time they might end up with less battery charge after a gaming session.

Mute Whereby on all devices except for your social stream. One very annoying thing I noticed is that, both on the iPad and on the Samsungs, it is impossible to turn off the sound completely. Therefore you need to do two things:

1. Disable sound input by clicking on the microphone icon in the bottom bar.
2. Disable sound output of all connections by clicking the Mute option in the menu you get after clicking on the three bullets icon in the upper right corner. You must repeat this for every connection.

You can only mute the output once everyone else has joined the stream. If someone drops out and re-joins you must mute them again. This is annoying; but it’s caused by idiotic device vendors not allowing you to mute the sound completely by using the provided hardware buttons — don’t ask me why they took this stupid step.

Now ask the others to join you. If possible and necessary they can also add their own cameras, for instance to show their player boards.

Picking the game

With the technical set-up out of the way, you should pick your game. I found that there are two absolute necessities here:

1. All players must own the game, so that they can copy the moves of the other players.
2. The game should have little to no hidden information.

So you might need to buy the same game as your friends. If you are in the Amsterdam area, please support your friendly local game store Friends & Foes instead of the big online retailers. Friends & Foes deliver in Amsterdam (I just ordered Tzolkin from them).

The two games I played most often so far are Azul and Alchemists. I am currently gearing up to try Madeira, Istanbul and Tzolkin; they should work as well.

Azul, Madeira, and Tzolkin have no hidden information at all. They have a variable set-up (and in case of Azul this is repeated each round), but that should be no problem.

Appoint one player or group of players as the Master; the other ones have Copies. The Master players draw all the randoms and show them to the other players, who copy them on to their Copy boards. Having the Master set provide all random draws is very important, since usually quite a bit of design thought went in to deciding exactly how many of one type of card or tile are available. These distributions should not be disturbed!

Azul

With Azul it is very important that all players set up copies of all other players’ personal boards. Part of the game is figuring out which tiles other players are likely to want, and for that all players need an overview of who has which tiles in which position.

Wnen I stream Azul, the main camera is on the central part with the available tiles. Other players can copy that if they like, but it’s not really necessary if the stream is clear enough. My secondary camera is on my own player board, so that everyone can see what I’m doing.

During the game all players clearly state their moves; for instance “I take the two blues with the star, and I put them on my three row.” I take the tiles from the central part, and the other players see me doing that, so they can correct me. They don’t see my copy of their playing baords, but that has never been a problem yet, as long as everyone gives clear instructions.

Alchemists

Alchemists does have a little bit of hidden information: random ingredients drawn, and random helper cards we always call Friendly Friends. (I forget their official name.) The Master player draws these cards for me and shows them on their camera without looking. I take the corresponding cards from my own copy of the game. This works fine, and the distribution of ingredients and Friendly Friends remains intact.

Alchemists really only needs a Master main board stream and social streams; there is no reason to add more cameras.

Although Alchemists’ board is pretty big, it doesn’t contain all that much information, which is good for online gaming. I just need to see which artifacts and ingredients are drawn (and copy them to my own board), and where players place their action cubes (and copy them as well). If I can’t see it clearly I just ask, and that works fine.

Part of Alchemists becomes much easier. In real life every player needs a beautifully-designed but sometimes cumbersone player contraption to both visualise their research and hide it from the other players.

Credit: Karel_danek

Online, it’s not necessary, and I find that my research and thinking flows much easier. Other players cannot see my board, and that gives me a lot more space to work with.

Madeira, Istanbul and Tzolkin

I haven’t played Madeira, Istanbul and Tzolkin yet, but they do not contain hidden information; just start-of-game randoms, plus the random buildings that occasionally appear in Tzolkin and the bonus cards in Istanbul. I do not think these will cause a problem.

The bigger problem might be that their boards are much more involved, and there’s a lot of game state to track. I might need to use two cameras to stream them accurately; I’m not sure yet. We’ll figure that out once we do the first session.

Online Resource

Online Resource

Dewey Library - QA331.7.T3925 2019

Dewey Library - QA377.B85 2019

Online Resource

Online Resource

Dewey Library - QA278.55.B55 2020

Dewey Library - QA612.7.H36 2020

Online Resource

Dewey Library - QA279.5.S67 2019

The Centre could offer a larger share of the revenue to states in exchange for greater empowerment of Centre on dual-control subjects

The situation demands side-pocketing of the provisions of the Fiscal Responsibility and Budget Management Act, urgent clearance of goods and services tax dues to the states

Here's a selection of Business Standard Opinion pieces for the day

Massive asteroid 1998 OR2 to fly by planet Earth today!

WhatsApp may soon allow you to use it on multiple devices simultaneous...

Yes Bank Scam: CBI custody of Wadhawan brothers extended till May 10

Italy says it has developed world's first COVID-19 vaccine

World Thalassemia Day: Hrithik Roshan, Farah Khan create awareness about bl...

No Army deployment in Mumbai, may request additional force from Centre if n...

Vijay as Professor, Shah Rukh Khan as Berlin: 'Money Heist' direc...

Happy Birthday Vijay Deverakonda: 5 times actor's 'The Deverakond...

Mother’s Day 2020: 7 ways to surprise mums during Lockdown

JNU extends registration deadline for entrance examinations to May 15 due t...

Mother's Day 2020: Simplest way to thank your mom on this day

Mother's Day 2020: WhatsApp, SMS, Facebook messages, quotes to make yo...

World Red Cross Day 2020: History, significance & celebration

WATCH: MS Dhoni, Ziva play fetch with pet dog in adorable father-daugh...

'I wish both BCCI, CA manage something to get it underway': Rohit...

Chiayi Swingers vs ICCT Smashers, Dream11 Prediction: Best picks for CHI vs...